[Starlingx-discuss] [Important] repo restructuring

[Scott Little]

Reminder

Please treat the code base as frozen. No gerrit reviews, other than the 
restructuring reviews I'll be publishing today, should be receiving a 
WF+1 until further notice.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Scott


On 2019-09-03 2:33 p.m., Scott Little wrote:
> Pending a final green sanity result, the tentative restructure day 
> will be Sept 4 (tomorrow).
>
> Please freeze ALL code submissions, starting at 1 pm UTC on Sept 4, 
> until further notice.
>
> I'll be running a repo split tool. It will generate more than a dozen 
> code reviews that will ALL have to be merged before we can unfreeze 
> the code for general updates.
>
> After everything has merged, you'll need to ...
>
> 1) If you are working on code that has not been relocated (refer to 
> spreadsheet [3]) then 'repo sync --force-sync' be sufficient.  Before 
> doing that, be sure to save your work as a commit on a private working 
> branch.
>
> 2) If your working on code that has been relocated,  Then your best 
> bet is to start with a fresh 'repo init' into a new working 
> directory.  Use 'git format-patch' or 'diff' to capture your work, and 
> apply the patch at the new location.   Some surgery to path names may 
> be required.
>
> Scott Little
>
>
>
> On 2019-08-30 4:09 p.m., Scott Little wrote:
>>
>> The layered build feature is getting ready for its initial required 
>> changes [1] [2].
>>
>> The first phase is a restructuring of the StarlingX git repos to 
>> enable layered builds in the next phase.  In light of new package 
>> additions in the last few weeks, there has been a few modifications 
>> and additions to the spreadsheet [3] documenting all the intended 
>> moves.  Edits are in blue text.  The intent is that all package 
>> relocations will be history preserving.
>>
>> We plan to implement the git restructuring on the week of September 3-6.
>>
>> My initial ask of the StarlingX community is that we *temporarily 
>> freeze the addition of any new packages* while we make a final test 
>> run.  This means that any updates that touch a centos_pkgs_dir file 
>> should not receive a WF+1 until the relocation is complete.  After 
>> the relocation, you may need to re-issue your code review.
>>
>> Thanks for your co-operation.
>>
>> Scott Little
>>
>> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/672288/
>>
>> [2] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006166
>>
>> [3] 
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zURL1UlDST8lnvw3dMlNWN6pkLX6EVF6TDBwNR9TQik/edit#gid=1697053891 
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190904/7d66576e/attachment-0001.html>