[Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

Tue May 7 14:44:26 UTC 2019

How about cloudadmin (or cloudadm to make it shorter) or edgeadmin (edgeadm)? 
stxadm is my favorite, but I know there is a strong opinion against stx.

Regards,
Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com] 
Sent: May 7, 2019 10:42
To: Bujold, Kristine <Kristine.Bujold at windriver.com>; Penney, Don <Don.Penney at windriver.com>; Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

Sysadmin + 1, easier to spell then deployadmin.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bujold, Kristine [mailto:Kristine.Bujold at windriver.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 10:41 PM
To: Penney, Don <Don.Penney at windriver.com>; Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

sysadmin +1

-----Original Message-----
From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney at windriver.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 10:38 AM
To: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

3 characters ;)

-----Original Message-----
From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 10:36 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

On 5/7/19 6:51 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
> I'd vote -1 on deployadmin based on length alone. It would be nice to keep it short... less typing :)
> 
It's only 2 characters longer than sysadmin and it is descriptive of the 
account.

Just saying, no vote yet from me..

Sau!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shuquan Huang [mailto:huang.shuquan at 99cloud.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 3:44 AM
> To: Saul Wold
> Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
> 
> sysadmin +1
> 
> On May 7, 2019, at 6:24 AM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/6/19 2:43 PM, Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
>> What about 'deployadmin' ?
> That's an interesting alternative.
> 
> Sau!
> 
>> Regards,
>> José
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jim Somerville [mailto:jim.somerville at windriver.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 4:08 PM
>>> To: Dean Troyer <dtroyer at gmail.com>; Wensley, Barton
>>> <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com>
>>> Cc: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2019-05-06 2:32 p.m., Dean Troyer wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:06 PM Wensley, Barton
>>>> <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com> wrote:
>>>>> I guess I'm less concerned about using stx or starlingx than others. Obviously
>>> "wrs" is bad since it is tied to a company. But it seems common practice to use
>>> the project name for the default user (think nova, neutron, glance, etc...).
>>>>
>>>> The only reason I'd be reluctant to include a project identifier is
>>>> because those things can change and this is just painful enough to not
>>>> want to do again.
>>>>
>>>> 'admin' has other uses at the OS level, we need to be clear enough to
>>>> not cause confusion there.  Unless it has other similar uses
>>>> 'sysadmin' is the best I have heard and I do not have a better
>>>> suggestion.
>>>
>>> Just to be devil's advocate here, sysadmin could easily already be in use on a
>>> future port of this stuff to another platform.
>>>
>>>   From a security standpoint, it would be on an easily guessed list of userids for
>>> black hat penetration testing.
>>>
>>> It also shows up on the Big Username Blacklist.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/marteinn/The-Big-Username-
>>> Blacklist/blob/master/list_raw.txt
>>>
>>> -Jim
>>>
>>>>
>>>> dt
>>>>
>>>> Unless we want to use 'bikeshed' :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> 

_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss