[Starlingx-discuss] proposal for lifecycle operator

[Chen, Haochuan Z]

Hi Bob

For lifecycle operator, after it merge, I should update two of my patch for rook. If your patch merge in 1st and 2nd week of Jan, it only left 1 or two week for me, with basic function validation. It is very time limited for me.

So I wish to merge my patch firstly and I could work together with Dan for lifecycle operator.
https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/720637
https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/rook-ceph/+/716792
https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/rook-ceph/+/765693
https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/utilities/+/760503
https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ha/+/764588
https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/stx-puppet/+/739363
https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/758935
https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/metal/+/737228
https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/openstack-armada-app/+/731872

Please review my patch.

Thanks!

Martin, Chen
IOTG, Software Engineer
021-61164330

From: Church, Robert <Robert.Church at windriver.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 11:26 AM
To: Chen, Haochuan Z <haochuan.z.chen at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Voiculeasa, Dan <Dan.Voiculeasa at windriver.com>
Subject: Re: proposal for lifecycle operator

Hi Martin,

See inline..

Thanks,
Bob

From: "Chen, Haochuan Z" <haochuan.z.chen at intel.com<mailto:haochuan.z.chen at intel.com>>
Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 7:32 AM
To: "'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>, Robert Church <Robert.Church at windriver.com<mailto:Robert.Church at windriver.com>>, "Voiculeasa, Dan" <Dan.Voiculeasa at windriver.com<mailto:Dan.Voiculeasa at windriver.com>>
Subject: proposal for lifecycle operator

[Please note this e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
Hi Bob

I study patch for lifecycle operator. Something to check with you
https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22story_2007960%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)

1, lifecycle operator will merge in r5 release or not?
[RTC] Yes. We’ll land this prior to MS3 (1/29/21). Based on the year-end holidays, I’d like to get this merged in the 1st or 2nd week in January

2, propose to add a hook for APP_LIFECYCLE_TIMMING_POST.
Now there is only hook for constants.APP_LIFECYCLE_TIMING_PRE, which is called before application apply.
Propose to add a hook to be called, after application apply, APP_LIFECYCLE_TIMMING_POST.
[RTC] Seems reasonable. We’ll add this as well. Let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Thanks!

Martin, Chen
IOTG, Software Engineer
021-61164330

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20201210/c490d609/attachment-0001.html>