[Starlingx-discuss] starlingx Standard deployment with one controller

Waines, Greg Greg.Waines at windriver.com
Fri Nov 6 12:27:33 UTC 2020

Not really ... .

I mean you could just configure 1x controller in a standard configuration ... and you could even suppress the alarms related to the second controller missing ...

BUT you would not be able to make any post-install configuration changes to the controller that requires the controller to be locked, because the system will not allow you to lock the last controller in a system configuration ( ... suspect it won’t even allow you to force lock it ...).

AND you would not be able to apply a ‘reboot-required’ patch or upgrade with a single controller in standard configuration.

... so not really.


From: "Rai, Ankush" <Ankush.Rai at commscope.com>
Date: Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 10:07 AM
To: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] starlingx Standard deployment with one controller

[Please note this e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]

I understand that we should have the high-availability for the controller in the real edge-deployment, but just wanted to check the possibility of having only one controller in “bare metal Standard with Controller Storage” deployment?
Is this kind of deployment possible and what all changes we need to have for single controller deployment?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20201106/a65d324d/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list