[Starlingx-discuss] Regarding stx-openstack aplication deployment in R4.0
Amit Mahajan
ebiibe82 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 8 05:06:32 UTC 2020
Hi Liu,
Thanks for the reply.
But what is the use of the application placed in the "containers" folder?
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:14 AM Liu, ZhipengS <zhipengs.liu at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Mahajan,
>
>
>
> You should use the second one.
>
> 1.
> http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/
> flock
> /outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz
> <http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Zhipeng
>
>
>
> *From:* Amit Mahajan <ebiibe82 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 2020年9月7日 19:11
> *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] Regarding stx-openstack aplication
> deployment in R4.0
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> We are deploying *StarlingX R4.0 Duplex Bare metal mode*.
>
>
>
> While downloading stx-openstack applications manifests and helm-charts
> from the public domain (CENGN StarlingX mirror
> <http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/>), we got to the
> “4.0.1” release folder. Exploring it further, we found that “stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz”
> was placed at following two locations.
>
> 1.
> http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/
> containers
> /outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz
> <http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/containers/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz>
> 2.
> http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/
> flock
> /outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz
> <http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz>
>
> Both the “stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz” placed at
> above paths are different (checked md5 checksum). We explored a couple of
> charts (heat and neutron) inside these tgz files, but only difference was
> in *requirement.lock *and that too was only in the time of generation.
> However, *plugins/k8sapp_openstack-1.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl *seems
> different in both these files. Considering the plugin related differences, please
> suggest which one should be used for deploying the stx-openstack
> application.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Amit
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20200908/f3dff34d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list