[Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
huang.shuquan at 99cloud.net
Tue May 7 07:44:05 UTC 2019
On May 7, 2019, at 6:24 AM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
On 5/6/19 2:43 PM, Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
> What about 'deployadmin' ?
That's an interesting alternative.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Somerville [mailto:jim.somerville at windriver.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 4:08 PM
>> To: Dean Troyer <dtroyer at gmail.com>; Wensley, Barton
>> <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com>
>> Cc: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
>> On 2019-05-06 2:32 p.m., Dean Troyer wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:06 PM Wensley, Barton
>>> <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com> wrote:
>>>> I guess I'm less concerned about using stx or starlingx than others. Obviously
>> "wrs" is bad since it is tied to a company. But it seems common practice to use
>> the project name for the default user (think nova, neutron, glance, etc...).
>>> The only reason I'd be reluctant to include a project identifier is
>>> because those things can change and this is just painful enough to not
>>> want to do again.
>>> 'admin' has other uses at the OS level, we need to be clear enough to
>>> not cause confusion there. Unless it has other similar uses
>>> 'sysadmin' is the best I have heard and I do not have a better
>> Just to be devil's advocate here, sysadmin could easily already be in use on a
>> future port of this stuff to another platform.
>> From a security standpoint, it would be on an easily guessed list of userids for
>> black hat penetration testing.
>> It also shows up on the Big Username Blacklist.
>>> Unless we want to use 'bikeshed' :)
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
More information about the Starlingx-discuss