[Starlingx-discuss] Cilium over Calico
bnovickovs at weecodelab.com
bnovickovs at weecodelab.com
Tue Nov 10 21:21:12 UTC 2020
There is new Cilium version which has VM support:
https://cilium.io/blog/2020/11/10/cilium-19
On 2020-10-20 06:52, Wang, Yi C wrote:
> Technically, I think it is doable. But for the time being, I guess
> there is no strong motivation to replace calico with cilium.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bnovickovs at weecodelab.com <bnovickovs at weecodelab.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 5:34 AM
> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Cilium over Calico
>
> On 2020-10-14 22:21, bnovickovs at weecodelab.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am wondering, if there is possibility of using Cilium CNI instead of
>> Calico?
>>
>> According to this comparison
>> https://itnext.io/benchmark-results-of-kubernetes-network-plugins-cni-
>> over-10gbit-s-network-updated-august-2020-6e1b757b9e49
>> ; Calico is still better in terms of performance/resource consumption.
>> However, if we consider production-grade bare metal k8s cluster,
>> Cilium offers:
>> - better visibility/observation
>> - encryption
>> - and it seems like comparing to Calico, Cilium project seems to be
>> more active.
>>
>> Thank you
>
> Forgot to mention Hubble https://github.com/cilium/hubble
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list