[Starlingx-discuss] MultiOS: why do we build or own Helm and Helm-infra rather than to use th eone provided by the distro?

[Scott Little]

I believe there was a minimum version required to support another 
package, and CentOS build of that version was not available... at least 
not at that time.

Scott


On 2019-09-17 11:12 a.m., Victor Rodriguez wrote:
> You  mean why do we build the RPM  :
> http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build/outputs/RPMS/std/helm-2.13.1-0.tis.2.x86_64.rpm
> ??
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:35 AM Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source)
> <dominig.arfoll at fridu.net> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I wonder why StarlingX needs to build locally a version of Helm and Helm
>> Infra.
>> Would it be possible to use the OpenSUSE release ?
>> Release 2.13 and 3.0 are already available. Would any do ?
>>
>> --
>> Dominig ar Foll
>> Senior Software Architect
>> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss