[Starlingx-discuss] Consoolidated stx.2.0.1 maintenance RC build testing

[Martinez Monroy, Elio]

Consolidated Regression Automated Results Report

Configuration:
•	Virtual Environment
•	4 configurations (Simplex, Duplex, Standard, External)
•	ISO: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/2.0/centos/20191005T150558Z/


Results:
PASS			87.00	125.00	153.00	153.00
FAIL			6.00	11.00	12.00	9.00
TOTAL EXECUTED	93.00	136.00	165.00	162.00
PASS RATE		93.54	91.911	92.72	94.44

TP: 
•	https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r5VIUq-6z3I3nWB_Bo4a4ZnUhsVZfatPM4W8aaqg6Hc/edit?usp=sharing

Ovservations:
•	Inestability in some scenarios because of WS resources, in some configurations passes and with larger configurations fails. 
•	We are getting the following  known issues 
	o	https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1836378
	o	https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1841660
	o	https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1835807
	o	https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1834512



Conclusions:
•	2.0.1 Maintenance RC is healthy 


-----Original Message-----
From: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com> 
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 10:44 AM
To: Little, Scott <Scott.Little at windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx.2.0.1 maintenance RC build Requested

Thanks Scott.

Hi da/team, 
Can you please start the planned sanity/regression testing?

Thanks,
Ghada


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Little [mailto:scott.little at windriver.com] 
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2019 1:08 PM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx.2.0.1 maintenance RC build Requested

We finally have a good build!

Happy Testing.

Scott


_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss