[Starlingx-discuss] docker-lv extension issue with RAID-5

Akki yadav yadav.akshay58 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 04:41:56 UTC 2020


Hi Austin,

Thanks for the reply.

We don't want to extend XFS, we want to reserve 60 GB for the docker
filesystem from the beginning. We want that the setup should come up with
docker-lv size of 60 GB by default.
Can you please suggest the way?

Regards
Akshay

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 6:17 AM Sun, Austin <austin.sun at intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Akshay:
>
> I think you want to extend the docker-lv w/o reinstall and provision .
>
>
>
> In you setup , you can run command like
>
>
>
> ‘system host-fs-modify controller-0 docker=60” to enlarge docker lv.
>
> system host-fs-modify controller-1 docker=60
>
> Thanks.
>
> BR
> Austin Sun.
>
> *From:* Akki yadav <yadav.akshay58 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 7, 2020 9:41 PM
> *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] docker-lv extension issue with RAID-5
>
>
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I am trying to install Bare metal StarlingX AIO duplex setup with RAID-5
> configured on my physical servers.
> While applying stx-openstack application, it always fails at 21% stating a
> timeout.
> In sysinv logs, I have seen some XFS currupt errors and some other errors
> which could be because of the extension of docker-lv from 30 GB to 60 GB.
> I was trying to install the setup from scratch again so that I could
> deploy the setup with docker-lv set to 60 GB only so that I need not to
> extend the LV.
>
> Can anyone please tell me how may set it to 60 so no need to extend it?
>
> Regards
> Akshay
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20201208/2dd5b3c1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list