[Starlingx-discuss] Regarding stx-openstack aplication deployment in R4.0

[Liu, ZhipengS]

Hi Mahajan,

You should use the second one.

  1.  http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz
Thanks!
Zhipeng

From: Amit Mahajan <ebiibe82 at gmail.com>
Sent: 2020年9月7日 19:11
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Regarding stx-openstack aplication deployment in R4.0


Hi All,



We are deploying StarlingX R4.0 Duplex Bare metal mode.



While downloading stx-openstack applications manifests and helm-charts from the public domain (CENGN StarlingX mirror<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/>), we got to the “4.0.1” release folder. Exploring it further, we found that “stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz” was placed at following two locations.

  1.  http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/containers/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz
  2.  http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz

Both the “stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz” placed at above paths are different (checked md5 checksum). We explored a couple of charts (heat and neutron) inside these tgz files, but only difference was in requirement.lock and that too was only in the time of generation. However, plugins/k8sapp_openstack-1.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl seems different in both these files. Considering the plugin related differences, please suggest which one should be used for deploying the stx-openstack application.



Regards,

Amit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20200908/8cb280f6/attachment.html>