[Starlingx-discuss] 回复: PBR Status Check

wesley.yang at jitstack.com wesley.yang at jitstack.com
Tue Feb 4 08:27:37 UTC 2020


Hi Saul
I'm working at home remotely at home for the Government's restriction, my colleagues are also working remotely or still on vacation.
You may see that my colleagues Yakun has just sent the preliminary result to you, and he will do some more test and update later.

Wesley

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> 
发送时间: 2020年2月4日 8:54
收件人: wesley.yang at jitstack.com; daniels.cai at jitstack.com; Yang, Bin <bin.yang at intel.com>
抄送: Hu, Yong <yong.hu at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
主题: Re: PBR Status Check

Hi Wesley,

Following up on this, I am not sure what your working status is because of the Virus and various Gov't restrictions.  If you are working, can you give us an update on the Performance impact question I listed below.

Thanks
   Sau!


On 1/22/20 10:14 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> 
> Hi All & Welcome Wesley,
> 
> We have a new community member from JitStack starting to look at the 
> PBR work, here is some background for him.
> 
> The PBR work was proposed via the StarlingX Feature Specification 
> process, see the Flock Versioning specification [0], this is based on 
> the OpenStack Python Build Reasonableness [1] and Semantic Versioning
> (SemVer) [2] definition.
> 
> One of the issues that we are trying to resolve is the impact of the 
> proposed change from Bin Yang to the time it takes to build a single 
> package with PBR before and after the change. Ideally this would be 
> done multiple times and provide the average along with the deviation.
> This in an important part of the project in order for us to move forward.
> 
> Look forward to working with you.
> 
> Sau!
> 
> [0]
> https://docs.starlingx.io/specs/specs/stx-3.0/approved/standardize_flo
> ck_versioning.html
> 
> [1] https://docs.openstack.org/pbr/latest/
> [2] https://docs.openstack.org/pbr/latest/user/semver.html

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: <shangyakun at jitstack.com>
Subject: Re: Testing performance impact of PBR
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 16:15:53 +0800
Size: 21362
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20200204/8214cd22/attachment.mht>


More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list