[Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal

[Jolliffe, Ian]

+1 sysadmin

On 2019-05-07, 10:59 AM, "Ngo, Tee" <Tee.Ngo at windriver.com> wrote:

    +1 for sysadmin, generic, clear and concise.
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com] 
    Sent: May-07-19 10:53 AM
    To: Penney, Don; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
    
    
    
    On 5/7/19 7:37 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
    > 3 characters ;)
    > 
    ENOTAWAKE!
    
    Alex suggested shortening admin -> adm, good thought
    
    sysadm
    deployadm
    cloudadm
    edgeadm
    
    A rif on Controller:
    ctrladm
    conadm
    
    Trying new terms!
    
    Sau!
    
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 10:36 AM
    > To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > On 5/7/19 6:51 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
    >> I'd vote -1 on deployadmin based on length alone. It would be nice to keep it short... less typing :)
    >>
    > It's only 2 characters longer than sysadmin and it is descriptive of the
    > account.
    > 
    > Just saying, no vote yet from me..
    > 
    > Sau!
    > 
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Shuquan Huang [mailto:huang.shuquan at 99cloud.net]
    >> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 3:44 AM
    >> To: Saul Wold
    >> Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    >> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
    >>
    >> sysadmin +1
    >>
    >> On May 7, 2019, at 6:24 AM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 5/6/19 2:43 PM, Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
    >>> What about 'deployadmin' ?
    >> That's an interesting alternative.
    >>
    >> Sau!
    >>
    >>> Regards,
    >>> José
    >>>> -----Original Message-----
    >>>> From: Jim Somerville [mailto:jim.somerville at windriver.com]
    >>>> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 4:08 PM
    >>>> To: Dean Troyer <dtroyer at gmail.com>; Wensley, Barton
    >>>> <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com>
    >>>> Cc: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    >>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 2019-05-06 2:32 p.m., Dean Troyer wrote:
    >>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:06 PM Wensley, Barton
    >>>>> <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com> wrote:
    >>>>>> I guess I'm less concerned about using stx or starlingx than others. Obviously
    >>>> "wrs" is bad since it is tied to a company. But it seems common practice to use
    >>>> the project name for the default user (think nova, neutron, glance, etc...).
    >>>>>
    >>>>> The only reason I'd be reluctant to include a project identifier is
    >>>>> because those things can change and this is just painful enough to not
    >>>>> want to do again.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> 'admin' has other uses at the OS level, we need to be clear enough to
    >>>>> not cause confusion there.  Unless it has other similar uses
    >>>>> 'sysadmin' is the best I have heard and I do not have a better
    >>>>> suggestion.
    >>>>
    >>>> Just to be devil's advocate here, sysadmin could easily already be in use on a
    >>>> future port of this stuff to another platform.
    >>>>
    >>>>    From a security standpoint, it would be on an easily guessed list of userids for
    >>>> black hat penetration testing.
    >>>>
    >>>> It also shows up on the Big Username Blacklist.
    >>>>
    >>>> https://github.com/marteinn/The-Big-Username-
    >>>> Blacklist/blob/master/list_raw.txt
    >>>>
    >>>> -Jim
    >>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> dt
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Unless we want to use 'bikeshed' :)
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> _______________________________________________
    >>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    >>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    >>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    >>> _______________________________________________
    >>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    >>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    >>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    >> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    >>
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    >> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    >> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    >>
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    > 
    
    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss