[Starlingx-discuss] Debranding reviews please

[Sun, Austin]

Done. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Selvaraj, Susendra <susendra.selvaraj at intel.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 8:28 PM
To: Selvaraj, Susendra <susendra.selvaraj at intel.com>; Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>; Hu, Yong <yong.hu at intel.com>; Sun, Austin <austin.sun at intel.com>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Debranding reviews please

Hi Yong, Austin, could you please review below patch for +2
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750042

regards,
Susendra.

-----Original Message-----
From: Selvaraj, Susendra <susendra.selvaraj at intel.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 1:31 PM
To: Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Debranding reviews please

Hi Scott, we could go ahead to merge patches for - Preparing the tool chain for the switch. 
Who could give +2 for below patches - 
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750467
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750042

Regards,
Susendra.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com> 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 2:05 AM
To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Debranding reviews please

I should have that for you tomorrow

Scott


On 2020-09-24 3:50 p.m., Jones, Bruce E wrote:
> Scott, thank you for driving this!
>
> Are there any updates needed to the documentation (starlingx/docs project) as a result of this change?
>
>        brucej
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 12:22 PM
> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Debranding reviews please
>
> I know the debranding topic still says 'wip' but the code is ready for review.
>
>
> Reviews in intended delivery order ...
>
>
> Preparing the tool chain for the switch ...
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750041
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750467
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750042
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749974
>
> Then as a set  ... rename cgcs-tis-repo to local-repo ...
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/687401
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749997
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/754129
>
> And the next set   ... rename cgcs-centos-repo to centos-repo
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/687403
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749998
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750043
>
> Finally
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/754130
>
>
> The full set for review is here:
>
> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:debrand_wip+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
>
>
> Thanks Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss



_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss