[Starlingx-discuss] Status of f/centos8 pending reviews

[Saul Wold]

Scott,

Thanks for starting to take a work on this.

I am taking a look at this, will this make merging master with the 
existing f/centos8 branches harder or easier?

Should we do the merge of master first and then make the changes and 
merge again?  I know we are going to have do more merges to keep 
f/centos8 current with master.

Thanks for the support!

Sau!


On 11/13/20 10:31 AM, Scott Little wrote:
> I have posted two updates for review that introduce into the master 
> branch build tool changes to support a Centos8 build environment.  This 
> only covers generate-centos-repo.sh, build-pkgs and build-iso.
> 
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762701/
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762700/
> 
> I have not yet defined the Centos8 Docker file.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> On 2020-11-10 12:01 a.m., Saul Wold wrote:
>> Oops, /me forgot to add the discuss list!
>>
>> Sau!
>>
>> On 11/9/20 5:27 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>
>>> Cores & Centos8 Team members
>>>
>>> There are many pending f/centos8 patches pending review  [0] still, 
>>> some as old as mid-May!
>>>
>>> We we start to spin this work up again, I have already put out a 
>>> request from the original community team to do the initial rebase, 
>>> but we also need to understand why some of these pending reviews have 
>>> not been merged.  Should they be merged before the rebase or after?
>>>
>>> Many of these have at least 1 +2 and need a second +2 and +W. I have 
>>> CC'ed the cores of the STX-Upstream Project where many of these are 
>>> pending in.
>>>
>>> Please take some time to review these.
>>>
>>> [0] 
>>> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/projects:starlingx/+AND+topic:centos8+AND+status:open 
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>    Sau!
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

-- 
Sau!