[Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews

[Saul Wold]

On 5/29/19 4:32 PM, Penney, Don wrote:
> The install_state progress notifications are part of the StarlingX installer customizations to Anaconda. If you have the stock CentOS installer, you won't get these notifications. Likewise, this would likely explain issue #1.
> 
Yuppers,  I have re-built my installer images and ISO, and seem to have 
fixed the eth interface issue and the install_state issue.

I have run through the Setup/Provisioning and it's currently working on 
Sanity, but all passing green so far.

I could log into the controller-1 with sysadmin and the correctly 
changed password so that control is working.

Finally some positive news!

Sau!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 7:11 PM
> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/29/19 1:53 PM, Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I used the ISO provided by Saul and below are some findings on virtual environment.
>>
>> 1. Interfaces are named eth0 and eth1 instead of eth1000 and eth1001, this is breaking our automation flow
> I think this might be because I have an older installer, thoughts?
> 
> I am rebuilding the iso with updated installer files (squashfs.img,
> initrd.img and vmlinuz).
> 
> 
>> 2. it never updates the `install_state` it always stays in `None` as our automation uses that value to monitor the installation progress it also fails
> Not sure how this one can be connected to wrsroot / sysadmin, if someone
> can point me a to a little further details of where this state change
> happens, I can take a look further into it.  Maybe a permissions issue?
> 
> Sau!
> 
>> 3. Hacking those 2 issues I was able to complete deployment and execute Sanity (using config_controller --force) without significant problems (I saw some issues but are related to my host machine resources rather than the functionality)
>>
>> Note: Issues 1 and 2 were not observed on any other ISOs recently validated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> José
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 1:03 PM
>>> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
>>>
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I pushed the rebased reviews for the username change to this set of 5 repos:
>>>
>>> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:wrsroot
>>>
>>> I have created an ISO that the Intel team is testing with, if other members can
>>> build an iso with an updated manifest to include these changes and test.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>       Sau!
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>