[Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
Waheed, Numan
Numan.Waheed at windriver.com
Thu May 30 16:20:40 UTC 2019
Hi Saul,
As I indicated in the community meeting yesterday, we will have to see how this change impacts automation. We will need to modify automation according to this change.
I will be able to start testing it in the later half of next week and it will take approximately 1 week to fully test and make required changes. Please don't merge these changes until the testing is complete. I expect to finish testing by Jun 12, 2019.
Scott, I will need a build with Saul's changes next week. Can you please plan it in your schedule. Thanks.
Numan
-----Original Message-----
From: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
Sent: May-30-19 11:19 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
I did another push of the sysadmin changes with clean'ed up Commit messages, removed [WIP] and fixed the groupname and long lines.
Please do a review and any additional testing.
I also changed the topic to be "sysadmin" instead of wrsroot!
https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:sysadmin+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
Thanks
Sau!
On 5/29/19 9:34 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>
>
> On 5/29/19 4:32 PM, Penney, Don wrote:
>> The install_state progress notifications are part of the StarlingX
>> installer customizations to Anaconda. If you have the stock CentOS
>> installer, you won't get these notifications. Likewise, this would
>> likely explain issue #1.
>>
> Yuppers, I have re-built my installer images and ISO, and seem to have
> fixed the eth interface issue and the install_state issue.
>
> I have run through the Setup/Provisioning and it's currently working on
> Sanity, but all passing green so far.
>
> I could log into the controller-1 with sysadmin and the correctly
> changed password so that control is working.
>
> Finally some positive news!
>
> Sau!
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 7:11 PM
>> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/29/19 1:53 PM, Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I used the ISO provided by Saul and below are some findings on
>>> virtual environment.
>>>
>>> 1. Interfaces are named eth0 and eth1 instead of eth1000 and eth1001,
>>> this is breaking our automation flow
>> I think this might be because I have an older installer, thoughts?
>>
>> I am rebuilding the iso with updated installer files (squashfs.img,
>> initrd.img and vmlinuz).
>>
>>
>>> 2. it never updates the `install_state` it always stays in `None` as
>>> our automation uses that value to monitor the installation progress
>>> it also fails
>> Not sure how this one can be connected to wrsroot / sysadmin, if someone
>> can point me a to a little further details of where this state change
>> happens, I can take a look further into it. Maybe a permissions issue?
>>
>> Sau!
>>
>>> 3. Hacking those 2 issues I was able to complete deployment and
>>> execute Sanity (using config_controller --force) without significant
>>> problems (I saw some issues but are related to my host machine
>>> resources rather than the functionality)
>>>
>>> Note: Issues 1 and 2 were not observed on any other ISOs recently
>>> validated.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> José
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 1:03 PM
>>>> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> I pushed the rebased reviews for the username change to this set of
>>>> 5 repos:
>>>>
>>>> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:wrsroot
>>>>
>>>> I have created an ISO that the Intel team is testing with, if other
>>>> members can
>>>> build an iso with an updated manifest to include these changes and
>>>> test.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Sau!
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list