[Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews

[Saul Wold]

I did another push of the sysadmin changes with clean'ed up Commit 
messages, removed [WIP] and fixed the groupname and long lines.



Please do a review and any additional testing.

I also changed the topic to be "sysadmin" instead of wrsroot!
https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:sysadmin+(status:open+OR+status:merged)

Thanks
    Sau!


On 5/29/19 9:34 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/29/19 4:32 PM, Penney, Don wrote:
>> The install_state progress notifications are part of the StarlingX 
>> installer customizations to Anaconda. If you have the stock CentOS 
>> installer, you won't get these notifications. Likewise, this would 
>> likely explain issue #1.
>>
> Yuppers,  I have re-built my installer images and ISO, and seem to have 
> fixed the eth interface issue and the install_state issue.
> 
> I have run through the Setup/Provisioning and it's currently working on 
> Sanity, but all passing green so far.
> 
> I could log into the controller-1 with sysadmin and the correctly 
> changed password so that control is working.
> 
> Finally some positive news!
> 
> Sau!
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 7:11 PM
>> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/29/19 1:53 PM, Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I used the ISO provided by Saul and below are some findings on 
>>> virtual environment.
>>>
>>> 1. Interfaces are named eth0 and eth1 instead of eth1000 and eth1001, 
>>> this is breaking our automation flow
>> I think this might be because I have an older installer, thoughts?
>>
>> I am rebuilding the iso with updated installer files (squashfs.img,
>> initrd.img and vmlinuz).
>>
>>
>>> 2. it never updates the `install_state` it always stays in `None` as 
>>> our automation uses that value to monitor the installation progress 
>>> it also fails
>> Not sure how this one can be connected to wrsroot / sysadmin, if someone
>> can point me a to a little further details of where this state change
>> happens, I can take a look further into it.  Maybe a permissions issue?
>>
>> Sau!
>>
>>> 3. Hacking those 2 issues I was able to complete deployment and 
>>> execute Sanity (using config_controller --force) without significant 
>>> problems (I saw some issues but are related to my host machine 
>>> resources rather than the functionality)
>>>
>>> Note: Issues 1 and 2 were not observed on any other ISOs recently 
>>> validated.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> José
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 1:03 PM
>>>> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> I pushed the rebased reviews for the username change to this set of 
>>>> 5 repos:
>>>>
>>>> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:wrsroot
>>>>
>>>> I have created an ISO that the Intel team is testing with, if other 
>>>> members can
>>>> build an iso with an updated manifest to include these changes and 
>>>> test.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>       Sau!
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss