[Starlingx-discuss] About Nginx worker process number

Xie, Cindy cindy.xie at intel.com
Mon May 20 14:11:40 UTC 2019

What service request will Nginx accept and process, and on what kind of frequency? Just need to evaluate how it is being used and the required responsiveness.

Thx. - cindy

From: Wang, Yi C [mailto:yi.c.wang at intel.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2019 10:54 PM
To: Rowsell, Brent <Brent.Rowsell at windriver.com>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] About Nginx worker process number

Hi all,

Any recommends on the setting for the number of  nginx worker processes of ingress controllers? Thanks.

From: Wang, Yi C [mailto:yi.c.wang at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 8:50 PM
To: Rowsell, Brent <Brent.Rowsell at windriver.com<mailto:Brent.Rowsell at windriver.com>>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] About Nginx worker process number

Hi Brent,

I am working on the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1823803 which is about large nginx worker process number. With current starlingx code, there are three nginx ingress controllers, one for kube-system namespace ingress, one for openstack namespace ingress, and the last one for mariadb.  Each controller creates  as many worker processes as the number of cores.

I have initialized three patches to fix this issue. I have no idea about how much the workload of the three ingress controllers will be, so I temporally set the number of worker processes as 1.  Do your experts have any suggestions on this setting? Thanks.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190520/bc51e5e6/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list