[Starlingx-discuss] Sanity RC 5.0 Test LAYERED build ISO 20210519T010439Z

Dimofte, Alexandru alexandru.dimofte at intel.com
Fri May 21 15:30:08 UTC 2021


Hi Frank,

Thank you for the hint. Your assumption was right! There was a wrong bios boot order.

BR,
Alex

From: Miller, Frank <Frank.Miller at windriver.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:03 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>; Sun, Austin <austin.sun at intel.com>; Dimofte, Alexandru <alexandru.dimofte at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Little, Scott <Scott.Little at windriver.com>; Panech, Davlet <Davlet.Panech at windriver.com>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity RC 5.0 Test LAYERED build ISO 20210519T010439Z

For #1 I suggest you check if controller-1 is booting from disk instead of installing from controller-1 - might be a BIOS boot order issue?

For #2, is the rabbitmq pod creating 750 processes?  That's surprising but as we just use the rabbitmq software from the OpenStack project I suspect Austin you do not know.  In order to determine a more appropriate number someone needs to see how many pids are used by the rabbitmq process. Can you check the pod Austin and determine this number? Then normal practice would be to double this number at a minimum.  Also the commit you reference is not in the r/stx.5.0 branch so why is this showing up in r/stx.5.0 sanity? Is this a result of controller-1 not running the right load? Was the rabbitmq pod being launched on controller-1?

Frank

From: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 2:54 PM
To: Sun, Austin <austin.sun at intel.com<mailto:austin.sun at intel.com>>; Dimofte, Alexandru <alexandru.dimofte at intel.com<mailto:alexandru.dimofte at intel.com>>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>; Miller, Frank <Frank.Miller at windriver.com<mailto:Frank.Miller at windriver.com>>; Little, Scott <Scott.Little at windriver.com<mailto:Scott.Little at windriver.com>>; Panech, Davlet <Davlet.Panech at windriver.com<mailto:Davlet.Panech at windriver.com>>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity RC 5.0 Test LAYERED build ISO 20210519T010439Z

If each controller is running a different load, then this would be a lab setup issue. @Dimofte, Alexandru<mailto:alexandru.dimofte at intel.com> can you please investigate this?

We will wait for the resolution of this issue before declaring the 5.0 release as ready.

Thanks,
Ghada

From: Sun, Austin <austin.sun at intel.com<mailto:austin.sun at intel.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 10:14 PM
To: Dimofte, Alexandru <alexandru.dimofte at intel.com<mailto:alexandru.dimofte at intel.com>>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>; Miller, Frank <Frank.Miller at windriver.com<mailto:Frank.Miller at windriver.com>>; Little, Scott <Scott.Little at windriver.com<mailto:Scott.Little at windriver.com>>; Panech, Davlet <Davlet.Panech at windriver.com<mailto:Davlet.Panech at windriver.com>>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity RC 5.0 Test LAYERED build ISO 20210519T010439Z

[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
Hi All:
Some Investigation found on LP #1928949:
1) Not sure why controller-1 build info is master info. controller-0 is r/stx.5.0 , "20210519T042950Z" .
     Is it possible ?  @Miller, Frank<mailto:Frank.Miller at windriver.com> , @Little, Scott<mailto:Scott.Little at windriver.com> @Panech, Davlet<mailto:Davlet.Panech at windriver.com>:  could this happen possibly  ?  or setup issue ?
2)  This issue is because rabbitmq pod running on controller-1 fail.
     + exec rabbitmq-server
Failed to create thread: Resource temporarily unavailable (11)
    Once changes,  --pod-max-pids 750 to --pod-max-pids 2000 in /etc/sysconfig/kubelet on controller-1 .   reapply openstack the rabbitmq pod running on controller-1 successfully .
    This change is related w/ [1]  merged on 0518
     maybe need increase some value for pid limited ,  the question is what value should be appropriate.

[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/stx-puppet/+/791267/3/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/stx-puppet/*/791267/3/__;Kw!!AjveYdw8EvQ!O0bB7OtiCCPZIDipG-T_lalpmSeoNwF_PwryeAYLmGdp0heiK3ZEgweneLoTLtcRIzyc$>

Thanks.
BR
Austin Sun.

From: Dimofte, Alexandru <alexandru.dimofte at intel.com<mailto:alexandru.dimofte at intel.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 10:52 PM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity RC 5.0 Test LAYERED build ISO 20210519T010439Z

Sanity Test from 2021-May-19 (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/5.0/centos/flock/20210519T010439Z/outputs/iso/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/5.0/centos/flock/20210519T010439Z/outputs/iso/__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!O0bB7OtiCCPZIDipG-T_lalpmSeoNwF_PwryeAYLmGdp0heiK3ZEgweneLoTLri9xlkK$>)

Status: RED

This might be related to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1928949<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/*bug/1928949__;Kw!!AjveYdw8EvQ!O0bB7OtiCCPZIDipG-T_lalpmSeoNwF_PwryeAYLmGdp0heiK3ZEgweneLoTLoaBS07J$>  - stx-openstack apply-failed because of osh-openstack-rabbitmq install issue

Helm-Chart used: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/5.0/centos/flock/20210519T010439Z/outputs/helm-charts/helm-charts-stx-openstack-centos-stable-versioned.tgz<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/5.0/centos/flock/20210519T010439Z/outputs/helm-charts/helm-charts-stx-openstack-centos-stable-versioned.tgz__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!O0bB7OtiCCPZIDipG-T_lalpmSeoNwF_PwryeAYLmGdp0heiK3ZEgweneLoTLryQ0UxK$>

Regards,
Alexandru Dimofte

  [Logo    Description automatically generated]
Dimofte Alexandru
Software Engineer
STARLINGX TEAM
Skype no: +40 336403734
Personal Mobile: +40 743167456
alexandru.dimofte at intel.com<mailto:alexandru.dimofte at intel.com>
Intel Romania


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20210521/1ba2f03a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5624 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20210521/1ba2f03a/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list