[Starlingx-discuss] MultiOS: why do we build or own Helm and Helm-infra rather than to use th eone provided by the distro?

[Victor Rodriguez]

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:51 AM Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com> wrote:
>
> I believe there was a minimum version required to support another
> package, and CentOS build of that version was not available... at least
> not at that time.
>

If is supported now, do you think we could work on using the existing
one provided by the distro ?

> Scott
>
>
> On 2019-09-17 11:12 a.m., Victor Rodriguez wrote:
> > You  mean why do we build the RPM  :
> > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build/outputs/RPMS/std/helm-2.13.1-0.tis.2.x86_64.rpm
> > ??
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:35 AM Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source)
> > <dominig.arfoll at fridu.net> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I wonder why StarlingX needs to build locally a version of Helm and Helm
> >> Infra.
> >> Would it be possible to use the OpenSUSE release ?
> >> Release 2.13 and 3.0 are already available. Would any do ?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dominig ar Foll
> >> Senior Software Architect
> >> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> >> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss