[Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190428

Wed May 1 01:46:50 UTC 2019

Thanks Jose for the update regarding LP 1826445<https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1826445>. I see you've added a notes there. Mingyuan will continue w/ the debug.

From: Perez Carranza, Jose
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 3:54 AM
To: Miller, Frank <Frank.Miller at windriver.com>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com>; Perez Ibarra, Maria G <maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190428

Hi Frank

LP 1826445<https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1826445> is updated with our latest findings, this seems to be a resources issue, Christopher was able complete successfully the "application apply" on a configuration were  VMs hosting nodes have  8 cores and 32GB each controllers and computes. This is a considerable increase to the values mentioned on the wiki (16 GB for controllers and 10 GB for computes).

Regards,
José

From: Miller, Frank [mailto:Frank.Miller at windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 8:33 AM
To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Perez Ibarra, Maria G <maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com<mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com>>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190428

Cindy:

I'll look for someone to triage 1824412<https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1824412> and update with any findings.

But for 1826445<https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1826445> this is only reported in a virtual lab in an Intel site.  We are not able to reproduce this issue in our labs or virtual environment.  I suggest we wait for your team to return from Labor Day to reproduce and investigate.

Frank

From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 12:25 AM
To: Miller, Frank <Frank.Miller at windriver.com<mailto:Frank.Miller at windriver.com>>; Perez Ibarra, Maria G <maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com<mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com>>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190428

Hi, Frank,
I just assign LP#1824412<https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1824412> to Zhipeng.

However, due to the fact that China is going to Labor Day holiday and will be black-out for 4 days, I am doubt how much progress we can make. It's appreciated if WR can have resource on both 1824412 and 1826445.

Thanks. - cindy

From: Miller, Frank [mailto:Frank.Miller at windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 12:17 PM
To: Perez Ibarra, Maria G <maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com<mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com>>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190428

Maria - the sanities are much improved and I don't think they should be labelled RED.  Looks more like YELLOW to me.

There are 2 issues reported in this sanity.  Can we get updates on the status of the 2 issues from the LP primes:

·         Cindy for: VM resize failed by "No valid host was found" https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1824412

·         Mingyuan for: Failing application-apply due error on osh-openstack-openvswitch https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1826445

Let us know if you require assistance to triage/debug.

Frank

From: Perez Ibarra, Maria G [mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 10:25 PM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190428

Status of the Sanity Test for last CENGN ISO: bootimage.iso from 2019-APRIL-28 (link<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190428T233000Z/>)

Status: RED

===========================================

Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Bare Metal Environment

AIO - Simplex

Setup             Manual [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  49 TCs [FAIL] | 03 TCs FAIL

Sanity Platform   07 TCs [PASS]

TOTAL: 57 TCS [Fail : 3 TCs]

AIO - Duplex

Setup             Manual [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  52 TCs [PASS]

Sanity Platform   05 TCs [PASS]

TOTAL: 57 TCS PASS

Standard - Local Storage (2+2)

Setup             Manual [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  49 TCs [PASS]

Sanity Platform   07 TCs [PASS]

TOTAL: 57 TCS PASS

Standard - Dedicated Storage (2+2+2)

Setup             Manual [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  52 TCs [PASS]

Sanity Platform   05 TCs [PASS]

TOTAL: 57 TCS PASS

Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Virtual Environment

AIO - Simplex

Setup             04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]
Sanity OpenStack  49 TCs [PASS] | 3 TCs FAIL
Sanity Platform   07 TCs [PASS]

TOTAL: [ 61 TCs ] [Fail : 3 TCs]

AIO - Duplex

Setup             04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]
Sanity OpenStack  49 TCs [PASS]
Sanity Platform   07 TCs [PASS]

TOTAL: [ 61 TCs PASS ]

Standard - Local Storage

Setup             04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning      01 TCs [FAIL]
Sanity OpenStack  49 TCs [FAIL]
Sanity Platform   07 TCs [FAIL]

TOTAL: [ 61 TCs PASS ] [Fail : 57 TCs]

----------------------------------------------------------

-          VM resize failed by "No valid host was found" https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1824412

-          Failing application-apply due error on osh-openstack-openvswitch https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1826445

For more detail of the tests: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Test/SanityTests#Sanity-OpenStack

Regards
Maria G.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190501/17ca090f/attachment-0001.html>