[Starlingx-discuss] Distruted StarlingX 4.0 - Worker nodes not booting up

[Sriram]

Hi,

I'm using rel-20.06 software of starlingX-4.0. Initial connection happens
to pxe server on controller-0. I do see some packets between worker node
and controller-0. Below tcpdump shows those packets

[root at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]# tcpdump -i any port 69 or port 53 or
> port 67 -nn
> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
> listening on any, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size 262144
> bytes
> 10:42:58.263992 ethertype IPv4, IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67:
> BOOTP/DHCP, Request from f0:d4:e2:e9:8e:c4, length 548
> 10:42:58.263992 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request
> from f0:d4:e2:e9:8e:c4, length 548
> 10:42:58.264290 IP 192.168.22.102.67 > 255.255.255.255.68: BOOTP/DHCP,
> Reply, length 305
> 10:42:58.264299 ethertype IPv4, IP 192.168.22.102.67 > 255.255.255.255.68:
> BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 305
> 10:43:02.301357 ethertype IPv4, IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67:
> BOOTP/DHCP, Request from f0:d4:e2:e9:8e:c4, length 548
> 10:43:02.301357 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request
> from f0:d4:e2:e9:8e:c4, length 548
> 10:43:02.310717 IP 192.168.22.102.67 > 255.255.255.255.68: BOOTP/DHCP,
> Reply, length 305
> 10:43:02.310725 ethertype IPv4, IP 192.168.22.102.67 > 255.255.255.255.68:
> BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 305
> 10:43:02.311555 ethertype IPv4, IP 169.254.202.138.2070 >
> 169.254.202.1.69:  27 RRQ "pxelinux.0" octet tsize 0
> 10:43:02.311555 IP 169.254.202.138.2070 > 169.254.202.1.69:  27 RRQ
> "pxelinux.0" octet tsize 0
> 10:43:02.311927 ethertype IPv4, IP 169.254.202.138.2071 >
> 169.254.202.1.69:  32 RRQ "pxelinux.0" octet blksize 1456
> 10:43:02.311927 IP 169.254.202.138.2071 > 169.254.202.1.69:  32 RRQ
> "pxelinux.0" octet blksize 1456
> 10:43:02.358861 ethertype IPv4, IP 169.254.202.138.49152 >
> 169.254.202.1.69:  79 RRQ
> "pxelinux.cfg/44454c4c-4800-104c-8034-cac04f473333" octet tsize 0 blksize
> 1408
> ..................
>
>
>
> *10:43:40.347690 ethertype IPv4, IP 169.254.202.138.49156 >
> 169.254.202.1.69:  57 RRQ "rel-20.06/installer-bzImage" octet tsize 0
> blksize 140810:43:40.347690 IP 169.254.202.138.49156 > 169.254.202.1.69:
>  57 RRQ "rel-20.06/installer-bzImage" octet tsize 0 blksize
> 140810:43:41.035183 ethertype IPv4, IP 169.254.202.138.49157 >
> 169.254.202.1.69:  56 RRQ "rel-20.06/installer-initrd" octet tsize 0
> blksize 140810:43:41.035183 IP 169.254.202.138.49157 > 169.254.202.1.69:
>  56 RRQ "rel-20.06/installer-initrd" octet tsize 0 blksize 1408*


169.254.202.138  is the worker node ip and 169.254.202.1 is the
controller-0 ip. Above 4 are the last packets exchanged and after that no
communication is seen. Worker node does not proceed further in
installation.
Pxe network in the controller node is on vlan-143 and I have enabled the
same vlan in bios of the worker node.

Please let me know if any info is required.

Regards,
Sriram



On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 1:25 PM Sriram <sriram.ec at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to bring up the edge cloud with 3 nodes (1 controller and 2
> worker nodes) with starlingX 4.0 - distributed cloud.
> Central cloud is up and running with All in One Duplex 2 controller
> configuration.
>
> I was able to bring up the controller-0 in edge cloud using iso (virtual
> cd/dvd mount) and  was able to configure the personality for the other
> nodes as workers. But worker-0 and worker-1 are stuck in pxe boot for more
> than 2hrs. Any suggestions?
>
> In "Standard controller with storage" configuration, is having 2
> controllers compulsory ?
>
> https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/controller_storage.html
> This document says it supports 2 controllers and upto 10 worker nodes.
>
> Regards,
> Sriram
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20201002/9e6b87f3/attachment.html>