[Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

[Saul Wold]

On 5/6/19 10:46 AM, Wensley, Barton wrote:
> Saul,
> 
> One drawback with using admin is it may cause some confusion with the identically named OpenStack admin user. How about "stxadmin" instead? Is there a concern with using "stx" in the user name?
> 
Yes, there is concern about using stx in the name, as mentioned in my 
initial email we want to avoid stx, root, starlingx, it should remain 
generic.

I think the same concern of using wrs in the name, it might obsucre or 
not be meaningful.

Sau!

> Bart
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: May 3, 2019 6:28 PM
> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> We talked about some of the branding changes at the PTG just now and one
> item to try and tackle now for this release would be changing wrsroot to
> some alternative.
> 
> This will be a pretty mechanical change, it will touch the integ,
> config, metal, and update repos. There might be a couple places where
> this can be placed in a variable or parameter. There is currently a
> storyboard titled "Change wrsroot to stxuser" [0].  There was some
> initial discussion at the PTG regarding the new user name. We want to
> avoid stx, or starlingx and "root", in the name it should remain more
> generic.
> 
> One obvious choice is:
> 
> admin
> 
> Please reply with additional suggestions before next week's TSC (5/9).
> 
> Ultimately, this change will require changes to tests, test frameworks,
> scripts (such as deployment tools) and documentation.
> 
> [0] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004716
> 
> Thanks for your input.
> 
> Sau!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>