[Starlingx-discuss] UPDATE: Limited code merges until sanity results improve
Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com
Thu May 16 12:39:50 UTC 2019
Thanks Christopher for the update. I appreciate you trying the new build so promptly.
I’ve assigned https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1829299 to Mingyuan for investigation as this looks specific to the Intel setup.
Regarding the cinder volume issue, are you referring to https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1828059 ? If so, can you please do a collect and add it to the launchpad so that Daniel and the storage team can investigate.
From: Lemus Contreras, Cristopher J [mailto:cristopher.j.lemus.contreras at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 1:11 AM
To: Khalil, Ghada; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] UPDATE: Limited code merges until sanity results improve
Used CENGN image that was created with the listed patches on previous email: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190515T220331Z/outputs/iso/bootimage.iso
Automation for our lab is still broken (local mirror registry dependency): https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1829299
However, by manually applying the workaround that is documented on the same launchpad, I was able to do a full provisioning on Baremetal Simplex, Duplex and Standard (2+2).
About sanity tests, at least against duplex, the issue with the Volumes is still present:
Launch Instances :: Launch Cirros instances. | FAIL |
Invalid volume: Invalid input received: Invalid volume: Volume attachments can not be created if the volume is in an error state. The Volume f80e9811-a45e-4646-9634-56122eee813e currently has a status of: error (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-31db1545-9a79-4ed9-b3df-dd8d5d9d5c60) (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-d4bbb73f-207f-4365-9f5a-4f0625d2c5d0)
Other tests that are not depending on “Volumes” are passing.
Sanity is currently running against simplex and standard, will update tomorrow morning, and, as soon as possible, a formal Sanity Report will be sent.
Great improvement!, much appreciated!
From: "Khalil, Ghada" <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>
Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM
To: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] UPDATE: Limited code merges until sanity results improve
** limited merges are still in effect **
The following sanity issues have fixes merged in stx master:
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1828059 (dup)
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1828899 (dup)
A build has been triggered on cengn.
** Test team, please start sanity on the new build **
From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 11:09 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Limited code merges until sanity results improve
As discussed in the community meeting today, effective immediately, we ask the core reviewers to only merge code for sanity gating issues and critical/high priority bugs only.
This is in an effort to get some stability in the load and address the sanity issues recently reported.
A new label, stx.sanity, will be introduced to easily help the community identify issues affecting sanity moving forward.
(tagging of the current issues is in progress)
For more details on the current issues, see today’s meeting minutes on the community etherpad:
Another email will be sent once the limited merge is lifted.
We appreciate your patience as we work together to get stable loads.
PS: Developers can continue to post reviews as per the normal process. Core reviewers can continue to review code as well, but not to merge them unless they meet the criteria stated above.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Starlingx-discuss