[Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_master_master - Build # 408 - Failure!

Wed Feb 5 17:39:58 UTC 2020

A review is posted in starlingx/integ to resolve this build issue:
https://review.opendev.org/706009

From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney at windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2020 11:28 AM
To: Little, Scott; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_master_master - Build # 408 - Failure!

I’ve verified this fix and will post a review shortly.

·         cleaned containerd and rpm from workspace

·         attempt to build just containerd fails, reproducing CENGN failure

·         update spec with new BuildRequires

·         attempt to build just containerd fails, due to failure to meet BuildRequires

·         attempt to build both rpm and containerd succeeds

From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney at windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2020 11:13 AM
To: Little, Scott; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_master_master - Build # 408 - Failure!

I’ve been able to reproduce the failure, so I’ll try this fix

From: Little, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2020 10:50 AM
To: Penney, Don; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_master_master - Build # 408 - Failure!

Comparing installed_pkgs.log between success and failure cases, I note that the failed build was using the stock CentOS rpm, while the success case used rpm-4.14.0-1.tis.1.

I think we should try adding...

    BuildRequires:    rpm-devel >= 4.14.0
    BuildRequires:    rpm-libs >= 4.14.0

... to the containerd spec.

This should induce an upgrade to the newer rpm.

On 2020-02-05 10:42 a.m., Penney, Don wrote:
I don’t see any recent updates that would point to this, but I’m trying a build of my own to see if I can reproduce this failure.

From: Scott Little [mailto:scott.little at windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2020 10:25 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_master_master - Build # 408 - Failure!

Failed to build containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.src.rpm

+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz --dwz-low-mem-die-limit 10000000 --dwz-max-die-limit 110000000 /builddir/build/BUILD/src

extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/runc

extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/crictl

*** ERROR: No build ID note found in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/crictl

Previous build success looked like this ... note the extra arguments ...

+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh -j24 --strict-build-id -m --build-id-seed 1.3.0-1.tis --unique-debug-suffix -1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64 --unique-debug-src-base containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64 --run-dwz --dwz-low-mem-die-limit 10000000 --dwz-max-die-limit 110000000 /builddir/build/BUILD/src

extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/crictl

extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/runc

*** ERROR: No build ID note found in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/crictl

readelf: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/runc-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64.debug: Error: the dynamic segment offset + size exceeds the size of the file

/usr/lib/rpm/sepdebugcrcfix: Updated 0 CRC32s, 1 CRC32s did match.

+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot

+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress

+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip

+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile /usr/bin/python 1

+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink

+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars

Processing files: containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64

warning: Missing build-id in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/containerd-shim

warning: Missing build-id in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/containerd-shim-runc-v1

warning: Missing build-id in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/containerd-shim-runc-v2

warning: Missing build-id in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64/usr/bin/crictl

Provides: containerd containerd = 1.3.0-1.tis containerd(x86-64) = 1.3.0-1.tis containerd.io runc

Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1

Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) libseccomp.so.2()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)

Processing files: containerd-debuginfo-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64

Provides: containerd-debuginfo = 1.3.0-1.tis containerd-debuginfo(x86-64) = 1.3.0-1.tis

Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1

Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64

Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/containerd-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64.rpm

Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/containerd-debuginfo-1.3.0-1.tis.x86_64.rpm

There is nothing obvious in the change log.  Looking for something environmental...

Scott

On 2020-02-04 11:58 p.m., build.starlingx at gmail.com<mailto:build.starlingx at gmail.com> wrote:

Project: STX_build_master_master

Build #: 408

Status: Failure

Timestamp: 20200205T023000Z

Check logs at:

http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20200205T023000Z/logs

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Parameters

BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false

BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false

_______________________________________________

Starlingx-discuss mailing list

Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>

http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20200205/f1c43cec/attachment-0001.html>