[Starlingx-discuss] the way to enable swift in starlingx
von Hoesslin, Volker
Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de
Fri Feb 7 12:46:03 UTC 2020
After some research i have checked the stx-openstack.yaml and checkout the chart-url:
http://172.17.0.1/helm_charts/starlingx/ceph-rgw-0.1.0.tgz
so i curl this endpoint and got an 404 ... so i tried an controller swact... re-apply stx-openstack on controller-1 and it seems running now...
$ system application-list
+---------------------+---------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------+----------+----------------------------------------------+
| application | version | manifest name | manifest file | status | progress |
+---------------------+---------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------+----------+----------------------------------------------+
| platform-integ-apps | 1.0-8 | platform-integration-manifest | manifest.yaml | applied | completed |
| stx-openstack | 1.0-19-centos-stable-latest | armada-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | applying | processing chart: osh-openstack-cinder, overall completion: 36.0% |
+---------------------+---------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------+----------+----------------------------------------------+
--- after some minutes...
After time its stopped with a failure... i have checked the logs and got the info that the script is waiting for an evicted cinder-volume pod, i think evicted pods should be skipped on script? So i delete this old pod and re-apply the stx-openstack... for now ist running...
--- after some minutes
Applying is still stopped at 71% on waitung on evicted horizon-pods... after delete all evicted pods, the script is finished successed...
So, i tried to use the OS-horizon gui to checkout the new options: Object Storage -> containers ... if i click on this section i got some access-denied toasts and my current user (admin) is logged off... how can i handle this and define the nessesary roles/groups to access this section?
Greez & thx, volker...
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Chen, Haochuan Z <haochuan.z.chen at intel.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Februar 2020 12:38
An: von Hoesslin, Volker <Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>; 'ji at sibyl.li' <ji at sibyl.li>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>; Hu, Yong <yong.hu at intel.com>
Betreff: [URL wurde verändert] Re: [Starlingx-discuss] the way to enable swift in starlingx
Externe E-Mail! Öffnen Sie nur Links oder Anhänge von vertrauenswürdigen Absendern!
You can save all the log, with command collect, and submit a launchpad issue with log attached.
$ collect
http://Achtung/https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+filebug
Thanks!
Martin, Chen
IOTG, Software Engineer
021-61164330
-----Original Message-----
From: von Hoesslin, Volker <Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 7:10 PM
To: Chen, Haochuan Z <haochuan.z.chen at intel.com>; 'ji at sibyl.li' <ji at sibyl.li>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>; Hu, Yong <yong.hu at intel.com>
Subject: AW: the way to enable swift in starlingx
Hi, my setup: STX 3 (2x controller, 2x worker, 3x storage). STX-OpenStack (1.0-19-centos-stable-latest) is currently successfully installed/running... So i try to enable the swift/radosgw, but it fails:
controller-0:~$ source /etc/platform/openrc
[sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system service-parameter-modify radosgw config service_enabled=true
+-------------+--------------------------------------+
| Property | Value |
+-------------+--------------------------------------+
| uuid | 11edb3d5-ac8f-4510-950e-cccbf6da4aad |
| service | radosgw |
| section | config |
| name | service_enabled |
| value | true |
| personality | None |
| resource | None |
+-------------+--------------------------------------+
[sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system service-parameter-apply radosgw Applying radosgw service parameters
[sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system helm-chart-attribute-modify stx-openstack ceph-rgw openstack --enabled=true
+------------+--------------------+
| Property | Value |
+------------+--------------------+
| attributes | {u'enabled': True} |
| name | ceph-rgw |
| namespace | openstack |
+------------+--------------------+
[sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-apply stx-openstack
+---------------+----------------------------------+
| Property | Value |
+---------------+----------------------------------+
| active | True |
| app_version | 1.0-19-centos-stable-latest |
| created_at | 2020-01-23T12:21:23.423993+00:00 |
| manifest_file | stx-openstack.yaml |
| manifest_name | armada-manifest |
| name | stx-openstack |
| progress | None |
| status | applying |
| updated_at | 2020-01-23T12:52:39.080423+00:00 |
+---------------+----------------------------------+
Please use 'system application-list' or 'system application-show stx-openstack' to view the current progress.
[sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list
+---------------------+---------------------------+-------------------------------+--------------------+--------------+-------------------------------------+
| application | version | manifest name | manifest file | status | progress |
+---------------------+---------------------------+-------------------------------+--------------------+--------------+-------------------------------------+
| platform-integ-apps | 1.0-8 | platform-integration-manifest | manifest.yaml | applied | completed |
| stx-openstack | 1.0-19-centos-stable-latest | armada-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | apply-failed | (0) Reason: SSLError [Errno 2] No such file or directory |
+---------------------+---------------------------+-------------------------------+--------------------+--------------+-------------------------------------+
Is there are any other steps to get this running on STX3 and stx-openstack 1.0-19-centos-stable-latest ?
Greez & thx, volker...
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Chen, Haochuan Z <haochuan.z.chen at intel.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Dezember 2019 05:53
An: von Hoesslin, Volker <Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>; 'ji at sibyl.li' <ji at sibyl.li>
Cc: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>; Hu, Yong <yong.hu at intel.com>
Betreff: the way to enable swift in starlingx
Hi
system application-upload <openstack application tarball>
system service-parameter-modify radosgw config service_enabled=true
system service-parameter-apply radosgw
system helm-chart-attribute-modify stx-openstack ceph-rgw openstack --enabled=true
system application-apply stx-openstack
openstack endpoint list | grep object
BR!
-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Haochuan Z
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 10:12 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Cc: Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de; ji at sibyl.li
Subject: swift enabling
Hi
I find there is voice to enable swift, why it was removed?
Thanks!
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:53:31 -0600
From: joji vlogs <ji at sibyl.li>
To: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Enabling Object Storage
Message-ID:
<CAHQOA=hsC+wQf+MOVLx6iPziPBvmqtbJJ4saogGqgTnb4byB_g at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi all,
I recently did a test deployment based on a 2+2+2 setup with one minor difference being I only have one storage server on hand.
My question is how would I go about enabling object storage? I saw a reference to it in the helm charts and attempted to set an override but the APIs would not be listening for requests and a "unable to get swift service info" error.
Thank you and have a great day!
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:14:15 +0000
From: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>
To: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] STX 2.0: swift?
Message-ID: <DB39DAB5F762704A93D316F9CE7D021E42929584 at emilio.sis.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
hi,
how can i add the object storage (swift) feature to my current STX2.0 openstack?
BR!
Martin, Chen
SSP, Software Engineer
021-61164330
-----Original Message-----
From: starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:05 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 18, Issue 150
Send Starlingx-discuss mailing list submissions to
starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io
You can reach the person managing the list at
starlingx-discuss-owner at lists.starlingx.io
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Starlingx-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: controller filesystem (Waines, Greg)
2. Enabling Object Storage (joji vlogs)
3. Re: <BLOCKING> StarlingX 2.0 Account Locked for User (Andy Ning)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:26:31 +0000
From: "Waines, Greg" <Greg.Waines at windriver.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>, "von Hoesslin, Volker"
<Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun at intel.com>,
"starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>, "Dale, Kristal"
<kristal.dale at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem
Message-ID: <B514CD7A-7A7F-4051-9A62-F62193853B41 at windriver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Actually a section on managing filesystems on the controllers is planned for STX 3.0 ... based on the proposed TOC for the new Operations Guide.
Greg
From: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
Date: Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM
To: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun at intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>, "Dale, Kristal" <kristal.dale at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem
Kristal:
We probably need a Story/Task added to the documentation to get the documentation of host-fs added in the right place. This helps with filesystem re-sizing.
Maybe it's already there.
Sau!
On 11/21/19 7:12 AM, von Hoesslin, Volker wrote:
incredible !!! thats the point i have search! big thx!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Von:* Sun, Austin [austin.sun at intel.com<mailto:austin.sun at intel.com>]
*Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 15:20
*An:* von Hoesslin, Volker; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
*Betreff:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem Hi Volker:
From the email chain,
http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-August/005656.html
You can probably the command line to change the size of docker lv Thanks.
BR
Austin Sun.
*From:* von Hoesslin, Volker <Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de<mailto:Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>>
*Sent:* Thursday, November 21, 2019 9:20 PM
*To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
*Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem hi, i trying to import some existing qcow2 images into my new installed STX 2.0.
openstack image create --file /media/foobar.qcow2 --private --unprotected --disk-format qcow2 "foobar"
all works fine, the image are available.
now, i'm trying to create an new volume based on this images. if the images are <=6GB all works fine, but some images are very huge
(10-200GB) and then it ends in an error. after some research i can see on controller the mount point
/dev/mapper/cgts--vg-docker--lv 30G 11G 20G 35% /var/lib/docker
increase the used storage. after fail "volume create" it goes back to given value 35%. in my oppinion, this mount point should resize to some value about 300-400GB, but how? in STX horizon backend
(http://Achtung/http://10.10.10.2:8080/admin/system_config/?tab=system_config_tab__storage_table)
there is an "docker-distribution", but no docker-mount-point itself?
btw, if i try to change the "docker-distribution" value to some other value (eg. 500GB via horizon backend), i got this error:
*Error: *backup size of 60 is insufficient for host controller-1.
Minimum backup size of 100 is required based upon glance size 20 and database size 20. Rejecting modification request.
- see attachment -
how can i increase the backup size to handle this error?!
greez & thx, volker...
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20191125/053843ae/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:53:31 -0600
From: joji vlogs <ji at sibyl.li>
To: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Enabling Object Storage
Message-ID:
<CAHQOA=hsC+wQf+MOVLx6iPziPBvmqtbJJ4saogGqgTnb4byB_g at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi all,
I recently did a test deployment based on a 2+2+2 setup with one minor difference being I only have one storage server on hand.
My question is how would I go about enabling object storage? I saw a reference to it in the helm charts and attempted to set an override but the APIs would not be listening for requests and a "unable to get swift service info" error.
Thank you and have a great day!
Austin Gillmann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20191125/7f40d408/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:05:19 -0500
From: Andy Ning <andy.ning at windriver.com>
To: <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] <BLOCKING> StarlingX 2.0 Account
Locked for User
Message-ID: <8f8e6cad-0ad7-4be4-6693-a25e6cec93ad at windriver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
On 2019-11-25 12:00 AM, Yong Hu wrote:
> Hi Anirudh,
>
> This issue is similar to this LP#1853017 [0], which was triggered the
> account locking if the password of Openstack user "admin" was changed.
> In this LP, for unknown reason, "registry-token-server" daemon kept
> accessing "keystone" on host (not the instance in containers) with
> obsolete token and led to "admin" account locked after 5 attempts.
>
If registry token server keeps on accessing keystone with obsolete token, this could be a bug in the token server. Normally if a keystone client get a failed authentication, it should try to retrieve a new token by using username/password.
Andy
> Right now, I am debugging this issue.
> Good thing is Cengn build 11/16 seemed not to have such a problem
> (LP#1853017).
>
> You might have a try with this version?
> BTW: which cengn build were you using?
>
>
> [0] http://Achtung/https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1853017
>
> regards,
> Yong
>
> On 2019/11/19 6:06 PM, Anirudh Gupta wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> I have installed StarlingX 2.0 Duplex Bare Metal.
>>
>> I am trying to create 2 VM’s and repeating this cycle a number of times.
>>
>> After using the setup for around half and hour, I am not longer able
>> to access the GUI.
>>
>> Ever though I type correct Username/Password, it gives an error of
>> Invalid Credentials.
>>
>> Then, I thought to use the CLI commands by following LOAD CLI section
>> given in link
>>
>> http://Achtung/https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r2_rel
>> ease/openstack/
>> access.html#local-cli
>>
>>
>> But with this also, I am facing the same error
>>
>> controller-0:~$ export OS_CLOUD=openstack_helm
>>
>> controller-0:~$ openstack endpoint list
>>
>> The account is locked for user: 230578cde382430a8adac399afab1230.
>> (HTTP 401) (Request-ID: req-6da6d59a-2edd-4f2b-a8bf-f13f2e423a77)
>>
>> Earlier this automatically started working after 5-7 mins.
>>
>> But this time, I am completely Blocked.
>>
>> I have also raised a bug regarding the same
>>
>> http://Achtung/https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1853093
>>
>> Please suggest some pointers, so that I can unblock and resume my
>> activities.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Anirudh Gupta
>>
>> DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and all of its contents, contains
>> information which is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected
>> from disclosure. The information contained in this electronic mail
>> transmission is intended for use only by the individual or entity to
>> which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or may
>> have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please
>> notify the sender immediately and delete / destroy all copies of this
>> electronic mail transmission without disclosing, copying,
>> distributing, forwarding, printing or retaining any part of it.
>> Hughes Systique accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising
>> from the use of the information transmitted by this email including
>> damage from virus.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sta
>> rlingx-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/star
> lingx-discuss
--
Andy Ning
Cube: 3071
Tel: 613-9631408 (int: 4408)
Skype: andy.ning.wr
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
------------------------------
End of Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 18, Issue 150
**************************************************
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://Achtung/http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list