[Starlingx-discuss] [centos8] build-pkgs failed to build on f/centos8 branch: No matching package to install: 'chartmuseum'

Bai, Haiqing Haiqing.Bai at windriver.com
Thu Nov 19 07:16:24 UTC 2020


Build-pkgs on f/centos8 branch has below issue for some "helm" packages:

DEBUG util.py:634:  Ignoring repositories: local-installer
DEBUG util.py:634:  No matching package to install: 'chartmuseum'
DEBUG util.py:634:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:634:  Error: Some packages could not be found.
DEBUG util.py:787:  Child return code was: 1
DEBUG util.py:359:  kill orphans

Talked this issue with Fuyong,   actually chartmuseum is built from chartmuseum-v0.12.0-amd64,
to fix this issue, the below commit on "master" must be cherry-picked:
=======starlingx/tools=====================================
commit 572ffec838388bd603b059324ef468dc859f1b6f
Author: Jim Gauld <james.gauld at windriver.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 2 12:04:04 2020 -0400

    Special handling of chartmuseum binary download

    This enables chartmuseum binary v0.12.0 as a download target
    instead of expecting a tarball. This is looking for the specific
    tarball-dl.lst entry !chartmuseum-v0.12.0-amd64 .

    The chartmuseum binary is required to build helm charts.

    Change-Id: Iae7f3543313894310c85f6c55bb6d8f58cfb71ae
    Story: 2007000
    Task: 38893
Signed-off-by: Jim Gauld <james.gauld at windriver.com>

=====starlingx/integ========================================
commit 0cdd4acac8f6f9e596a9d3c8c65a01d956b65d61
Author: Jim Gauld <james.gauld at windriver.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 2 16:48:15 2020 -0400

    Add helm v3, chartmuseum, and armada tarballs

    This includes download tarballs required to support Helm v3
    and containerized armada:
    - armada
    - helm v3.2.0
    - chartmuseum 0.12.0, and binary

    The helm 2.13.1 version is to be removed in a subsequent commit.

    Depends-On: https://review.opendev.org/732731
    Change-Id: I3b694c4b2421ed00cb95ea01e4a79bf7c633678b
    Story: 2007000
    Task: 38893
Signed-off-by: Jim Gauld james.gauld at windriver.com<mailto:james.gauld at windriver.com>

It seems this case is very typical  to show the  importance of rebasing "f/centos8",  to avoid
much double effort on the same issue.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20201119/19cdc469/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list