[Starlingx-discuss] Regarding first rc of StarlingX 6.0

[Khalil, Ghada]

Thanks for the update Alex.  Al Bailey is looking into the LP.

From: Dimofte, Alexandru <alexandru.dimofte at intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 3:51 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Regarding first rc of StarlingX 6.0

[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
Hi Ghada,

Yes, I sent this report a bit late because I triggered the sanity twice on the bare-metal configurations. All virtual configurations are green but in the same time,
all bare-metal configurations are failing at the provisioning step because the controller-0 availability is "degraded". I also observed this alarm:
"200.006 controller-0 is degraded due to the failure of its 'sw-patch-agent' process. Auto recovery of this major process is in progress.", so I opened the LP: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1955076<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/*bug/1955076__;Kw!!AjveYdw8EvQ!I7oUm87oL2rvpK8dQnB2L_uNDFzUz7qRvYXjurirrxvEKhTOHyFKq2oeDVQHcydyQQz7$>

Best regards,
Alex


From: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 9:55 PM
To: Dimofte, Alexandru <alexandru.dimofte at intel.com<mailto:alexandru.dimofte at intel.com>>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Regarding first rc of StarlingX 6.0

Hi Alex,
Any news on sanity with the stx.6.0 rc builds?  I saw a sanity from the main branch today, but not from the stx.6.0 branch yet.

Thanks,
Ghada

From: Dimofte, Alexandru <alexandru.dimofte at intel.com<mailto:alexandru.dimofte at intel.com>>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2021 10:16 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Regarding first rc of StarlingX 6.0

[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
Hello,

I observed that the first image of STX RC6.0 is ready on http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/flock/20211211T105745Z/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/flock/20211211T105745Z/__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!JZl-YGRHjTMtY_AlK_C35CWOOFKPD7zcFQLWhK9ODpF6kr56Exo7g80Wxojjul0wpbTc$>
The issue is that we don't have the helm-charts available for this image. In order to run sanity tests I need the helm-charts (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/flock/20211211T105745Z/outputs/helm-charts/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/flock/20211211T105745Z/outputs/helm-charts/__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!JZl-YGRHjTMtY_AlK_C35CWOOFKPD7zcFQLWhK9ODpF6kr56Exo7g80Wxojjuv98MDye$>).
So, I guess I need to wait for the next RC6.0 image...

Kind regards,
Alex

  [Logo    Description automatically generated]
Dimofte Alexandru
Software Engineer
PMCE TEAM
Personal Mobile: +40 743167456
alexandru.dimofte at intel.com<mailto:alexandru.dimofte at intel.com>
Str. Iancu Fotea nr. 38, mun. Galati, jud. Galati, 800017, ROMANIA
Intel Romania


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20211216/28302bf3/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4767 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20211216/28302bf3/attachment-0001.png>