From ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com Tue Nov 1 12:58:08 2022 From: ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com (Cervi, Thales Elero) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:58:08 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] openstack charts for debian 8? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi. Unfortunately, there are not. I mean, the charts are packaged and could be deployed through Kubernetes on CentOS or Debian hosts, but for the openstack app to be completely applied and be entirely functional we still need to port the host virtualization packages to Debian (i.e. libvirt and qemu). This is something that is currently being worked on and is on our roadmap for stx/8.0 In case you are interested, you can follow the https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010317? and as soon as all tasks are merged, a first development version would be ready for exploratory tests (not officially released and supported yet though). Hope this clarifies your question. Regards, Thales ________________________________ From: Outback Dingo Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 10:10 AM To: Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] openstack charts for debian 8? [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi are there any charts yet for openstack for the debian builds pre-8 yet ??? Thanks _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From openinfradn at gmail.com Tue Nov 1 14:33:12 2022 From: openinfradn at gmail.com (open infra) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 20:03:12 +0530 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Virtio-forwarder with StarlingX Message-ID: Hi, Is it possible to use Virtio-forwarder with StarlingX? Regards Danishka -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Tue Nov 1 17:02:52 2022 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 17:02:52 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20221028T060000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2022-November 1st. (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20221028T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Tue Nov 1 18:15:41 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 18:15:41 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails In-Reply-To: <1666223473424.2931194307.2848983426@optimcloud.com> References: <1666223473424.2931194307.2848983426@optimcloud.com> Message-ID: Good Afternoon. I added a new comment to the LP, we tested an install in a DX machine with STX 7.0 + STX-Openstack, using the mirrors provided: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/flock/outputs/ and http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-205-centos-stable-versioned.tgz and it applied successfully, so the BUG was not reproduced. Regards Gabriel ________________________________ From: Embedded Devel Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 8:51 PM To: Calixto de Paula, Gabriel ; Outback Dingo Cc: Cervi, Thales Elero ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] launchpad report filed. stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails Edit Bug #1993593 On Tuesday 18 October 2022 07:07:32 PM (+07:00), Calixto de Paula, Gabriel wrote: Good morning, Thanks for the logs and the alarm-list, did you raise an Launchpad also? There it'll be easier for us to investigate ? Regards Gabriel ________________________________ From: Outback Dingo Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 5:31 PM To: Calixto de Paula, Gabriel Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] We are looking into the alarm. sysinv.log is attached. [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ fm alarm-list +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ | Alarm ID | Reason Text | Entity ID | Severity | Time Stamp | +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ | 200.004 | controller-0 experienced a service-affecting failure. Auto-recovery in | host=controller-0 | critical | 2022-10-14T20: | | | progress. Manual Lock and Unlock may be required if auto-recovery is | | | 14:55.375316 | | | unsuccessful. | | | | | | | | | | +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:12 PM Calixto de Paula, Gabriel wrote: > > Hi, > We ran some sanity tests on Sep-5th-2022 using the latest build on stx rc 7.0(http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/flock/latest_build/), with no issues applying stx-openstack. > Can you give us more info (alarm-list and sysinv log for example)? > Also, can you raise a Launchpad with this info so that we can investigate? > > Regards > Gabriel > ________________________________ > From: Outback Dingo > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 5:38 PM > To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > tried to deploy openstack on stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' > done it before on 6.x, no issues, seems something broken > > document followed > https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r6_release/openstack/install.html > manifest used > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-205-centos-stable-versioned.tgz > > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > | application | version | manifest > name | manifest file | status | > progress | > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > | cert-manager | 1.0-37 | > cert-manager-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > applied | completed | > | nginx-ingress-controller | 1.1-38 | > nginx-ingress-controller-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > applied | completed | > | stx-openstack | 1.0-205-centos-stable- | > openstack-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | > uploaded | completed | > | | versioned | > | | | > | > | | | > | | | > | > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-apply > stx-openstack > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -- Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From starlingx.build at gmail.com Tue Nov 1 19:19:33 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:19:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 4285 - Failure! Message-ID: <223972803.6.1667330375229.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_repo_sync_layered Build #: 4285 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221101T191918Z Branch: r/stx.6.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221101T191910Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: r/stx.6.0 MANIFEST: compiler.xml PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221101T191910Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221101T191910Z/logs MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-6.0-compiler From starlingx.build at gmail.com Tue Nov 1 19:19:37 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:19:37 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_6.0_build_layer_compiler - Build # 16 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <1436077762.148.1667066432268.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1436077762.148.1667066432268.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1849218169.9.1667330378018.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_6.0_build_layer_compiler Build #: 16 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221101T191910Z Branch: r/stx.6.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221101T191910Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: true From starlingx.build at gmail.com Tue Nov 1 20:23:38 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 16:23:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_BUILD_container_setup_layered - Build # 3778 - Failure! Message-ID: <1816391070.13.1667334219889.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_BUILD_container_setup_layered Build #: 3778 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221101T195247Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221101T194826Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters PROJECT: rc-6.0-compiler MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/rc-6.0-compiler/20221101T194826Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-rc-6.0-compiler-20221101T194826Z-builder PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221101T194826Z/logs DOCKER_BUILD_TAG: rc-6.0-compiler-20221101T194826Z-builder-image PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221101T194826Z/logs LAYER: compiler MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-6.0-compiler From starlingx.build at gmail.com Tue Nov 1 20:23:49 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 16:23:49 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_6.0_build_layer_compiler - Build # 17 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <856095309.7.1667330375917.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <856095309.7.1667330375917.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1041918902.16.1667334230720.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_6.0_build_layer_compiler Build #: 17 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221101T194826Z Branch: r/stx.6.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221101T194826Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: true From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Tue Nov 1 21:09:41 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 14:09:41 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX TSC, PL, TL election - Nomination period started Message-ID: <5B778D13-C51E-4B2A-8629-638280C4BE6F@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, Nominations for the 3 Technical Steering Committee positions and all PL/TL positions are now open and will remain open until __November 08, 2022 20:45 UTC__. All nominations must be submitted as a text file to the starlingx/election repository as explained on the election website[1]. Please note that the name of the file should match the email address in your Gerrit configuration. Candidates for the Technical Steering Committee Positions: Any contributing community member who is an individual member of the Foundation can propose their candidacy for an available, directly-elected TSC seat. Candidates for the Project Lead Positions: Any contributing community member who is an individual member of the Foundation can propose their candidacy for the project PL seat. Candidates for the Technical Lead Positions: Any contributing community member who is an individual member of the Foundation and is a core reviewer to the given project can propose their candidacy for the project TL seat. The election will be held from November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC through to November 22, 2022 20:45 UTC. The electorate of the TSC election are the community members that are also contributors for one of the official teams[2] or served in a leadership role (TSC, PL, TL) over the 12-month timeframe October 31, 2021 to October 31, 2022, as well as the contributors who are acknowledged by the TSC. The electorate of the PL/TL election are the community members that are contributors for the given official team[2] over the 12-month timeframe October 31, 2021 to October 31, 2022, as well as the contributors who are acknowledged by the TSC. Please see the website[3] for additional details about this election. Please find below the timeline: TSC nomination starts @ November 1, 2022 20:45 UTC TSC nomination ends @ November 8, 2022 20:45 UTC PL/TL nomination starts @ November 1, 2022 20:45 UTC PL/TL nomination ends @ November 8, 2022 20:45 UTC TSC campaigning starts @ November 8, 2022 20:45 UTC TSC campaigning ends @ November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC TSC election starts @ November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC TSC election ends @ November 22, 2022 20:45 UTC PL/TL election starts @ November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC PL/TL election ends @ November 22, 2022 20:45 UTC If you have any questions please be sure to either ask them on the mailing list or to the elections officials[4]. Thank you, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/projects/index.html [3] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ [4] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From outbackdingo at gmail.com Wed Nov 2 01:36:18 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:36:18 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Scott V. Kamp candidacy for StarlingX TSC role Message-ID: Hello, My name is Scott Kamp, I am nominating myself for election to StarlingX TSC. I am an avid user and advocate of the StarlingX community over the past years. My goals for the StarlingX community is to bring StarlingX to a larger global user base. I am intent on growing the community and helping StarlingX become a more community friendly solution for users to realize its potential allowing for a more global footprint and adoption into many industries including IOT, Smart Home, and Telecomm. I intend to also enable the community to create reproducible builds and provide a upgrade path to current deployments moving forward, while also contributing features that I feel are required. This will allow more users to become involved, and more feedback will come to the community via the extended user base as it grows which makes StarlingX a more versatile, stable, scalable and more secure system. Thank you for considering me as a contributor to the TSC. From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Wed Nov 2 13:56:28 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 13:56:28 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-weekly StarlingX Release Meeting Message-ID: Updated meeting series for the StarlingX Release Meeting Starting from Nov 9, 2022 and meeting every other week. Bi-weekly meeting on Wednesday 06:30AM PT / 09:30AM ET / 02:30PM UTC Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236?pwd=N21CUXNXVlJXMlcyZjZ0SE96cVNjQT09 Meeting agenda/minutes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases Regards, Ghada -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2230 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Wed Nov 2 13:56:48 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 13:56:48 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Schedule change for the bi-weekly release & os-distro meetings Message-ID: Hello all, There is a change to the schedule for the Wednesday 6:30am Pacific / 9:30am Eastern StarlingX community meetings. This timeslot is using on alternative weeks for the StarlingX Release Meeting and the OS-Distro Subproject Meeting. Due to conflicts for the OS-Distro team, we will be switching the weeks around. The OS-Distro meeting will take place on Nov 2, Nov 16, Nov 30, ...etc. The Release meeting will take place on Nov 9, Nov 23, Dec 7, ...etc. Updated invites have been sent. Regards, Ghada -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at windriver.com Wed Nov 2 17:09:15 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 13:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Summary of the numerous build issues to strike CENGN in the past week Message-ID: It was a really bad week for build issues on CENGN.? Below I try to summarize the we've been working on. Scott PS: use a wide window to view! Branch OS Type Issue ====== == ==== ===== Master Centos Layered Build failures Oct 28-31 Issue: 'Repo' pulled down a non-backward compatible upgrade from upstream that breaks non-containerized uses of 'repo'. Fix: Updated the version of 'repo' on CENGN bare metal. Manual build successful: Oct 31 Master Centos Monolithic Build Failure Oct 29 Issue: Corruption of the jenkins build script. Cause of corruption unknown. Fix: Repaired build script and restarted jenkins Next build attempt Nov 5 Master Debian Monolithic Build Failures Oct 28-Nov 1 Issue 1: Attempt to optimize the 'publish packages' step had undetected bugs when merged Friday. Fix 1: corrected on path, and prevented script from throwing error when a grep fails to find a match. Benefit: 'publish packages' step takes minutes, not hours. Issue 2: STX_build_debian_master jenkins job was deleted. Unclear how/why but CENGN jenkins was very slow and acting strangely. Fix 2: restored STX_build_debian_master from git, but we've lost build history. Restarted Jenkins. Issue 3: Activation of 'reuse' accelerated package build, ~8 hrs -> ~2hrs. Works for ISO, but breaks container image build. Misunderstood the intent of one recent fix to this feature, thought it would address the container image build issues. Clearly it did not. Fix 3: Deactivated 'reuse' feature once again. Longer term, a LP will be raised vs docker images. Docker images need to pull debs from the aptly published repo, not the traditional repo. Issue 4: A jenkins job was create to test changes to jenkins pipeline scripts. That job had a name that was similar to but not identical to the main job. This exposed a defect in how minikube finds containers using fuzzy rather than exact matches. Cross-talk between main and dev minikube environments broke both builds. https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1995400 Fix 4: Quick fix was to change the dev build name to avoid the 'fuzzy' match, and to nuke/rebuild both correpted minikube environments. Longer term, we need to use exect matches within minikube. Success: Build with docker images, TIMESTAMP 20221102T060000Z, Available 20221102T160000Z stx.6.0 Centos Layered Build Failed Oct 29-Nov 1 Issue: The builder container can't build. pip install pulled in unconstrained packages that have dropped py2.7 compatibility. https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1995484 Fix: Add constraints to maintain py2.7 compatibility in the pip installed packages. https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/863265 Test build started stx.7.0 Centos Layered Build Failed Oct 30 Issue: Failed to build containers locationservice-base, notificationclient-base, notificationservice-base https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1995486 One candidate fix back-ported https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ptp-notification-armada-app/+/856185 Awaiting a free time slot for a trial build. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chris.friesen at windriver.com Wed Nov 2 21:14:45 2022 From: chris.friesen at windriver.com (Chris Friesen) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 15:14:45 -0600 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] K8s upgrade to 1.24 not quite functional yet Message-ID: <70b6ab9b-fe51-84bc-e84e-8c0f9dd19798@windriver.com> Hey all, Just a heads-up that there are some issues with K8s upgrades from 1.23 to 1.24. First, there's what appears to be a timing issue with orchestrated upgrades on AIO-SX, where puppet seems to be trying to update the bind mount before kubelet is stopped all the way. There are also some issues with preserving some of our modified kubelet options over the upgrade. So unless you have a really good reason to play with it, I suggest avoiding any K8s upgrades to 1.24 for now. Thanks, Chris Friesen From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Wed Nov 2 13:55:50 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 13:55:50 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-weekly StarlingX Release Meeting (new time) Message-ID: New meeting series has been sent to the stx-discuss mailing list. New meeting series for the StarlingX Release Meeting Bi-weekly meeting on Wednesday 06:30AM PT / 09:30AM ET / 02:30PM UTC Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236?pwd=N21CUXNXVlJXMlcyZjZ0SE96cVNjQT09 Meeting agenda/minutes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 3763 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Nov 3 02:06:40 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 19:06:40 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications - UPDATE In-Reply-To: References: <4DB4DFD4-3AB2-4EA8-956C-4297DA0B16B2@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Everyone, Based on the votes here I went ahead and created the new IRC channel for the Gerrit notifications. I already got the system configured and have the project channel available for conversations now. With that, that StarlingX project has two channel on the OFTC network now: #starlingx - channel for project and community related discussions #starlingx-gerritbot - channel to capture and highlight notifications from Gerrit about new and merged patches Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Ildik? > On Oct 24, 2022, at 05:54, Outback Dingo wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 7:27 PM Waines, Greg wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ildiko Vancsa >> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 5:38 PM >> To: StarlingX ML >> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications >> >> [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> I?m reaching out to you about a topic with regards to IRC that came up during the community building discussions at the recent PTG. >> >> Currently we have one IRC channel for project related conversations and information sharing on the OFTC network called #starlingx. We also have a few bots set up for this channel, one of which sends a notification to the channel whenever there is a new change that is proposed or get merged into any of the StarlingX repos. While it is a useful feature, it makes the project channel very noisy and makes it hard to maintain a conversation due to the high volume of Gerrit notifications. >> >> I would like to propose to create a new IRC channel for the Gerrit bot messages, to keep them available without flooding the project?s main IRC channel. We could call it #starlingx-gerrit. >> >> What do you all think? >> >> Thanks and Best Regards, >> Ildik? >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem >> Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Nov 3 02:34:48 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 19:34:48 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation From starlingx.build at gmail.com Thu Nov 3 04:22:48 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:22:48 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] STX_build_docker_flock_images - Build # 607 - Failure! Message-ID: <1161607200.22.1667449385158.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_flock_images Build #: 607 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221103T003510Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters WEB_HOST: mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/rc-6.0-containers/20221102T231513Z OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-6.0-containers/cgcs-root BASE_VERSION: rc-6.0-stable-20221102T231513Z PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/logs REGISTRY_USERID: slittlewrs LATEST_PREFIX: rc-6.0 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/logs PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221102T231513Z FLOCK_VERSION: rc-6.0-centos-stable-20221102T231513Z WEB_HOST_PORT: 80 PREFIX: rc-6.0 TIMESTAMP: 20221102T231513Z BUILD_STREAM: stable REGISTRY_ORG: starlingx PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/outputs REGISTRY: docker.io From starlingx.build at gmail.com Thu Nov 3 04:23:07 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:23:07 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_build_docker_images_layered - Build # 363 - Failure! Message-ID: <1677252192.25.1667449388137.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_images_layered Build #: 363 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221103T000026Z Branch: r/stx.6.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: r/stx.6.0 MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/rc-6.0-containers/20221102T231513Z OS: centos MUNGED_BRANCH: rc-6.0 MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-6.0-containers/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/logs MASTER_BUILD_NUMBER: 8 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_6.0_build_layer_containers MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-6.0-containers PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221102T231513Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-rc-6.0-containers-20221102T231513Z-builder TIMESTAMP: 20221102T231513Z OS_VERSION: 7.5.1804 BUILD_STREAM: stable PUBLISH_INPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/inputs LAYER: containers PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/outputs MAIN_HELM_CHART_RPM_NAME: stx-openstack-helm From starlingx.build at gmail.com Thu Nov 3 04:23:10 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:23:10 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_6.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 8 - Failure! Message-ID: <1353897082.28.1667449391040.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_6.0_build_layer_containers Build #: 8 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221102T231513Z Branch: r/stx.6.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/containers/20221102T231513Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true FORCE_BUILD: true From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Nov 3 11:46:29 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:46:29 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: My thoughts ... I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX For example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can pick 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. - Kuberenetes - OpenStack - Distributed Cloud - Standalone Clouds, - Deployment Configs * SX, * DX, * Standard), - Rook, - PTP, - N3000 Support, - ACC100 Support, - NVIDA GPU Support, - QAT Support, - OIDC authentication, - Vault, - Portieris, - Auditd, - Metrics Server, - SNMP, - Dedicated CPUs, - Isolated CPUs, - ISTIO, - Cert Manager, - Remote CLI Container, - Kata Containers, - RWO PVC, - RWX PVC, - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg and forwarding, bond), - vRAN Tools Container, - ... OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included in StarlingX Solution - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Nov 3 15:20:48 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] builds on r/stx.6.0 branch Message-ID: <3238f0cb-adcc-0ab5-656b-2517b89a0c71@windriver.com> For branch r/stx.6.0, we are now able to builds packages and iso again.?? Container builds are still having issues that we continue to investigate. Scott From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Nov 3 18:19:10 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 18:19:10 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Nov 2, 2022) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call November 2, 2022 Meeting is at 7pm PDT / 10pm EDT / +1 10am CST Standing topics - Build - Main Branch CentOS Builds - Several build failures this week. Issues are addressed. - Summary sent by ScottL: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013516.html - Main Branch Debian Builds - Several build failures this week. Majority of issues are addressed to re-enabled the builds. May need to re-work some of the short terms fixes. - Summary sent by ScottL: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013516.html - Debian Build Acceleration Feature - Code caused the Debian build issues. Fixes were merged. - The Acceleration feature is now functional for the ISO build, but not yet for container builds. - Weekly CentOS Builds for stx.6.0 & stx.7.0 - stx.6.0 - plan to build ISO only and no containers - stx.7.0 - plan to build both ISO and containers (since stx.8.0 is several months from being released) - Working through build issues. - stx.6.0 issue has been addressed. - stx.7.0 issue is still under investigation. - Sanity - CentOS Main Branch Sanity w/ stx-openstack - LP causing the last red sanity has been resolved as of Oct 27 - LP: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1993832 - No new sanity email sent since then - Rob will follow up to ensure the stx-openstack sanity is restarted. - stx-openstack sanity transition to Debian - Planned for the Dec time-frame - Email to the mailing list: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013487.html - Debian Main Branch Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Nov 1: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013506.html - Status: Green - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - Doc review from Ildiko: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/843349 - Request for Juanita to merge. - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - Upcoming Elections - Nomination period starts next week on Nov 1 for both TSC & PL/TL positions. - Nomination period ends on Nov 8 ARs from Previous Meetings - Action: Ghada to ask Frank about the latest in the plan to disable stx CentOS builds. This needs community communication via the mailing list. - Closed. Time-frame is Dec. Email to the mailing list: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013487.html - Action: Rob/Thales to discuss if stx-openstack CentOS can be stopped for the next 4-6wks if the builds are stopping. To make this decision, a community poll via the mailing list is needed. - Closed. stx-openstack sanity will continue on CentOS until it's ready to migrate to Debian in Dec. - Action: Ildiko to add Scott Kamp to the electoral as a contributor to the project. - Closed. ScottK has been added. Open Requests for Help - Virtio-forwarder with StarlingX - NEW - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013505.html - Action: ScottK to respond - stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails - Response sent to mailing list: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013507.html - Reported issue is not reproduced. - LP Reference: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1993593 - The reporter (ScottK) is in the process of rebuilding the server and retesting the stx-openstack install. - Consider this closed for now. - Rook Installation - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013404.html - Response sent to the mailing list: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013488.html - Summary: rook was not transitioned to FluxCD in stx.7.0. To use the armada version, need to configure the system w/ k8s 1.18 - Consider this closed - Enabling cpu_dedicated_set - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013382.html - Last Question posted in the thread: Is there a way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? - Pinged Chris Friesen, but no response From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Thu Nov 3 18:41:57 2022 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 18:41:57 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 02-11-22 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello all, Here are this week's docs team meeting minutes (short form). Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Wednesdays 12:30 PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 02-Nov-22 StarlingX 8.0 Release: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Doc Tasks created - Doc Team to ensure Stories/Tasks are added to the commit messages - Ongoing WIP - https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/index-install-e083ca818006.html - AR Ron to modify Page - DONE - 8.0 (Master) - To update Greg about the Installation Doc folders for Stx 6.0 / Stx 7.0 on master - DONE - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862705: Verified Hardware Updates - WIP - https://docs.starlingx.io/ Update Welcome Page for Stx 7.0, 6.0, Master - DONE - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/861367 Flatten TOC for better customer experience - AR Ron - O-RAN updates https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010278- Updates are available in: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862367 - Stx Doc team to review and provide comments - events.yaml - Automation of the events.yaml file in the docs - AR Juanita / Ron - WIP - GPU Operator Removal on WRO - To confirm with Douglas / Greg - WIP Gerrit Reviews: - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 4 reviews Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 9 bugs outstanding - The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects - WIP To Update https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862596 with the Stx 8.0 Release Notes page - AR Juanita - DONE, provided a new file, needs to be updated for Stx 8.0 General Updates: - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed with Greg; (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) Elections: Nov 15-22 [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Fri Nov 4 18:23:23 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:23:23 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? Thanks, Ildik? > On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: > > My thoughts ... > > I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. > I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX > For example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? > ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can pick 1 or more of the capabilities > e.g. > - Kuberenetes > - OpenStack > - Distributed Cloud > - Standalone Clouds, > - Deployment Configs > * SX, > * DX, > * Standard), > - Rook, > - PTP, > - N3000 Support, > - ACC100 Support, > - NVIDA GPU Support, > - QAT Support, > - OIDC authentication, > - Vault, > - Portieris, > - Auditd, > - Metrics Server, > - SNMP, > - Dedicated CPUs, > - Isolated CPUs, > - ISTIO, > - Cert Manager, > - Remote CLI Container, > - Kata Containers, > - RWO PVC, > - RWX PVC, > - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg and forwarding, bond), > - vRAN Tools Container, > - ... > > > OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: > > - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included in StarlingX Solution > > - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io > > > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM > To: StarlingX ML > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. > > The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. > > The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. > > We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey > > > If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. > > I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From chris.friesen at windriver.com Fri Nov 4 20:33:03 2022 From: chris.friesen at windriver.com (Chris Friesen) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:33:03 -0600 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] manual K8s upgrade to 1.24 should be functional now Message-ID: <1718ed2b-5d99-8c9c-113f-c981d0e6212c@windriver.com> Hi everyone, I'm happy to announce that the manual upgrade from K8s 1.23 to 1.24 (as documented at https://docs.starlingx.io/updates/kubernetes/manual-kubernetes-components-upgrade.html) should now be functional. We haven't yet bottomed out the apparent race condition when the orchestrated upgrade tries to upgrade kubelet, that will be next. Thanks, Chris Friesen From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Nov 5 18:04:38 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 14:04:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 4313 - Failure! Message-ID: <151825605.37.1667671482025.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_repo_sync_layered Build #: 4313 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221105T180414Z Branch: r/stx.6.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: r/stx.6.0 MANIFEST: compiler.xml PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-6.0-compiler From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Nov 5 18:04:44 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 14:04:44 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_6.0_build_layer_compiler - Build # 19 - Failure! Message-ID: <1025997679.40.1667671485271.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_6.0_build_layer_compiler Build #: 19 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221105T180000Z Branch: r/stx.6.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: true From outbackdingo at gmail.com Sun Nov 6 00:19:09 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 07:19:09 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Virtio-forwarder with StarlingX In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Can I ask, what would be the business case or use case for a userland forwarding engine? Can you maybe describe the purpose or the environment where you would find this beneficial. It is currently not yet part of the base StarlingX build, however that's not to say it couldn't be at some time. Or that it was made to be installable by the "platform administrator". Scott On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 9:42 PM open infra wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it possible to use Virtio-forwarder with StarlingX? > > Regards > Danishka > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Mon Nov 7 11:49:43 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:49:43 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Sep-18 build + STX-Openstack MASTER latest build [20221104T230835Z] GREEN sanity results - Nov-7 Message-ID: Hi all, Here's the results for StarlingX + STX-openstack using the Sep-18 build : http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20220918T013730Z/outputs/iso/bootimage.iso and latest Helm-Charts: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/helm-charts/ [sysadmin at controller-1 ~(keystone_admin)]$ cat /etc/build.info OS="centos" SW_VERSION="22.12" BUILD_TARGET="Host Installer" BUILD_TYPE="Formal" BUILD_ID="20220918T013730Z" controller-1:~$ cat /opt/platform/fluxcd/22.12/stx-openstack/1.0-244-centos-stable-versioned/metadata.yaml app_name: stx-openstack app_version: 1.0-244-centos-stable-versioned build_date: 2022-11-05 01:18:08 +0000 Overall Sanity Results: GREEN AIO-DX baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=ovs-dpdk : Sanity Results Status: GREEN Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 15 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221106 21:12:41 test_ssh_to_hosts PASS 20221106 21:13:32 test_lock_unlock_host[controller] PASS 20221106 21:44:32 test_swact_controllers PASS 20221106 21:53:05 test_openstack_services_healthy PASS 20221106 21:53:34 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS 20221106 22:02:06 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS 20221106 22:06:36 test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS 20221106 22:08:53 test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] PASS 20221106 22:12:25 test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS 20221106 22:15:25 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS 20221106 22:17:58 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] PASS 20221106 22:20:43 test_evacuate_vms PASS 20221106 22:47:32 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221106 22:47:43 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS 20221106 22:47:50 test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Mon Nov 7 12:27:15 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:27:15 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> Message-ID: Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM To: Waines, Greg Cc: StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? Thanks, Ildik? > On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: > > My thoughts ... > > I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. > I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX For > example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? > ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can pick > 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. > - Kuberenetes > - OpenStack > - Distributed Cloud > - Standalone Clouds, > - Deployment Configs > * SX, > * DX, > * Standard), > - Rook, > - PTP, > - N3000 Support, > - ACC100 Support, > - NVIDA GPU Support, > - QAT Support, > - OIDC authentication, > - Vault, > - Portieris, > - Auditd, > - Metrics Server, > - SNMP, > - Dedicated CPUs, > - Isolated CPUs, > - ISTIO, > - Cert Manager, > - Remote CLI Container, > - Kata Containers, > - RWO PVC, > - RWX PVC, > - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, > point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg and > forwarding, bond), > - vRAN Tools Container, > - ... > > > OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: > > - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included in > StarlingX Solution > > - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io > > > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM > To: StarlingX ML > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. > > The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. > > The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. > > We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the > opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I > created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a section > for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: > https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey > > > If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. > > I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From scott.little at windriver.com Mon Nov 7 14:31:33 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:31:33 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 4313 - Failure! In-Reply-To: <151825605.37.1667671482025.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <151825605.37.1667671482025.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: It appears repo's own git was corrupted for this build.? I've reinitialized it, and started the 6.0 build. Scott On 2022-11-05 14:04, starlingx.build at gmail.com wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Project: STX_repo_sync_layered > Build #: 4313 > Status: Failure > Timestamp: 20221105T180414Z > Branch: r/stx.6.0 > > Check logs at: > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Parameters > > BRANCH: r/stx.6.0 > MANIFEST: compiler.xml > PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs > PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs > MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-6.0-compiler > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From outbackdingo at gmail.com Mon Nov 7 14:40:44 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 21:40:44 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX 6.0 - Ceph deployment fails now Message-ID: So we went to try to deploy a new starlingx 6.0 AIO bare metal in the lab two times, however both times, ceph fails to properly complete configuration, we looked at a previous 6.0 server deployed 120+ days ago and found they differ greatly, so i have to ask whats changed that would break this after the release? and is there a way to resolv it manually as from what ican see a fresh 6.0 install fails to really complete prod server where ceph works [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ ceph status cluster: id: 67f59a3e-bd10-433e-b5da-c16bb88053cb health: HEALTH_OK kube-system ceph-pools-audit-27797180-fl2wh 0/1 Completed 0 12m kube-system ceph-pools-audit-27797185-vdggr 0/1 Completed 0 7m49s kube-system ceph-pools-audit-27797190-79bq4 0/1 Completed 0 2m48s kube-system cephfs-provisioner-bd46f868-vn7x8 1/1 Running 0 103d kube-system rbd-provisioner-759dfb8b6b-mgdj6 1/1 Running 0 103d [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ kubectl get storageclass --all-namespaces NAME PROVISIONER RECLAIMPOLICY VOLUMEBINDINGMODE ALLOWVOLUMEEXPANSION AGE cephfs ceph.com/cephfs Delete Immediate false 110d general (default) ceph.com/rbd Delete Immediate false 110d [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------------------+--------------+-------------------+ | application | version | manifest name | manifest file | status | progress | +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------------------+--------------+-------------------+ | cert-manager | 1.0-26 | cert-manager-manifest | certmanager-manifest. | applied | completed | | | | | yaml | | | | | | | | | | | nginx-ingress-controller | 1.1-18 | nginx-ingress-controller-manifest | nginx_ingress_control | applied | completed | | | | | ler_manifest.yaml | | | | | | | | | | | oidc-auth-apps | 1.0-61 | oidc-auth-manifest | manifest.yaml | uploaded | completed | | platform-integ-apps | 1.0-44 | platform-integration-manifest | manifest.yaml | apply-failed | operation aborted | | | | | | | , check logs for | | | | | | | detail | | | | | | | | | rook-ceph-apps | 1.0-14 | rook-ceph-manifest | manifest.yaml | uploaded | completed | | stx-openstack | 1.0-140-centos-stable- | openstack-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | applied | completed | | | versioned | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------------------+--------------+-------------------+ [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ dev server where ceph is broken [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ ceph status cluster: id: 06ba8bae-bb17-43ef-96c2-c2ec136a6041 health: HEALTH_OK 0 ceph/rbd servies in k8s kubectl get storageclass --all-namespaces No resources found [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list +--------------------------+---------+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+---------+-----------+ | application | version | manifest name | manifest file | status | progress | +--------------------------+---------+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+---------+-----------+ | cert-manager | 1.0-26 | cert-manager-manifest | certmanager-manifest.yaml | applied | completed | | nginx-ingress-controller | 1.1-18 | nginx-ingress-controller-manifest | nginx_ingress_controller_manifest.yaml | applied | completed | +--------------------------+---------+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+---------+-----------+ [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Mon Nov 7 17:14:45 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:14:45 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX TSC, PL, TL election - Nomination period started In-Reply-To: <5B778D13-C51E-4B2A-8629-638280C4BE6F@gmail.com> References: <5B778D13-C51E-4B2A-8629-638280C4BE6F@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7E7379C3-BA8C-4DC2-A8B1-F1B7E328F85A@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, It is a friendly reminder that the nomination period of the 2022 H2 StarlingX TSC/PL/TL election is open until __November 08, 2022 20:45 UTC__. If you would like to run for one of the 3 open TSC seats or project PL or TL positions you can find details on how to submit your candidacy on the election web page[1]. In case you have any questions please respond to this thread or reach out to the election officials[2]. Thank you, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > On Nov 1, 2022, at 14:09, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > Nominations for the 3 Technical Steering Committee positions and all PL/TL positions are now open and will remain open until __November 08, 2022 20:45 UTC__. > > All nominations must be submitted as a text file to the starlingx/election repository as explained on the election website[1]. > > Please note that the name of the file should match the email address in your Gerrit configuration. > > Candidates for the Technical Steering Committee Positions: Any contributing community member who is an individual member of the Foundation can propose their candidacy for an available, directly-elected TSC seat. > > Candidates for the Project Lead Positions: Any contributing community member who is an individual member of the Foundation can propose their candidacy for the project PL seat. > > Candidates for the Technical Lead Positions: Any contributing community member who is an individual member of the Foundation and is a core reviewer to the given project can propose their candidacy for the project TL seat. > > The election will be held from November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC through to November 22, 2022 20:45 UTC. > > The electorate of the TSC election are the community members that are also contributors for one of the official teams[2] or served in a leadership role (TSC, PL, TL) over the 12-month timeframe October 31, 2021 to October 31, 2022, as well as the contributors who are acknowledged by the TSC. > > The electorate of the PL/TL election are the community members that are contributors for the given official team[2] over the 12-month timeframe October 31, 2021 to October 31, 2022, as well as the contributors who are acknowledged by the TSC. > > Please see the website[3] for additional details about this election. > > Please find below the timeline: > > TSC nomination starts @ November 1, 2022 20:45 UTC > TSC nomination ends @ November 8, 2022 20:45 UTC > PL/TL nomination starts @ November 1, 2022 20:45 UTC > PL/TL nomination ends @ November 8, 2022 20:45 UTC > > TSC campaigning starts @ November 8, 2022 20:45 UTC > TSC campaigning ends @ November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC > > TSC election starts @ November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC > TSC election ends @ November 22, 2022 20:45 UTC > PL/TL election starts @ November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC > PL/TL election ends @ November 22, 2022 20:45 UTC > > If you have any questions please be sure to either ask them on the mailing list or to the elections officials[4]. > > Thank you, > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy > [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/projects/index.html > [3] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ > [4] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > > > From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Tue Nov 8 02:53:36 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 18:53:36 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> Hi Greg, Sounds good. I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Ildik? > On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: > > Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM > To: Waines, Greg > Cc: StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. > > Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > >> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >> >> My thoughts ... >> >> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX For >> example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can pick >> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >> - Kuberenetes >> - OpenStack >> - Distributed Cloud >> - Standalone Clouds, >> - Deployment Configs >> * SX, >> * DX, >> * Standard), >> - Rook, >> - PTP, >> - N3000 Support, >> - ACC100 Support, >> - NVIDA GPU Support, >> - QAT Support, >> - OIDC authentication, >> - Vault, >> - Portieris, >> - Auditd, >> - Metrics Server, >> - SNMP, >> - Dedicated CPUs, >> - Isolated CPUs, >> - ISTIO, >> - Cert Manager, >> - Remote CLI Container, >> - Kata Containers, >> - RWO PVC, >> - RWX PVC, >> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg and >> forwarding, bond), >> - vRAN Tools Container, >> - ... >> >> >> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >> >> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included in >> StarlingX Solution >> >> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >> >> >> Greg. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ildiko Vancsa >> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >> To: StarlingX ML >> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >> >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >> >> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >> >> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >> >> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I >> created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a section >> for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >> >> >> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >> >> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions. >> >> Thanks, >> Ildik? >> >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem >> Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > From scott.little at windriver.com Tue Nov 8 14:31:21 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 09:31:21 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX debian build failed Message-ID: <683c8f0c-2bba-1b5b-17b1-53371ee496ff@windriver.com> CENGN was unable to pull software from opendev last night.? As a result the Debian build failed. I have restarted the Debian build this morning. Scott From fungi at yuggoth.org Tue Nov 8 14:51:09 2022 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 14:51:09 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX debian build failed In-Reply-To: <683c8f0c-2bba-1b5b-17b1-53371ee496ff@windriver.com> References: <683c8f0c-2bba-1b5b-17b1-53371ee496ff@windriver.com> Message-ID: <20221108145109.xr5gljgy75vrdv46@yuggoth.org> On 2022-11-08 09:31:21 -0500 (-0500), Scott Little wrote: > CENGN was unable to pull software from opendev last night. [...] Any idea whether the issues were at the CENGN or OpenDev end? If you've got additional details on the nature of the failures, I can look into them from the OpenDev side of things. -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Tue Nov 8 19:19:49 2022 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 19:19:49 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 220221106T070000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2022-November 8. (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20221106T070000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Tue Nov 8 21:46:04 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:46:04 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX TSC/PL/TL election - Nomination period ended Message-ID: <4A0C0724-7272-4F6F-81F1-5BCC15E25605@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, I would like to inform you that the nomination period[1] for the StarlingX TSC/PL/TL election has ended. Thank you to all candidates who submitted their nominations into this round. As we have 4 eligible candidates for the 3 open TSC seats, we will be running a campaigning period followed by voting to elect the 3 new TSC members who will join the group for the upcoming one year term. Please look out for the information and updates on the mailing list about the campaign. The election officials[2] are still finalizing some details and will come back with further updates with regards to the PL/TL positions shortly. Thank you, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Tue Nov 8 21:58:27 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:58:27 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Campaigning started Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, The StarlingX TSC Election Campaigning Period has now started [1] and will end on November 15 at 2045 UTC. During the next couple days, you are all encouraged to ask the candidates questions about their platforms [2], opinions on StarlingX, community governance, and anything else that will help you to better determine how you will vote. This is the time to raise any issues you wish the future TSC to consider, and to evaluate the opinions of the nominees prior to their election. Candidates: Each of you has posted a platform[2], and announced your nomination to the project contributors. From this point, you are encouraged to ask each other questions about the posted platforms, and begin discussion of any points that you feel are particularly important during the next cycle. While you are not yet TSC members for the upcoming term, your voices and opinions about the issues raised in your platforms and questions raised by the wider community will help ensure that the future TSC has the widest possible input on the matters of community concern, and the electorate has the best information to determine the ideal TSC composition to address these and other issues that may arise. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik?, on behalf of the StarlingX election officials[3] [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ [2] https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc [3] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Nov 9 00:35:09 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 16:35:09 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Campaigning started In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3B4FB042-0F96-4CB2-B9A7-30BDC734B149@openinfra.dev> Hi StarlingX TSC candidates, I would like to use the opportunity to ask you a question as part of the TSC election campaign period. Growing and diversifying the community has been an important topic for the project since its inception. What is your strategy to support this effort? For instance, how would you lower the barriers for newcomers to enter and start participating in the community? Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 8, 2022, at 13:58, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > The StarlingX TSC Election Campaigning Period has now started [1] and will end on November 15 at 2045 UTC. > > During the next couple days, you are all encouraged to ask the candidates questions about their platforms [2], opinions on StarlingX, community governance, and anything else that will help you to better determine how you will vote. This is the time to raise any issues you wish the future TSC to consider, and to evaluate the opinions of the nominees prior to their election. > > > Candidates: > > Each of you has posted a platform[2], and announced your nomination to the project contributors. From this point, you are encouraged to ask each other questions about the posted platforms, and begin discussion of any points that you feel are particularly important during the next cycle. > > While you are not yet TSC members for the upcoming term, your voices and opinions about the issues raised in your platforms and questions raised by the wider community will help ensure that the future TSC has the widest possible input on the matters of community concern, and the electorate has the best information to determine the ideal TSC composition to address these and other issues that may arise. > > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik?, on behalf of the StarlingX election officials[3] > > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ > [2] https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc > [3] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > From scott.little at windriver.com Wed Nov 9 13:56:48 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 08:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 4313 - Failure! In-Reply-To: References: <151825605.37.1667671482025.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: The 6.0 build was successful. Scott On 2022-11-07 09:31, Scott Little wrote: > It appears repo's own git was corrupted for this build.? I've > reinitialized it, and started the 6.0 build. > > Scott > > > On 2022-11-05 14:04, starlingx.build at gmail.com wrote: >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the >> sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Project: STX_repo_sync_layered >> Build #: 4313 >> Status: Failure >> Timestamp: 20221105T180414Z >> Branch: r/stx.6.0 >> >> Check logs at: >> http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Parameters >> >> BRANCH: r/stx.6.0 >> MANIFEST: compiler.xml >> PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: >> http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs >> PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: >> /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221105T180000Z/logs >> MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-6.0-compiler >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Nov 9 15:32:06 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:32:06 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Mission statement discussion input and workshop Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, As a follow up to the PTG the StarlingX Marketing team started to work on proposals to update the project?s mission statement. The team would like to ask the community for input so we can have a more guided activity and better fitting results. The questions we raised during the Marketing meeting yesterday: * What will be the community?s priorities for the short to mid-term future, meaning the next 1-3 years? * What is the community?s vision with regards to challenges that the StarlingX platform is developed and shaped to solve and address? To ensure progress the Marketing team set up an ad-hoc meeting time for Monday (November 14) at 11am US Pacific Time, to have a workshop and work on options. Anyone who is interested in participating in that conversation please join us on the call! The dial-in link for the meeting is: https://windriver.zoom.us/j/97692404047?pwd=Um93SXBzNFMwL21JUmJYU3dteVNVdz09 Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation From Frank.Miller at windriver.com Wed Nov 9 15:53:50 2022 From: Frank.Miller at windriver.com (Miller, Frank) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:53:50 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config Message-ID: Config Cores: I'd like to propose that Dan Voiculeasa be added as a Core to the starlingx/config repo. Dan has contributed to StarlingX for 3 years, has made over 350 commits including 70+ to the config repo and has become a SME in many areas through his work on migrating StarlingX to run on Debian. Let me know if you agree. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com Wed Nov 9 16:01:05 2022 From: Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com (Subramanian, Ramaswamy) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:01:05 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 From: Miller, Frank Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 10:54 AM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config Config Cores: I'd like to propose that Dan Voiculeasa be added as a Core to the starlingx/config repo. Dan has contributed to StarlingX for 3 years, has made over 350 commits including 70+ to the config repo and has become a SME in many areas through his work on migrating StarlingX to run on Debian. Let me know if you agree. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tee.Ngo at windriver.com Wed Nov 9 16:16:14 2022 From: Tee.Ngo at windriver.com (Ngo, Tee) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:16:14 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 From: Subramanian, Ramaswamy Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:01 AM To: Miller, Frank ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: Miller, Frank > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 10:54 AM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config Config Cores: I'd like to propose that Dan Voiculeasa be added as a Core to the starlingx/config repo. Dan has contributed to StarlingX for 3 years, has made over 350 commits including 70+ to the config repo and has become a SME in many areas through his work on migrating StarlingX to run on Debian. Let me know if you agree. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Nov 10 01:35:48 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:35:48 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] 2022 H2 PL/TL election update Message-ID: Hi StarlingX community, The nomination period for the 2022 H2 StarlingX PL/TL elections are now over. We did not have more than one eligible candidate running for any of the open positions. This means that we will not run the voting period for this portion of the current election cycles. Congratulations to all the new and reelected PLs and TLs! You can find all the candidates for the 2022 H2 StarlingX PL/TL elections here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2 The following patch is updating the projects.yaml file with the results where we have changes: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/governance/+/864154 We have 2 new PLs and 2 new TLs. We have one unfilled position, which is the Build PL role where we did not have eligible candidates nominating during this round. Thank you to all the candidates for running in the elections! If you have any questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. Thanks and Best Regards, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From ildiko at openinfra.dev Thu Nov 10 01:54:37 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:54:37 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] KubeCon EU CFP open In-Reply-To: <50D7D69E-CAF4-4D14-99CF-F31178C54047@gmail.com> References: <50D7D69E-CAF4-4D14-99CF-F31178C54047@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, It is a friendly reminder that the CFP deadline for KubeCon EU is approaching rapidly! __The KubeCon EU CFP closes November 18 at 11:59 PM Pacific Standard Time (PST)!__ You can find more information and submit your abstract(s) here: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/kubecon-cloudnativecon-europe/program/cfp/#general-info Please let me know if I can help you with putting together or reviewing your abstract. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Sep 26, 2022, at 09:24, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > I?m reaching out to you to draw your attention to the KubeCon Europe (Tuesday, 17 April ? Friday, 21 April 2023) event CFP that is already open! > > Since StarlingX is integrating a couple of projects from the CNCF ecosystem this event is a great opportunity to build connections within that ecosystem. It can also be used to raise awareness of the StarlingX project and start and foster cross-community collaboration activities. > > __The KubeCon EU CFP closes November 18!__ > > Please let me know if I can help you with putting together or reviewing your abstarct. > > Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > From Eric.MacDonald at windriver.com Thu Nov 10 12:05:02 2022 From: Eric.MacDonald at windriver.com (MacDonald, Eric) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:05:02 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 From: Ngo, Tee Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:16 AM To: Subramanian, Ramaswamy ; Miller, Frank ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: Subramanian, Ramaswamy > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:01 AM To: Miller, Frank >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: Miller, Frank > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 10:54 AM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config Config Cores: I'd like to propose that Dan Voiculeasa be added as a Core to the starlingx/config repo. Dan has contributed to StarlingX for 3 years, has made over 350 commits including 70+ to the config repo and has become a SME in many areas through his work on migrating StarlingX to run on Debian. Let me know if you agree. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Nov 10 13:02:11 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:02:11 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: StarlingX Release Meeting - Nov 9/2022 Message-ID: Agenda/Minutes are posted at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases Schedule Change - The schedule for the release meeting has been updated as per emails to the mailing list - We are now meeting on the opposite week in a two-week period. - Schedule Change: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013515.html - New Invite: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013514.html stx.8.0 - Reference Links: - Release/Feature Planning: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Release Verification: - Folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1E_AQPxVrNnbVtSqQ9_CdqYidqMmYcq4n - Feature Testing: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yzlArypq3sgdNdYzMwBONLnOsx6OqMpxj6KT0P6Pc6M/edit#gid=968103774 - Regression Testing: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1b5w2oLlGwipTlrNysWwl1JnM1dvyboIIQhpBJLcZECI/edit#gid=1717644237 - Milestone-2 achieved on Oct 20. Thank you! - Feature Status - Updated feature status/dates in the planning spreadsheet. - Follow-Up Required for the following features: - Code Merge Dates: - Kubernetes Custom Configuration Support -- Action: Carlos Fleck - K8s & Container Components Refresh - k8s 1.24 -- Action: Chris Friesen - Platform Single Core Tuning -- Action: Guilherme Batista Leite - Feature Tested Dates: - FEC Device Configurability (fec-operator Integration) for ACC100 & N3000 -- Action: Rob Cooke - Support for 'reader' role at 'system' scope for StarlingX APIs / CLIs -- Action: Rob Cooke - New Feature Proposals: - Platform Network Reconfiguration: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010319 - Helps w/ DC re-config use-cases. Investigation started. Planning still in progress. TBD whether this fits within the stx.8.0 release dates. From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Thu Nov 10 13:05:12 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:05:12 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Sep-18 build + STX-Openstack MASTER latest build [20221109T001502Z] GREEN sanity results - Nov-7 Message-ID: Hi all, Here's the results for StarlingX + STX-openstack using the Sep-18 build : http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20220918T013730Z/outputs/iso/bootimage.iso and latest Helm-Charts: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/helm-charts/ [sysadmin at controller-1 ~(keystone_admin)]$ cat /etc/build.info OS="centos" SW_VERSION="22.12" BUILD_TARGET="Host Installer" BUILD_TYPE="Formal" BUILD_ID="20220918T013730Z" controller-1:~$ cat /opt/platform/fluxcd/22.12/stx-openstack/1.0-244-centos-stable-versioned/metadata.yaml app_name: stx-openstack app_version: 1.0-244-centos-stable-versioned build_date: 2022-11-09 02:42:31 +0000 Overall Sanity Results: ?RED AIO-DX baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=ovs-dpdk : Sanity Status: RED Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 6 (40.0%) Failed: 9 (60.0%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221110 06:11:05 test_ssh_to_hosts FAIL 20221110 06:12:01 test_lock_unlock_host[controller] PASS 20221110 06:40:20 test_swact_controllers FAIL 20221110 06:48:26 test_openstack_services_healthy FAIL 20221110 06:48:51 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] FAIL 20221110 06:49:19 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] FAIL 20221110 06:49:44 test_horizon_create_delete_instance FAIL 20221110 06:51:15 test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] FAIL 20221110 06:51:53 test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] FAIL 20221110 06:52:36 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] FAIL 20221110 06:53:04 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] PASS 20221110 06:53:29 test_evacuate_vms PASS 20221110 07:20:21 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221110 07:20:34 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS 20221110 07:20:41 test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ? All of the Failed Test Cases above are related to the Launchpad: Bug #1991701 - Appfwk operation fails due to AttributeError in RPC dispatcher Regards Gabriel Calixto -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Nov 10 13:12:52 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:12:52 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, Regarding the question below: Is there way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? Application-isolated CPUs are configured on a per-host basis. When new nodes are added, they will need to be explicitly configured. Is there a specific use-case that you have where it would be beneficial for new nodes to automatically inherit the config of an existing node? There was an old capability where host profiles could be created and applied to new nodes. But this proved problematic as exact hardware matches were not guaranteed. As a result, this capability was abandoned a long time ago. Regards, Ghada From: open infra Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 3:32 AM To: Brito, Thiago Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:16 AM Brito, Thiago > wrote: Did you do an application-apply after you changed the processors to application-isolated? Can you send the output of the command below for you compute pods: kubectl exec -n openstack nova-compute-[woker|controller]-X-XXXXX-xxxx -- cat /etc/nova/nova.conf|grep dedicated_set Is there way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? Don't forget to change the id of the pod for your compute pods. Thiago ________________________________ From: open infra > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 5:45 AM To: Brito, Thiago > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Here is the info from STX side Processors 2 Physical Cores Per Processor 32 Hyper-Threading Yes CPU Assignments Create Cpu Profile Function Processor Logical Cores Platform Processor 0 : 0,64 vSwitch Shared Application Processor 0 : 17-31,81-95 Processor 1 : 56-63,120-127 Application-isolated Processor 0 : 1-16,65-80 Processor 1 : 32-55,96-119 On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:46 PM open infra > wrote: Hi Thiago, I have configured the worker as mentioned in the given link and dedicated cpu_policy set in the flavor. Instance creation failed with the following error. No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available. controller-0:~$ openstack flavor show dn.large -c properties +------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | properties | hw:cpu_cores='2', hw:cpu_policy='dedicated', hw:cpu_sockets='1', hw:cpu_threads='2', hw:numa_nodes='1' | +------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Regards, Danishka On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:18 AM Brito, Thiago > wrote: Hi Danishka, Whatever you configure on the platform as Application-isolated core for a node will get to cpu_dedicated_set on stx-openstack. Please check this doc: https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.5.0/admintasks/openstack/configure-dedicated-and-shared-cpu-pools-on-hosts.html Thiago ________________________________ From: open infra > Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:15 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi, Is the cpu_dedicated_set is already enabled in stx based openstack? How to verify and enable it? Regards, Danishka -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Nov 10 13:19:08 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:19:08 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Nov 9, 2022) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call November 9, 2022 Standing topics - Build - Main Branch CentOS Builds - Green all week - Main Branch Debian Builds - Two build failures, attributed to intermittent env/networking issues. Both resolved. - Debian Build Acceleration/Reuse Feature - The Acceleration feature is now functional for the ISO build, but not yet for container builds. - Work on container build re-use has not started yet. - Weekly CentOS Builds for stx.6.0 & stx.7.0 - stx.6.0 Builds - plan to build ISO and containers - Builds are setup and building successfully - stx.7.0 Builds - plan to build both ISO and containers - Builds are setup and building successfully - Sanity - CentOS Main Branch Sanity w/ stx-openstack - Last sanity email sent on Nov 7: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013533.html - Status: Green - Note: The platform CentOS build is fixed on Sept18 which is the last green sanity build for CentOS. - stx-openstack sanity transition to Debian - Planned for the Dec time-frame. On track. - Email to the mailing list: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013487.html - Debian Main Branch Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Nov 8: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013541.html - Status: Green - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - Fixes to libvirt env: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/863735 - From last meeting: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/843349 >> merged Nov 2 - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - Elections - PL/TL positions have uncontested candidates, so no election is planned for these positions. - 3 full year TSC positions are up for renewal - 4 candidates are running - Campaign period ends Nov 15. Then ballots will be sent. - StarlingX 6.0 fails to deploy - See below in "Open Requests for Help" ARs from Previous Meetings - None Open Requests for Help - StarlingX 6.0 fails to deploy - NEW - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013536.html - This is using the released stx.6.0 release which hasn't changed, so unclear why this is failing now. - ScottL confirmed that the stx.6.0 release ISO has not changed. - ScottK is planning to try the deployment on another h/w. If still failing, will collect logs and open an LP - Virtio-forwarder with StarlingX - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013505.html - ScottK responded with additional questions: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013532.html - Waiting for response - Enabling cpu_dedicated_set - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013382.html - Last Question posted in the thread: Is there a way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? - Ghada to respond that app-isolated corese are setup From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Thu Nov 10 14:11:48 2022 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:11:48 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 09-11-22 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Here are this week's docs team meeting minutes (short form). Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Wednesdays 12:30 PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 09-Nov-22 StarlingX 8.0 Release: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Doc Tasks created - Doc Team to ensure Stories/Tasks are added to the commit messages - Ongoing WIP - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862705: Verified Hardware Updates - AR Juanita / Ron - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/861367 Flatten TOC for better customer experience - AR Ron - O-RAN updates https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010278- Updates are available in: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862367 - Stx Doc team to review and provide comments - events.yaml - Automation of the events.yaml file in the docs - AR Juanita / Ron - WIP - GPU Operator Removal on WRO - AR Elisa - To be merged once approved. Gerrit Reviews: - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 3 reviews Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs; Total 9 bugs outstanding - The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects - WIP To Update https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862596 with the Stx 8.0 Release Notes page - AR Juanita - DONE, provided a new file, needs to be updated for Stx 8.0 General Updates: - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed with Greg (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) Elections: Nov 15-22 [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Bin.Qian at windriver.com Thu Nov 10 14:48:42 2022 From: Bin.Qian at windriver.com (Qian, Bin) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:48:42 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 From: MacDonald, Eric Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 7:05 AM To: Ngo, Tee ; Subramanian, Ramaswamy ; Miller, Frank ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: Ngo, Tee > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:16 AM To: Subramanian, Ramaswamy >; Miller, Frank >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: Subramanian, Ramaswamy > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:01 AM To: Miller, Frank >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: Miller, Frank > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 10:54 AM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config Config Cores: I'd like to propose that Dan Voiculeasa be added as a Core to the starlingx/config repo. Dan has contributed to StarlingX for 3 years, has made over 350 commits including 70+ to the config repo and has become a SME in many areas through his work on migrating StarlingX to run on Debian. Let me know if you agree. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Nov 10 15:59:24 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:59:24 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hey Ildiko, I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. looking good, Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM To: Waines, Greg Cc: StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Greg, Sounds good. I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Ildik? > On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: > > Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM > To: Waines, Greg > Cc: StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. > > Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > >> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >> >> My thoughts ... >> >> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX For >> example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >> pick >> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >> - Kuberenetes >> - OpenStack >> - Distributed Cloud >> - Standalone Clouds, >> - Deployment Configs >> * SX, >> * DX, >> * Standard), >> - Rook, >> - PTP, >> - N3000 Support, >> - ACC100 Support, >> - NVIDA GPU Support, >> - QAT Support, >> - OIDC authentication, >> - Vault, >> - Portieris, >> - Auditd, >> - Metrics Server, >> - SNMP, >> - Dedicated CPUs, >> - Isolated CPUs, >> - ISTIO, >> - Cert Manager, >> - Remote CLI Container, >> - Kata Containers, >> - RWO PVC, >> - RWX PVC, >> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg >> and forwarding, bond), >> - vRAN Tools Container, >> - ... >> >> >> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >> >> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included in >> StarlingX Solution >> >> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >> >> >> Greg. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ildiko Vancsa >> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >> To: StarlingX ML >> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >> >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >> >> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >> >> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >> >> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I >> created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >> >> >> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >> >> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions. >> >> Thanks, >> Ildik? >> >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > From Robert.Church at windriver.com Thu Nov 10 16:04:23 2022 From: Robert.Church at windriver.com (Church, Robert) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 16:04:23 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <77144A4E-90E2-4FC7-AABE-6F9ED73DC962@windriver.com> +2 From: "Qian, Bin" Date: Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 8:56 AM To: "MacDonald, Eric" , "Ngo, Tee" , "Subramanian, Ramaswamy" , "Miller, Frank" , "'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'" Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: MacDonald, Eric Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 7:05 AM To: Ngo, Tee ; Subramanian, Ramaswamy ; Miller, Frank ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: Ngo, Tee > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:16 AM To: Subramanian, Ramaswamy >; Miller, Frank >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: Subramanian, Ramaswamy > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:01 AM To: Miller, Frank >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config +1 From: Miller, Frank > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 10:54 AM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config Config Cores: I?d like to propose that Dan Voiculeasa be added as a Core to the starlingx/config repo. Dan has contributed to StarlingX for 3 years, has made over 350 commits including 70+ to the config repo and has become a SME in many areas through his work on migrating StarlingX to run on Debian. Let me know if you agree. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Nov 10 22:56:11 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:56:11 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Greg, Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. Thanks, Ildik? > On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: > > Hey Ildiko, > I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. > looking good, > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM > To: Waines, Greg > Cc: StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi Greg, > > Sounds good. > > I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey > > Please let me know what you think. > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > >> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: >> >> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. >> Greg. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ildiko Vancsa >> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM >> To: Waines, Greg >> Cc: StarlingX ML >> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >> >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. >> >> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? >> >> Thanks, >> Ildik? >> >> >>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >>> >>> My thoughts ... >>> >>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX For >>> example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >>> pick >>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >>> - Kuberenetes >>> - OpenStack >>> - Distributed Cloud >>> - Standalone Clouds, >>> - Deployment Configs >>> * SX, >>> * DX, >>> * Standard), >>> - Rook, >>> - PTP, >>> - N3000 Support, >>> - ACC100 Support, >>> - NVIDA GPU Support, >>> - QAT Support, >>> - OIDC authentication, >>> - Vault, >>> - Portieris, >>> - Auditd, >>> - Metrics Server, >>> - SNMP, >>> - Dedicated CPUs, >>> - Isolated CPUs, >>> - ISTIO, >>> - Cert Manager, >>> - Remote CLI Container, >>> - Kata Containers, >>> - RWO PVC, >>> - RWX PVC, >>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg >>> and forwarding, bond), >>> - vRAN Tools Container, >>> - ... >>> >>> >>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >>> >>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included in >>> StarlingX Solution >>> >>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >>> >>> >>> Greg. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >>> To: StarlingX ML >>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>> >>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>> >>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>> >>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >>> >>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >>> >>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >>> >>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I >>> created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>> >>> >>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >>> >>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ildik? >>> >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >> > From chris.friesen at windriver.com Fri Nov 11 18:52:19 2022 From: chris.friesen at windriver.com (Chris Friesen) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:52:19 -0600 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Dan Voiculeasa as Core to config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <193fe866-4abc-e7eb-f7a3-dc207b41c677@windriver.com> +1 Sounds good to me. On 11/9/2022 9:53 AM, Miller, Frank wrote: > > Config Cores: > > I?d like to propose that Dan Voiculeasa be added as a Core to the > starlingx/config repo.? Dan has contributed to StarlingX for 3 years, > has made over 350 commits including 70+ to the config repo and has > become a SME in many areas through his work on migrating StarlingX to > run on Debian.? Let me know if you agree. > > Frank > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From outbackdingo at gmail.com Mon Nov 14 08:45:51 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:45:51 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Campaigning started In-Reply-To: <3B4FB042-0F96-4CB2-B9A7-30BDC734B149@openinfra.dev> References: <3B4FB042-0F96-4CB2-B9A7-30BDC734B149@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Ive always championed people who were unaware of starlingx by advocating to them the solution, Ive also started the process to bring more user knowledge to the community where we saw ourselves struggle, like building images, and platform updates/upgrades between revisions I have also had a few extensive conversations about bringing forth better methods of communications, other then lists where users can possibly get faster responses to questions. Among other things contributing to documentation fixes that we came across during numerous installations over time, that we felt could be inaccurate or also potentially unclear to new users. I have also made numerous suggestions as to making the iso more readily findable via the primary web page. I also have worked to contribute back features we found potentially useful to the userbase, such as the work to prototype wireguard. As i'm sure I will continue to advocate StarlingX to people who didnt know it exists, and also champion it among many verticles, including telecom and IOT. On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 7:40 AM Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX TSC candidates, > > I would like to use the opportunity to ask you a question as part of the TSC election campaign period. > > Growing and diversifying the community has been an important topic for the project since its inception. What is your strategy to support this effort? For instance, how would you lower the barriers for newcomers to enter and start participating in the community? > > Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > On Nov 8, 2022, at 13:58, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > > > The StarlingX TSC Election Campaigning Period has now started [1] and will end on November 15 at 2045 UTC. > > > > During the next couple days, you are all encouraged to ask the candidates questions about their platforms [2], opinions on StarlingX, community governance, and anything else that will help you to better determine how you will vote. This is the time to raise any issues you wish the future TSC to consider, and to evaluate the opinions of the nominees prior to their election. > > > > > > Candidates: > > > > Each of you has posted a platform[2], and announced your nomination to the project contributors. From this point, you are encouraged to ask each other questions about the posted platforms, and begin discussion of any points that you feel are particularly important during the next cycle. > > > > While you are not yet TSC members for the upcoming term, your voices and opinions about the issues raised in your platforms and questions raised by the wider community will help ensure that the future TSC has the widest possible input on the matters of community concern, and the electorate has the best information to determine the ideal TSC composition to address these and other issues that may arise. > > > > > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > Ildik?, on behalf of the StarlingX election officials[3] > > > > > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ > > [2] https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc > > [3] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Mon Nov 14 13:21:47 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:21:47 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> Message-ID: Added responses to your questions. Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 5:56 PM To: Waines, Greg Cc: StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Greg, Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. Thanks, Ildik? > On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: > > Hey Ildiko, > I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. > looking good, > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM > To: Waines, Greg > Cc: StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi Greg, > > Sounds good. > > I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: > https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey > > Please let me know what you think. > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > >> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: >> >> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. >> Greg. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ildiko Vancsa >> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM >> To: Waines, Greg >> Cc: StarlingX ML >> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >> >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. >> >> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? >> >> Thanks, >> Ildik? >> >> >>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >>> >>> My thoughts ... >>> >>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX For >>> example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >>> pick >>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >>> - Kuberenetes >>> - OpenStack >>> - Distributed Cloud >>> - Standalone Clouds, >>> - Deployment Configs >>> * SX, >>> * DX, >>> * Standard), >>> - Rook, >>> - PTP, >>> - N3000 Support, >>> - ACC100 Support, >>> - NVIDA GPU Support, >>> - QAT Support, >>> - OIDC authentication, >>> - Vault, >>> - Portieris, >>> - Auditd, >>> - Metrics Server, >>> - SNMP, >>> - Dedicated CPUs, >>> - Isolated CPUs, >>> - ISTIO, >>> - Cert Manager, >>> - Remote CLI Container, >>> - Kata Containers, >>> - RWO PVC, >>> - RWX PVC, >>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg >>> and forwarding, bond), >>> - vRAN Tools Container, >>> - ... >>> >>> >>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >>> >>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included in >>> StarlingX Solution >>> >>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >>> >>> >>> Greg. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >>> To: StarlingX ML >>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>> >>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>> >>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>> >>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >>> >>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >>> >>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >>> >>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I >>> created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>> >>> >>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >>> >>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ildik? >>> >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discus >>> s >> > From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Mon Nov 14 15:02:15 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:02:15 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Campaigning started In-Reply-To: <3B4FB042-0F96-4CB2-B9A7-30BDC734B149@openinfra.dev> References: <3B4FB042-0F96-4CB2-B9A7-30BDC734B149@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Contributions from a diverse community is a valuable aspect of developing in an open source project. Unfortunately StarlingX has not been able to leveraged this value because of our lack of diversity in the community. Long term contributors to open source projects are typically 'users' of the open source project. Therefore focusing on supporting, growing and diversifying the 'users' of StarlingX will be a good first step in diversifying both users and contributors of StarlingX. In the past, StarlingX's approach to "support" of new "users" of StarlingX has been somewhat of a "best effort" approach across the entire StarlingX community ... i.e. with no clear owner. As a result, for a variety of reasons, this approach has just not worked. As suggested by an OIF board member at a recent StarlingX update meeting, an alternative approach would be to find a StarlingX community member (or two) whose 'primary' role is to support new users and contributors in the StarlingX community. This would include both re-active and pro-active aspects of support. I.e. this would include timely responses to questions on StarlingX mailing list and StarlingX IRC channel, with followups to ensure new user is 'successful' in evaluating StarlingX, with followups to understand new user's use case for StarlingX, improving the StarlingX website for new users, work to make 'kicking the tires' on StarlingX easier, holding StarlingX user hands-on sessions online and at major conferences, etc. . As TSC, I would like to pursue this approach support of StarlingX. Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 7:35 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Campaigning started CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX TSC candidates, I would like to use the opportunity to ask you a question as part of the TSC election campaign period. Growing and diversifying the community has been an important topic for the project since its inception. What is your strategy to support this effort? For instance, how would you lower the barriers for newcomers to enter and start participating in the community? Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 8, 2022, at 13:58, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > The StarlingX TSC Election Campaigning Period has now started [1] and will end on November 15 at 2045 UTC. > > During the next couple days, you are all encouraged to ask the candidates questions about their platforms [2], opinions on StarlingX, community governance, and anything else that will help you to better determine how you will vote. This is the time to raise any issues you wish the future TSC to consider, and to evaluate the opinions of the nominees prior to their election. > > > Candidates: > > Each of you has posted a platform[2], and announced your nomination to the project contributors. From this point, you are encouraged to ask each other questions about the posted platforms, and begin discussion of any points that you feel are particularly important during the next cycle. > > While you are not yet TSC members for the upcoming term, your voices and opinions about the issues raised in your platforms and questions raised by the wider community will help ensure that the future TSC has the widest possible input on the matters of community concern, and the electorate has the best information to determine the ideal TSC composition to address these and other issues that may arise. > > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik?, on behalf of the StarlingX election officials[3] > > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ > [2] > https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/20 > 22_H2/tsc [3] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From outbackdingo at gmail.com Mon Nov 14 15:01:46 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:01:46 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> Message-ID: added my input.... :) On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:26 PM Waines, Greg wrote: > > Added responses to your questions. > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 5:56 PM > To: Waines, Greg > Cc: StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi Greg, > > Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. > > If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > > > On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: > > > > Hey Ildiko, > > I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. > > looking good, > > Greg. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ildiko Vancsa > > Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM > > To: Waines, Greg > > Cc: StarlingX ML > > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Sounds good. > > > > I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: > > https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > > > Thanks, > > Ildik? > > > > > >> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: > >> > >> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. > >> Greg. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ildiko Vancsa > >> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM > >> To: Waines, Greg > >> Cc: StarlingX ML > >> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > >> > >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > >> > >> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. > >> > >> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ildik? > >> > >> > >>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: > >>> > >>> My thoughts ... > >>> > >>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. > >>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX For > >>> example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? > >>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can > >>> pick > >>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. > >>> - Kuberenetes > >>> - OpenStack > >>> - Distributed Cloud > >>> - Standalone Clouds, > >>> - Deployment Configs > >>> * SX, > >>> * DX, > >>> * Standard), > >>> - Rook, > >>> - PTP, > >>> - N3000 Support, > >>> - ACC100 Support, > >>> - NVIDA GPU Support, > >>> - QAT Support, > >>> - OIDC authentication, > >>> - Vault, > >>> - Portieris, > >>> - Auditd, > >>> - Metrics Server, > >>> - SNMP, > >>> - Dedicated CPUs, > >>> - Isolated CPUs, > >>> - ISTIO, > >>> - Cert Manager, > >>> - Remote CLI Container, > >>> - Kata Containers, > >>> - RWO PVC, > >>> - RWX PVC, > >>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, > >>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg > >>> and forwarding, bond), > >>> - vRAN Tools Container, > >>> - ... > >>> > >>> > >>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: > >>> > >>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included in > >>> StarlingX Solution > >>> > >>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io > >>> > >>> > >>> Greg. > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Ildiko Vancsa > >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM > >>> To: StarlingX ML > >>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > >>> > >>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > >>> > >>> Hi StarlingX Community, > >>> > >>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. > >>> > >>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. > >>> > >>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. > >>> > >>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the > >>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I > >>> created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a > >>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: > >>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey > >>> > >>> > >>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. > >>> > >>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. > >>> > >>> Please let me know if you have any questions. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Ildik? > >>> > >>> > >>> ??? > >>> > >>> Ildik? V?ncsa > >>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list > >>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > >>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discus > >>> s > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From openinfradn at gmail.com Mon Nov 14 16:03:38 2022 From: openinfradn at gmail.com (open infra) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:33:38 +0530 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 6:42 PM Khalil, Ghada wrote: > Hello, > > Regarding the question below: > > Is there way I can enable application-isolation across all the > worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? > > > > Application-isolated CPUs are configured on a per-host basis. When new > nodes are added, they will need to be explicitly configured. > > > > Is there a specific use-case that you have where it would be beneficial > for new nodes to automatically inherit the config of an existing node? > There was an old capability where host profiles could be created and > applied to new nodes. But this proved problematic as exact hardware matches > were not guaranteed. As a result, this capability was abandoned a long time > ago. > I was looking for easy method for re-using configuration of for group of nodes and make sure no human errors. Lets say, all nodes in bladcenter A get specific config. Right now we have less than 20 workers in a test bed but when it scale to hundreds there is a high chance we might miss one node. > > Regards, > > Ghada > > > > *From:* open infra > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2022 3:32 AM > *To:* Brito, Thiago > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set > > > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:16 AM Brito, Thiago > wrote: > > Did you do an application-apply after you changed the processors to > application-isolated? Can you send the output of the command below for you > compute pods: > > > > kubectl exec -n openstack nova-compute-[woker|controller]-X-XXXXX-xxxx -- > cat /etc/nova/nova.conf|grep dedicated_set > > > > > > Is there way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker > nodes including new nodes to be added in future? > > > > Don't forget to change the id of the pod for your compute pods. > > > > Thiago > ------------------------------ > > *From:* open infra > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 7, 2021 5:45 AM > *To:* Brito, Thiago > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set > > > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > Here is the info from STX side > > > > > > *Processors * > > 2 > > *Physical Cores Per Processor * > > 32 > > *Hyper-Threading * > > Yes > > CPU Assignments > > Create Cpu Profile > > > *Function* > > *Processor Logical Cores* > > Platform > > *Processor 0 : *0,64 > > vSwitch > > Shared > > Application > > *Processor 0 : *17-31,81-95 > *Processor 1 : *56-63,120-127 > > Application-isolated > > *Processor 0 : *1-16,65-80 > *Processor 1 : *32-55,96-119 > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:46 PM open infra wrote: > > Hi Thiago, > > > > I have configured the worker as mentioned in the given link and dedicated > cpu_policy set in the flavor. > > Instance creation failed with the following error. > > > > No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available. > > > > controller-0:~$ openstack flavor show dn.large -c properties > > > +------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > | Field | Value > | > > > +------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > | properties | hw:cpu_cores='2', hw:cpu_policy='dedicated', > hw:cpu_sockets='1', hw:cpu_threads='2', hw:numa_nodes='1' | > > > +------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > Regards, > > Danishka > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:18 AM Brito, Thiago > wrote: > > Hi Danishka, > > > > Whatever you configure on the platform as Application-isolated core for a > node will get to cpu_dedicated_set on stx-openstack. Please check this doc: > https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.5.0/admintasks/openstack/configure-dedicated-and-shared-cpu-pools-on-hosts.html > > > > > Thiago > ------------------------------ > > *From:* open infra > *Sent:* Monday, December 6, 2021 3:15 PM > *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set > > > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > Hi, > > > > Is the cpu_dedicated_set is already enabled in stx based openstack? > > How to verify and enable it? > > > > Regards, > > Danishka > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Tue Nov 15 00:12:43 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:12:43 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Election update - TSC voting requires preparation steps - ACTION NEEDED Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, We have 4 candidates for the 3 full-term TSC seats: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc Electorate: Individuals who are Individual Members of the Open Infrastructure Foundation and contributed to the project during the interval of October 31, 2021 - October 31, 2022 are eligible to vote in the voting period that starts this Tuesday (November 15). __If you do not have an active Open Infrastructure Foundation Individual Member account you need to register/update your profile here: https://openinfra.dev/join/ __ In addition to the above: We are using CIVS for the election process. There is a preparation step that people who are eligible to vote and would like to participate in the election, now need to take. __To receive the voting ballot from CIVS: you must opt-in to receiving email communications from CIVS.__ __This step needs to be completed BEFORE the polling starts on November 15.__ More information and the form to do so can be found at https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/opt_in.pl For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 In case you have questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. Thanks, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From outbackdingo at gmail.com Tue Nov 15 01:46:18 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:46:18 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Election update - TSC voting requires preparation steps - ACTION NEEDED In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Ildiko I dont see my name in the list of the email addresses of the electorate?? I was pretty sure you added it Thanks On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 7:17 AM Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > We have 4 candidates for the 3 full-term TSC seats: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc > > > Electorate: Individuals who are Individual Members of the Open Infrastructure Foundation and contributed to the project during the interval of October 31, 2021 - October 31, 2022 are eligible to vote in the voting period that starts this Tuesday (November 15). > > __If you do not have an active Open Infrastructure Foundation Individual Member account you need to register/update your profile here: https://openinfra.dev/join/ __ > > > In addition to the above: We are using CIVS for the election process. There is a preparation step that people who are eligible to vote and would like to participate in the election, now need to take. > > __To receive the voting ballot from CIVS: you must opt-in to receiving email communications from CIVS.__ > > __This step needs to be completed BEFORE the polling starts on November 15.__ > > More information and the form to do so can be found at https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/opt_in.pl > > > For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 > > In case you have questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. > > Thanks, > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com Tue Nov 15 02:55:37 2022 From: Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com (Subramanian, Ramaswamy) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 02:55:37 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Campaigning started In-Reply-To: <3B4FB042-0F96-4CB2-B9A7-30BDC734B149@openinfra.dev> References: <3B4FB042-0F96-4CB2-B9A7-30BDC734B149@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Building a community at a high level is a two-step process. The first is step is attracting the users. The second step is onboarding and maintaining users. Each step has many barriers. "Why StarlingX?" is a significant barrier for users considering/reviewing StarlingX. There are many factors that influence the selection process. One of the biggest factor is the features. And, an easy way to understand various capabilities will greatly aid the selection process. Blogs and Demo videos greatly assist in providing an overview of capabilities and learn them without setting up environments (or going through elaborate process). After a user has selected StarlingX, next step is onboarding and maintaining them. There are many barriers in this area. Below are some of them (not an exhaustive list). 1. Cultural differences (Depending on their background, they may expect real time communication) 2. Technical challenges (They may not realize the resources needed to develop/use, lack of technical skills, support expectations) 3. Newcomer characteristics. * Behavior (underestimate the time/support, may lack patience, may lack commitment) * Background (Expectations based on experience with other communities) 4. Documentation challenges(information overload, missing documentation) There are many barriers to onboarding and maintaining users. There may be a need to have multiple approaches to assist diverse community members. As a TSC, I would focus on the first step of attracting the users. In collaboration with project teams, I will contribute to blogs and demos where appropriate. Regards, Ram P.S.: If you have not seen it already, here is a demo showcasing the scalability of StarlingX (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3uGlKLNoRE). It?s also accessible from the StarlingX home page (https://www.starlingx.io/). -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 7:35 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Campaigning started CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX TSC candidates, I would like to use the opportunity to ask you a question as part of the TSC election campaign period. Growing and diversifying the community has been an important topic for the project since its inception. What is your strategy to support this effort? For instance, how would you lower the barriers for newcomers to enter and start participating in the community? Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 8, 2022, at 13:58, Ildiko Vancsa > wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > The StarlingX TSC Election Campaigning Period has now started [1] and will end on November 15 at 2045 UTC. > > During the next couple days, you are all encouraged to ask the candidates questions about their platforms [2], opinions on StarlingX, community governance, and anything else that will help you to better determine how you will vote. This is the time to raise any issues you wish the future TSC to consider, and to evaluate the opinions of the nominees prior to their election. > > > Candidates: > > Each of you has posted a platform[2], and announced your nomination to the project contributors. From this point, you are encouraged to ask each other questions about the posted platforms, and begin discussion of any points that you feel are particularly important during the next cycle. > > While you are not yet TSC members for the upcoming term, your voices and opinions about the issues raised in your platforms and questions raised by the wider community will help ensure that the future TSC has the widest possible input on the matters of community concern, and the electorate has the best information to determine the ideal TSC composition to address these and other issues that may arise. > > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik?, on behalf of the StarlingX election officials[3] > > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ > [2] > https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/20 > 22_H2/tsc [3] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From erin at openstack.org Tue Nov 15 15:00:35 2022 From: erin at openstack.org (Erin Disney) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:00:35 -0600 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] The CFP for the OpenInfra Summit 2023 is open! Message-ID: <90DD4E6A-84BB-43D6-BCF6-4BAA3E3C96F4@openstack.org> Hi Everyone! The CFP for the 2023 OpenInfra Summit (June 13-15, 2023) is NOW LIVE [1]! Check out the full list of tracks and submit a talk on your topic of expertise [2]. The CFP closes January 10, 2023, at 11:59 p.m. PT We are also now accepting submissions for Forum sessions [3]! What should you submit to the forum vs. the traditional CFP? For the Forum, submit discussion-oriented sessions, including challenges around different software components, working group progress or best practices to tackle common issues. Looking for other resources? Registration [4], sponsorships [5], travel support [6] and visa requests [7] are also all open! Find all the information on the OpenInfra Summit 2023 in one place [8]! Cheers, Erin [1] https://cfp.openinfra.dev/app/vancouver-2023/19/presentations [2] https://openinfra.dev/summit/vancouver-2023/summit-tracks/ [3] https://cfp.openinfra.dev/app/vancouver-2023/20/ [4] http://openinfra.dev/summit/registration [5] http://openinfra.dev/summit/vancouver-2023/summit-sponsor/ [6] https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_tsp [7] https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/visa_yvrsummit2023 [8] https://openinfra.dev/summit/vancouver-2023 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Tue Nov 15 18:09:52 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:09:52 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Election update - TSC voting requires preparation steps - ACTION NEEDED In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0A87FFDD-C76B-4AD9-A7DE-5AAFF0B9745A@gmail.com> Hi Scott, Thanks for catching that. I fixed it now! Best Regards, Ildik? > On Nov 14, 2022, at 17:46, Outback Dingo wrote: > > Hi Ildiko > > I dont see my name in the list of the email addresses of the electorate?? > I was pretty sure you added it > > Thanks > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 7:17 AM Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> We have 4 candidates for the 3 full-term TSC seats: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc >> >> >> Electorate: Individuals who are Individual Members of the Open Infrastructure Foundation and contributed to the project during the interval of October 31, 2021 - October 31, 2022 are eligible to vote in the voting period that starts this Tuesday (November 15). >> >> __If you do not have an active Open Infrastructure Foundation Individual Member account you need to register/update your profile here: https://openinfra.dev/join/ __ >> >> >> In addition to the above: We are using CIVS for the election process. There is a preparation step that people who are eligible to vote and would like to participate in the election, now need to take. >> >> __To receive the voting ballot from CIVS: you must opt-in to receiving email communications from CIVS.__ >> >> __This step needs to be completed BEFORE the polling starts on November 15.__ >> >> More information and the form to do so can be found at https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/opt_in.pl >> >> >> For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 >> >> In case you have questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. >> >> Thanks, >> >> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Tue Nov 15 20:25:00 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:25:00 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Election update - TSC voting requires preparation steps - ACTION NEEDED In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <06D86D7C-96D0-4CDE-8983-A8B2EE8996DC@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, It is a friendly reminder to please complete the preparation step to be able to vote in the upcoming poll to elect 3 new members to the TSC. __To receive the voting ballot from CIVS: you must opt-in to receiving email communications from CIVS.__ __This step needs to be completed BEFORE the polling starts on November 15.__ More information and the form to do so can be found at https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/opt_in.pl The voting will kick off later today with a bit of a delay to allow everyone to opt-in through the CIVS system. For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 In case you have questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. Thanks, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > On Nov 14, 2022, at 16:12, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > We have 4 candidates for the 3 full-term TSC seats: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc > > > Electorate: Individuals who are Individual Members of the Open Infrastructure Foundation and contributed to the project during the interval of October 31, 2021 - October 31, 2022 are eligible to vote in the voting period that starts this Tuesday (November 15). > > __If you do not have an active Open Infrastructure Foundation Individual Member account you need to register/update your profile here: https://openinfra.dev/join/ __ > > > In addition to the above: We are using CIVS for the election process. There is a preparation step that people who are eligible to vote and would like to participate in the election, now need to take. > > __To receive the voting ballot from CIVS: you must opt-in to receiving email communications from CIVS.__ > > __This step needs to be completed BEFORE the polling starts on November 15.__ > > More information and the form to do so can be found at https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/opt_in.pl > > > For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 > > In case you have questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. > > Thanks, > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > > From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Wed Nov 16 05:13:01 2022 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 05:13:01 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-Weekly StarlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS meeting - Nov 2nd, 2022 Message-ID: Hi, Below is the meeting minutes for Nov. 2, 2022: November 2, 2022 Attendees: Mark Asselstine, Frank Miller, Linda Wang, Scott Kamp, Scott Little, Davlet Panech, Litao Gao, Mike Matteson, Charles Short 1. General Topics * 0.1 Split Images * 0.1.1 Only worked for ISO image, and not for builds. use the cleaner solution: no changes in Jenkins, but just the docker files. * 0.2. Davelt will create launch pad for modification of containers * 0.3 CNGN can get the build working (parallel build improvement), build can be done within few hours. * 0.4 content sharing, patch size reduction, due to initramfs size, current Debian patch size is large. * founds ways to reduce initramfs by using previous built intiramfs. * Fixes are under review. Should be coming soon. * 0.5 Up-rev to the latest kernel LTS stable version is still in planning. Once we have someone to work on it, it will be posted for review. * 2. StartlingX * 0.1. Wireguard kernel configs have been posted and merged * 0.2 StarlingX 8.0 * 0.2.1.1 Content Shaing: next step is to share aptly storge. Naming convention and so on within aptly will need to change. The path will need to change to be unique. * 0.2.1.2 Shared the content for multiple builds, need to have stable APIs. with Aptly containers. * 0.2.1.3 Concerns about the repo layouts. Pulp will resolve this issue; but Pulp is currently under refactoring, so we will have to stay with Aptly for now. * 1. Naming convention is 1 issue. * 0.2.1.4 Changes for Pulp: need to push a couple more general fixes to help move the changes along. * 0.2.1.5 2nd issue, administrator will need to provide user certification to prevent conflicts. * Ai: Davlet to create a Jira on issue: Couldn't create miniq in build environment . Next meeting: Nov 16th -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Wed Nov 16 06:02:43 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 22:02:43 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Voting Kickoff Message-ID: <1B8AADCF-1FB7-4DCE-A339-8573EA424EA6@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, The poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is now open and will remain open for you to cast your vote until November 22, 2022, 2045 UTC. We are having elections for the 3 full-term TSC seats[1]. If you are an OpenInfra Foundation Individual Member and an active contributor to the project then you are eligible to vote. You should find your email with a link to the Condorcet page to cast your vote in the inbox of your Gerrit preferred email[2]. What to do if you don't see the email even though you are eligible to vote: * check the trash or spam folders of your Gerrit Preferred Email address, in case it went into trash or spam * wait a bit and check again, in case your email server is a bit slow * you might?ve missed to opt-in in the CIVS system, you will need to follow the steps of the process[3] and then email the election officials[4] to resend you the ballot * email the election officials to help you sort out the issue If we can confirm that you are entitled to vote, we will add you to the voters list for the appropriate election. Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc Happy voting, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#technical-steering-committee-s-election [2] Sign into review.openstack.org: Go to Settings > Contact Information. Look at the email listed as your Preferred Email. That is where the ballot has been sent. [3] https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013568.html [4] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Wed Nov 16 22:20:41 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 22:20:41 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for your response. Please see inline. From: open infra Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 11:04 AM To: Khalil, Ghada Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 6:42 PM Khalil, Ghada > wrote: Hello, Regarding the question below: Is there way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? Application-isolated CPUs are configured on a per-host basis. When new nodes are added, they will need to be explicitly configured. Is there a specific use-case that you have where it would be beneficial for new nodes to automatically inherit the config of an existing node? There was an old capability where host profiles could be created and applied to new nodes. But this proved problematic as exact hardware matches were not guaranteed. As a result, this capability was abandoned a long time ago. I was looking for easy method for re-using configuration of for group of nodes and make sure no human errors. Lets say, all nodes in bladcenter A get specific config. Right now we have less than 20 workers in a test bed but when it scale to hundreds there is a high chance we might miss one node. [GK] Unfortunately there is no mechanism to apply the config to multiple nodes. Regards, Ghada From: open infra > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 3:32 AM To: Brito, Thiago > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:16 AM Brito, Thiago > wrote: Did you do an application-apply after you changed the processors to application-isolated? Can you send the output of the command below for you compute pods: kubectl exec -n openstack nova-compute-[woker|controller]-X-XXXXX-xxxx -- cat /etc/nova/nova.conf|grep dedicated_set Is there way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? Don't forget to change the id of the pod for your compute pods. Thiago ________________________________ From: open infra > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 5:45 AM To: Brito, Thiago > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Here is the info from STX side Processors 2 Physical Cores Per Processor 32 Hyper-Threading Yes CPU Assignments Create Cpu Profile Function Processor Logical Cores Platform Processor 0 : 0,64 vSwitch Shared Application Processor 0 : 17-31,81-95 Processor 1 : 56-63,120-127 Application-isolated Processor 0 : 1-16,65-80 Processor 1 : 32-55,96-119 On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:46 PM open infra > wrote: Hi Thiago, I have configured the worker as mentioned in the given link and dedicated cpu_policy set in the flavor. Instance creation failed with the following error. No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available. controller-0:~$ openstack flavor show dn.large -c properties +------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | properties | hw:cpu_cores='2', hw:cpu_policy='dedicated', hw:cpu_sockets='1', hw:cpu_threads='2', hw:numa_nodes='1' | +------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Regards, Danishka On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:18 AM Brito, Thiago > wrote: Hi Danishka, Whatever you configure on the platform as Application-isolated core for a node will get to cpu_dedicated_set on stx-openstack. Please check this doc: https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.5.0/admintasks/openstack/configure-dedicated-and-shared-cpu-pools-on-hosts.html Thiago ________________________________ From: open infra > Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:15 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] How to enable cpu_dedicated_set [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi, Is the cpu_dedicated_set is already enabled in stx based openstack? How to verify and enable it? Regards, Danishka -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Wed Nov 16 22:36:46 2022 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 22:36:46 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 16-11-22 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Here are this week's docs team meeting minutes (short form). Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Wednesdays 12:30 PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 16-Nov-22 StarlingX 8.0 Release: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Doc Tasks created - Doc Team to ensure Stories/Tasks are added to the commit messages - Ongoing WIP - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862705: Verified Hardware Updates - WIP - Discuss with prime - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/861367 Flatten TOC for better customer experience - AR Ron - O-RAN updates https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010278- Updates are available in: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862367 - Stx Doc team to review and provide comments - DONE events.yaml - Automation of the events.yaml file in the docs - AR Ron / Juanita - WIP * Dependent on Fault Management events.yaml review; https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/fault/+/863574 - This review is merged. * All alarms and log rst files will be removed from the StarlingX docs (For example; 100-series-alarm-messages; 400-series-customer-log-messages) to accommodate this automation. * These files will be replaced by build-time artifacts (since a script has been created to capture these alarms and log files). * Reviewers need to refer to https://docs.starlingx.io/fault-mgmt/index-fault-98d5f50a9b8c.html to view updated alarms and log files. * All alarms and logs will be included in the Fault Management guide. * Alarm updates are only supported on Master * Doc Team to be included as part of the Gerrit review cycle for any alarm updates in the event.yaml files - To discuss details with Greg Waines / Frank Miller (To update the Contributor Guide after discussion with the primes with the required process) Installation Guide - Restructuring of the Installation Guide is WIP and the plan is to deliver for stx 8.0. Miscellaneous Updates: - Backslashes to be removed from rst files wherever applicable especially in code blocks, for example, \(code\_remove\) - GPU Operator Removal on WRO - AR Elisa - To be reviewed by PV before it is merged. - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/861904 Gerrit Reviews: - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 4 reviews - To verify if this Gerrit review is applicable to earlier releases of StarlingX - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/864440 - AR Elaine Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 9 bugs outstanding - The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects - WIP General Updates: - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed with Greg (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) Elections: Nov 15-22 [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Wed Nov 16 22:51:56 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 22:51:56 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Nov 16, 2022) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call November 16, 2022 Standing topics - Build - Main Branch CentOS Builds - Green all week - Main Branch Debian Builds - 6 out of 7 builds passed. - One failure last night was related to a transient connectivity issue. Build will be re-triggered tonight as per the usual schedule. - Debian Build Acceleration/Reuse Feature - The Acceleration feature is now functional for the ISO build, but not yet for container builds. - Work on container build re-use has not started yet. - Weekly CentOS Builds for stx.6.0 & stx.7.0 - Complete - Sanity - CentOS Main Branch Sanity w/ stx-openstack - Last sanity email sent on Nov 10: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013554.html - Status: Red - LP: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1991701 - Already addressed on the latest build. - Team discussing options of (1) moving to new CentOS build to pick up fix OR (2) waiitng for stx-openstack sanity on Debian - Currently, the platform CentOS build is fixed on Sept18 which is the last green sanity build for CentOS. - stx-openstack sanity transition to Debian - Planned for the Dec time-frame. On track. - Email to the mailing list: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013487.html - Debian Main Branch Sanity - Had a tool issue which prevented install/sanity from running. - Team believes the issue is addressed. - Will aim to trigger another sanity by end of week. If not, it will be on the coming Monday. - Last sanity email sent on Nov 8: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013541.html - Status: Green - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - From last meeting: Fixes to libvirt env: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/863735 - Review comments provided; waiting for new patchset from author - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - TSC Elections - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013568.html - IMPORTANT: Voters need to opt-in to receive a ballot ARs from Previous Meetings - None Open Requests for Help - StarlingX 6.0 fails to deploy - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013536.html - This is using the released stx.6.0 release which hasn't changed, so unclear why this is failing now. - ScottK Update (Nov 16): Fails to install on one node, but installed successfully on other ones. - Appears to be some kind of anomoly specific to this node. - Consider Closed as it's tied to a specific h/w system - StarlingX 7.0 & 8.0 deployment failures - NEW - Reported by ScottK in the Nov 16 meeting - Working through installation issues on various hardware. Will share more info w/ the mailing list once issues are more isolated. - Virtio-forwarder with StarlingX - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013505.html - ScottK responded with additional questions: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013532.html - Waiting for response / no response as of Nov 16 - Enabling cpu_dedicated_set - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013382.html - Last Question posted in the thread: Is there a way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? - Responses provided. There is no capability to do this at the moment. - Consider Closed. From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Nov 17 03:56:06 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 19:56:06 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Election update - TSC voting requires preparation steps - ACTION NEEDED In-Reply-To: <06D86D7C-96D0-4CDE-8983-A8B2EE8996DC@gmail.com> References: <06D86D7C-96D0-4CDE-8983-A8B2EE8996DC@gmail.com> Message-ID: <2918CC93-3D7E-4AC7-B64F-D35358000EC1@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, It is a friendly reminder that the voting period for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is currently ongoing! Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, and I would like to encourage you to please exercise your right to vote! Please also remember to take the steps to fulfill the prerequisites so you can receive your ballot if you are eligible to vote: __To receive the voting ballot from CIVS: you must opt-in to receiving email communications from CIVS.__ More information and the form to do so can be found at https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/opt_in.pl __In addition, if you do not have an active Open Infrastructure Foundation Individual Member account you need to register/update your profile here: https://openinfra.dev/join/ __ For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 In case you have questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. Thanks, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > On Nov 15, 2022, at 12:25, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > It is a friendly reminder to please complete the preparation step to be able to vote in the upcoming poll to elect 3 new members to the TSC. > > __To receive the voting ballot from CIVS: you must opt-in to receiving email communications from CIVS.__ > > __This step needs to be completed BEFORE the polling starts on November 15.__ > > More information and the form to do so can be found at https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/opt_in.pl > > > The voting will kick off later today with a bit of a delay to allow everyone to opt-in through the CIVS system. > > > For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 > > In case you have questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. > > Thanks, > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > >> On Nov 14, 2022, at 16:12, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> We have 4 candidates for the 3 full-term TSC seats: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc >> >> >> Electorate: Individuals who are Individual Members of the Open Infrastructure Foundation and contributed to the project during the interval of October 31, 2021 - October 31, 2022 are eligible to vote in the voting period that starts this Tuesday (November 15). >> >> __If you do not have an active Open Infrastructure Foundation Individual Member account you need to register/update your profile here: https://openinfra.dev/join/ __ >> >> >> In addition to the above: We are using CIVS for the election process. There is a preparation step that people who are eligible to vote and would like to participate in the election, now need to take. >> >> __To receive the voting ballot from CIVS: you must opt-in to receiving email communications from CIVS.__ >> >> __This step needs to be completed BEFORE the polling starts on November 15.__ >> >> More information and the form to do so can be found at https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/opt_in.pl >> >> >> For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 >> >> In case you have questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. >> >> Thanks, >> >> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials >> >> >> > From ildiko at openinfra.dev Thu Nov 17 04:09:51 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:09:51 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Mission statement discussion input and workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to let you know that marketing team is having a follow-up workshop to continue the discussion about refreshing the project?s mission statement, and I would like to invite and encourage everyone who would like to participate to join. The call is scheduled to November 29 at noon PST / 2000 UTC. The Zoom bridge to dial in is: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85344179503?pwd=K05kckptcmM2N3dhTEJheFVyS05OQT09 Please find the notes from our previous call here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-mission-statement Please let me know if you would like me to add you to the meeting invite. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 9, 2022, at 07:32, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > As a follow up to the PTG the StarlingX Marketing team started to work on proposals to update the project?s mission statement. > > The team would like to ask the community for input so we can have a more guided activity and better fitting results. The questions we raised during the Marketing meeting yesterday: > * What will be the community?s priorities for the short to mid-term future, meaning the next 1-3 years? > * What is the community?s vision with regards to challenges that the StarlingX platform is developed and shaped to solve and address? > > To ensure progress the Marketing team set up an ad-hoc meeting time for Monday (November 14) at 11am US Pacific Time, to have a workshop and work on options. Anyone who is interested in participating in that conversation please join us on the call! > The dial-in link for the meeting is: https://windriver.zoom.us/j/97692404047?pwd=Um93SXBzNFMwL21JUmJYU3dteVNVdz09 > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Thu Nov 17 15:34:23 2022 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:34:23 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20221115T070000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2022-November 16. (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20221115T070000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Thu Nov 17 17:19:11 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:19:11 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Pausing stx + stx-openstack sanity runs Message-ID: Hi all, After some discussion, we've decided to pause momentarily the STX-Openstack sanity executions for the community mailing list, as we are facing some issues with StarlingX CentOS builds, that are affecting the results for STX-Openstack, since the debian migration is not finished yet. With the conclusion of this migration, we'll come back to send the results here on the mailing list, and keep you all posted. Regards Gabriel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Thu Nov 17 22:40:39 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:40:39 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] 'extra-atcs' field in the projects.yaml file Message-ID: <03A846D2-B63C-4906-A8AF-DE8F20C5684B@openinfra.dev> Hi StarlingX community, A few of you have raised the question of what the ?extra-atcs? field represents in the governance repository. To help with providing answer to that question I created a patch to add it to the description of the election process. You can find the patch here: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/election/+/864580 Please add questions and comments to the review if the description is not clear. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Fri Nov 18 17:23:36 2022 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 17:23:36 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-Weekly StarlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS meeting minutes - Nov 16, 2022 Message-ID: Hi, November 16, 2022 Attendees: Frank Miller, Scott Kamp, Charles Short, Linda Wang, Carlos Pocahy, Davlet Panech, Scott Little 1. General Topics * 0.1 Split package list between repositories * * decentralized package lists, one for ISO content, and one for container images. * 0.2 Log into the git before download the source. So will need login credentials to authenticate. * * workaround: currently use repo sync outside of the containers. * * Feature request for the tool - file a request in Story Board. 0.3. ISO size is bigger than 4G. * * Someone may have hit this limit. * * One of the tools broke when the ISO is bigger than 4G. * * The tool that creates CD or ISO format , possibly due to USB, will break due to this limitation. * * There is an iso8660/udf limit as well on file size * * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO-9660 * * AI#3: build team: need to compare the CentOS vs Debian size. (may be immutable filesystem) 2. StarlingX * 0.1 StarlingX 8.0 * 0.1.1 Kernel uprev version * * Kernel up'rev minor version: currently v5.10.127, => v5.10.152 * * Patch is ready, under going testing (Sanity and Cyclic tests) * * Patchset is also ready for review * * 1 week from Monday to push for merge. * * AI#1: send email to mailing list to inform people kernel updates is happening. * 0.1.2 Secureboot * * Which systems are enabled for Secureboot * * Simplex vs Duplex, which should be enabled * * Eric has finished his work. * * AI#2: send email out to mailing list, that secureboot is enabled. Next Meeting: Nov 30th, 2022 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Fri Nov 18 17:30:36 2022 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 17:30:36 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX 8.0 Kernel minor version p'rev to 5.10.152 Message-ID: Hi, As mentioned in the bi-weekly StarlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS meeting this week, the minor kernel minor version in StartlingX 8.0 has ben up rev'ed from 5.10.112 to 5.10.152 with the following merge request: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/kernel/+/864389. The request has been merged as of 2 days ago. Many thanks, Linda -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Sun Nov 20 00:36:12 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:36:12 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Voting Kickoff In-Reply-To: <1B8AADCF-1FB7-4DCE-A339-8573EA424EA6@gmail.com> References: <1B8AADCF-1FB7-4DCE-A339-8573EA424EA6@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, It is a friendly reminder that the poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is now open and will __remain open for you to cast your vote until November 22, 2022, 2045 UTC__. So far 20% of the eligible voters casted their votes. Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc If you are eligible to vote and haven?t received your ballot please reach out to the election officials[1]. Thanks and Best Regards, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > On Nov 15, 2022, at 22:02, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > The poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is now open and will remain open for you to cast your vote until November 22, 2022, 2045 UTC. > > We are having elections for the 3 full-term TSC seats[1]. > > If you are an OpenInfra Foundation Individual Member and an active contributor to the project then you are eligible to vote. You should find your email with a link to the Condorcet page to cast your vote in the inbox of your Gerrit preferred email[2]. > > What to do if you don't see the email even though you are eligible to vote: > > * check the trash or spam folders of your Gerrit Preferred Email address, in case it went into trash or spam > * wait a bit and check again, in case your email server is a bit slow > * you might?ve missed to opt-in in the CIVS system, you will need to follow the steps of the process[3] and then email the election officials[4] to resend you the ballot > * email the election officials to help you sort out the issue > > If we can confirm that you are entitled to vote, we will add you to the voters list for the appropriate election. > > Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! > > Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc > > Happy voting, > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#technical-steering-committee-s-election > [2] Sign into review.openstack.org: Go to Settings > Contact Information. Look at the email listed as your Preferred Email. That is where the ballot has been sent. > [3] https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013568.html > [4] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From ildiko at openinfra.dev Mon Nov 21 17:51:40 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:51:40 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> Message-ID: <16069B94-01C2-4250-A901-50247CF9D951@openinfra.dev> Thanks Greg and Scott! I added some more suggestions and questions. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 14, 2022, at 07:01, Outback Dingo wrote: > > added my input.... :) > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:26 PM Waines, Greg wrote: >> >> Added responses to your questions. >> Greg. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ildiko Vancsa >> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 5:56 PM >> To: Waines, Greg >> Cc: StarlingX ML >> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >> >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. >> >> If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. >> >> Thanks, >> Ildik? >> >> >>> On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: >>> >>> Hey Ildiko, >>> I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. >>> looking good, >>> Greg. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM >>> To: Waines, Greg >>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>> >>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>> >>> Hi Greg, >>> >>> Sounds good. >>> >>> I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: >>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>> >>> Please let me know what you think. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ildik? >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. >>>> Greg. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM >>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>> >>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. >>>> >>>> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ildik? >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> My thoughts ... >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >>>>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX For >>>>> example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >>>>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >>>>> pick >>>>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >>>>> - Kuberenetes >>>>> - OpenStack >>>>> - Distributed Cloud >>>>> - Standalone Clouds, >>>>> - Deployment Configs >>>>> * SX, >>>>> * DX, >>>>> * Standard), >>>>> - Rook, >>>>> - PTP, >>>>> - N3000 Support, >>>>> - ACC100 Support, >>>>> - NVIDA GPU Support, >>>>> - QAT Support, >>>>> - OIDC authentication, >>>>> - Vault, >>>>> - Portieris, >>>>> - Auditd, >>>>> - Metrics Server, >>>>> - SNMP, >>>>> - Dedicated CPUs, >>>>> - Isolated CPUs, >>>>> - ISTIO, >>>>> - Cert Manager, >>>>> - Remote CLI Container, >>>>> - Kata Containers, >>>>> - RWO PVC, >>>>> - RWX PVC, >>>>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >>>>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg >>>>> and forwarding, bond), >>>>> - vRAN Tools Container, >>>>> - ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >>>>> >>>>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included in >>>>> StarlingX Solution >>>>> >>>>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Greg. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >>>>> To: StarlingX ML >>>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>> >>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>> >>>>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>>>> >>>>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >>>>> >>>>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >>>>> >>>>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >>>>> >>>>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >>>>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. I >>>>> created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >>>>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ildik? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ??? >>>>> >>>>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>>>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discus >>>>> s >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Tue Nov 22 00:52:37 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:52:37 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Voting Kickoff In-Reply-To: References: <1B8AADCF-1FB7-4DCE-A339-8573EA424EA6@gmail.com> Message-ID: <83337576-7CA2-414F-9DD0-85B1CCE46058@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, It is a friendly reminder that the poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is closing __this Tuesday (November 22)__. So far 23% of the eligible voters casted their votes. Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc If you are eligible to vote and haven?t received your ballot please reach out to the election officials[1 Thanks and Best Regards, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > On Nov 19, 2022, at 16:36, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > It is a friendly reminder that the poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is now open and will __remain open for you to cast your vote until November 22, 2022, 2045 UTC__. > > So far 20% of the eligible voters casted their votes. > > Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! > > Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc > > > If you are eligible to vote and haven?t received your ballot please reach out to the election officials[1]. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > > >> On Nov 15, 2022, at 22:02, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> The poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is now open and will remain open for you to cast your vote until November 22, 2022, 2045 UTC. >> >> We are having elections for the 3 full-term TSC seats[1]. >> >> If you are an OpenInfra Foundation Individual Member and an active contributor to the project then you are eligible to vote. You should find your email with a link to the Condorcet page to cast your vote in the inbox of your Gerrit preferred email[2]. >> >> What to do if you don't see the email even though you are eligible to vote: >> >> * check the trash or spam folders of your Gerrit Preferred Email address, in case it went into trash or spam >> * wait a bit and check again, in case your email server is a bit slow >> * you might?ve missed to opt-in in the CIVS system, you will need to follow the steps of the process[3] and then email the election officials[4] to resend you the ballot >> * email the election officials to help you sort out the issue >> >> If we can confirm that you are entitled to vote, we will add you to the voters list for the appropriate election. >> >> Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! >> >> Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc >> >> Happy voting, >> >> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#technical-steering-committee-s-election >> [2] Sign into review.openstack.org: Go to Settings > Contact Information. Look at the email listed as your Preferred Email. That is where the ballot has been sent. >> [3] https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013568.html >> [4] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Tue Nov 22 20:07:12 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:07:12 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Voting - CLOSING SOON In-Reply-To: <83337576-7CA2-414F-9DD0-85B1CCE46058@gmail.com> References: <1B8AADCF-1FB7-4DCE-A339-8573EA424EA6@gmail.com> <83337576-7CA2-414F-9DD0-85B1CCE46058@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, It is a friendly reminder that the poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is __closing later today__! Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 If you are eligible to vote and haven?t received your ballot please reach out to the election officials[1] Thanks and Best Regards, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > On Nov 21, 2022, at 16:52, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > It is a friendly reminder that the poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is closing __this Tuesday (November 22)__. > > So far 23% of the eligible voters casted their votes. > > Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! > > Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc > > > If you are eligible to vote and haven?t received your ballot please reach out to the election officials[1 > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > > >> On Nov 19, 2022, at 16:36, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> It is a friendly reminder that the poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is now open and will __remain open for you to cast your vote until November 22, 2022, 2045 UTC__. >> >> So far 20% of the eligible voters casted their votes. >> >> Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! >> >> Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc >> >> >> If you are eligible to vote and haven?t received your ballot please reach out to the election officials[1]. >> >> Thanks and Best Regards, >> >> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials >> >> >> >>> On Nov 15, 2022, at 22:02, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >>> >>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>> >>> The poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is now open and will remain open for you to cast your vote until November 22, 2022, 2045 UTC. >>> >>> We are having elections for the 3 full-term TSC seats[1]. >>> >>> If you are an OpenInfra Foundation Individual Member and an active contributor to the project then you are eligible to vote. You should find your email with a link to the Condorcet page to cast your vote in the inbox of your Gerrit preferred email[2]. >>> >>> What to do if you don't see the email even though you are eligible to vote: >>> >>> * check the trash or spam folders of your Gerrit Preferred Email address, in case it went into trash or spam >>> * wait a bit and check again, in case your email server is a bit slow >>> * you might?ve missed to opt-in in the CIVS system, you will need to follow the steps of the process[3] and then email the election officials[4] to resend you the ballot >>> * email the election officials to help you sort out the issue >>> >>> If we can confirm that you are entitled to vote, we will add you to the voters list for the appropriate election. >>> >>> Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! >>> >>> Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc >>> >>> Happy voting, >>> >>> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#technical-steering-committee-s-election >>> [2] Sign into review.openstack.org: Go to Settings > Contact Information. Look at the email listed as your Preferred Email. That is where the ballot has been sent. >>> [3] https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013568.html >>> [4] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials >> > From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Tue Nov 22 22:53:09 2022 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 22:53:09 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20221122T070000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2022-November 22. (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20221122T070000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Wed Nov 23 03:59:50 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:59:50 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC Election Voting - Now Closed In-Reply-To: References: <1B8AADCF-1FB7-4DCE-A339-8573EA424EA6@gmail.com> <83337576-7CA2-414F-9DD0-85B1CCE46058@gmail.com> Message-ID: <78657D7E-ECE7-4CA2-96A8-2606F86BB4FC@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, The 2022 H2 StarlingX TSC elections are now over. We were running a poll to elect members to the 3 one-year term TSC seats. We had 130 eligible voters and received 38 votes. Congratulations to the new and re-elected TSC members: * Greg Waines * Ramaswamy Subramanian * Scott V Kamp You can find all the candidates for the 2022 H2 StarlingX TSC elections here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc The following patch is updating the TSC member file with the results: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/governance/+/865368 Thank you to all the candidates for running in the elections. If you have any questions please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1]. Thanks and Best Regards, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > On Nov 22, 2022, at 12:07, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > It is a friendly reminder that the poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is __closing later today__! > > Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! > > Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc > For reference, the list of the email addresses of the electorate for the poll is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.ba0ed0fbd20fcdc313694ea6017181c3 > > > If you are eligible to vote and haven?t received your ballot please reach out to the election officials[1] > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > > >> On Nov 21, 2022, at 16:52, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> It is a friendly reminder that the poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is closing __this Tuesday (November 22)__. >> >> So far 23% of the eligible voters casted their votes. >> >> Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! >> >> Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc >> >> >> If you are eligible to vote and haven?t received your ballot please reach out to the election officials[1 >> >> Thanks and Best Regards, >> >> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials >> >> >> >>> On Nov 19, 2022, at 16:36, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >>> >>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>> >>> It is a friendly reminder that the poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is now open and will __remain open for you to cast your vote until November 22, 2022, 2045 UTC__. >>> >>> So far 20% of the eligible voters casted their votes. >>> >>> Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! >>> >>> Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc >>> >>> >>> If you are eligible to vote and haven?t received your ballot please reach out to the election officials[1]. >>> >>> Thanks and Best Regards, >>> >>> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 15, 2022, at 22:02, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>>> >>>> The poll for the 2022 H2 TSC elections is now open and will remain open for you to cast your vote until November 22, 2022, 2045 UTC. >>>> >>>> We are having elections for the 3 full-term TSC seats[1]. >>>> >>>> If you are an OpenInfra Foundation Individual Member and an active contributor to the project then you are eligible to vote. You should find your email with a link to the Condorcet page to cast your vote in the inbox of your Gerrit preferred email[2]. >>>> >>>> What to do if you don't see the email even though you are eligible to vote: >>>> >>>> * check the trash or spam folders of your Gerrit Preferred Email address, in case it went into trash or spam >>>> * wait a bit and check again, in case your email server is a bit slow >>>> * you might?ve missed to opt-in in the CIVS system, you will need to follow the steps of the process[3] and then email the election officials[4] to resend you the ballot >>>> * email the election officials to help you sort out the issue >>>> >>>> If we can confirm that you are entitled to vote, we will add you to the voters list for the appropriate election. >>>> >>>> Our democratic process is important to the health of StarlingX, please exercise your right to vote! >>>> >>>> Candidate statements/platforms can be found here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2022_H2/tsc >>>> >>>> Happy voting, >>>> >>>> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#technical-steering-committee-s-election >>>> [2] Sign into review.openstack.org: Go to Settings > Contact Information. Look at the email listed as your Preferred Email. That is where the ballot has been sent. >>>> [3] https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013568.html >>>> [4] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials >>> >> > From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Wed Nov 23 13:55:51 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:55:51 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Project Meeting Minutes Message-ID: StarlingX PLs & TLs, An overdue action I had from the StarlingX PTG .... >From our discussions in the PTG around better communication and information sharing within the StarlingX Community, it was proposed that "ALL" weekly or bi-weekly Project Meetings send out Minutes/ProjectUpdate to the StarlingX Discuss Mailing List after every Project Meeting. This is to ensure that all community members (even ones that cannot attend the actual meetings due to timezone reasons or meeting conflicts) have the opportunity to follow discussions, activities, proposed decisions and status of activities going on in the Projects. I realize that a number of Projects are already doing this, please continue. Just want to ensure that all Projects know that this is expected by the community. thanks Greg. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From shavin.wijetunge at xunison.com Wed Nov 23 15:30:57 2022 From: shavin.wijetunge at xunison.com (Shavin Wijetunge) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:30:57 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] FW: KICKOFF meeting for STARLINGX UPGRADE SUPPORT Activity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sent from my Galaxy When: 25 Nov 2022 19:30:00 ________________________________ From: Shavin Wijetunge Sent: Wednesday, 23 November 2022 07:26:45 UTC To: Scott Kamp ; Kajamugan Varatharaja ; Greg ; Outback Dingo ; Frank ; Mike ; Ramaswamy ; Douglas ; Heitor Vieira Cc: Cervi, Thales Elero Subject: KICKOFF meeting for STARLINGX UPGRADE SUPPORT Activity When: 25 November 2022 14:00-15:00. Where: Tennyson Regis is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: KICKOFF meeting for STARLINGX UPGRADE SUPPORT Activity Time: Nov 25, 2022 09:00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89946289886?pwd=TDRpZzF1Y0xoWi9uNkFxTHVvazVOQT09 Meeting ID: 899 4628 9886 Passcode: 263668 One tap mobile +13602095623,,89946289886#,,,,*263668# US +13863475053,,89946289886#,,,,*263668# US Dial by your location +1 360 209 5623 US +1 386 347 5053 US +1 507 473 4847 US +1 564 217 2000 US +1 646 931 3860 US +1 669 444 9171 US +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 689 278 1000 US +1 719 359 4580 US +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) +1 253 205 0468 US +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +1 305 224 1968 US +1 309 205 3325 US +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) Meeting ID: 899 4628 9886 Passcode: 263668 Find your local number: https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kb0eG8NEY1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 4728 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Wed Nov 23 18:14:10 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:14:10 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: <16069B94-01C2-4250-A901-50247CF9D951@openinfra.dev> References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> <16069B94-01C2-4250-A901-50247CF9D951@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Hey Ildiko, Just reviewed the current etherpad page ( https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey ). I added some new comments. Generally though, it looked like we are removing a lot of questions ? Why is that ? Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 12:52 PM To: Outback Dingo Cc: Waines, Greg ; StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks Greg and Scott! I added some more suggestions and questions. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 14, 2022, at 07:01, Outback Dingo wrote: > > added my input.... :) > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:26 PM Waines, Greg wrote: >> >> Added responses to your questions. >> Greg. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ildiko Vancsa >> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 5:56 PM >> To: Waines, Greg >> Cc: StarlingX ML >> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >> >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. >> >> If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. >> >> Thanks, >> Ildik? >> >> >>> On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: >>> >>> Hey Ildiko, >>> I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. >>> looking good, >>> Greg. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM >>> To: Waines, Greg >>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>> >>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>> >>> Hi Greg, >>> >>> Sounds good. >>> >>> I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: >>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>> >>> Please let me know what you think. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ildik? >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. >>>> Greg. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM >>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>> >>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. >>>> >>>> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ildik? >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> My thoughts ... >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >>>>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX >>>>> For example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >>>>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >>>>> pick >>>>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >>>>> - Kuberenetes >>>>> - OpenStack >>>>> - Distributed Cloud >>>>> - Standalone Clouds, >>>>> - Deployment Configs >>>>> * SX, >>>>> * DX, >>>>> * Standard), >>>>> - Rook, >>>>> - PTP, >>>>> - N3000 Support, >>>>> - ACC100 Support, >>>>> - NVIDA GPU Support, >>>>> - QAT Support, >>>>> - OIDC authentication, >>>>> - Vault, >>>>> - Portieris, >>>>> - Auditd, >>>>> - Metrics Server, >>>>> - SNMP, >>>>> - Dedicated CPUs, >>>>> - Isolated CPUs, >>>>> - ISTIO, >>>>> - Cert Manager, >>>>> - Remote CLI Container, >>>>> - Kata Containers, >>>>> - RWO PVC, >>>>> - RWX PVC, >>>>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >>>>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg >>>>> and forwarding, bond), >>>>> - vRAN Tools Container, >>>>> - ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >>>>> >>>>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included >>>>> in StarlingX Solution >>>>> >>>>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Greg. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >>>>> To: StarlingX ML >>>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>> >>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>> >>>>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>>>> >>>>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >>>>> >>>>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >>>>> >>>>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >>>>> >>>>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >>>>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. >>>>> I created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >>>>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ildik? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ??? >>>>> >>>>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>>>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure >>>>> Foundation >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-disc >>>>> us >>>>> s >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Nov 23 18:19:38 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:19:38 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> <16069B94-01C2-4250-A901-50247CF9D951@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: <764C3AE4-BD17-48EF-8F58-E560044886D4@openinfra.dev> Hi Greg, Great, thank you for checking! I added a comment to the top of the etherpad (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey#L8) about the crossed over lines when I made the edits yesterday. Tl;dr: I started to build the new survey in the tool that we?re going to use going forward and I marked the questions I already added to the form by crossing them over. It is just a reminder that those are already added and if we change them then I?ll have to update the actual survey form as well. Sorry about the confusion. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 23, 2022, at 10:14, Waines, Greg wrote: > > Hey Ildiko, > Just reviewed the current etherpad page ( https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey ). > I added some new comments. > > Generally though, it looked like we are removing a lot of questions ? Why is that ? > > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 12:52 PM > To: Outback Dingo > Cc: Waines, Greg ; StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Thanks Greg and Scott! > > I added some more suggestions and questions. Please let me know what you think. > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > >> On Nov 14, 2022, at 07:01, Outback Dingo wrote: >> >> added my input.... :) >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:26 PM Waines, Greg wrote: >>> >>> Added responses to your questions. >>> Greg. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 5:56 PM >>> To: Waines, Greg >>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>> >>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>> >>> Hi Greg, >>> >>> Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. >>> >>> If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ildik? >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Ildiko, >>>> I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. >>>> looking good, >>>> Greg. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM >>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>> >>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> Hi Greg, >>>> >>>> Sounds good. >>>> >>>> I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: >>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>> >>>> Please let me know what you think. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ildik? >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. >>>>> Greg. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM >>>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>> >>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. >>>>> >>>>> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ildik? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> My thoughts ... >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >>>>>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX >>>>>> For example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >>>>>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >>>>>> pick >>>>>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >>>>>> - Kuberenetes >>>>>> - OpenStack >>>>>> - Distributed Cloud >>>>>> - Standalone Clouds, >>>>>> - Deployment Configs >>>>>> * SX, >>>>>> * DX, >>>>>> * Standard), >>>>>> - Rook, >>>>>> - PTP, >>>>>> - N3000 Support, >>>>>> - ACC100 Support, >>>>>> - NVIDA GPU Support, >>>>>> - QAT Support, >>>>>> - OIDC authentication, >>>>>> - Vault, >>>>>> - Portieris, >>>>>> - Auditd, >>>>>> - Metrics Server, >>>>>> - SNMP, >>>>>> - Dedicated CPUs, >>>>>> - Isolated CPUs, >>>>>> - ISTIO, >>>>>> - Cert Manager, >>>>>> - Remote CLI Container, >>>>>> - Kata Containers, >>>>>> - RWO PVC, >>>>>> - RWX PVC, >>>>>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >>>>>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg >>>>>> and forwarding, bond), >>>>>> - vRAN Tools Container, >>>>>> - ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included >>>>>> in StarlingX Solution >>>>>> >>>>>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Greg. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >>>>>> To: StarlingX ML >>>>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>>> >>>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>>>>> >>>>>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >>>>>> >>>>>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >>>>>> >>>>>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >>>>>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. >>>>>> I created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >>>>>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >>>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ildik? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ??? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>>>>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure >>>>>> Foundation >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-disc >>>>>> us >>>>>> s >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > > > > From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Wed Nov 23 21:39:25 2022 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 21:39:25 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 23-11-22 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Here are this week's docs team meeting minutes (short form). Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Wednesdays 12:30 PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 23-Nov-22 StarlingX 8.0 Release: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Doc Tasks created - Doc Team to ensure Stories/Tasks are added to the commit messages - Ongoing WIP - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862705: Verified Hardware Updates - WIP - Discuss with prime - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/861367 Flatten TOC for better customer experience - AR Ron - events.yaml - Automation of the final updates of the events.yaml file in the StarlingX docs - AR Ron / Juanita - WIP - Reviewers need to refer to https://docs.starlingx.io/fault-mgmt/index-fault-98d5f50a9b8c.html to view updated alarms and log files. - Alarm updates are only supported on Master - Manual updates need to be implemented on the branches for alarms (events.yaml) since script is not supported on the branches as of date. - Doc Team to be included as part of the Gerrit review cycle for any alarm updates in the event.yaml files - To discuss details with Greg Waines / Frank Miller (To update the Contributor Guide after discussion with the primes with the required process) Installation Guide - Restructuring of the Installation Guide is WIP and the plan is to deliver for stx 8.0. Miscellaneous Updates: - Backslashes to be removed from rst files wherever applicable especially in code blocks, for example, \(code\_remove\) - To be cleaned up in rst files as the files are being updated for any doc Gerrit reviews. - GPU Operator Removal on WRO - AR Elisa - To be reviewed by PV before it is merged. - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/861904 - DONE Gerrit Reviews: Attention Needed from ALL core reviewers before DOC Reviews are merged - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 4 reviews NOTE: All core reviewers to review and +1 or WF the Doc reviews at : https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - To verify if this Gerrit review is applicable to earlier releases of StarlingX - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/864440 - AR Elaine - DONE, Needs to be cherry picked to the different releases. Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 10 bugs outstanding - The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects - WIP General Updates: - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed with Greg (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Nov 23 23:22:01 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:22:01 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: <764C3AE4-BD17-48EF-8F58-E560044886D4@openinfra.dev> References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> <16069B94-01C2-4250-A901-50247CF9D951@openinfra.dev> <764C3AE4-BD17-48EF-8F58-E560044886D4@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Hi All, We are now in the finish line to update the StarlingX survey! I got through the survey etherpad and there?s one question that I have a question to which is currently unanswered. It is question 14, which is currently in line #80 here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey#L80 Please let me know if you have an opinion about it. I will share the link to the new survey as soon as we finalize the last outstanding item. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 23, 2022, at 10:19, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > Great, thank you for checking! > > I added a comment to the top of the etherpad (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey#L8) about the crossed over lines when I made the edits yesterday. > > Tl;dr: I started to build the new survey in the tool that we?re going to use going forward and I marked the questions I already added to the form by crossing them over. It is just a reminder that those are already added and if we change them then I?ll have to update the actual survey form as well. Sorry about the confusion. > > Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > >> On Nov 23, 2022, at 10:14, Waines, Greg wrote: >> >> Hey Ildiko, >> Just reviewed the current etherpad page ( https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey ). >> I added some new comments. >> >> Generally though, it looked like we are removing a lot of questions ? Why is that ? >> >> Greg. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ildiko Vancsa >> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 12:52 PM >> To: Outback Dingo >> Cc: Waines, Greg ; StarlingX ML >> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >> >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Thanks Greg and Scott! >> >> I added some more suggestions and questions. Please let me know what you think. >> >> Thanks, >> Ildik? >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem >> Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >>> On Nov 14, 2022, at 07:01, Outback Dingo wrote: >>> >>> added my input.... :) >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:26 PM Waines, Greg wrote: >>>> >>>> Added responses to your questions. >>>> Greg. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 5:56 PM >>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>> >>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> Hi Greg, >>>> >>>> Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. >>>> >>>> If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ildik? >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Ildiko, >>>>> I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. >>>>> looking good, >>>>> Greg. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM >>>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>> >>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Greg, >>>>> >>>>> Sounds good. >>>>> >>>>> I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: >>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know what you think. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ildik? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. >>>>>> Greg. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>>> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM >>>>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>>> >>>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. >>>>>> >>>>>> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ildik? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My thoughts ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >>>>>>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX >>>>>>> For example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >>>>>>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >>>>>>> pick >>>>>>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >>>>>>> - Kuberenetes >>>>>>> - OpenStack >>>>>>> - Distributed Cloud >>>>>>> - Standalone Clouds, >>>>>>> - Deployment Configs >>>>>>> * SX, >>>>>>> * DX, >>>>>>> * Standard), >>>>>>> - Rook, >>>>>>> - PTP, >>>>>>> - N3000 Support, >>>>>>> - ACC100 Support, >>>>>>> - NVIDA GPU Support, >>>>>>> - QAT Support, >>>>>>> - OIDC authentication, >>>>>>> - Vault, >>>>>>> - Portieris, >>>>>>> - Auditd, >>>>>>> - Metrics Server, >>>>>>> - SNMP, >>>>>>> - Dedicated CPUs, >>>>>>> - Isolated CPUs, >>>>>>> - ISTIO, >>>>>>> - Cert Manager, >>>>>>> - Remote CLI Container, >>>>>>> - Kata Containers, >>>>>>> - RWO PVC, >>>>>>> - RWX PVC, >>>>>>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >>>>>>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg >>>>>>> and forwarding, bond), >>>>>>> - vRAN Tools Container, >>>>>>> - ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included >>>>>>> in StarlingX Solution >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Greg. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >>>>>>> To: StarlingX ML >>>>>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >>>>>>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. >>>>>>> I created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >>>>>>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >>>>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Ildik? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ??? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>>>>>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure >>>>>>> Foundation >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>>>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-disc >>>>>>> us >>>>>>> s >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Nov 24 01:25:28 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 01:25:28 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: StarlingX Release Meeting - Nov 23/2022 Message-ID: Agenda/Minutes are posted at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases stx.8.0 - Reference Links: - Release/Feature Planning: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Release Verification: - Folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1E_AQPxVrNnbVtSqQ9_CdqYidqMmYcq4n - Feature Testing: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yzlArypq3sgdNdYzMwBONLnOsx6OqMpxj6KT0P6Pc6M/edit#gid=968103774 - Regression Testing: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1b5w2oLlGwipTlrNysWwl1JnM1dvyboIIQhpBJLcZECI/edit#gid=1717644237 - Feature Status - Updated feature status/dates in the planning spreadsheet. - 4 features are Done - Migrate Flock Services to Debian: AIO-DX - Migrate Flock Services to Debian: Standard and Storage - Adapt Installer to Debian and OSTree - DC Bring up on Debian - 11 features are Code Merged since the last meeting - Adapt DC subcloud installation to Debian OS and OSTree - Debian: Migrate patching services to debian - Redfish Virtual Media Robustness Improvements - Platform backup and restore optimization - K8s & Container Components Refresh - k8s 1.24 - Container CNI Component Refresh - k8s 1.24 - PTP O-RAN Compliant API Notification - Support for ACC200 static config - Adapt Local Install to Debian and OSTree - Centralized Subcloud backup and restore - O-RAN Spec Compliant O2 Interfaces - Follow-Up / Re-forecast Required for the following features: - Code Merge Dates - Platform Single Core Tuning -- Action: Guilherme Batista Leite - Feature Tested Dates - FEC Device Configurability (fec-operator Integration) for ACC100 & N3000 -- Action: Rob Cooke - Support for 'reader' role at 'system' scope for StarlingX APIs / CLIs -- Action: Rob Cooke - Platform Single Core Tuning -- Action: Guilherme Batista Leite - New Feature Proposals: - None since the last meeting stx.7.0 Blogs - PTP Enhancements - Multiple NIC Support / SyncE / Various NIC Support - Prime: Ghada Khalil - Forecast: mid-Sept >> end-Oct >> mid-Dec / Author: Cole Walker - Subcloud Local Install - Prime: RamS - Forecast: end-Nov << TBC as RamS did not attend From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Nov 24 02:00:04 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 02:00:04 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Nov 23, 2022) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call November 23, 2022 Standing topics - Build - Main Branch CentOS Builds - All green this week - Main Branch Debian Builds - 6 out of 8 are green. - Had 2 failures related to download / connectivity issues. Re-attempt passed. - May look at adding retries to the build for these errors as an enhancement - Tracked by: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1997568 - Debian Build Acceleration/Reuse Feature - The Acceleration feature is now functional for the ISO build, but not yet for container builds. - Work on container build re-use has not started yet. - Sanity - CentOS Main Branch Sanity w/ stx-openstack - Paused as of Nov 17 due to CentOS build issues - Email: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013582.html - stx-openstack sanity transition to Debian - Planned for the Dec time-frame. On track. - Team is focused on trying to get a Debian-based sanity; could be as early as next week - Email to the mailing list: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013487.html - Debian Main Branch Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Nov 22: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013590.html - Status: Green - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - From last meeting: Fixes to libvirt env: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/863735 - Review comments provided; waiting for new patchset from author - Doc review for k8s: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862596 - First action is for the author to address the unresolved comments - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - TSC Elections are Complete - Congratulations to Greg, RamS & ScottK! - Email: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013591.html ARs from Previous Meetings - None Open Requests for Help - StarlingX 7.0 & 8.0 deployment failures - Reported by ScottK in the Nov 16 meeting - Working through installation issues on various hardware. Will share more info w/ the mailing list once issues are more isolated. - Nov 23: Team working thru setting up new hardware to re-test the deployments. - Virtio-forwarder with StarlingX - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013505.html - ScottK responded with additional questions: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013532.html - Waiting for response / no response as of Nov 23 From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Nov 24 14:38:56 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:38:56 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: <764C3AE4-BD17-48EF-8F58-E560044886D4@openinfra.dev> References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> <16069B94-01C2-4250-A901-50247CF9D951@openinfra.dev> <764C3AE4-BD17-48EF-8F58-E560044886D4@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Ah ok ... sorry missed your comment. Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 1:20 PM To: Waines, Greg Cc: Outback Dingo ; StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Greg, Great, thank you for checking! I added a comment to the top of the etherpad (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey#L8) about the crossed over lines when I made the edits yesterday. Tl;dr: I started to build the new survey in the tool that we?re going to use going forward and I marked the questions I already added to the form by crossing them over. It is just a reminder that those are already added and if we change them then I?ll have to update the actual survey form as well. Sorry about the confusion. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 23, 2022, at 10:14, Waines, Greg wrote: > > Hey Ildiko, > Just reviewed the current etherpad page ( https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey ). > I added some new comments. > > Generally though, it looked like we are removing a lot of questions ? Why is that ? > > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 12:52 PM > To: Outback Dingo > Cc: Waines, Greg ; StarlingX ML > > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Thanks Greg and Scott! > > I added some more suggestions and questions. Please let me know what you think. > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > >> On Nov 14, 2022, at 07:01, Outback Dingo wrote: >> >> added my input.... :) >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:26 PM Waines, Greg wrote: >>> >>> Added responses to your questions. >>> Greg. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 5:56 PM >>> To: Waines, Greg >>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>> >>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>> >>> Hi Greg, >>> >>> Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. >>> >>> If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ildik? >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Ildiko, >>>> I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. >>>> looking good, >>>> Greg. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM >>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>> >>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> Hi Greg, >>>> >>>> Sounds good. >>>> >>>> I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: >>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>> >>>> Please let me know what you think. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ildik? >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. >>>>> Greg. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM >>>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>> >>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. >>>>> >>>>> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ildik? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> My thoughts ... >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >>>>>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX >>>>>> For example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >>>>>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >>>>>> pick >>>>>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >>>>>> - Kuberenetes >>>>>> - OpenStack >>>>>> - Distributed Cloud >>>>>> - Standalone Clouds, >>>>>> - Deployment Configs >>>>>> * SX, >>>>>> * DX, >>>>>> * Standard), >>>>>> - Rook, >>>>>> - PTP, >>>>>> - N3000 Support, >>>>>> - ACC100 Support, >>>>>> - NVIDA GPU Support, >>>>>> - QAT Support, >>>>>> - OIDC authentication, >>>>>> - Vault, >>>>>> - Portieris, >>>>>> - Auditd, >>>>>> - Metrics Server, >>>>>> - SNMP, >>>>>> - Dedicated CPUs, >>>>>> - Isolated CPUs, >>>>>> - ISTIO, >>>>>> - Cert Manager, >>>>>> - Remote CLI Container, >>>>>> - Kata Containers, >>>>>> - RWO PVC, >>>>>> - RWX PVC, >>>>>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >>>>>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual >>>>>> rtg and forwarding, bond), >>>>>> - vRAN Tools Container, >>>>>> - ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included >>>>>> in StarlingX Solution >>>>>> >>>>>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on >>>>>> docs.starlingx.io >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Greg. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >>>>>> To: StarlingX ML >>>>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>>> >>>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>>>>> >>>>>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >>>>>> >>>>>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >>>>>> >>>>>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >>>>>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. >>>>>> I created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >>>>>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >>>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ildik? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ??? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>>>>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure >>>>>> Foundation >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-dis >>>>>> c >>>>>> us >>>>>> s >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discus >>> s > > > > From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Nov 24 14:42:49 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:42:49 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> <16069B94-01C2-4250-A901-50247CF9D951@openinfra.dev> <764C3AE4-BD17-48EF-8F58-E560044886D4@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Answer to question on line 80 ... Does the CPU configuration (shared, dedicated, isolated) count as an acceleration feature or should we have a CPU configuration specific question rather? I suppose it's more of a performance feature than an acceleration feature ... but I don't think it's a stretch to include it with the acceleration features, as opposed to splitting it out into another question ... but up to you. Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 6:22 PM To: StarlingX ML Cc: Waines, Greg ; Outback Dingo Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, We are now in the finish line to update the StarlingX survey! I got through the survey etherpad and there?s one question that I have a question to which is currently unanswered. It is question 14, which is currently in line #80 here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey#L80 Please let me know if you have an opinion about it. I will share the link to the new survey as soon as we finalize the last outstanding item. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 23, 2022, at 10:19, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > Great, thank you for checking! > > I added a comment to the top of the etherpad (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey#L8) about the crossed over lines when I made the edits yesterday. > > Tl;dr: I started to build the new survey in the tool that we?re going to use going forward and I marked the questions I already added to the form by crossing them over. It is just a reminder that those are already added and if we change them then I?ll have to update the actual survey form as well. Sorry about the confusion. > > Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > >> On Nov 23, 2022, at 10:14, Waines, Greg wrote: >> >> Hey Ildiko, >> Just reviewed the current etherpad page ( https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey ). >> I added some new comments. >> >> Generally though, it looked like we are removing a lot of questions ? Why is that ? >> >> Greg. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ildiko Vancsa >> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 12:52 PM >> To: Outback Dingo >> Cc: Waines, Greg ; StarlingX ML >> >> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >> >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Thanks Greg and Scott! >> >> I added some more suggestions and questions. Please let me know what you think. >> >> Thanks, >> Ildik? >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >>> On Nov 14, 2022, at 07:01, Outback Dingo wrote: >>> >>> added my input.... :) >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:26 PM Waines, Greg wrote: >>>> >>>> Added responses to your questions. >>>> Greg. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 5:56 PM >>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>> >>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> Hi Greg, >>>> >>>> Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. >>>> >>>> If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ildik? >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Ildiko, >>>>> I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. >>>>> looking good, >>>>> Greg. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM >>>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>> >>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Greg, >>>>> >>>>> Sounds good. >>>>> >>>>> I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: >>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know what you think. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ildik? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. >>>>>> Greg. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>>> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM >>>>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>>> >>>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. >>>>>> >>>>>> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ildik? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My thoughts ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >>>>>>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX >>>>>>> For example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >>>>>>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >>>>>>> pick >>>>>>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >>>>>>> - Kuberenetes >>>>>>> - OpenStack >>>>>>> - Distributed Cloud >>>>>>> - Standalone Clouds, >>>>>>> - Deployment Configs >>>>>>> * SX, >>>>>>> * DX, >>>>>>> * Standard), >>>>>>> - Rook, >>>>>>> - PTP, >>>>>>> - N3000 Support, >>>>>>> - ACC100 Support, >>>>>>> - NVIDA GPU Support, >>>>>>> - QAT Support, >>>>>>> - OIDC authentication, >>>>>>> - Vault, >>>>>>> - Portieris, >>>>>>> - Auditd, >>>>>>> - Metrics Server, >>>>>>> - SNMP, >>>>>>> - Dedicated CPUs, >>>>>>> - Isolated CPUs, >>>>>>> - ISTIO, >>>>>>> - Cert Manager, >>>>>>> - Remote CLI Container, >>>>>>> - Kata Containers, >>>>>>> - RWO PVC, >>>>>>> - RWX PVC, >>>>>>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >>>>>>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg >>>>>>> and forwarding, bond), >>>>>>> - vRAN Tools Container, >>>>>>> - ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included >>>>>>> in StarlingX Solution >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Greg. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >>>>>>> To: StarlingX ML >>>>>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >>>>>>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. >>>>>>> I created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >>>>>>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >>>>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Ildik? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ??? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>>>>>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure >>>>>>> Foundation >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>>>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-disc >>>>>>> us >>>>>>> s >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From starlingx.build at gmail.com Fri Nov 25 08:44:59 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 03:44:59 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] STX_build_docker_flock_images - Build # 632 - Failure! Message-ID: <265801524.68.1669365901888.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_flock_images Build #: 632 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221125T044123Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters WEB_HOST: mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221125T032358Z OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root BASE_VERSION: master-stable-20221125T032358Z PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/logs REGISTRY_USERID: slittlewrs LATEST_PREFIX: master PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/logs PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221125T032358Z FLOCK_VERSION: master-centos-stable-20221125T032358Z WEB_HOST_PORT: 80 PREFIX: master TIMESTAMP: 20221125T032358Z BUILD_STREAM: stable REGISTRY_ORG: starlingx PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/outputs REGISTRY: docker.io From starlingx.build at gmail.com Fri Nov 25 08:45:04 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 03:45:04 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] master STX_build_docker_images_layered - Build # 388 - Failure! Message-ID: <1346677209.71.1669365904975.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_images_layered Build #: 388 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221125T041055Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221125T032358Z OS: centos MUNGED_BRANCH: master MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/logs MASTER_BUILD_NUMBER: 382 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221125T032358Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-containers-20221125T032358Z-builder TIMESTAMP: 20221125T032358Z OS_VERSION: 7.5.1804 BUILD_STREAM: stable PUBLISH_INPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/inputs LAYER: containers PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/outputs MAIN_HELM_CHART_RPM_NAME: stx-openstack-helm-fluxcd From starlingx.build at gmail.com Fri Nov 25 08:45:09 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 03:45:09 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_containers_master_master - Build # 382 - Failure! Message-ID: <478129688.74.1669365911460.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master Build #: 382 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221125T032358Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true FORCE_BUILD: false From scott.little at eng.windriver.com Fri Nov 25 15:14:46 2022 From: scott.little at eng.windriver.com (Scott.Little) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_containers_master_master - Build # 382 - Failure! In-Reply-To: <478129688.74.1669365911460.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <478129688.74.1669365911460.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: Build failed on container 'stx-keystone-api-proxy' *23:56:16* Collecting docker===4.0.2 *23:56:16* Downloading docker-4.0.2-py2.py3-none-any.whl (138 kB) *23:56:16* ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement zerorpc (from sysinv===1.0->-c /tmp/wheels/upper-constraints.txt (line 728)) (from versions: none) *23:56:16* ERROR: No matching distribution found for zerorpc (from sysinv===1.0->-c /tmp/wheels/upper-constraints.txt (line 728)) *23:56:16* The command '/bin/sh -c /opt/loci/stx-scripts/install.sh' returned a non-zero code: 1 Looks like we need some work on requirements/constraints to maintain python 2.7 compatibility for this container. Scott On 2022-11-25 03:45, starlingx.build at gmail.com wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Project: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master > Build #: 382 > Status: Failure > Timestamp: 20221125T032358Z > Branch: master > > Check logs at: > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/logs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Parameters > > BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false > BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true > FORCE_BUILD: false > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at eng.windriver.com Fri Nov 25 15:30:41 2022 From: scott.little at eng.windriver.com (Scott.Little) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:30:41 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_containers_master_master - Build # 382 - Failure! In-Reply-To: References: <478129688.74.1669365911460.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <18007651-4696-0bcc-acd2-a09fbcb72cd8@eng.windriver.com> Likely trigger: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/859571 LaunchPad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1997977 Scott On 2022-11-25 10:14, Scott.Little wrote: > Build failed on container 'stx-keystone-api-proxy' > > *23:56:16* Collecting docker===4.0.2 > *23:56:16* Downloading docker-4.0.2-py2.py3-none-any.whl (138 kB) > *23:56:16* ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement zerorpc (from sysinv===1.0->-c /tmp/wheels/upper-constraints.txt (line 728)) (from versions: none) > *23:56:16* ERROR: No matching distribution found for zerorpc (from sysinv===1.0->-c /tmp/wheels/upper-constraints.txt (line 728)) > *23:56:16* The command '/bin/sh -c /opt/loci/stx-scripts/install.sh ' returned a non-zero code: 1 > > Looks like we need some work on requirements/constraints to maintain > python 2.7 compatibility for this container. > > Scott > > > On 2022-11-25 03:45, starlingx.build at gmail.com wrote: >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Project: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master >> Build #: 382 >> Status: Failure >> Timestamp: 20221125T032358Z >> Branch: master >> >> Check logs at: >> http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221125T032358Z/logs >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Parameters >> >> BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false >> BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true >> FORCE_BUILD: false >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Nov 26 08:57:36 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 03:57:36 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] STX_build_docker_flock_images - Build # 633 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <1185996135.66.1669365896156.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1185996135.66.1669365896156.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1848113984.81.1669453059354.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_flock_images Build #: 633 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221126T045202Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters WEB_HOST: mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221126T032203Z OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root BASE_VERSION: master-stable-20221126T032203Z PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/logs REGISTRY_USERID: slittlewrs LATEST_PREFIX: master PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/logs PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221126T032203Z FLOCK_VERSION: master-centos-stable-20221126T032203Z WEB_HOST_PORT: 80 PREFIX: master TIMESTAMP: 20221126T032203Z BUILD_STREAM: stable REGISTRY_ORG: starlingx PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/outputs REGISTRY: docker.io From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Nov 26 08:57:43 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 03:57:43 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] master STX_build_docker_images_layered - Build # 389 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <1384811420.69.1669365902807.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1384811420.69.1669365902807.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <2068978104.84.1669453065012.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_images_layered Build #: 389 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221126T041923Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221126T032203Z OS: centos MUNGED_BRANCH: master MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/logs MASTER_BUILD_NUMBER: 383 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221126T032203Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-containers-20221126T032203Z-builder TIMESTAMP: 20221126T032203Z OS_VERSION: 7.5.1804 BUILD_STREAM: stable PUBLISH_INPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/inputs LAYER: containers PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/outputs MAIN_HELM_CHART_RPM_NAME: stx-openstack-helm-fluxcd From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Nov 26 08:57:48 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 03:57:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_containers_master_master - Build # 383 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <2079541563.72.1669365906093.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <2079541563.72.1669365906093.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <722958028.87.1669453069054.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master Build #: 383 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221126T032203Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221126T032203Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true FORCE_BUILD: false From outbackdingo at gmail.com Mon Nov 28 00:10:15 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:10:15 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Starlingx iso [BUILD] Message-ID: Ok here is where we find the problems tb.sh create .... ok tb,sh exec ..... ok so reading this i think slim clarification is needed, do we run centos-mirror-tools/download_mirror.sh outside the container? Package mirror creation Once the StarlingX docker image has been built, you must create a mirror before creating the ISO image. Basically, a mirror is a directory that contains a series of packages. The packages are organized to be consumed by the ISO creation scripts. The HOST_MIRROR_DIR variable provides the path to the mirror. The buildrc file sets the value of this variable unless the localrc file has modified it. The mirror creation involves a set of scripts and configuration files required to download a group of RPMs, SRPMs, source code packages and so forth. These tools live inside centos-mirror-tools directory. All items included in this directory must be visble inside the container environment. Then the container shall be run from the same directory where these tools are stored. Basically, we run a container with the previously created StarlingX docker image, using the following configuration: As /localdisk is defined as the workdir of the container, the same folder name should be used to define the volume. The container will start to run and populate logs and output folders in this directory. From starlingx.build at gmail.com Mon Nov 28 07:32:04 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 02:32:04 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] STX_build_docker_flock_images - Build # 635 - Failure! Message-ID: <1122430301.100.1669620726278.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_flock_images Build #: 635 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221128T032355Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters WEB_HOST: mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221128T020137Z OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root BASE_VERSION: master-stable-20221128T020137Z PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/logs REGISTRY_USERID: slittlewrs LATEST_PREFIX: master PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/logs PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221128T020137Z FLOCK_VERSION: master-centos-stable-20221128T020137Z WEB_HOST_PORT: 80 PREFIX: master TIMESTAMP: 20221128T020137Z BUILD_STREAM: stable REGISTRY_ORG: starlingx PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/outputs REGISTRY: docker.io From starlingx.build at gmail.com Mon Nov 28 07:32:08 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 02:32:08 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] master STX_build_docker_images_layered - Build # 391 - Failure! Message-ID: <1332850555.103.1669620729795.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_images_layered Build #: 391 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221128T025232Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221128T020137Z OS: centos MUNGED_BRANCH: master MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/logs MASTER_BUILD_NUMBER: 384 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221128T020137Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-containers-20221128T020137Z-builder TIMESTAMP: 20221128T020137Z OS_VERSION: 7.5.1804 BUILD_STREAM: stable PUBLISH_INPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/inputs LAYER: containers PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/outputs MAIN_HELM_CHART_RPM_NAME: stx-openstack-helm-fluxcd From starlingx.build at gmail.com Mon Nov 28 07:32:12 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 02:32:12 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_containers_master_master - Build # 384 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <1257495805.85.1669453066110.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1257495805.85.1669453066110.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1091116616.106.1669620733087.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master Build #: 384 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221128T020137Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221128T020137Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true FORCE_BUILD: false From starlingx.build at gmail.com Tue Nov 29 09:19:45 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 04:19:45 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] STX_build_docker_flock_images - Build # 636 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <1466343889.98.1669620723207.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1466343889.98.1669620723207.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1131472545.113.1669713588314.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_flock_images Build #: 636 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221129T045726Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters WEB_HOST: mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221129T032931Z OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root BASE_VERSION: master-stable-20221129T032931Z PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs REGISTRY_USERID: slittlewrs LATEST_PREFIX: master PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221129T032931Z FLOCK_VERSION: master-centos-stable-20221129T032931Z WEB_HOST_PORT: 80 PREFIX: master TIMESTAMP: 20221129T032931Z BUILD_STREAM: stable REGISTRY_ORG: starlingx PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/outputs REGISTRY: docker.io From starlingx.build at gmail.com Tue Nov 29 09:19:50 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 04:19:50 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] master STX_build_docker_images_layered - Build # 392 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <1990146641.101.1669620727473.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1990146641.101.1669620727473.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <349404237.116.1669713591463.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_images_layered Build #: 392 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221129T042555Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221129T032931Z OS: centos MUNGED_BRANCH: master MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs MASTER_BUILD_NUMBER: 385 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221129T032931Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-containers-20221129T032931Z-builder TIMESTAMP: 20221129T032931Z OS_VERSION: 7.5.1804 BUILD_STREAM: stable PUBLISH_INPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/inputs LAYER: containers PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/outputs MAIN_HELM_CHART_RPM_NAME: stx-openstack-helm-fluxcd From starlingx.build at gmail.com Tue Nov 29 09:19:53 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 04:19:53 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_containers_master_master - Build # 385 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <496736136.104.1669620730795.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <496736136.104.1669620730795.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1442170134.119.1669713594726.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master Build #: 385 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221129T032931Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true FORCE_BUILD: false From scott.little at windriver.com Tue Nov 29 16:59:14 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Starlingx iso [BUILD] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: centos-mirror-tools/download_mirror.sh should be run inside the container for 'normal' usage. I recommend you use 'download_mirror.sh -U' due to your geographic location. It looks like one of the upstream 3rd party repos has gone missing, which is messing up the yum cache initialization.? download_mirror.sh is failing in a particularly ungraceful way. I think the following stx-tools change might get us though the download_mirror.sh diff --git a/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo b/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo index 2fa55a6..6978ff0 100644 --- a/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo +++ b/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo @@ -4,4 +4,12 @@ type=rpm-md ?baseurl=http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/katacontainers:/releases:/x86_64:/stable-1.11/CentOS_7/ ?gpgcheck=1 ?gpgkey=http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/katacontainers:/releases:/x86_64:/stable-1.11/CentOS_7/repodata/repomd.xml.key +enabled=0 + +[CENGN_katacontainers_releases_x86_64_stable-1.11] +name=Branch project for Kata Containers branch stable-1.11 (CentOS_7) +type=rpm-md +baseurl=http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/centos/download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/katacontainers:/releases:/x86_64:/stable-1.11/CentOS_7/ +gpgcheck=0 + enabled=1 On 2022-11-27 19:10, Outback Dingo wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Ok here is where we find the problems > > tb.sh create .... ok > tb,sh exec ..... ok > > so reading this i think slim clarification is needed, do we run > > centos-mirror-tools/download_mirror.sh outside the container? > > Package mirror creation > Once the StarlingX docker image has been built, you must create a > mirror before creating the ISO image. Basically, a mirror is a > directory that contains a series of packages. The packages are > organized to be consumed by the ISO creation scripts. > > The HOST_MIRROR_DIR variable provides the path to the mirror. The > buildrc file sets the value of this variable unless the localrc file > has modified it. > > The mirror creation involves a set of scripts and configuration files > required to download a group of RPMs, SRPMs, source code packages and > so forth. These tools live inside centos-mirror-tools directory. > > All items included in this directory must be visble inside the > container environment. Then the container shall be run from the same > directory where these tools are stored. Basically, we run a container > with the previously created StarlingX docker image, using the > following configuration: > > As /localdisk is defined as the workdir of the container, the same > folder name should be used to define the volume. The container will > start to run and populate logs and output folders in this directory. > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From scott.little at eng.windriver.com Tue Nov 29 17:07:44 2022 From: scott.little at eng.windriver.com (Scott.Little) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Starlingx iso [BUILD] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Created a launchpad for this issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1998234 Scott On 2022-11-29 11:59, Scott Little wrote: > diff --git > a/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo > b/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo > index 2fa55a6..6978ff0 100644 > --- a/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo > +++ b/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo > @@ -4,4 +4,12 @@ type=rpm-md > ?baseurl=http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/katacontainers:/releases:/x86_64:/stable-1.11/CentOS_7/ > > ?gpgcheck=1 > ?gpgkey=http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/katacontainers:/releases:/x86_64:/stable-1.11/CentOS_7/repodata/repomd.xml.key > > +enabled=0 > + > +[CENGN_katacontainers_releases_x86_64_stable-1.11] > +name=Branch project for Kata Containers branch stable-1.11 (CentOS_7) > +type=rpm-md > +baseurl=http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/centos/download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/katacontainers:/releases:/x86_64:/stable-1.11/CentOS_7/ > > +gpgcheck=0 > + enabled=1 From Rob.Cooke at windriver.com Tue Nov 29 19:53:48 2022 From: Rob.Cooke at windriver.com (Cooke, Rob) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:53:48 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Test Status Call - Nov 29, 2022 Message-ID: Hi everyone, Please find below this minutes from this week's StarlingX Test Status Call: Minutes for 11/29/2022 https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-test * Open Topics: o None * Sanity Status: o Sanity on STX 8.0 - Green ? Last execution, Nov 22, 2022 - Results email: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013590.html ? Next execution planned for Nov 30 o Sanity on STX 8.0 plus Openstack is on hold, see details in this community email: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-November/013582.html ? Planning to get execution back on track within the next week (by Dec 7) on Debian based build * Feature Test Status: o Feature testing is tracked in the following google sheet ? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yzlArypq3sgdNdYzMwBONLnOsx6OqMpxj6KT0P6Pc6M/edit#gid=968103774 Thanks, Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at eng.windriver.com Tue Nov 29 21:14:35 2022 From: scott.little at eng.windriver.com (Scott.Little) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:14:35 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Starlingx iso [BUILD] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <06fd6699-afa5-b5aa-bf48-2250a4b3ab2e@eng.windriver.com> Fixes posted for review. master: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/866071 r/stx.6.0: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/866072 r/stx.7.0: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/866073 On 2022-11-29 12:07, Scott.Little wrote: > Created a launchpad for this issue: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1998234 > > Scott > > On 2022-11-29 11:59, Scott Little wrote: >> diff --git >> a/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo >> b/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo >> index 2fa55a6..6978ff0 100644 >> --- a/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo >> +++ b/centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX_3rd_katacontainer.repo >> @@ -4,4 +4,12 @@ type=rpm-md >> ?baseurl=http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/katacontainers:/releases:/x86_64:/stable-1.11/CentOS_7/ >> >> ?gpgcheck=1 >> ?gpgkey=http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/katacontainers:/releases:/x86_64:/stable-1.11/CentOS_7/repodata/repomd.xml.key >> >> +enabled=0 >> + >> +[CENGN_katacontainers_releases_x86_64_stable-1.11] >> +name=Branch project for Kata Containers branch stable-1.11 (CentOS_7) >> +type=rpm-md >> +baseurl=http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/centos/download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/katacontainers:/releases:/x86_64:/stable-1.11/CentOS_7/ >> >> +gpgcheck=0 >> + enabled=1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From scott.little at eng.windriver.com Tue Nov 29 21:17:17 2022 From: scott.little at eng.windriver.com (Scott.Little) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] master STX_build_docker_images_layered - Build # 392 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <349404237.116.1669713591463.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1990146641.101.1669620727473.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> <349404237.116.1669713591463.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: The container build issues for the last week or so remain the same... https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1997977 Scott On 2022-11-29 04:19, starlingx.build at gmail.com wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Project: STX_build_docker_images_layered > Build #: 392 > Status: Still Failing > Timestamp: 20221129T042555Z > Branch: master > > Check logs at: > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Parameters > > BRANCH: master > MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221129T032931Z > OS: centos > MUNGED_BRANCH: master > MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root > PUBLISH_LOGS_URL:http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs > MASTER_BUILD_NUMBER: 385 > PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/logs > MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master > MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers > PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers > PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221129T032931Z > DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-containers-20221129T032931Z-builder > TIMESTAMP: 20221129T032931Z > OS_VERSION: 7.5.1804 > BUILD_STREAM: stable > PUBLISH_INPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/inputs > LAYER: containers > PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221129T032931Z/outputs > MAIN_HELM_CHART_RPM_NAME: stx-openstack-helm-fluxcd > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Tue Nov 29 20:47:53 2022 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:47:53 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20221128T070000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2022-November 29. (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20221128T070000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Wed Nov 30 04:42:37 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:42:37 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX TSC election results Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, The 2022 H2 StarlingX TSC elections are now over, I?m reaching out to you with the final results. During the regular elections the community elected 3 members to the TSC to serve a full-year term: * Greg Waines * Ramaswamy Subramanian * Scott V Kamp Along with the 3 seats up for election, we also had 2 open TSC seats for a half-year term. The newly elected TSC decided to have the remaining eligible candidate, Shuquan Huang, take one of these open seats without running an interim election. Please find the updated information about the StarlingX TSC here: https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html Hereby please join me to congratulate the new and re-elected members of the StarlingX Technical Steering Committee! Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? V?ncsa, on behalf of the StarlingX Election Officials [1] [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From starlingx.build at gmail.com Wed Nov 30 09:45:46 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 04:45:46 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] STX_build_docker_flock_images - Build # 637 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <638252610.111.1669713583762.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <638252610.111.1669713583762.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <602476916.126.1669801549604.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_flock_images Build #: 637 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221130T050709Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters WEB_HOST: mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221130T033322Z OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root BASE_VERSION: master-stable-20221130T033322Z PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/logs REGISTRY_USERID: slittlewrs LATEST_PREFIX: master PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/logs PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221130T033322Z FLOCK_VERSION: master-centos-stable-20221130T033322Z WEB_HOST_PORT: 80 PREFIX: master TIMESTAMP: 20221130T033322Z BUILD_STREAM: stable REGISTRY_ORG: starlingx PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/outputs REGISTRY: docker.io From starlingx.build at gmail.com Wed Nov 30 09:45:54 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 04:45:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] master STX_build_docker_images_layered - Build # 393 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <1823026630.114.1669713589209.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1823026630.114.1669713589209.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1895044714.129.1669801556949.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_images_layered Build #: 393 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221130T043217Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221130T033322Z OS: centos MUNGED_BRANCH: master MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/logs MASTER_BUILD_NUMBER: 386 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221130T033322Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-containers-20221130T033322Z-builder TIMESTAMP: 20221130T033322Z OS_VERSION: 7.5.1804 BUILD_STREAM: stable PUBLISH_INPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/inputs LAYER: containers PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/outputs MAIN_HELM_CHART_RPM_NAME: stx-openstack-helm-fluxcd From starlingx.build at gmail.com Wed Nov 30 09:46:02 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 04:46:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_containers_master_master - Build # 386 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <587006435.117.1669713592235.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <587006435.117.1669713592235.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <779254264.132.1669801564562.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_containers_master_master Build #: 386 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221130T033322Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221130T033322Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true FORCE_BUILD: false From scott.little at windriver.com Wed Nov 30 14:35:50 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Starlingx iso [BUILD] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <32f7f994-07b9-a29d-cfa8-911ddce07f73@windriver.com> These fixes have merged to address download_mirror.sh failures on our supported branches... ??? master: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/866071 ??? r/stx.6.0: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/866072 ?? r/stx.7.0: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/866073 The download_mirror.sh script should be run inside the build container. The official documentation has moved here.... https://docs.starlingx.io/developer_resources/build_guide.html and you can navigate back to old release documentation with the '<<' and '>>' buttons at the upper right. e.g. for for stx.6.0 you can navigate to... https://docs.starlingx.io/releasenotes/r6-0-release-notes-bc72d0b961e7.html The source code for the documentation can be found here ... cgcs-root/stx/docs/doc/source/developer_resources/ Your appear to be quoting from 'tools/README.rst' which is unmaintained, and ought to have been deleted or reduced to pointers to the official docs. Please file a LaunchPad to fix or remove the misleading document. Hope this helps! Scott On 2022-11-27 19:10, Outback Dingo wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Ok here is where we find the problems > > tb.sh create .... ok > tb,sh exec ..... ok > > so reading this i think slim clarification is needed, do we run > > centos-mirror-tools/download_mirror.sh outside the container? > > Package mirror creation > Once the StarlingX docker image has been built, you must create a > mirror before creating the ISO image. Basically, a mirror is a > directory that contains a series of packages. The packages are > organized to be consumed by the ISO creation scripts. > > The HOST_MIRROR_DIR variable provides the path to the mirror. The > buildrc file sets the value of this variable unless the localrc file > has modified it. > > The mirror creation involves a set of scripts and configuration files > required to download a group of RPMs, SRPMs, source code packages and > so forth. These tools live inside centos-mirror-tools directory. > > All items included in this directory must be visble inside the > container environment. Then the container shall be run from the same > directory where these tools are stored. Basically, we run a container > with the previously created StarlingX docker image, using the > following configuration: > > As /localdisk is defined as the workdir of the container, the same > folder name should be used to define the volume. The container will > start to run and populate logs and output folders in this directory. > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Wed Nov 30 15:38:05 2022 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:38:05 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-Weekly StarlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS meeting minutes - Nov 30, 2022 Message-ID: November 30, 2022 Attendees: Mark A., Charles Short, Mike Matterson, Elisamara Goncalves, Linda Wang, Scott Little, Scott Kampe 1. General Topics ??????0.1 Split package list betweeen repositories * * Resource & landing. * *AI: Check with Davlet to see if there is a request posted to Launchpad. * * Backup plan: use centOS build or docker images. ??????0.2 Log into the git before download the source. * * How to pass the credential through the tooling layer when log into git repo. * * workaround: currently use repo sync outside of the containers. * * AI: Scott to write up a feature request for the tool - file a request in Story Board ??????0.3 Pre-patch ISO (Luis) * * Check to see if there is a ticket to look into this issue. * 2. StarlingX ??????0.1 Secureboot enablement ????????????* AI: (lwang8) Will send out notification to the list once it is confirmed enabled by default. ??????0.2 ISO size bigginer than 4G ????????????* with OOT driver may need to include the kernel source/debug package that will allow OOT tree driver to be built on the target system. ????????????* This will add the ISO size back up to greater than 4G. ????????????* AI: (mike/scott) low priority but still need to investigate the "ISO daisy chain extension of another ISO/4G, and the tooling needs. Next Meeting: December 14, 2022 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Nov 30 17:39:25 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:39:25 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Mission statement discussion input and workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to you with a short update about the mission statement discussion. Unfortunately we didn?t hit critical mass on the call that was scheduled for yesterday due to some last minute conflicts that folks had. We decided to use the regular Marketing team meeting as a follow-up workshop to continue the discussion about refreshing the project?s mission statement. I would like to invite and encourage everyone who would like to participate to join. The call is scheduled for December 06 at noon PST / 2000 UTC. The Zoom bridge to dial in is: https://zoom.us/j/270117095?pwd=SFBReFFsdUdQd3FMdnMxVytiSzhUZz09 Please find the notes from our previous call here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-mission-statement Please let me know if you would like me to add you to the meeting invite. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 16, 2022, at 20:09, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > I?m reaching out to let you know that marketing team is having a follow-up workshop to continue the discussion about refreshing the project?s mission statement, and I would like to invite and encourage everyone who would like to participate to join. > > The call is scheduled to November 29 at noon PST / 2000 UTC. > > The Zoom bridge to dial in is: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85344179503?pwd=K05kckptcmM2N3dhTEJheFVyS05OQT09 > > Please find the notes from our previous call here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-mission-statement > > Please let me know if you would like me to add you to the meeting invite. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > >> On Nov 9, 2022, at 07:32, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> As a follow up to the PTG the StarlingX Marketing team started to work on proposals to update the project?s mission statement. >> >> The team would like to ask the community for input so we can have a more guided activity and better fitting results. The questions we raised during the Marketing meeting yesterday: >> * What will be the community?s priorities for the short to mid-term future, meaning the next 1-3 years? >> * What is the community?s vision with regards to challenges that the StarlingX platform is developed and shaped to solve and address? >> >> To ensure progress the Marketing team set up an ad-hoc meeting time for Monday (November 14) at 11am US Pacific Time, to have a workshop and work on options. Anyone who is interested in participating in that conversation please join us on the call! >> The dial-in link for the meeting is: https://windriver.zoom.us/j/97692404047?pwd=Um93SXBzNFMwL21JUmJYU3dteVNVdz09 >> >> Thanks and Best Regards, >> Ildik? >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem >> Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> > From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Nov 30 17:45:54 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:45:54 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] PL/TL information in the projects.yaml file is now updated Message-ID: <33437FB2-39D1-428C-84AF-441576C0F34C@openinfra.dev> Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to you to let you know that the projects.yaml file is now updated with the results of the recent PL/TL elections! You can find the up to date file here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/governance/src/branch/master/reference/tsc/projects.yaml You can also check out the rendered version in the governance documents here: https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/projects/index.html Hereby please join me to congratulate the new and re-elected Project and Team Leads! Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? V?ncsa, on behalf of the StarlingX Election Officials [1] [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Nov 30 17:54:26 2022 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:54:26 -0800 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey In-Reply-To: References: <62FCC0FF-6565-4CA1-94B7-1A0D52475D61@gmail.com> <4B7C8711-FCF5-4168-844D-0DD09B22D710@gmail.com> <16069B94-01C2-4250-A901-50247CF9D951@openinfra.dev> <764C3AE4-BD17-48EF-8F58-E560044886D4@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, Thank you all for reviewing the Starlingx User Survey! After a short discussion period we have a final set of questions to go into the survey. Based on the previous survey and the community?s input, I already created the new form in a tool called Formstack. You can find the new survey here for review: https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/starlingx_user_survey __Please let me know if you spotted any typos or other issues as soon as you can!__ As next steps, I will update the website with the new link as well as include it in the upcoming OpenInfra Foundation Newsletter. Please let me now if you have any questions or comments. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Nov 24, 2022, at 06:42, Waines, Greg wrote: > > Answer to question on line 80 ... Does the CPU configuration (shared, dedicated, isolated) count as an acceleration feature or should we have a CPU configuration specific question rather? > > I suppose it's more of a performance feature than an acceleration feature ... but I don't think it's a stretch to include it with the acceleration features, as opposed to splitting it out into another question ... but up to you. > > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 6:22 PM > To: StarlingX ML > Cc: Waines, Greg ; Outback Dingo > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi All, > > We are now in the finish line to update the StarlingX survey! > > I got through the survey etherpad and there?s one question that I have a question to which is currently unanswered. It is question 14, which is currently in line #80 here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey#L80 > > Please let me know if you have an opinion about it. I will share the link to the new survey as soon as we finalize the last outstanding item. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > >> On Nov 23, 2022, at 10:19, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> Great, thank you for checking! >> >> I added a comment to the top of the etherpad (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey#L8) about the crossed over lines when I made the edits yesterday. >> >> Tl;dr: I started to build the new survey in the tool that we?re going to use going forward and I marked the questions I already added to the form by crossing them over. It is just a reminder that those are already added and if we change them then I?ll have to update the actual survey form as well. Sorry about the confusion. >> >> Best Regards, >> Ildik? >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem >> Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >>> On Nov 23, 2022, at 10:14, Waines, Greg wrote: >>> >>> Hey Ildiko, >>> Just reviewed the current etherpad page ( https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey ). >>> I added some new comments. >>> >>> Generally though, it looked like we are removing a lot of questions ? Why is that ? >>> >>> Greg. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 12:52 PM >>> To: Outback Dingo >>> Cc: Waines, Greg ; StarlingX ML >>> >>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>> >>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>> >>> Thanks Greg and Scott! >>> >>> I added some more suggestions and questions. Please let me know what you think. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ildik? >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 14, 2022, at 07:01, Outback Dingo wrote: >>>> >>>> added my input.... :) >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:26 PM Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Added responses to your questions. >>>>> Greg. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 5:56 PM >>>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>> >>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Greg, >>>>> >>>>> Great, thank you. I added some clarification questions to it. >>>>> >>>>> If you feel a more real-time conversation would be good, I?m in the #starlingx channel on IRC. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ildik? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 10, 2022, at 07:59, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey Ildiko, >>>>>> I updated https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey with some comments ... in blue. >>>>>> looking good, >>>>>> Greg. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>>> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:54 PM >>>>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>>> >>>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Greg, >>>>>> >>>>>> Sounds good. >>>>>> >>>>>> I created a new proposed survey on the top of the etherpad: >>>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know what you think. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ildik? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 7, 2022, at 04:27, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah I would still add Vault and Portieris ... we plan to put them back. >>>>>>> Greg. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 2:23 PM >>>>>>> To: Waines, Greg >>>>>>> Cc: StarlingX ML >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Greg for the feedback! I will add your suggestion to the etherpad. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Quick question regarding the list below. In my understanding 7.0 was dropping support for Vault and Portieris. Do you still want to include them in the list? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Ildik? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 04:46, Waines, Greg wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My thoughts ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think it would be helpful to get a view of what capabilities in StarlingX that our users are leveraging. >>>>>>>> I.e. to help guide us on evolving the capabilities of StarlingX >>>>>>>> For example, ask what capabilities of StarlingX do you use ? >>>>>>>> ... and provide a CHECKBOX list of capabilities that the user can >>>>>>>> pick >>>>>>>> 1 or more of the capabilities e.g. >>>>>>>> - Kuberenetes >>>>>>>> - OpenStack >>>>>>>> - Distributed Cloud >>>>>>>> - Standalone Clouds, >>>>>>>> - Deployment Configs >>>>>>>> * SX, >>>>>>>> * DX, >>>>>>>> * Standard), >>>>>>>> - Rook, >>>>>>>> - PTP, >>>>>>>> - N3000 Support, >>>>>>>> - ACC100 Support, >>>>>>>> - NVIDA GPU Support, >>>>>>>> - QAT Support, >>>>>>>> - OIDC authentication, >>>>>>>> - Vault, >>>>>>>> - Portieris, >>>>>>>> - Auditd, >>>>>>>> - Metrics Server, >>>>>>>> - SNMP, >>>>>>>> - Dedicated CPUs, >>>>>>>> - Isolated CPUs, >>>>>>>> - ISTIO, >>>>>>>> - Cert Manager, >>>>>>>> - Remote CLI Container, >>>>>>>> - Kata Containers, >>>>>>>> - RWO PVC, >>>>>>>> - RWX PVC, >>>>>>>> - Network Plugins (SRIOV, Host-device, Macvlan, ipvlan, bridge, >>>>>>>> point-to-point, vlan, tuning, bandwidth src-based rtg, virtual rtg >>>>>>>> and forwarding, bond), >>>>>>>> - vRAN Tools Container, >>>>>>>> - ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OTHER QUESTIONS TO ADD: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Open question on any service(s) that is currently not included >>>>>>>> in StarlingX Solution >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Specific questions or open ask for comments on docs.starlingx.io >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Greg. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Ildiko Vancsa >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:35 PM >>>>>>>> To: StarlingX ML >>>>>>>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Project Survey >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As you might know the StarlingX project has a short survey that is continuously open to learn about new and ongoing interest in the project. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The survey?s main target has been to get some more background information about industry segments, use cases, etc that drive people and organizations to take a look at the project. The questions also ask about the adoption phase that companies are in as well as provides the opportunity to give feedback to the community. So far the responses were coming from people/companies who were evaluating the project. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The raw data is available to OpenInfra Foundation staff to access as confidential information, which we then anonymize, aggregate and share. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We are currently moving to a new tool and that provides the >>>>>>>> opportunity for the community to review and update the questions. >>>>>>>> I created an etherpad that lists the current questions and has a >>>>>>>> section for feedback and proposed updates and new questions: >>>>>>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/starlingx-survey >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you would like to change any of the current questions or add new ones, please add them to the etherpad or reply to this thread __by the end of next week (November 11)__. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to note that the current survey is ket short intentionally. It gives a better likelihood that people will go through all the questions and finish the survey. When proposing new questions please keep this in mind as well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Ildik? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ??? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>>>>>>> Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure >>>>>>>> Foundation >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>>>>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-disc >>>>>>>> us >>>>>>>> s >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>>>> https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Wed Nov 30 22:22:46 2022 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 22:22:46 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 30-11-22 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Here are this week's docs team meeting minutes (short form). Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Wednesdays 12:30 PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 30-Nov-22 StarlingX 8.0 Release: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Doc Tasks created - Doc Team to ensure Stories/Tasks are added to the commit messages - Ongoing WIP - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862705: Verified Hardware Updates - WIP - Discuss with prime - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/861367 Flatten TOC for better customer experience - AR Ron - Every one to be cautious about merge conflicts till this review this merged.. - events.yaml - Automation of the final updates of the events.yaml file in the StarlingX docs - AR Ron / Juanita - WIP - Reviewers need to refer to https://docs.starlingx.io/fault-mgmt/index-fault-98d5f50a9b8c.html to view updated alarms and log files. - Alarm updates are only supported on Master - Manual updates need to be implemented on the branches for alarms (events.yaml) since script is not supported on the branches as of date. - Doc Team to be included as part of the Gerrit review cycle for any alarm updates in the event.yaml files - To discuss details with Greg Waines / Frank Miller (To update the Contributor Guide after discussion with the primes with the required process) Installation Guide - Restructuring of the Installation Guide is WIP and the plan is to deliver for stx 8.0. Miscellaneous Updates: - Backslashes to be removed from rst files wherever applicable especially in code blocks, for example, \(code\_remove\) - To be cleaned up in rst files as the files are being updated for any doc Gerrit reviews. - Numbering in the Install Guides is causing issues - AR Ron to check Gerrit Reviews: Attention Needed from ALL core reviewers before DOC Reviews are merged - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 1 Review NOTE: All core reviewers to review and +1 or WF the Doc reviews at : https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 11 bugs outstanding - The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects - WIP General Updates: - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed with Greg (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: