[Starlingx-discuss] [Query] StarlingX 4.0 - Storage Network separate from MGMT+Cluster in Bare Metal Standard with Dedicated Storage Model

[Anirudh Gupta]

Hi Team,

Can someone help me in regard to the below mail shared.

*Query: *Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from
mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through
that network

Regards
Anirudh Gupta

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 7:41 PM Anirudh Gupta <anyrude10 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> I am trying to set up a Bare metal Standard with Dedicated Storage
> Installation R4.0
> <https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedicated_storage.html> with
> 2 Controllers, 2 Storage Nodes and 2 Worker Nodes.
>
>
> https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedicated_storage.html
>
>
>
> [image: image.png]
>
>
>
>  As per the Network Diagram, storage nodes are connected to MGMT + Cluster
> Networks and all the traffic flows through this network only.
>
>
> https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedicated_storage_install_kubernetes.html#configure-storage-nodes
>
>
> Even the document suggests to assign the cluster-host network to the MGMT
> interface for the storage nodes
>
> system interface-network-assign $NODE mgmt0 cluster-host
>
>
> Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from
> mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only
> through that network
>
> Looking forward for your response.
>
> Regards
> Anirudh Gupta
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20210113/d326afca/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 106914 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20210113/d326afca/attachment-0001.png>