[Starlingx-discuss] Review seeking Operator Feedback

[Fried, Eric]

> Expect a more detailed query soon

It's here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/006726.html

For those of you who aren't subscribed to openstack-discuss... I'm not sure the best way for you to respond. I guess reply to me and/or Bruce and we'll post on your behalf?

Thanks,
efried

From: Fried, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 14:24
To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: Review seeking Operator Feedback

Thanks Bruce.

Expect a more detailed query soon - we're still working out what and how to ask - but the main point of interest is something like:

Is it a hard requirement to be able to mix NUMA-aware and non-NUMA-aware guests on the same host?

If you can live without this, many things become simpler (the entire 'can_split' section of the reference spec - and the dozens of associated comments - will melt away into nothingness).

Thanks,
efried

From: Jones, Bruce E
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 13:21
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Cc: Fried, Eric <eric.fried at intel.com>
Subject: FW: Review seeking Operator Feedback

StarlingX community: here is a link to a new spec under review in Nova that may be of interest.  Eric is looking for comments and feedback, especially from operators.  I’d give this review a +1 just for the title. ☺

      brucej

From: Gregg, Denise D
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 11:37 AM
To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>
Cc: Fried, Eric <eric.fried at intel.com>
Subject: Review seeking Operator Feedback


Bruce – Here is spec.
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/658510/

Eric – possibly can you provide some context of what information you’d be seeking from operators 😊.

Denise

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190531/d6ecec46/attachment.html>