[Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

[Rowsell, Brent]

+1 for sysadmin

Brent 
-----Original Message-----
From: Wensley, Barton [mailto:Barton.Wensley at windriver.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 2:51 PM
To: Dean Troyer <dtroyer at gmail.com>
Cc: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

OK - I'm good with sysadmin.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Troyer [mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com]
Sent: May 6, 2019 2:32 PM
To: Wensley, Barton
Cc: Saul Wold; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:06 PM Wensley, Barton <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com> wrote:
> I guess I'm less concerned about using stx or starlingx than others. Obviously "wrs" is bad since it is tied to a company. But it seems common practice to use the project name for the default user (think nova, neutron, glance, etc...).

The only reason I'd be reluctant to include a project identifier is because those things can change and this is just painful enough to not want to do again.

'admin' has other uses at the OS level, we need to be clear enough to not cause confusion there.  Unless it has other similar uses 'sysadmin' is the best I have heard and I do not have a better suggestion.

dt

Unless we want to use 'bikeshed' :)

--
Dean Troyer
dtroyer at gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss