[Starlingx-discuss] Initial StarlingX survey - feedback needed
Gowan, Jeff
Jeff.Gowan at windriver.com
Thu Mar 28 20:27:34 UTC 2019
Ildiko,
Here are a couple of thoughts on the survey.
Question 1
"Smary city" should be Smart city
Can we add virtual RAN?
Question 3
Can we add "colleague/associate" to capture word of mouth?
Thanks,
-Jeff
On 3/28/19, 12:33 PM, "starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io> wrote:
Send Starlingx-discuss mailing list submissions to
starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io
You can reach the person managing the list at
starlingx-discuss-owner at lists.starlingx.io
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Starlingx-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: What is the new openstack command to create an stack? (Curtis)
2. Initial StarlingX survey - feedback needed (Ildiko Vancsa)
3. Re: OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing (Martinez Monroy, Elio)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:29:06 -0400
From: Curtis <serverascode at gmail.com>
To: "Alonso, Juan Carlos" <juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com>
Cc: "Hernandez Gonzalez, Fernando"
<fernando.hernandez.gonzalez at intel.com>,
"starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] What is the new openstack command to
create an stack?
Message-ID:
<CAJ_JamBTrxeuy1MA6nbm64oPYVa8OEFvcDx6QwqHkz-WJGvPug at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:09 PM Alonso, Juan Carlos <
juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Fernando,
>
>
>
> I have the same steps to test. The problem comes when execute “openstack
> stack create” command.
>
> Seems that there was an update with such command.
>
> I figured out that the current OpenStack documentation shows that we are
> using the correct command. Maybe we have a real issue.
>
> https://docs.openstack.org/heat/rocky/getting_started/create_a_stack.html
>
> Need to confirm.
>
I'm guessing you are missing python-heatclient.
Thanks,
Curtis
>
>
> Regards.
>
> Juan Carlos Alonso
>
>
>
> *From:* Hernandez Gonzalez, Fernando
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:28 AM
> *To:* Alonso, Juan Carlos <juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com>;
> starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> *Subject:* RE: [Starlingx-discuss] What is the new openstack command to
> create an stack?
>
>
>
> Hi JC,
>
>
>
> I am almost finishing the “HEAT HOT template” Test cases (the basics)… please look at the next link <https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/stx-test/tree/doc/source/manual_tests/heat/heat_hot_template_suite.rst>, under “HEAT_HOT_Template_07”, you will see the prerequisites for creation of Nova Server instance and the required template.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> *Fernando Hernandez Gonzalez*
>
> *Software Engineer*
>
>
>
> Avenida del Bosque #1001 Col, El Bajío
>
> Zapopan, Jalisco MX, 45019
>
> ____________________________________
>
> *Office:* +52.33.16.45.01.34 inet 86450134
>
>
>
> *From:* Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com
> <juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:19 AM
> *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] What is the new openstack command to
> create an stack?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Do someone know what is the new openstack command to create an stack? Then
> to create an instance.
>
>
>
> I usually use:
>
> $openstack stack create --template ${stack_name} --parameter
> "NetID=${net_id}"
>
>
>
> But got the below error:
>
> openstack: 'stack create…’ is not an openstack command.
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
> Juan Carlos Alonso
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
--
Blog: serverascode.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190328/a8aa1b55/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:37:44 +0100
From: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com>
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Initial StarlingX survey - feedback
needed
Message-ID: <88772002-9A60-4741-8CDF-1BB2D44C6769 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi StarlingX Community,
As I reached out about this earlier a few of us started to draft a survey to learn about what people and companies are doing around edge and to see if they know about StarlingX and getting some initial feedback on what they are interested in.
Please note that the idea is to get a high level view and find out about interest as opposed to going into deep details on deployment options, use cases or ways to contribute.
In that sense the main objectives for the survey is to keep it short and simple and make it easy to fill out. You will see that the questions are mainly having options to select from as opposed to being free form, the option to specify custom answer is provided where applicable like the use cases one as we can’t list all the possible ones. We also added a question to give any feedback people might have for the community.
The OpenStack Foundation will have access to the complete dataset and will provide the anonymized information to the community once it’s available.
The survey is available here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/StarlingX
Please read through the questions and reply back if you have comments or questions.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Ildikó
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:47:13 +0000
From: "Martinez Monroy, Elio" <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>
To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com>, "Xu, Chenjie"
<chenjie.xu at intel.com>, "Khalil, Ghada" <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>,
"Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin at intel.com>, "Cabrales, Ada"
<ada.cabrales at intel.com>, "Perez, Ricardo O"
<ricardo.o.perez at intel.com>
Cc: "'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'"
<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>, "Zhao, Forrest"
<forrest.zhao at intel.com>, "Rowsell, Brent"
<Brent.Rowsell at windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Message-ID:
<1466AF2176E6F040BD63860D0A241BBD46CA563A at FMSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Matt
Just exercising same stuff, please check my outputs from compute-0, please let me know if something else is needed
sudo /usr/sbin/dmdecode
Password:
sudo: /usr/sbin/dmdecode: command not found
compute-0:~$ sudo /usr/sbin/dmidecode
# dmidecode 3.1
Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs.
SMBIOS 2.8 present.
10 structures occupying 419 bytes.
Table at 0x000F6460.
Handle 0x0000, DMI type 0, 24 bytes
BIOS Information
Vendor: SeaBIOS
Version: Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1
Release Date: 04/01/2014
Address: 0xE8000
Runtime Size: 96 kB
ROM Size: 64 kB
Characteristics:
BIOS characteristics not supported
Targeted content distribution is supported
BIOS Revision: 0.0
Handle 0x0100, DMI type 1, 27 bytes
System Information
Manufacturer: QEMU
Product Name: Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
Version: pc-i440fx-2.5
Serial Number: Not Specified
UUID: 71d54a5d-b569-4e1c-83e3-9babf169e824
Wake-up Type: Power Switch
SKU Number: Not Specified
Family: Not Specified
Handle 0x0300, DMI type 3, 21 bytes
Chassis Information
Manufacturer: QEMU
Type: Other
Lock: Not Present
Version: pc-i440fx-2.5
Serial Number: Not Specified
Asset Tag: Not Specified
Boot-up State: Safe
Power Supply State: Safe
Thermal State: Safe
Security Status: Unknown
OEM Information: 0x00000000
Height: Unspecified
Number Of Power Cords: Unspecified
Contained Elements: 0
Handle 0x0400, DMI type 4, 42 bytes
Processor Information
Socket Designation: CPU 0
Type: Central Processor
Family: Other
Manufacturer: QEMU
ID: A3 06 01 00 FF FB 8B 07
Version: pc-i440fx-2.5
Voltage: Unknown
External Clock: Unknown
Max Speed: 2000 MHz
Current Speed: 2000 MHz
Status: Populated, Enabled
Upgrade: Other
L1 Cache Handle: Not Provided
L2 Cache Handle: Not Provided
L3 Cache Handle: Not Provided
Serial Number: Not Specified
Asset Tag: Not Specified
Part Number: Not Specified
Core Count: 6
Core Enabled: 6
Thread Count: 1
Characteristics: None
Handle 0x1000, DMI type 16, 23 bytes
Physical Memory Array
Location: Other
Use: System Memory
Error Correction Type: Multi-bit ECC
Maximum Capacity: 10 GB
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Number Of Devices: 1
Handle 0x1100, DMI type 17, 40 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x1000
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: Unknown
Data Width: Unknown
Size: 10240 MB
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: DIMM 0
Bank Locator: Not Specified
Type: RAM
Type Detail: Other
Speed: Unknown
Manufacturer: QEMU
Serial Number: Not Specified
Asset Tag: Not Specified
Part Number: Not Specified
Rank: Unknown
Configured Clock Speed: Unknown
Minimum Voltage: Unknown
Maximum Voltage: Unknown
Configured Voltage: Unknown
Handle 0x1300, DMI type 19, 31 bytes
Memory Array Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00000000000
Ending Address: 0x000BFFFFFFF
Range Size: 3 GB
Physical Array Handle: 0x1000
Partition Width: 1
Handle 0x1301, DMI type 19, 31 bytes
Memory Array Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00100000000
Ending Address: 0x002BFFFFFFF
Range Size: 7 GB
Physical Array Handle: 0x1000
Partition Width: 1
Handle 0x2000, DMI type 32, 11 bytes
System Boot Information
Status: No errors detected
Handle 0x7F00, DMI type 127, 4 bytes
End Of Table
compute-0:~$ virsh nodeinfo
CPU model: x86_64
CPU(s): 6
CPU frequency: 3792 MHz
CPU socket(s): 1
Core(s) per socket: 6
Thread(s) per core: 1
NUMA cell(s): 1
Memory size: 10485236 KiB
compute-0:~$ /usr/bin/topology
TOPOLOGY:
logical cpus : 6
sockets : 1
cores_per_pkg : 6
threads_per_core : 1
numa_nodes : 1
total_memory : 9.61 GiB
memory_per_node : 10.00 GiB
LOGICAL CPU TOPOLOGY:
cpu_id : 0 1 2 3 4 5
socket_id : 0 0 0 0 0 0
core_id : 0 1 2 3 4 5
thread_id : 0 0 0 0 0 0
CORE TOPOLOGY:
cpu_id socket_id core_id thread_id affinity
0 0 0 0 0x1
1 0 1 0 0x2
2 0 2 0 0x4
3 0 3 0 0x8
4 0 4 0 0x10
5 0 5 0 0x20
compute-0:~$ grep -i numa /var/log/dmesg
[ 0.000000] No NUMA configuration found
From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 6:10 AM
To: Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu at intel.com>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez at intel.com>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao at intel.com>; Rowsell, Brent <Brent.Rowsell at windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hello Chenjie,
Can you run the following set of commands on your test system compute hosts and provide the output for each?
sudo /usr/sbin/dmidecode
virsh nodeinfo
/usr/bin/topology
grep -i numa /var/log/dmesg
From: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu at intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com>>
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 5:45 AM
To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com>>, Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>, "Martinez Monroy, Elio" <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>>, "Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>, "Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales at intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com>>, "Perez, Ricardo O" <ricardo.o.perez at intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez at intel.com>>
Cc: "'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hi Matt,
I tried standard 0322 ISO image on 4 bare metals and “NUMA sections are still missing”. The docker images versions and build baseline have been attached. The ISO image link is following:
http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190322T174230Z/outputs/iso/
Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie
From: Xu, Chenjie
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 10:38 AM
To: 'Peters, Matt' <Matt.Peters at windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez at intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez at intel.com>>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hi Matt,
Sorry for misleading! I mean “NUMA sections are still missing”.
I have multiple systems experiencing this issue:
1. 0306 ISO image for OVSDPDK Upgrade Testing on 4 bare metals
2. 0322 ISO image for OVSDPDK Upgrade Testing on 4 bare metals
3. 0305 ISO image on 4 bare metals
4. 0315 ISO image one 1 bare metals
The item 1, 2 and 3 use same bare metals. The item 4 use a separate bare metal.
I will try 0322 ISO image on 4 bare metals.
Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie
From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:10 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu at intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez at intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez at intel.com>>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hello Chenjie,
Can you clarify this statement? “NUMA sections missing bug still exits”.
Did you mean to say that the missing NUMA sections in the domain XML are now present, but you still can’t ping over the vhost port, or are you saying the NUMA sections are still missing?
Do you have multiple systems that are experiencing this issue, or is it isolated to a single system that you are having problems with the NUMA topology? I believe you mentioned that you saw the same connectivity issues on a standard load from the mirror, so that still points to a test system / environment issue.
As Ghada mentioned, I think the next steps are to get results from the sanity systems with the same load baseline and to test with your custom load on a system that has been proven to work on the standard load.
-Matt
From: Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 9:28 AM
To: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu at intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com>>, "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com>>, "Martinez Monroy, Elio" <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>>, "Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>, "Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales at intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com>>, "Perez, Ricardo O" <ricardo.o.perez at intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez at intel.com>>
Cc: "'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Has Elio or Rich from the test team tried the new load as well on their systems? Do they see the same issues you reported? I think we need some data for another system to compare.
Ada,
As part of this thread, I also requested that a VM connectivity test be added to regular sanity so that there is data from the daily cengn builds w/o the new version of ovs-dpdk. Has the sanity suite been updated?
Thanks,
Ghada
From: Xu, Chenjie [mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 7:09 AM
To: Peters, Matt; Martinez Monroy, Elio; Khalil, Ghada; Lin, Shuicheng; Cabrales, Ada; Perez, Ricardo O
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'; Zhao, Forrest
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hi Matt,
I installed StarlingX using the new 0322 ISO image for OVSDPDK Upgrade Testing on 4 bare metals. NUMA sections missing bug still exits:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1820378
This time I update the docker images to latest before installing StarlingX. And the docker images versions and build baseline have been attached. Could you please help review the docker image versions?
Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie
From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 8:31 PM
To: Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu at intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez at intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez at intel.com>>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hello Chenjie,
Comparing the image list to our labs shows a difference in the image IDs (sha), but I’m not sure if that is just a difference in build baselines or an actual difference in the images. Since some of them align, I think you might be running a different set of images. Can you confirm what the build baseline is that you pulled the images from?
I have attached a sample list from our labs for comparison.
-Matt
From: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu at intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com>>
Date: Friday, March 22, 2019 at 7:25 AM
To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com>>, "Martinez Monroy, Elio" <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>>, Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>, "Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>, "Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales at intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com>>, "Perez, Ricardo O" <ricardo.o.perez at intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez at intel.com>>
Cc: "'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hi Matt,
The docker image versions in my environment and helm-charts-manifest-no-tests.tgz has been attached. The helm-charts-manifest-no-tests.tgz is built by Shuicheng for the OVSDPDK Upgrade Testing ISO image.
Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie
From: Martinez Monroy, Elio [mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 11:20 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez at intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez at intel.com>>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Perfect, I will be cheking my mail for that new ISO.
Adding Richo , he is the one that is going to execute the tests.
Thanks
BR
Elio
From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:15 AM
To: Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hi Shuicheng,
We discussed this in the networking bi-weekly team meeting today.
Please re-enable the mlx pmd – re-apply the following patch:
https://github.com/openstack/stx-integ/blob/master/networking/openvswitch/centos/meta_patches/0005-enable-mlx-pmds.patch
Then please rebase to the latest master and build a new load for Ada’s team to start testing
Hi Elio,
One a new build is available, please start testing as per our previous plans. You need to run a networking regression on various NICs – including the mellanox. Testing was planned for about two weeks with the target for the code to merge after testing is complete by April 5. Please provide regular updates.
Please also verify if you see the 3 bugs that Chenjie reports below (please test on both a cengn load as well as the load with the ovs-dpdk upgrade). Please note that none of these issues are reproducible in WR labs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821150
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821135
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1820378
Thanks,
Ghada
From: Khalil, Ghada
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:12 AM
To: 'Lin, Shuicheng'; Xu, Chenjie; Liu, ZhipengS; Xie, Cindy; Cabrales, Ada
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'; Zhao, Forrest; Peters, Matt; Richard, Joseph; Winnicki, Chris; Peng, Peng; Martinez Monroy, Elio; Jones, Bruce E; Qin, Kailun; Guo, Ruijing; Le, Huifeng
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hi Shuicheng,
There is still testing planned by Ada’s team before merging the code related to networking regression. This will cover the mellanox NIC as well.
Can you confirm that the load being used has the mellanox pmd enabled in it?
Thanks,
Ghada
From: Lin, Shuicheng [mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:03 AM
To: Xu, Chenjie; Khalil, Ghada; Liu, ZhipengS; Xie, Cindy; Cabrales, Ada
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'; Zhao, Forrest; Peters, Matt; Richard, Joseph; Winnicki, Chris; Peng, Peng; Martinez Monroy, Elio; Jones, Bruce E; Qin, Kailun; Guo, Ruijing; Le, Huifeng
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Thanks Chenjie for the testing.
Hi all,
Does it mean greenlight for code merge, or any other test is needed?
Here is the patch list:
https://review.openstack.org/642672
https://review.openstack.org/642673
Best Regards
Shuicheng
From: Xu, Chenjie
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:46 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; Liu, ZhipengS <zhipengs.liu at intel.com<mailto:zhipengs.liu at intel.com>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com>>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>; Peters, Matt <Matt.Peters at windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com>>; Richard, Joseph <Joseph.Richard at windriver.com<mailto:Joseph.Richard at windriver.com>>; Winnicki, Chris <Chris.Winnicki at windriver.com<mailto:Chris.Winnicki at windriver.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; Peng, Peng <Peng.Peng at windriver.com<mailto:Peng.Peng at windriver.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com<mailto:bruce.e.jones at intel.com>>; Qin, Kailun <kailun.qin at intel.com<mailto:kailun.qin at intel.com>>; Guo, Ruijing <ruijing.guo at intel.com<mailto:ruijing.guo at intel.com>>; Le, Huifeng <huifeng.le at intel.com<mailto:huifeng.le at intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing
Hi team,
I have finished the Basic Functional Testing for OVSDPDK Upgrade. Please check following summaries:
Bug Summary:
No bug related to OVSDPDK Upgrade.
3 bugs related to cutting over to container and configuration.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821150
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821135
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1820378
The following features have been tested:
N/S traffic for FLAT/VLAN network
E/W traffic for FLAT/VLAN/VXLAN network (E/W traffic within same host and across hosts)
QOS
Security Group
MTU
Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190327/8e562cfc/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
------------------------------
End of Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 10, Issue 156
**************************************************
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list