From Rob.Cooke at windriver.com Mon Oct 3 13:48:21 2022 From: Rob.Cooke at windriver.com (Cooke, Rob) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 13:48:21 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Addition to StarlingX notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Imad, You should be able to request access to the list via this link https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss. Thanks, Rob From: Iqbal, Imad Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 4:47 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Addition to StarlingX notifications Hi Team, Would you mind adding my email ID in the StarlingX distribution list. I need these notifications for sanity and regression runs. Regards, Imad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kennelson11 at gmail.com Mon Oct 3 17:34:47 2022 From: kennelson11 at gmail.com (Kendall Nelson) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 12:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Fwd: PTG Schedule and Reminders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Everyone! The October 2022 Project Teams Gathering is right around the corner and the schedule is being setup by your team leads! Slots are going fast, so make sure to get your time booked ASAP! You can find the schedule and available slots on the PTGbot website [1]. The PTGbot site is the during-event website to keep track of what's being discussed and any last-minute schedule changes. It is driven via commands in the #openinfra-events IRC channel (on the OFTC network) where the PTGbot listens. If you have questions about the commands that you can give the bot, check out the documentation here[2]. Also, if you haven?t connected to IRC before, here are some docs on how to get setup![3] Lastly, please don't forget to register[4] (it is free after all!). Please let us know if you have any questions via email to ptg at openinfra.dev. Thanks! -Kendall (diablo_rojo) [1] PTGbot Site: https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html [2] PTGbot Documentation: https://github.com/openstack/ptgbot#open-infrastructure-ptg-bot [3] Setup IRC: https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/common/irc.html [4] PTG Registration: https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Mon Oct 3 21:20:18 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:20:18 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] OpenInfra Foundation profile for elections Message-ID: <3071CCE4-3E72-4878-8D61-906A11197AAA@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX community, I?m following up on our discussion about the list of electorate for the upcoming StarlingX PL/TL/TSC elections. As you probably already know, there is a list of criteria that you need to fulfill if you would like to participate in the elections, for instance, you need to be a contributor to the project. Beyond that, you also need to be an *Individual* member of the OpenInfra Foundation. You might already have a Foundation member profile, but if it is a ?Community? member profile, then you will need to switch it to ?Individual? member. You will need to log in to your profile to be able to change that. Once you?re on your profile page there?s a line of text with bold, which is also a button, that you can click on to change membership level. You can log in to your profile on openinfra.dev, there?s a button in the top right corner. Once you?re authenticated, there?s a ?Profile? button also in the top right corner, which will take you to your profile page and will also let you edit it. If you do not have a profile, you will need to register to create one. You can start the process by clicking on the ?Join? button on the openinfra.dev website. You can also find further instructions about the process here: https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/common/accounts.html#setup-your-open-infrastructure-foundation-account For more information about the upcoming StarlingX elections, please visit the election website: https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ If you have any questions or need any help, please respond to this thread or reach out to the election officials[1] directly. Thanks and Best Regards, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Mon Oct 3 21:32:27 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:32:27 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Next week's TSC & Community Call is in APAC time Message-ID: <8E4824BC-D720-4866-BAF7-8B69579F5457@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, It is a friendly reminder that this week?s TSC & Community Call will run in the APAC-friendly time slot, which is on Wednesday (October 05) at 7pm US Pacific Time! For further details about the call, including dial-in information, please see the ?Meetings? wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings#7pm_Pacific_on_Every_First_Wednesday_of_the_Month-_Technical_Steering_Committee_.26_Community_Call Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? From Thiago.Brito at windriver.com Wed Oct 5 13:01:20 2022 From: Thiago.Brito at windriver.com (Brito, Thiago) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 13:01:20 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Resignation from core roles Message-ID: Hey folks, As I'm moving on from WindRiver to a new opportunity, I won't be able to be an active contributor on StarlingX (at least for the time being). Therefore, I'm resigning my core roles on the following repositories: * openstack-armada-app * hem-charts * upstream * utilities Thank you for all the collaboration on the past releases. I wish you all the best on the releases to come and hope we cross paths again someday. Best regards, Thiago -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Chris.Winnicki at windriver.com Wed Oct 5 21:23:10 2022 From: Chris.Winnicki at windriver.com (Winnicki, Chris) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 21:23:10 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] AIO-SX Debian STX sanity is green: 20221001T060000Z In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: AIO-SX Debian STX sanity Green: Load is based on: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/latest_build/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso sysadmin at controller-0:~$ cat /etc/build.info SW_VERSION="22.12" BUILD_TARGET="Host Installer" BUILD_TYPE="Formal" BUILD_ID="20221001T060000Z" SRC_BUILD_ID="79" JOB="STX_build_debian_master" BUILD_BY="jenkins" BUILD_NUMBER="52" BUILD_HOST="starlingx_mirror" BUILD_DATE="2022-10-01 06:00:00 +0000" sysadmin at controller-0:~$ uname -a Linux controller-0 5.10.0-6-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT StarlingX Debian 5.10.112-1.stx.22 (2022-10-01 x86_64 GNU/Linux sysadmin at controller-0:~$ -Chris ________________________________ Lab: wcp_111 Job: Build Server: Build ID: Kubernetes Version: 1.23.1 Ceph Version: Development OpenStack Deployed: False Node Config: AIO-SX End Time: 20221005 21:14:57 Overall Status: GREEN Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 8 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 8 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221005 20:53:19 test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS 20221005 20:53:34 test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS 20221005 20:53:41 test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS 20221005 20:53:50 test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS 20221005 20:55:10 test_lock_unlock_host PASS 20221005 21:11:47 test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS 20221005 21:13:05 test_pod_to_service_connection PASS 20221005 21:13:42 test_host_to_service_connection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openstack.org Wed Oct 5 22:17:40 2022 From: ildiko at openstack.org (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 15:17:40 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Diversity & Inclusion session at the upcoming PTG Message-ID: <2292341C-99BE-4FD7-AD46-7CBFE6C5F01C@openstack.org> Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to draw your attention to one of the sessions at the upcoming PTG. The Diversity & Inclusion Working Group is planning to meet at 1400 UTC on Monday (October 17) at the PTG for a one-hour long session. It is a very important area for every open source community, including StarlingX, to address and ensure that their environment is friendly, welcoming and a pleasant space for anyone and everyone to participate in. I would like to encourage people in the community to add this session to your event agenda and participate, as well as bring back an overview to the community with discussion topics and action items. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Oct 6 13:25:45 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Debian Build Failure on 20221005T131433Z Message-ID: The debian build failed on missing package 'sysinv-fpga-agent' as can be seen by the logs at [1] It appears that sysinv-fpga-agent was being deliberately remove from the load [2], but on Debian specific packaging change was not merged in time for the build [3] The missing commit has now merged, and a new CENGN build has been started. Scott [1] http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20221005T131433Z [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/845819 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/845824/10/debian-mirror-tools/config/debian/distro/stx-std.lst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Thu Oct 6 18:16:02 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 18:16:02 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build ISO [20221006T013744Z] YELLOW sanity and regression results - Oct-6 Message-ID: Hi all, yesterday we had issues to execute the sanity, the ansible playbook was failing , these issues were corrected on these reverts: #860418 - Revert "Disable openldap CA cert installation for upgrade" #860417 - Revert "Add option for installing openldap CA cert" Here's the results for StarlingX + STX-openstack using the latest master branch build: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/iso/bootimage.iso and latest Helm-Charts: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/helm-charts/ [sysadmin at controller-1 ~(keystone_admin)]$ cat /etc/build.info OS="centos" SW_VERSION="22.12" BUILD_TARGET="Host Installer" BUILD_TYPE="Formal" BUILD_ID="20221006T013744Z" controller-1:~$ cat /opt/platform/armada/22.12/stx-openstack/1.0-220-centos-stable-versioned/metadata.yaml app_name: stx-openstack app_version: 1.0-220-centos-stable-versioned build_date: 2022-10-06 03:22:34 +0000 OVERALL SANITY RESULT: ?YELLOW? AIO-DX baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=ovs: Sanity Results: Status: YELLOW Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 13 (86.67%) Failed: 2 (13.33%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221006 14:10:47 test_ssh_to_hosts FAIL 20221006 14:11:36 test_lock_unlock_host[controller] PASS 20221006 14:37:54 test_swact_controllers PASS 20221006 14:45:34 test_openstack_services_healthy PASS 20221006 14:46:04 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS 20221006 14:50:36 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS 20221006 14:56:46 test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS 20221006 14:58:42 test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] PASS 20221006 15:02:24 test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS 20221006 15:05:26 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS 20221006 15:08:08 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] FAIL 20221006 15:11:04 test_evacuate_vms PASS 20221006 15:43:13 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221006 15:43:25 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS 20221006 15:43:31 test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression results: Status: YELLOW Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 11 (84.62%) Failed: 2 (15.38%) Total Executed: 13 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221006 15:48:08 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20221006 15:48:39 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20221006 15:49:07 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20221006 15:52:49 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] PASS 20221006 16:11:25 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20221006 16:21:26 test_cpu_thread_vm_topology_nova_actions[3-dedicated-require-image-None-volume-live_migrate] PASS 20221006 16:26:08 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20221006 16:27:51 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20221006 16:31:56 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20221006 16:37:34 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20221006 16:40:59 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] FAIL 20221006 16:44:35 test_vm_with_config_drive FAIL 20221006 17:15:45 test_lock_with_vms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- AIO-DX baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=ovs-dpdk : Sanity Results Status: GREEN Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 15 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221006 14:02:38 test_ssh_to_hosts PASS 20221006 14:03:29 test_lock_unlock_host[controller] PASS 20221006 14:20:44 test_swact_controllers PASS 20221006 14:28:14 test_openstack_services_healthy PASS 20221006 14:28:42 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS 20221006 14:33:05 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS 20221006 14:38:30 test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS 20221006 14:40:24 test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] PASS 20221006 14:44:12 test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS 20221006 14:47:14 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS 20221006 14:49:46 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] PASS 20221006 14:52:17 test_evacuate_vms PASS 20221006 15:18:36 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221006 15:18:47 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS 20221006 15:18:53 test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression Results Status: GREEN Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 12 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 12 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221006 15:23:26 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20221006 15:23:55 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20221006 15:24:21 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20221006 15:27:40 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] PASS 20221006 15:46:57 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20221006 15:56:29 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20221006 15:58:19 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20221006 16:02:20 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20221006 16:07:42 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20221006 16:11:29 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] PASS 20221006 16:15:25 test_vm_with_config_drive PASS 20221006 16:37:29 test_lock_with_vms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Best Regards Gabriel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Thu Oct 6 18:18:17 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 18:18:17 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build ISO [20221006T013744Z] YELLOW sanity and regression results - Oct-6 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Just a quick note: the failed tests are related to the low-priority launchpad: STX-Openstack | Hypervisor slow to go back up Best regards Gabriel ________________________________ From: Calixto de Paula, Gabriel Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 3:16 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build ISO [20221006T013744Z] YELLOW sanity and regression results - Oct-6 Hi all, yesterday we had issues to execute the sanity, the ansible playbook was failing , these issues were corrected on these reverts: #860418 - Revert "Disable openldap CA cert installation for upgrade" #860417 - Revert "Add option for installing openldap CA cert" Here's the results for StarlingX + STX-openstack using the latest master branch build: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/iso/bootimage.iso and latest Helm-Charts: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/helm-charts/ [sysadmin at controller-1 ~(keystone_admin)]$ cat /etc/build.info OS="centos" SW_VERSION="22.12" BUILD_TARGET="Host Installer" BUILD_TYPE="Formal" BUILD_ID="20221006T013744Z" controller-1:~$ cat /opt/platform/armada/22.12/stx-openstack/1.0-220-centos-stable-versioned/metadata.yaml app_name: stx-openstack app_version: 1.0-220-centos-stable-versioned build_date: 2022-10-06 03:22:34 +0000 OVERALL SANITY RESULT: ?YELLOW? AIO-DX baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=ovs: Sanity Results: Status: YELLOW Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 13 (86.67%) Failed: 2 (13.33%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221006 14:10:47 test_ssh_to_hosts FAIL 20221006 14:11:36 test_lock_unlock_host[controller] PASS 20221006 14:37:54 test_swact_controllers PASS 20221006 14:45:34 test_openstack_services_healthy PASS 20221006 14:46:04 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS 20221006 14:50:36 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS 20221006 14:56:46 test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS 20221006 14:58:42 test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] PASS 20221006 15:02:24 test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS 20221006 15:05:26 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS 20221006 15:08:08 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] FAIL 20221006 15:11:04 test_evacuate_vms PASS 20221006 15:43:13 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221006 15:43:25 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS 20221006 15:43:31 test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression results: Status: YELLOW Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 11 (84.62%) Failed: 2 (15.38%) Total Executed: 13 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221006 15:48:08 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20221006 15:48:39 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20221006 15:49:07 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20221006 15:52:49 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] PASS 20221006 16:11:25 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20221006 16:21:26 test_cpu_thread_vm_topology_nova_actions[3-dedicated-require-image-None-volume-live_migrate] PASS 20221006 16:26:08 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20221006 16:27:51 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20221006 16:31:56 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20221006 16:37:34 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20221006 16:40:59 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] FAIL 20221006 16:44:35 test_vm_with_config_drive FAIL 20221006 17:15:45 test_lock_with_vms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- AIO-DX baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=ovs-dpdk : Sanity Results Status: GREEN Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 15 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221006 14:02:38 test_ssh_to_hosts PASS 20221006 14:03:29 test_lock_unlock_host[controller] PASS 20221006 14:20:44 test_swact_controllers PASS 20221006 14:28:14 test_openstack_services_healthy PASS 20221006 14:28:42 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS 20221006 14:33:05 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS 20221006 14:38:30 test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS 20221006 14:40:24 test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] PASS 20221006 14:44:12 test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS 20221006 14:47:14 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS 20221006 14:49:46 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] PASS 20221006 14:52:17 test_evacuate_vms PASS 20221006 15:18:36 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221006 15:18:47 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS 20221006 15:18:53 test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression Results Status: GREEN Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 12 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 12 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221006 15:23:26 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20221006 15:23:55 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20221006 15:24:21 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20221006 15:27:40 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] PASS 20221006 15:46:57 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20221006 15:56:29 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20221006 15:58:19 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20221006 16:02:20 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20221006 16:07:42 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20221006 16:11:29 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] PASS 20221006 16:15:25 test_vm_with_config_drive PASS 20221006 16:37:29 test_lock_with_vms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Best Regards Gabriel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Fri Oct 7 03:18:13 2022 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 03:18:13 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 05-10-22 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello all, Here are this week's docs team meeting minutes (short form). Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Wednesdays 12:30 PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 05-Oct-22 StarlingX 8.0 Release: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - AR Juanita to create Stories for Stx 8.0 https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/index-install-e083ca818006.html - AR Ron - To fix the link for Stx 8.0 (Master) Gerrit Reviews: - Version drop-down on https://docs.starlingx.io/ - AR Ron to add the "Latest" category. Currently a workaround has been done to only display Stx 7.0 / Stx 6.0 - Stx Release Notes - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/850424 - AR Juanita - To automate the updates for the Introduction Guide - AR Ron - Pending Updates. This will be done in the next Release, Stx 8.0 - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 7 bugs outstanding General Updates: - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) - StarlingX PTG: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-ptg-planning-october-2022 - Elections: Nov 15-22 [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Lennart.Hagemann at continum.net Tue Oct 11 09:28:56 2022 From: Lennart.Hagemann at continum.net (Lennart Hagemann) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:28:56 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Trouble getting Rook installed on Virtual AIO Duplex Message-ID: Hi, I'm new to starlingx and playing around with it in a lab environment. I was following https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r7_release/virtual/aio_duplex_install_kubernetes.html and chose to set up rook as the storage backend. In the optional steps for rook it tells you "Wait for the rook-ceph-apps application to be uploaded" but I didn't see the application. Uploading it (and where you can download the manifest) was not discussed in the docs so I eventually figured it should have been automatically been uploaded when I add the storage backend? I removed the storage backend and re-added it, no application was uploaded so I checked the latest puppet logs where it exits during prefetching apt when executing /usr/bin/dpkg-query -W. I ran that command by hand and I do receive a syntax error "syntax error in triggers deferred file '/var/lib/dpkg/triggers/Unincorp' at line 1 character 65 ''. The content of the file is: 192.168.204.3:/var/rootdirs/opt/platform/sysinv/22.06:0x00000001 I think that might be a leftover from installation, but I am not entirely sure. I removed the file for testing purposes and dpkg-query -W did indeed execute successfully now. Re-Added the storage backend again, but no application appeared. The puppet run did run without errors though. So my most important questions are: Is the rook application actually supposed to upload itself automatically when adding the backend or do I need to upload it manually? If the latter, where can I find the manifest? Only found openstack manifests. If it does upload automatically, where can I dig deeper to gather more information on why it fails? Regards, Lennart -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Tue Oct 11 22:23:48 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 22:23:48 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: StarlingX Release Meeting - Oct 5/2022 Message-ID: Agenda/Minutes are posted at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases stx.7.0 - Release milestone declared as of Sep 9 - stx.7.0 storyboards closure: - Query: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/list?status=active&project_group_id=86&tags=stx.7.0 - Still Work In Progress - Some Debian stories should be closed today. But may need to continue a few in stx.8.0 as developers continue to use them even though there are new stories. - Blogs - Release Announcement - Prime: Ildiko - Complete. https://github.com/StarlingXWeb/starlingx-website/pull/201/ - Debian OS Migration - Prime: Frank Miller - Complete. https://github.com/StarlingXWeb/starlingx-website/pull/190/commits/ca7f8b155fa2e6f64620a94596d609f028c99e1e - PTP Enhancements - Multiple NIC Support / SyncE / Various NIC Support - Prime: Ghada Khalil - Forecast: mid-Sept >> end-Oct / Author: Cole Walker - Subcloud Local Install - Prime: RamS - Forecast: end-Nov stx.8.0 - Reference Links: - Release Folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qbnm3Zz5JzM16Drhw4locVQhn4uk7HI1?usp=sharing - Release/Feature Planning: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit?usp=sharing - Open StoryBoards: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/list?status=active&project_group_id=86&tags=stx.8.0 - Milestone-1 declared on Sept 23. - Feature content defined and the majority of the features have Code Merge & - Need to choose a time to stop building CentOS builds on the main stx branch for stx.8.0 - Topic for the upcoming PTG - Note: Still need to be able to build CentOS for stx.7.0 & stx.6.0 release branches - Next Milestone - Milestone-2 planned for Oct 19 (in two weeks) - Criteria: - Feature plans defined and feature development well underway >> Already in progress - Release test plan defined - including test automation deliverables >> Action: Rob to review/confirm that this can be done by Oct 19. From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Tue Oct 11 22:30:28 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 22:30:28 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Oct 5, 2022) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call October 5, 2022 Meeting is at 7pm PDT/ 10pm EDT / +1 10am CST Standing topics - Build - Main Branch CentOS Builds - Green builds all week - Main Branch Debian Builds - Green until 2 days ago. - A change to the build-tools broke the Jenkins Builds. Fix merged and load is rebuilding now. - Sanity - CentOS Main Branch Sanity w/o stx-openstack - No Longer will be run based on Debian Sanity working. - CentOS Main Branch Sanity w/ stx-openstack - Lab Issue - Investigating; LP may be generated to track this. - Previous LP: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1991115 resolved as of October 3. - Debian Main Branch Sanity - First run today: Success on Sanity today. - Action: Rob to look at plan to start these executions STATUS: First successful run today. - Need to consider an overlap period with both CentOS & Debian sanities running to ensure Debian is stable before discontinuing CentOS sanity. - No plans for overlap on sanity; will focus only on Debian sanity from now on. - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - None brought forward in the meeting - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - StarlingX Patch Process & StarlingX Upgrade Testing - PTG Topic to be added for discussion - Upcoming Elections - Email from Ildiko: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013381.html - Discussed in the TSC portion of the meeting - PTG - Tuesday-Wednesday October 18-19 - Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-ptg-planning-october-2022 - Discussed in the TSC portion of the meeting ARs from Previous Meetings - Action: Rob to confirm if the bi-weekly build meeting is active and send the date for the next meeting to the mailing list. - Meeting is not currently active. - Rob has sent out email to mailing list on changes to time for meeting. Open Requests for Help - Rebuilding ISOs - Raised by Scott Kamp - Still under discussion - Previous Actions: still open - Action: Rob to re-share build meeting link as per above. - Action: Scott Little will also look at the latest updates to the build guide as they were updated recently. - ACTION: Mike Matteson to investigate whether Scott Little has time to spend with Scott Kamp in resolving build issues in short term before PTG talks on this topic. - Enabling cpu_dedicated_set - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013382.html - No update on this; re-look at this next week. From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Wed Oct 12 14:04:33 2022 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:04:33 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-Weekly StarlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS meeting Message-ID: * Cadence and time slot: Sorry for the last-minute notice, This week's meeting has been cancelled due to conflict. Will reconvene in 2 weeks. Next Meeting: Oct 26th. Thanks, Linda * Bi-Weekly Wednesday 0930 EDT (1430 UTC, 2230 China time, 0630 PT time) * Call Details: * Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236?pwd=N21CUXNXVlJXMlcyZjZ0SE96cVNjQT09 * Dialing in from phone: * Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 876 9923 * Meeting ID: 342 730 236 * Passcode: 419405 * International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/ed95sU7aQ * Meeting Agenda and Minutes: * https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-distro-other -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 8462 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Wed Oct 12 14:04:58 2022 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:04:58 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Canceled: Bi-Weekly StarlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS meeting Message-ID: Hi, Sorry for the last-minute notice, This week's meeting has been cancelled due to conflict. Will reconvene in 2 weeks. Next Meeting: Oct 26th. Thanks, Linda -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 7345 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Chris.Winnicki at windriver.com Wed Oct 12 18:54:29 2022 From: Chris.Winnicki at windriver.com (Winnicki, Chris) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:54:29 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO [20221008T060000Z] Message-ID: Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO [20221008T060000Z] Based on ISO: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/latest_build/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso Sanity Test executed on Bare Metal Environment AIO - SX Build details: sysadmin at controller-0:~$ cat /etc/build.info SW_VERSION="22.12" BUILD_TARGET="Host Installer" BUILD_TYPE="Formal" BUILD_ID="20221008T060000Z" SRC_BUILD_ID="86" JOB="STX_build_debian_master" BUILD_BY="jenkins" BUILD_NUMBER="65" BUILD_HOST="starlingx_mirror" BUILD_DATE="2022-10-08 06:00:00 +0000" Test case detail: Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 8 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 8 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221012 18:18:47 test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS 20221012 18:19:04 test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS 20221012 18:19:10 test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS 20221012 18:19:20 test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS 20221012 18:20:56 test_lock_unlock_host PASS 20221012 18:34:24 test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS 20221012 18:35:48 test_pod_to_service_connection PASS 20221012 18:36:26 test_host_to_service_connection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Wed Oct 12 20:58:56 2022 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:58:56 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 12-10-22 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello all, Here are this week's docs team meeting minutes (short form). Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Wednesdays 12:30 PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 12-Oct-22 StarlingX 8.0 Release: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Doc Tasks created - Done - https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/index-install-e083ca818006.html - AR Ron - To fix the link for Stx 8.0 (Master) Gerrit Reviews: - Version drop-down on https://docs.starlingx.io/ - AR Ron to add the "Latest" category. Currently a workaround has been done to only display Stx 7.0 / Stx 6.0 - Stx Release Notes - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/850424 - To automate the updates for the Introduction Guide - Cherry picked to Stx 7.0 branch - Done - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged and Cherry Picked 3 reviews Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 8 bugs outstanding General Updates: - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) StarlingX PTG: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-ptg-planning-october-2022 Elections: Nov 15-22 [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From starlingx.build at gmail.com Thu Oct 13 04:37:57 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:37:57 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_pre_installer_layered - Build # 3251 - Failure! Message-ID: <235459859.43.1665635879693.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_pre_installer_layered Build #: 3251 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221013T042602Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221013T032922Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-flock/20221013T032922Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-flock-20221013T032922Z-builder OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-flock/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221013T032922Z/logs BUILD_IMG: true FULL_BUILD: false PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221013T032922Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_layer_flock_master_master LAYER: flock MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-flock BUILD_ISO: true From starlingx.build at gmail.com Thu Oct 13 04:38:03 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:38:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_flock_master_master - Build # 989 - Failure! Message-ID: <210490405.46.1665635884263.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_flock_master_master Build #: 989 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221013T032922Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221013T032922Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: false From starlingx.build at gmail.com Thu Oct 13 08:03:31 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 04:03:31 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_pre_installer - Build # 1582 - Failure! Message-ID: <295677451.49.1665648212105.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_pre_installer Build #: 1582 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221013T050129Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221013T043009Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master/20221013T043009Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-20221013T043009Z-builder OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221013T043009Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221013T043009Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_master_master MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master From starlingx.build at gmail.com Thu Oct 13 08:03:34 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 04:03:34 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_master_master - Build # 1439 - Failure! Message-ID: <1262443040.52.1665648215012.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_master_master Build #: 1439 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221013T043009Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221013T043009Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false FORCE_BUILD: true From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Thu Oct 13 12:15:19 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:15:19 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build ISO [20221012T045713Z] YELLOW sanity and regression results - Oct-12 Message-ID: Hi all, Here's the results for StarlingX + STX-openstack using the latest master branch build: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/iso/bootimage.iso and latest Helm-Charts: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/helm-charts/ controller-0:~$ cat /etc/build.info OS="centos" SW_VERSION="22.12" BUILD_TARGET="Host Installer" BUILD_TYPE="Formal" BUILD_ID="20221012T045713Z" controller-0:~$ cat /opt/platform/armada/22.12/stx-openstack/1.0-220-centos-stable-versioned/metadata.yaml app_name: stx-openstack app_version: 1.0-220-centos-stable-versioned build_date: 2022-10-12 07:20:21 +0000 OVERALL SANITY RESULT: ?YELLOW AIO-DX baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=ovs: Sanity Results: Status: YELLOW Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 14 (93.33%) Failed: 1 (6.67%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221013 03:47:48 test_ssh_to_hosts FAIL 20221013 03:48:34 test_lock_unlock_host[controller] PASS 20221013 04:14:15 test_swact_controllers PASS 20221013 04:23:12 test_openstack_services_healthy PASS 20221013 04:23:42 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS 20221013 04:28:25 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS 20221013 04:34:35 test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS 20221013 04:36:26 test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] PASS 20221013 04:40:13 test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS 20221013 04:43:14 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS 20221013 04:45:46 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] PASS 20221013 04:48:28 test_evacuate_vms PASS 20221013 05:17:13 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221013 05:17:24 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS 20221013 05:17:31 test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression results: Status: YELLOW Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 11 (84.62%) Failed: 2 (15.38%) Total Executed: 13 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221013 05:23:19 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20221013 05:23:49 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20221013 05:24:18 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20221013 05:28:04 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] PASS 20221013 05:46:46 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20221013 05:56:01 test_cpu_thread_vm_topology_nova_actions[3-dedicated-require-image-None-volume-live_migrate] PASS 20221013 06:00:44 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20221013 06:02:28 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20221013 06:06:13 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20221013 06:11:44 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20221013 06:15:17 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] FAIL 20221013 06:19:02 test_vm_with_config_drive FAIL 20221013 06:50:28 test_lock_with_vms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- the failed tests above are related to the low-priority launchpad: STX-Openstack | Hypervisor slow to go back up AIO-DX baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=ovs-dpdk : Sanity Results Status: GREEN Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 15 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221013 03:42:16 test_ssh_to_hosts PASS 20221013 03:43:05 test_lock_unlock_host[controller] PASS 20221013 03:59:53 test_swact_controllers PASS 20221013 04:08:10 test_openstack_services_healthy PASS 20221013 04:08:38 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS 20221013 04:13:03 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS 20221013 04:18:43 test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS 20221013 04:20:26 test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] PASS 20221013 04:24:07 test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS 20221013 04:27:07 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS 20221013 04:29:42 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] PASS 20221013 04:32:28 test_evacuate_vms PASS 20221013 04:59:39 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221013 04:59:50 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS 20221013 04:59:56 test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression Results Status: GREEN Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 12 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 12 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221013 05:05:45 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20221013 05:06:13 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20221013 05:06:41 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20221013 05:10:08 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] PASS 20221013 05:29:26 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20221013 05:39:13 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20221013 05:41:08 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20221013 05:45:30 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20221013 05:50:59 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20221013 05:54:34 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] PASS 20221013 05:58:20 test_vm_with_config_drive PASS 20221013 06:17:57 test_lock_with_vms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ?Best Regards Gabriel ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Steve.Geary at windriver.com Thu Oct 13 18:39:40 2022 From: Steve.Geary at windriver.com (Geary, Stephen (Steve)) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 18:39:40 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] PTG Communication Discussion Message-ID: All, I would like to propose we start Wednesday with the Community discussion. I am co-leading this conversation and have an unresolvable conflict later in the PTG session. Thanks. -steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Oct 13 19:56:55 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:56:55 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] PTG Communication Discussion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <25D08B96-176B-498D-9E4B-EAD1CAF00FE1@gmail.com> Hi Steve and All, I support the idea of starting Wednesday with this topic! I think it is a very important one and beyond making sure that Steve can be there for the whole discussion and lead it, it would probably also benefit from being the first topic of the day and having everyone?s full focus. Thanks, Ildik? > On Oct 13, 2022, at 11:39, Geary, Stephen (Steve) wrote: > > All, > > I would like to propose we start Wednesday with the Community discussion. > I am co-leading this conversation and have an unresolvable conflict later in the PTG session. > > > Thanks. > > -steve > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Fri Oct 14 10:48:30 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:48:30 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] PTG Communication Discussion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Updated the proposed agenda. Greg. From: Geary, Stephen (Steve) Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 2:40 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] PTG Communication Discussion All, I would like to propose we start Wednesday with the Community discussion. I am co-leading this conversation and have an unresolvable conflict later in the PTG session. Thanks. -steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Fri Oct 14 17:14:10 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:14:10 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Oct 12, 2022) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call October 12, 2022 Standing topics - Build - Main Branch CentOS Builds - Green all week - Main Branch Debian Builds - One build failure on Oct 7. A rebuild passed. - Green since then - Sanity - CentOS Main Branch Sanity w/o stx-openstack - No Longer will be run based on Debian Sanity working. - CentOS Main Branch Sanity w/ stx-openstack - Last sanity on Oct 6 is Yellow: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013402.html - Next sanity is planned for Oct 12-13 - Need to determine when the stx-openstack sanity can transition to Debian. - Action: Rob/Thales to provide a plan - Debian Main Branch Sanity - Last sanity on Oct 5 is Green: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013398.html - Sanity is typically planned for Monday, but hit some issues that prevented that from happening. Trying to get a sanity done before EOW. - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - None brought forward in the meeting - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - Next week's meeting will be cancelled because of the PTG - No other new topics ARs from Previous Meetings - Action: Rob to confirm if the bi-weekly build meeting is active and send the date for the next meeting to the mailing list. - Closed. Meeting is active. - Email Reminder: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013383.html Open Requests for Help - Rook Installation - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013404.html - Greg asked Flavio/Storage team if someone can respond. - Note: The original Intel team who intrdouced rook is no longer active in the community. - Enabling cpu_dedicated_set - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013382.html - Last Question posted here: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013382.html - Is there a way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? - Still need to find someone to respond. Ghada to contact Chris Friesen to request someone from the containers team to respond. - Rebuilding ISOs - Raised by Scott Kamp - Actions: - Action: Rob to re-share build meeting link as per above >> DONE - Action: Scott Little will also look at the latest updates to the build guide as they were updated recently. >> Still Open - Action: Mike Matteson to investigate whether Scott Little has time to spend with Scott Kamp in resolving build issues in short term before PTG talks on this topic. >> Still Open - Suggest that further discussions continue in the Build meeting From outbackdingo at gmail.com Fri Oct 14 20:38:58 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 03:38:58 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails Message-ID: tried to deploy openstack on stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' done it before on 6.x, no issues, seems something broken document followed https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r6_release/openstack/install.html manifest used http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-205-centos-stable-versioned.tgz [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ | application | version | manifest name | manifest file | status | progress | +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ | cert-manager | 1.0-37 | cert-manager-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | applied | completed | | nginx-ingress-controller | 1.1-38 | nginx-ingress-controller-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | applied | completed | | stx-openstack | 1.0-205-centos-stable- | openstack-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | uploaded | completed | | | versioned | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-apply stx-openstack Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' From outbackdingo at gmail.com Fri Oct 14 20:43:04 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 03:43:04 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare-metal 7.0 debian, fails to install Message-ID: I could only get a acreen shot of kernel segfaulting on dell c6220 debian 7.0, centos 7.0 did install fine on same box, sceen shot attached -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20221014_092052.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2134404 bytes Desc: not available URL: From amy at demarco.com Fri Oct 14 22:10:11 2022 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Diversity][PTG] Diversity and Inclusion WG session at PTG and meeting changes Message-ID: The Diversity and Inclusion WG will be holding its session on Monday at 14:00UTC in the Folsom room. On the agenda[0] are holding a Diversity Survey for the Foundation in 2023 which includes all projects and Community Leadership Mentorship. We have also moved our regular monthly meetings to the Second Tuesday of the month at 14:00UTC and we have also moved back from video to IRC with the meetings taking place in #openinfra-diversity on OFTC. Amy (spotz) 0 - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2022-ptg-diversity -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Fri Oct 14 22:57:45 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:57:45 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] PTG Communication Discussion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5BCD820C-C282-47A6-949F-4BD6DEAE7D5C@gmail.com> Thanks Greg! Best Regards, Ildik? > On Oct 14, 2022, at 03:48, Waines, Greg wrote: > > Updated the proposed agenda. > Greg. > > From: Geary, Stephen (Steve) > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 2:40 PM > To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] PTG Communication Discussion > > All, > > I would like to propose we start Wednesday with the Community discussion. > I am co-leading this conversation and have an unresolvable conflict later in the PTG session. > > > Thanks. > > -steve > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Fri Oct 14 23:53:28 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:53:28 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor In-Reply-To: <1C48CFE8-BC55-4360-99DD-5EE8205FF0B6@gmail.com> References: <93D2C061-CAFE-48F0-B128-241D66F235C8@gmail.com> <1C48CFE8-BC55-4360-99DD-5EE8205FF0B6@gmail.com> Message-ID: <42D3E443-E8DD-4585-A1EF-8D418F7C3A1E@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX TSC, I would like to propose to add Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as a contributor to the project. While Scott is currently not contributing code he has been participating in the community in the past couple of release cycles. He reported and was involved in identifying the following issues: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1984125 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1982061 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1972748 Scott is also active on the starlingx-discuss mailing list and weekly meetings, such as the community call. If the TSC approves, I will add Scott to the electorate etherpad for the 2022 fall elections: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-electorate-fall-2022 Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Oct 15 04:31:55 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 00:31:55 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_publish - Build # 4968 - Failure! Message-ID: <286515436.72.1665808317129.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_publish Build #: 4968 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221015T042421Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221015T021727Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-flock/20221015T021727Z OS: centos PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221015T021727Z/logs RETRIES: 13 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221015T021727Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_layer_flock_master_master RETRY_INTERVAL_SEC: 300 MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-flock PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock TIMESTAMP: 20221015T021727Z PUBLISH_INPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221015T021727Z/inputs LAYER: flock PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221015T021727Z/outputs From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Oct 15 04:31:59 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 00:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_flock_master_master - Build # 991 - Failure! Message-ID: <1090905216.75.1665808320612.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_flock_master_master Build #: 991 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221015T021727Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221015T021727Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: false From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Oct 15 05:26:11 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 01:26:11 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_pre_installer - Build # 1584 - Failure! Message-ID: <1812635061.78.1665811572955.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_pre_installer Build #: 1584 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221015T051927Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221015T043000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master/20221015T043000Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-20221015T043000Z-builder OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221015T043000Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221015T043000Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_master_master MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Oct 15 05:26:15 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 01:26:15 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_master_master - Build # 1441 - Failure! Message-ID: <1550724330.81.1665811576423.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_master_master Build #: 1441 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221015T043000Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221015T043000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false FORCE_BUILD: true From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sun Oct 16 03:51:34 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 23:51:34 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_pre_installer_layered - Build # 3260 - Failure! Message-ID: <409318935.89.1665892295251.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_pre_installer_layered Build #: 3260 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221016T034148Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221016T021150Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-flock/20221016T021150Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-flock-20221016T021150Z-builder OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-flock/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221016T021150Z/logs BUILD_IMG: true FULL_BUILD: false PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221016T021150Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_layer_flock_master_master LAYER: flock MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-flock BUILD_ISO: true From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sun Oct 16 03:51:37 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 23:51:37 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_flock_master_master - Build # 992 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <1911201737.73.1665808318477.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1911201737.73.1665808318477.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1632916468.92.1665892298195.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_flock_master_master Build #: 992 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221016T021150Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221016T021150Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: false From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sun Oct 16 04:36:00 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 00:36:00 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_download_mirror - Build # 1751 - Failure! Message-ID: <258993473.95.1665894961780.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_download_mirror Build #: 1751 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221016T043407Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221016T043000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-20221016T043000Z-builder PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221016T043000Z/logs MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221016T043000Z/logs MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sun Oct 16 04:36:03 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 00:36:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_master_master - Build # 1442 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <250664672.79.1665811574219.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <250664672.79.1665811574219.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1530759189.98.1665894964605.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_master_master Build #: 1442 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221016T043000Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221016T043000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false FORCE_BUILD: true From starlingx.build at gmail.com Mon Oct 17 05:19:02 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:19:02 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_pre_installer - Build # 1585 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <1812635061.78.1665811572955.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1812635061.78.1665811572955.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <137352763.108.1665983944127.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_pre_installer Build #: 1585 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221017T045948Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221017T043000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master/20221017T043000Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-20221017T043000Z-builder OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221017T043000Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221017T043000Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_build_master_master MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master From starlingx.build at gmail.com Mon Oct 17 05:19:06 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:19:06 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_master_master - Build # 1443 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <811536095.96.1665894962465.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <811536095.96.1665894962465.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <981362126.111.1665983947137.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_master_master Build #: 1443 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221017T043000Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221017T043000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false FORCE_BUILD: true From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Mon Oct 17 13:12:03 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:12:03 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, We ran some sanity tests on Sep-5th-2022 using the latest build on stx rc 7.0(http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/flock/latest_build/), with no issues applying stx-openstack. Can you give us more info (alarm-list and sysinv log for example)? Also, can you raise a Launchpad with this info so that we can investigate? Regards Gabriel ________________________________ From: Outback Dingo Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 5:38 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] tried to deploy openstack on stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' done it before on 6.x, no issues, seems something broken document followed https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r6_release/openstack/install.html manifest used http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-205-centos-stable-versioned.tgz [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ | application | version | manifest name | manifest file | status | progress | +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ | cert-manager | 1.0-37 | cert-manager-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | applied | completed | | nginx-ingress-controller | 1.1-38 | nginx-ingress-controller-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | applied | completed | | stx-openstack | 1.0-205-centos-stable- | openstack-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | uploaded | completed | | | versioned | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-apply stx-openstack Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Mon Oct 17 14:35:16 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:35:16 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Canceled: Bi-weekly StarlingX Release Meeting (new time) Message-ID: Cancelled due to the PTG. Feel free to join us there: The StarlingX PTG Meetings: * Tuesday, October 18 - 1300 UTC - 1700 UTC ( VIRTUAL ONLY ) * Wednesday, October 19 - 1300 UTC - 1700 UTC ( VIRTUAL ONLY ) * Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-ptg-planning-october-2022 ? PTG event page - http://ptg.openstack.org/ptg.html ? Meeting Links: https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html ---- New meeting series for the StarlingX Release Meeting Bi-weekly meeting on Wednesday 06:30AM PT / 09:30AM ET / 02:30PM UTC Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236?pwd=N21CUXNXVlJXMlcyZjZ0SE96cVNjQT09 Meeting agenda/minutes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 3913 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Mon Oct 17 14:36:24 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:36:24 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] No StarlingX TSC & Community Call on Oct 19 due to PTG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The TSC/Community meeting will be cancelled due to the PTG. Feel free to join us there: The StarlingX PTG Meetings: * Tuesday, October 18 - 1300 UTC - 1700 UTC ( VIRTUAL ONLY ) * Wednesday, October 19 - 1300 UTC - 1700 UTC ( VIRTUAL ONLY ) * Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-ptg-planning-october-2022 * PTG event page - http://ptg.openstack.org/ptg.html * Meeting Links: https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html -----Original Appointment----- From: Zvonar, Bill Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 10:57 AM To: Zvonar, Bill; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Cc: Wensley, Barton; Jones, Bruce E Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX TSC & Community Call When: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: https://zoom.us/j/342730236?pwd=N21CUXNXVlJXMlcyZjZ0SE96cVNjQT09 https://zoom.us/j/342730236?pwd=N21CUXNXVlJXMlcyZjZ0SE96cVNjQT09 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at windriver.com Mon Oct 17 17:20:40 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_flock_master_master - Build # 991 - Failure! In-Reply-To: <1090905216.75.1665808320612.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <1090905216.75.1665808320612.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <1a81828d-7595-637c-da79-d844450090e2@windriver.com> This and other builds over the weekend have failed due to disk space exhaustion. The cause was a 'repo sync' that resulted in the linux-yocto.git growing to over half a terabyte. Root cause unknown. I've cleaned the mess and restarted some builds.? Repo sync is once again behaving itself. Scott On 2022-10-15 00:31, starlingx.build at gmail.com wrote: > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > Project: STX_build_layer_flock_master_master > Build #: 991 > Status: Failure > Timestamp: 20221015T021727Z > Branch: master > > Check logs at: > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20221015T021727Z/logs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Parameters > > FULL_BUILD: false > FORCE_BUILD: false > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From outbackdingo at gmail.com Mon Oct 17 20:31:09 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:31:09 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We are looking into the alarm. sysinv.log is attached. [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ fm alarm-list +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ | Alarm ID | Reason Text | Entity ID | Severity | Time Stamp | +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ | 200.004 | controller-0 experienced a service-affecting failure. Auto-recovery in | host=controller-0 | critical | 2022-10-14T20: | | | progress. Manual Lock and Unlock may be required if auto-recovery is | | | 14:55.375316 | | | unsuccessful. | | | | | | | | | | +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:12 PM Calixto de Paula, Gabriel wrote: > > Hi, > We ran some sanity tests on Sep-5th-2022 using the latest build on stx rc 7.0(http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/flock/latest_build/), with no issues applying stx-openstack. > Can you give us more info (alarm-list and sysinv log for example)? > Also, can you raise a Launchpad with this info so that we can investigate? > > Regards > Gabriel > ________________________________ > From: Outback Dingo > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 5:38 PM > To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > tried to deploy openstack on stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' > done it before on 6.x, no issues, seems something broken > > document followed > https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r6_release/openstack/install.html > manifest used > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-205-centos-stable-versioned.tgz > > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > | application | version | manifest > name | manifest file | status | > progress | > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > | cert-manager | 1.0-37 | > cert-manager-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > applied | completed | > | nginx-ingress-controller | 1.1-38 | > nginx-ingress-controller-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > applied | completed | > | stx-openstack | 1.0-205-centos-stable- | > openstack-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | > uploaded | completed | > | | versioned | > | | | > | > | | | > | | | > | > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-apply > stx-openstack > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: sysinv.log Type: text/x-log Size: 1008235 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Tue Oct 18 12:07:32 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 12:07:32 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Good morning, Thanks for the logs and the alarm-list, did you raise an Launchpad also? There it'll be easier for us to investigate ? Regards Gabriel ________________________________ From: Outback Dingo Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 5:31 PM To: Calixto de Paula, Gabriel Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] We are looking into the alarm. sysinv.log is attached. [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ fm alarm-list +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ | Alarm ID | Reason Text | Entity ID | Severity | Time Stamp | +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ | 200.004 | controller-0 experienced a service-affecting failure. Auto-recovery in | host=controller-0 | critical | 2022-10-14T20: | | | progress. Manual Lock and Unlock may be required if auto-recovery is | | | 14:55.375316 | | | unsuccessful. | | | | | | | | | | +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:12 PM Calixto de Paula, Gabriel wrote: > > Hi, > We ran some sanity tests on Sep-5th-2022 using the latest build on stx rc 7.0(http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/flock/latest_build/), with no issues applying stx-openstack. > Can you give us more info (alarm-list and sysinv log for example)? > Also, can you raise a Launchpad with this info so that we can investigate? > > Regards > Gabriel > ________________________________ > From: Outback Dingo > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 5:38 PM > To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > tried to deploy openstack on stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' > done it before on 6.x, no issues, seems something broken > > document followed > https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r6_release/openstack/install.html > manifest used > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-205-centos-stable-versioned.tgz > > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > | application | version | manifest > name | manifest file | status | > progress | > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > | cert-manager | 1.0-37 | > cert-manager-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > applied | completed | > | nginx-ingress-controller | 1.1-38 | > nginx-ingress-controller-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > applied | completed | > | stx-openstack | 1.0-205-centos-stable- | > openstack-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | > uploaded | completed | > | | versioned | > | | | > | > | | | > | | | > | > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-apply > stx-openstack > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From outbackdingo at gmail.com Tue Oct 18 12:24:23 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 19:24:23 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Been a busy day, Engineer will do it soon On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, 7:07 PM Calixto de Paula, Gabriel < Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com> wrote: > Good morning, > Thanks for the logs and the alarm-list, did you raise an Launchpad also? > There it'll be easier for us to investigate ? > > Regards > Gabriel > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Outback Dingo > *Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2022 5:31 PM > *To:* Calixto de Paula, Gabriel > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / > openstack fails > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > We are looking into the alarm. sysinv.log is attached. > > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ fm alarm-list > > +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ > | Alarm ID | Reason Text > | Entity ID | Severity | Time Stamp | > > +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ > | 200.004 | controller-0 experienced a service-affecting failure. > Auto-recovery in | host=controller-0 | critical | 2022-10-14T20: > | > | | progress. Manual Lock and Unlock may be required if > auto-recovery is | | | 14:55.375316 > | > | | unsuccessful. > | | | | > | | > | | | | > > +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:12 PM Calixto de Paula, Gabriel > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > We ran some sanity tests on Sep-5th-2022 using the latest build on stx > rc 7.0( > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/flock/latest_build/), > with no issues applying stx-openstack. > > Can you give us more info (alarm-list and sysinv log for example)? > > Also, can you raise a Launchpad with this info so that we can > investigate? > > > > Regards > > Gabriel > > ________________________________ > > From: Outback Dingo > > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 5:38 PM > > To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack > fails > > > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > > > tried to deploy openstack on stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack > fails > > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute > 'startswith' > > done it before on 6.x, no issues, seems something broken > > > > document followed > > > https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r6_release/openstack/install.html > > manifest used > > > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-205-centos-stable-versioned.tgz > > > > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list > > > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > > | application | version | manifest > > name | manifest file | status | > > progress | > > > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > > | cert-manager | 1.0-37 | > > cert-manager-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > > applied | completed | > > | nginx-ingress-controller | 1.1-38 | > > nginx-ingress-controller-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > > applied | completed | > > | stx-openstack | 1.0-205-centos-stable- | > > openstack-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | > > uploaded | completed | > > | | versioned | > > | | | > > | > > | | | > > | | | > > | > > > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-apply > > stx-openstack > > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute > 'startswith' > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chris.friesen at windriver.com Wed Oct 19 14:06:44 2022 From: chris.friesen at windriver.com (Chris Friesen) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 08:06:44 -0600 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] heads-up, upcoming Kubernetes changes you may need to plan for Message-ID: <119291b6-b95c-3f58-2854-115cbeb4d50d@windriver.com> Hi all, We are in the process of adding support for Kubernetes 1.24.4 and there is a change that people need to be aware of. In 1.20 upstream K8s added a new "node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane=" label to identify control-plane nodes.? This is in addition to the previous "node-role.kubernetes.io/master=" label that already existed. Until K8s 1.24 there has been a "node-role.kubernetes.io/master=" taint on the control-plane node.? In 1.24 this taint is replaced with a "node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane=" taint. Currently in StarlingX we have reverted this upstream K8s change to buy us time to change all of the platform code to be compatible with the new label/taint. If anyone has application pods that run on controller nodes currently, there are two recommendations: 1. For pod nodeSelectors, replace any usage of "node-role.kubernetes.io/master=" with "node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane=". 2. For pod tolerations, for any pod with a toleration of "node-role.kubernetes.io/master=", add a new toleration for "node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane=". The current expectation is that we will be switching to the new label/taint for the K8s 1.25 timeframe at the latest, though if things go more smoothly than expected it may be possible to complete the switch in the current release. Chris Friesen Containers TL -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Wed Oct 19 16:50:43 2022 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:50:43 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20221018T060000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2022-October 19 (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20221018T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221019 14:29:31 test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS 20221019 14:29:49 test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS 20221019 14:29:55 test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS 20221019 14:30:05 test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS 20221019 14:31:21 test_lock_unlock_host PASS 20221019 14:44:49 test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS 20221019 14:46:07 test_pod_to_service_connection PASS 20221019 14:46:45 test_host_to_service_connection PASS 20221019 14:51:20 test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS 20221019 14:53:06 test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS 20221019 14:53:48 test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS 20221019 15:08:47 test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS 20221019 15:42:57 test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS 20221019 15:58:26 test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS 20221019 16:01:58 test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS 20221019 16:25:24 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221019 16:25:34 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Wed Oct 19 17:01:32 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:01:32 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Release planning - reviewing stx.8.0 milestone-2 offline Message-ID: Hello all, Since the bi-weekly starlingx release planning meeting was not held this week due to the PTG, I'd like to review the stx.8.0 milestone-2 criteria offline using the mailing list. The milestone is targeted for this week and I believe we are in good shape to declare it. The criteria for the milestone are: - Feature plans defined and feature development well underway - Based on the recent updates in [1] - worksheet: Release Candidates, it looks like feature leads have been updating feature dates. Thank you! - I'd like to ask each feature lead to have a final look and make any further updates by EOD Thursday Oct 20 - Release test plan defined - including test automation deliverables - Action: Rob to review/confirm that this can be done by Oct 19. - Rob, For your action: - please review the following test milestones in [1] - worksheet: Release Milestones - Feature Test Complete - Regression Test Start - Regression Test Complete - Final Regression Complete Suggest any date or duration changes if needed. Or confirm that the current plan is reasonable - please review the "Feature Tested" dates for the various features in [1] - worksheet: Release Candidates These dates were updated by the individual feature leads, so I expect they are accurate - please comment on whether there are planned automation deliverables for stx.8.0 - please complete by EOD Thursday Oct 20 - I already see that you have a folder for the stx.8.0 test activities [2], so thank you! Please note that feature proposals are come in at any time during the release cycle provided the feature dates fit within the overall release milestones, so declaring Milestone-2 doesn't impact new feature proposals. Regards, Ghada [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 [2] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1E_AQPxVrNnbVtSqQ9_CdqYidqMmYcq4n From Rob.Cooke at windriver.com Wed Oct 19 17:30:47 2022 From: Rob.Cooke at windriver.com (Cooke, Rob) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:30:47 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Release planning - reviewing stx.8.0 milestone-2 offline In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Ghada, Updates as per the request below. Release test plan defined - including test automation deliverables - Action: Rob to review/confirm that this can be done by Oct 19. [Rob] Plan has been defined, this can be closed. - Rob, For your action: - please review the following test milestones in [1] - worksheet: Release Milestones - Feature Test Complete - Regression Test Start - Regression Test Complete - Final Regression Complete Suggest any date or duration changes if needed. Or confirm that the current plan is reasonable [Rob] I have reviewed the milestones and believe the plan is reasonable. - please review the "Feature Tested" dates for the various features in [1] - worksheet: Release Candidates These dates were updated by the individual feature leads, so I expect they are accurate [Rob] Agreed, given the review with feature leads, I believe these to be accurate. - please comment on whether there are planned automation deliverables for stx.8.0 [Rob] We will plan some automation deliverables, the extent to which has not been fully defined yet - please complete by EOD Thursday Oct 20 - I already see that you have a folder for the stx.8.0 test activities [2], so thank you! -----Original Message----- From: Khalil, Ghada Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 1:02 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Cooke, Rob Subject: Release planning - reviewing stx.8.0 milestone-2 offline Hello all, Since the bi-weekly starlingx release planning meeting was not held this week due to the PTG, I'd like to review the stx.8.0 milestone-2 criteria offline using the mailing list. The milestone is targeted for this week and I believe we are in good shape to declare it. The criteria for the milestone are: - Feature plans defined and feature development well underway - Based on the recent updates in [1] - worksheet: Release Candidates, it looks like feature leads have been updating feature dates. Thank you! - I'd like to ask each feature lead to have a final look and make any further updates by EOD Thursday Oct 20 - Release test plan defined - including test automation deliverables - Action: Rob to review/confirm that this can be done by Oct 19. - Rob, For your action: - please review the following test milestones in [1] - worksheet: Release Milestones - Feature Test Complete - Regression Test Start - Regression Test Complete - Final Regression Complete Suggest any date or duration changes if needed. Or confirm that the current plan is reasonable - please review the "Feature Tested" dates for the various features in [1] - worksheet: Release Candidates These dates were updated by the individual feature leads, so I expect they are accurate - please comment on whether there are planned automation deliverables for stx.8.0 - please complete by EOD Thursday Oct 20 - I already see that you have a folder for the stx.8.0 test activities [2], so thank you! Please note that feature proposals are come in at any time during the release cycle provided the feature dates fit within the overall release milestones, so declaring Milestone-2 doesn't impact new feature proposals. Regards, Ghada [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 [2] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1E_AQPxVrNnbVtSqQ9_CdqYidqMmYcq4n From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Wed Oct 19 21:36:53 2022 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:36:53 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 19-10-22 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello all, Here are this week's docs team meeting minutes (short form). Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Wednesdays 12:30 PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ StarlingX 8.0 Release: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Doc Tasks created - Doc Team to ensure Stories/Tasks are added to the commit messages. - https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/index-install-e083ca818006.html - AR Ron - To fix the link for Stx 8.0 (Master) - O-RAN updates https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010278- AR Litao Gao to initiate Gerrit review - events.yaml - Automation of the events.yaml file in the docs - AR Juanita / Ron - GPU operator Removal from the odcs https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/859341- AR Elisa to confirm about cherry picking to Stx 6.0 / 7.0 Gerrit Reviews: - Version drop-down on https://docs.starlingx.io/ - AR Ron to add the "Latest" category. - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged and Cherry Picked 5 reviews Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 8 bugs outstanding - The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects. General Updates: -Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) StarlingX PTG Presentations: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1z3YDfXscDwv5ee86u0XWTiXauLqpw4yi Elections: Nov 15-22 [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lists at optimcloud.com Wed Oct 19 23:51:29 2022 From: lists at optimcloud.com (Embedded Devel) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:51:29 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1666223473424.2931194307.2848983426@optimcloud.com> launchpad report filed. stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails Edit Bug #1993593 On Tuesday 18 October 2022 07:07:32 PM (+07:00), Calixto de Paula, Gabriel wrote: Good morning, Thanks for the logs and the alarm-list, did you raise an Launchpad also? There it'll be easier for us to investigate ? Regards Gabriel From: Outback Dingo Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 5:31 PM To: Calixto de Paula, Gabriel Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] We are looking into the alarm. sysinv.log is attached. [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ fm alarm-list +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ | Alarm ID | Reason Text | Entity ID | Severity | Time Stamp | +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ | 200.004 | controller-0 experienced a service-affecting failure. Auto-recovery in | host=controller-0 | critical | 2022-10-14T20: | | | progress. Manual Lock and Unlock may be required if auto-recovery is | | | 14:55.375316 | | | unsuccessful. | | | | | | | | | | +----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+ On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:12 PM Calixto de Paula, Gabriel wrote: > > Hi, > We ran some sanity tests on Sep-5th-2022 using the latest build on stx rc 7.0(http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/flock/latest_build/), with no issues applying stx-openstack. > Can you give us more info (alarm-list and sysinv log for example)? > Also, can you raise a Launchpad with this info so that we can investigate? > > Regards > Gabriel > ________________________________ > From: Outback Dingo > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 5:38 PM > To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > tried to deploy openstack on stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' > done it before on 6.x, no issues, seems something broken > > document followed > https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r6_release/openstack/install.html > manifest used > http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-205-centos-stable-versioned.tgz > > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-list > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > | application | version | manifest > name | manifest file | status | > progress | > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > | cert-manager | 1.0-37 | > cert-manager-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > applied | completed | > | nginx-ingress-controller | 1.1-38 | > nginx-ingress-controller-fluxcd-manifests | fluxcd-manifests | > applied | completed | > | stx-openstack | 1.0-205-centos-stable- | > openstack-manifest | stx-openstack.yaml | > uploaded | completed | > | | versioned | > | | | > | > | | | > | | | > | > +--------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------------+----------+-----------+ > [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system application-apply > stx-openstack > Application-apply rejected: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith' > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -- Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chris.friesen at windriver.com Thu Oct 20 15:13:01 2022 From: chris.friesen at windriver.com (Chris Friesen) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:13:01 -0600 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] another heads-up for Kubernetes 1.24 Message-ID: Currently the containers team is in the process of adding K8s 1.24.4 as a supported version.? It's currently in the load but there are still some compatibility issues being resolved so you shouldn't try to use it yet. There's one major issue that people with custom applications should be aware of, until now we've been running with the "RemoveSelfLink" feature gate set to "false" for backwards compatibility.? This is no longer an option in Kubernetes 1.24, so any applications using the ".metadata.selfLink" field will need to be updated as it will now be unconditionally set to the empty string. In the StarlingX platform the current RBD provisioner uses this field, so PersistentVolumeClaims won't work with K8s 1.24.4 until the new RBD provisioner gets merged (see https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/platform-armada-app/+/858737 for ongoing work in this area). Thanks, Chris Friesen Containers TL From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Oct 20 19:16:15 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] IMPORTANT: Changes to Debian packaging rules. Message-ID: <6ce57da1-ea68-7faf-1d11-93e926e90696@windriver.com> The merge of https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/root/+/861819 has change how Debian packaging works! For downloaded packages, the file ... *stx-tools/debian-mirror-tools/config/debian/common/base-bullseye.lst* ... used to govern BOTH package download and inclusion in the ISO. That's no longer the case. Now 'base-bullseye.lst' only covers download, and the file ... *cgts-root/build-tools/stx/debian-image.inc* ... governs inclusion of downloaded packages into the iso. Why the change? This allows us to trim down the size of the Debian ISO by removing dev packages that were only needed to support package building prerequisites. Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Oct 20 20:24:19 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:24:19 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx.8.0 Milestone-2 Declared Message-ID: Hello all, Based on the stx.8.0 release/feature reviews, we are declaring Milestone-2 with a date of Oct 20/2022. Milestone-2 Criteria: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Release_Plan#Release_Milestones - Feature plans defined and feature development well underway - Release test plan defined - including test automation deliverables Subsequent Release Plan Dates are as follows: - Milestone-3: Jan 11 2023 - Feature Test Complete: Jan 25 2023 - Regression Test Start: Jan 3 2023 - Regression Test Complete: Jan 25 2023 - RC1: Feb 1 2023 - Final Regression Complete: Feb 15 2023 - Release: Feb 22 2023 A list of features is available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 Thank you to all community members who helped achieve this milestone. Regards, Ghada - stx releases prime From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Oct 20 23:39:08 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:39:08 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Pointers to StarlingX Contributor Process Message-ID: Hey Scott, ? just following up on the action I took from the PTG, Here?s the URLs and notes on contributing to StarlingX: StarlingX Contribution Guidelines are documented here: * https://docs.starlingx.io/contributor/index.html * https://docs.starlingx.io/contributor/development_process.html * https://docs.starlingx.io/developer_resources/code-submission-guide.html * https://docs.starlingx.io/contributor/doc_contribute_guide.html * https://docs.starlingx.io/contributor/api_contribute_guide.html * https://docs.starlingx.io/contributor/release_note_contribute_guide.html My summary of this is as follows: * Need to set yourself up with the required accounts for contributing to a project hosted by OpenDev ( https://docs.opendev.org/opendev/infra-manual/latest/developers.html ) * Create a STORY in https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/starlingx with a brief description of the feature/contribution you are proposing * Start attending the StarlingX Release Team Meetings * to let community know of your proposed contribution * add your STORY into the STX-R# Release Planning Spreadsheet * with info on forecasted SPEC Date, CodeComplete Date, TestComplete Date, etc. * AND report on progress of STORY/Feature over the course of the STX Release * Meeting info * Bi-weekly meeting on Wednesday 06:30AM PT / 09:30AM ET / 02:30PM UTC * Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236?pwd=N21CUXNXVlJXMlcyZjZ0SE96cVNjQT09 * Meeting agenda/minutes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases * Start attending the SubProject?s Meeting(s) that are most relevant to the contribution you are doing (e.g. if it?s some wireguard enhancement ? maybe Networking or Distro/Kernel SubProject ?) * good place to ask for detailed specific help in the area * good place to let community members ( who are ?cores? of the code repos you are changing ) be aware of the your upcoming contribution ? so that SPEC REVIEWS and CODE/GERRIT REVIEWS go more smoothly * good place to NAG community members (especially cores) to review your SPEC and CODE/GERRIT REVIEWS * Write your spec and submit it for review in GERRIT * ideally do this before you start (or are too far along) on the design/development of your contribution ? in case there is a lot of discussion around your approach * Develop and Test your code before submitting in GERRIT for REVIEW * address comments from review * Full integration testing on your update * explicit testing of your functionality * make sure your update works (and doesn?t break) system operations such as upgrades ?, controller switchover, backup & restore, etc. * raise launchpads and fix any issues found * Update StarlingX DOCs and submit for GERRIT REVIEW * address comments from review ( ? I likely forgot stuff ? any one in community feel free to update anything I?ve said ? ) let me know if you have any concerns/questions, Greg. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Fri Oct 21 16:05:20 2022 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:05:20 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build ISO [20221021T025854Z] sanity results - Oct-21 Message-ID: Hi all, Here's the results for StarlingX + STX-openstack using the latest master branch build: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/iso/bootimage.iso and latest Helm-Charts: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/latest_build/outputs/helm-charts/ BUILD_ID: 20221021T025854Z Overall Status: RED A BUG was found during the execution of sanity that caused RED results on both DX labs, seems like this bug entered on 15-Oct, all of the builds since then fail to install, a Launchpad was created for the issue: ?Bug #1993832 - StarlingX | Puppet error - Duplicate declaration during ansible playbook Regards Gabriel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From helena at openstack.org Fri Oct 21 17:50:46 2022 From: helena at openstack.org (Helena Spease) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:50:46 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Track Chair Nominations Close in One Week! Message-ID: <9B69E3A3-A3D6-401A-8683-1FF9A7B4CFB6@openstack.org> Hey everyone! Track Chair nominations > for the 2023 OpenInfra Summit in Vancouver (June 13-15, 2023) are closing soon! Please submit your nominations before they close on October 28, 2022 Track Chairs for each Track will help build the Summit schedule, and are made up of individuals working in open infrastructure. Responsibilities include: - Help the Summit team put together the best possible content based on your subject matter expertise - Promote the individual Tracks within your networks - Review the submissions and Community voting results in your particular Track - Determine if there are any major content gaps in your Track, and if so, potentially solicit additional speakers directly to submit - Ensure diversity of speakers and companies represented in your Track - Avoid vendor sales pitches, focusing more on real-world user stories and technical, in-the-trenches experiences 2023 Summit Tracks: - 5G/NFV & Edge - AI/Machine Learning/HPC - CI/CD - Container Infrastructure - Getting Started - Hardware Enablement - Open Development - Private & Hybrid Cloud - Public Cloud - Security - Hands On Workshops Full track descriptions are available here >. If you?re interested in nominating yourself or someone else to be a member of the Summit Track Chairs for a specific Track, please fill out the nomination form >. Nominations will close on October 28th, 2022. Track Chairs selections will occur before we close the Call for Presentations (CFP) so that the Chairs can host office hours to consult on submissions, and help promote the event. CFP will be opening in November, registration > and sponsorship > information are already available. Please email speakersupport at openinfra.dev with any questions or feedback. Cheers, Helena Spease -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Fri Oct 21 21:37:56 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 14:37:56 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications Message-ID: <4DB4DFD4-3AB2-4EA8-956C-4297DA0B16B2@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to you about a topic with regards to IRC that came up during the community building discussions at the recent PTG. Currently we have one IRC channel for project related conversations and information sharing on the OFTC network called #starlingx. We also have a few bots set up for this channel, one of which sends a notification to the channel whenever there is a new change that is proposed or get merged into any of the StarlingX repos. While it is a useful feature, it makes the project channel very noisy and makes it hard to maintain a conversation due to the high volume of Gerrit notifications. I would like to propose to create a new IRC channel for the Gerrit bot messages, to keep them available without flooding the project?s main IRC channel. We could call it #starlingx-gerrit. What do you all think? Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation From Al.Bailey at windriver.com Sat Oct 22 15:45:00 2022 From: Al.Bailey at windriver.com (Bailey, Henry Albert (Al)) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 15:45:00 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications In-Reply-To: <4DB4DFD4-3AB2-4EA8-956C-4297DA0B16B2@gmail.com> References: <4DB4DFD4-3AB2-4EA8-956C-4297DA0B16B2@gmail.com> Message-ID: I agree. I think that makes sense. Al -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 5:38 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to you about a topic with regards to IRC that came up during the community building discussions at the recent PTG. Currently we have one IRC channel for project related conversations and information sharing on the OFTC network called #starlingx. We also have a few bots set up for this channel, one of which sends a notification to the channel whenever there is a new change that is proposed or get merged into any of the StarlingX repos. While it is a useful feature, it makes the project channel very noisy and makes it hard to maintain a conversation due to the high volume of Gerrit notifications. I would like to propose to create a new IRC channel for the Gerrit bot messages, to keep them available without flooding the project?s main IRC channel. We could call it #starlingx-gerrit. What do you all think? Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Mon Oct 24 12:21:46 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:21:46 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications In-Reply-To: <4DB4DFD4-3AB2-4EA8-956C-4297DA0B16B2@gmail.com> References: <4DB4DFD4-3AB2-4EA8-956C-4297DA0B16B2@gmail.com> Message-ID: +1 -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 5:38 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to you about a topic with regards to IRC that came up during the community building discussions at the recent PTG. Currently we have one IRC channel for project related conversations and information sharing on the OFTC network called #starlingx. We also have a few bots set up for this channel, one of which sends a notification to the channel whenever there is a new change that is proposed or get merged into any of the StarlingX repos. While it is a useful feature, it makes the project channel very noisy and makes it hard to maintain a conversation due to the high volume of Gerrit notifications. I would like to propose to create a new IRC channel for the Gerrit bot messages, to keep them available without flooding the project?s main IRC channel. We could call it #starlingx-gerrit. What do you all think? Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com Mon Oct 24 12:46:13 2022 From: ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com (Cervi, Thales Elero) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:46:13 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications In-Reply-To: <4DB4DFD4-3AB2-4EA8-956C-4297DA0B16B2@gmail.com> References: <4DB4DFD4-3AB2-4EA8-956C-4297DA0B16B2@gmail.com> Message-ID: +1 ________________________________ From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 6:37 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to you about a topic with regards to IRC that came up during the community building discussions at the recent PTG. Currently we have one IRC channel for project related conversations and information sharing on the OFTC network called #starlingx. We also have a few bots set up for this channel, one of which sends a notification to the channel whenever there is a new change that is proposed or get merged into any of the StarlingX repos. While it is a useful feature, it makes the project channel very noisy and makes it hard to maintain a conversation due to the high volume of Gerrit notifications. I would like to propose to create a new IRC channel for the Gerrit bot messages, to keep them available without flooding the project?s main IRC channel. We could call it #starlingx-gerrit. What do you all think? Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From outbackdingo at gmail.com Mon Oct 24 12:54:29 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 19:54:29 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications In-Reply-To: References: <4DB4DFD4-3AB2-4EA8-956C-4297DA0B16B2@gmail.com> Message-ID: +1 On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 7:27 PM Waines, Greg wrote: > > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 5:38 PM > To: StarlingX ML > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] New IRC channel for Gerrit notifications > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > I?m reaching out to you about a topic with regards to IRC that came up during the community building discussions at the recent PTG. > > Currently we have one IRC channel for project related conversations and information sharing on the OFTC network called #starlingx. We also have a few bots set up for this channel, one of which sends a notification to the channel whenever there is a new change that is proposed or get merged into any of the StarlingX repos. While it is a useful feature, it makes the project channel very noisy and makes it hard to maintain a conversation due to the high volume of Gerrit notifications. > > I would like to propose to create a new IRC channel for the Gerrit bot messages, to keep them available without flooding the project?s main IRC channel. We could call it #starlingx-gerrit. > > What do you all think? > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Tue Oct 25 11:35:56 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:35:56 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor In-Reply-To: <42D3E443-E8DD-4585-A1EF-8D418F7C3A1E@gmail.com> References: <93D2C061-CAFE-48F0-B128-241D66F235C8@gmail.com> <1C48CFE8-BC55-4360-99DD-5EE8205FF0B6@gmail.com> <42D3E443-E8DD-4585-A1EF-8D418F7C3A1E@gmail.com> Message-ID: +1 -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 7:53 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi StarlingX TSC, I would like to propose to add Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as a contributor to the project. While Scott is currently not contributing code he has been participating in the community in the past couple of release cycles. He reported and was involved in identifying the following issues: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1984125 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1982061 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1972748 Scott is also active on the starlingx-discuss mailing list and weekly meetings, such as the community call. If the TSC approves, I will add Scott to the electorate etherpad for the 2022 fall elections: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-electorate-fall-2022 Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com Tue Oct 25 13:52:18 2022 From: Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com (Subramanian, Ramaswamy) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:52:18 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor In-Reply-To: References: <93D2C061-CAFE-48F0-B128-241D66F235C8@gmail.com> <1C48CFE8-BC55-4360-99DD-5EE8205FF0B6@gmail.com> <42D3E443-E8DD-4585-A1EF-8D418F7C3A1E@gmail.com> Message-ID: +1 -----Original Message----- From: Waines, Greg Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 7:36 AM To: Ildiko Vancsa ; StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor +1 -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 7:53 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi StarlingX TSC, I would like to propose to add Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as a contributor to the project. While Scott is currently not contributing code he has been participating in the community in the past couple of release cycles. He reported and was involved in identifying the following issues: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1984125 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1982061 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1972748 Scott is also active on the starlingx-discuss mailing list and weekly meetings, such as the community call. If the TSC approves, I will add Scott to the electorate etherpad for the 2022 fall elections: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-electorate-fall-2022 Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Tue Oct 25 17:26:18 2022 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 17:26:18 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20221022T060007Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2022-October 24 (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20221022T060007Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20221019 14:29:31 test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS 20221019 14:29:49 test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS 20221019 14:29:55 test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS 20221019 14:30:05 test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS 20221019 14:31:21 test_lock_unlock_host PASS 20221019 14:44:49 test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS 20221019 14:46:07 test_pod_to_service_connection PASS 20221019 14:46:45 test_host_to_service_connection PASS 20221019 14:51:20 test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS 20221019 14:53:06 test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS 20221019 14:53:48 test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS 20221019 15:08:47 test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS 20221019 15:42:57 test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS 20221019 15:58:26 test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS 20221019 16:01:58 test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS 20221019 16:25:24 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20221019 16:25:34 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chris.friesen at windriver.com Tue Oct 25 18:05:58 2022 From: chris.friesen at windriver.com (Chris Friesen) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:05:58 -0600 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Kubernetes 1.24.4 now supported as an optional version for fresh installs Message-ID: <227e741c-6d2c-fb88-389d-1526f0d35e76@windriver.com> Hi everyone, Earlier today https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ansible-playbooks/+/858832 was merged into the load, which should enable the use of Kubernetes 1.24.4 for fresh installs. For now it will not be the default, so if you want to test it you'll have to add "kubernetes_version: 1.24.4" to your localhost.yml file during installation. It should be included in tonight's Debian build. Upgrades from K8s 1.23 are in the process of being tested.? There will be at least one additional commit needed to support this, so don't waste time testing it just yet. :) Chris Friesen Containers TL From Frank.Miller at windriver.com Tue Oct 25 18:31:39 2022 From: Frank.Miller at windriver.com (Miller, Frank) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 18:31:39 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos Message-ID: Core reviewers: I'd like to propose that Bin Qian be added as a Core review to these 3 repos: StarlingX config, stx-puppet, ansible-playbooks repos Bin has been a contributor for StarlingX since the beginning of the project, has merged 100s of commits in that time, and is very familiar with each of these subproejcts. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kennelson11 at gmail.com Tue Oct 25 18:33:04 2022 From: kennelson11 at gmail.com (Kendall Nelson) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Fwd: Help us plan the next PTG! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Everyone! Congratulations on a great virtual PTG last week :) The OpenInfra Foundation is hosting the OpenInfra Summit in Vancouver [1], June 13 -15, 2023. We are trying to determine the level of interest among contributors to OpenInfra projects on attending a co-located PTG in Vancouver. *The exact format and dates are still being determined.* At this time, we are evaluating the level of interest from an attendee and employer perspective. Please complete the following poll so we can measure the level of interest and plan accordingly. Future updates will be distributed to the project mailing lists as well as previous PTG attendees. Poll: https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_ptg_2023 As a reminder, we are also gathering feedback for the virtual PTG here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Oct2022_PTGFeedback -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo) [1] https://openinfra.dev/summit/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Al.Bailey at windriver.com Tue Oct 25 19:12:09 2022 From: Al.Bailey at windriver.com (Bailey, Henry Albert (Al)) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 19:12:09 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 From: Miller, Frank Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 2:32 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos Core reviewers: I'd like to propose that Bin Qian be added as a Core review to these 3 repos: StarlingX config, stx-puppet, ansible-playbooks repos Bin has been a contributor for StarlingX since the beginning of the project, has merged 100s of commits in that time, and is very familiar with each of these subproejcts. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Robert.Church at windriver.com Tue Oct 25 20:12:27 2022 From: Robert.Church at windriver.com (Church, Robert) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:12:27 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos Message-ID: <5FF5FA33-D615-44B5-9975-2ABFDCF5AA0F@windriver.com> +1 From: "Bailey, Henry Albert (Al)" Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 2:15 PM To: "Miller, Frank" , "'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'" Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos +1 From: Miller, Frank Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 2:32 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos Core reviewers: I?d like to propose that Bin Qian be added as a Core review to these 3 repos: StarlingX config, stx-puppet, ansible-playbooks repos Bin has been a contributor for StarlingX since the beginning of the project, has merged 100s of commits in that time, and is very familiar with each of these subproejcts. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chris.friesen at windriver.com Tue Oct 25 21:45:35 2022 From: chris.friesen at windriver.com (Chris Friesen) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:45:35 -0600 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Kubernetes 1.24.4 now supported as an optional version for fresh installs In-Reply-To: <227e741c-6d2c-fb88-389d-1526f0d35e76@windriver.com> References: <227e741c-6d2c-fb88-389d-1526f0d35e76@windriver.com> Message-ID: As a followup...it is expected that PersistentVolumeClaims will not work with K8s 1.24 until https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/platform-armada-app/+/858737 merges and we switch to using ceph-csi as the RBD provisioner. The platform-integ-apps application applies successfully, but applications actually *using* PVCs will not work. Chris Friesen On 10/25/2022 12:05 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Earlier today > https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ansible-playbooks/+/858832 was > merged into the load, which should enable the use of Kubernetes 1.24.4 > for fresh installs. > > For now it will not be the default, so if you want to test it you'll > have to add "kubernetes_version: 1.24.4" to your localhost.yml file > during installation. > > It should be included in tonight's Debian build. > > Upgrades from K8s 1.23 are in the process of being tested.? There will > be at least one additional commit needed to support this, so don't > waste time testing it just yet. :) > > Chris Friesen > > Containers TL > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Hugo.Brito at encora.com Tue Oct 25 21:03:14 2022 From: Hugo.Brito at encora.com (Hugo Nicodemos Andrade de Brito) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:03:14 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos In-Reply-To: <5FF5FA33-D615-44B5-9975-2ABFDCF5AA0F@windriver.com> References: <5FF5FA33-D615-44B5-9975-2ABFDCF5AA0F@windriver.com> Message-ID: +1 Hugo Brito (He/His) System Developer Specialist Recife, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Church, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 5:12 PM To: Bailey, Henry Albert (Al) ; Miller, Frank ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos You don't often get email from robert.church at windriver.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. +1 From: "Bailey, Henry Albert (Al)" Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 2:15 PM To: "Miller, Frank" , "'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'" Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos +1 From: Miller, Frank Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 2:32 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos Core reviewers: I?d like to propose that Bin Qian be added as a Core review to these 3 repos: StarlingX config, stx-puppet, ansible-playbooks repos Bin has been a contributor for StarlingX since the beginning of the project, has merged 100s of commits in that time, and is very familiar with each of these subproejcts. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mingyuan.qi at intel.com Wed Oct 26 05:27:28 2022 From: mingyuan.qi at intel.com (Qi, Mingyuan) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 05:27:28 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor In-Reply-To: References: <93D2C061-CAFE-48F0-B128-241D66F235C8@gmail.com> <1C48CFE8-BC55-4360-99DD-5EE8205FF0B6@gmail.com> <42D3E443-E8DD-4585-A1EF-8D418F7C3A1E@gmail.com> Message-ID: +1 Mingyuan -----Original Message----- From: Subramanian, Ramaswamy Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 21:52 To: Waines, Greg ; Ildiko Vancsa ; StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor +1 -----Original Message----- From: Waines, Greg Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 7:36 AM To: Ildiko Vancsa ; StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor +1 -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 7:53 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi StarlingX TSC, I would like to propose to add Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as a contributor to the project. While Scott is currently not contributing code he has been participating in the community in the past couple of release cycles. He reported and was involved in identifying the following issues: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1984125 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1982061 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1972748 Scott is also active on the starlingx-discuss mailing list and weekly meetings, such as the community call. If the TSC approves, I will add Scott to the electorate etherpad for the 2022 fall elections: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-electorate-fall-2022 Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From outbackdingo at gmail.com Wed Oct 26 10:22:21 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:22:21 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Kubernetes 1.24.4 now supported as an optional version for fresh installs In-Reply-To: References: <227e741c-6d2c-fb88-389d-1526f0d35e76@windriver.com> Message-ID: Great to see this kind of "Heads up" coming to the lists now, excellent information On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 4:50 AM Chris Friesen wrote: > > As a followup...it is expected that PersistentVolumeClaims will not work > with K8s 1.24 until > https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/platform-armada-app/+/858737 > merges and we switch to using ceph-csi as the RBD provisioner. The > platform-integ-apps application applies successfully, but applications > actually *using* PVCs will not work. > > Chris Friesen > > > On 10/25/2022 12:05 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Earlier today > > https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ansible-playbooks/+/858832 was > > merged into the load, which should enable the use of Kubernetes 1.24.4 > > for fresh installs. > > > > For now it will not be the default, so if you want to test it you'll > > have to add "kubernetes_version: 1.24.4" to your localhost.yml file > > during installation. > > > > It should be included in tonight's Debian build. > > > > Upgrades from K8s 1.23 are in the process of being tested. There will > > be at least one additional commit needed to support this, so don't > > waste time testing it just yet. :) > > > > Chris Friesen > > > > Containers TL > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Wed Oct 26 14:05:35 2022 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:05:35 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-Weekly StarlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS meeting Message-ID: * Cadence and time slot: * Bi-Weekly Wednesday 0930 EDT (1430 UTC, 2230 China time, 0630 PT time) * Call Details: * Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236?pwd=N21CUXNXVlJXMlcyZjZ0SE96cVNjQT09 * Dialing in from phone: * Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 876 9923 * Meeting ID: 342 730 236 * Passcode: 419405 * International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/ed95sU7aQ * Meeting Agenda and Minutes: * https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-distro-other -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 8463 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Wed Oct 26 14:05:34 2022 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:05:34 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-Weekly StarlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS meeting Message-ID: * Cadence and time slot: * Bi-Weekly Wednesday 0930 EDT (1430 UTC, 2230 China time, 0630 PT time) * Call Details: * Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236?pwd=N21CUXNXVlJXMlcyZjZ0SE96cVNjQT09 * Dialing in from phone: * Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 876 9923 * Meeting ID: 342 730 236 * Passcode: 419405 * International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/ed95sU7aQ * Meeting Agenda and Minutes: * https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-distro-other -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 8637 bytes Desc: not available URL: From scott.little at windriver.com Wed Oct 26 15:49:47 2022 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Revised CENGN Build schedules Message-ID: <93de06de-e853-9cec-c8fb-bec99dc06c86@windriver.com> Branch OS Type Containers Schedule ====== ====== ========== ========== ======================== master Debian monolithic Yes Sunday-Friday, 6:00 UTC master Centos layered Yes Sunday-Friday, 23:00 UTC master Centos monolithic No Saturday, 13:00 UTC stx.6.0 Centos layered No Saturday, 18:00 UTC stx.7.0 Centos layered Yes Saturday, 23:00 UTC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Wed Oct 26 20:56:41 2022 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 20:56:41 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 19-10-26 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello all, Here are this week's docs team meeting minutes (short form). Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Wednesdays 12:30 PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 26-Oct-22 StarlingX 8.0 Release: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjhRQm717zOTo2ngs5SEs3elhJwSRxFAI-ruqJaBe80/edit#gid=1107209846 - Doc Tasks created - Doc Team to ensure Stories/Tasks are added to the commit messages. - https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/index-install-e083ca818006.html - AR Ron to modify Page; https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/861755 - 8.0 (Master) - To update Greg about the Installation Doc folders for Stx 6.0 / Stx 7.0 on master - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862705: Verified Hardware Updates - To discuss with Greg - https://docs.starlingx.io/ Update Welcome Page for Stx 7.0, 6.0, Master - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/861367 Flatten TOC for better customer experience - AR Ron - O-RAN updates https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010278- AR Litao Gao to initiate Gerrit review - events.yaml - Automation of the events.yaml file in the docs - AR Juanita / Ron - GPU operator Removal from the docs https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/859341- AR Elisa to confirm about cherry picking to Stx 6.0 / 7.0 - DONE - GPU Operator Removal on WRO - To confirm with Douglas / Greg Gerrit Reviews: - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 4 reviews Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 9 bugs outstanding - The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects. To Update https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/862596 with the Stx 8.0 Release Notes page - AR Juanita General Updates: - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) StarlingX PTG Presentations: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1z3YDfXscDwv5ee86u0XWTiXauLqpw4yi Elections: Nov 15-22 [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From starlingx.build at gmail.com Wed Oct 26 23:00:25 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:00:25 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 4262 - Failure! Message-ID: <1944822023.125.1666825234732.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_repo_sync_layered Build #: 4262 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221026T230013Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221026T230000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MANIFEST: compiler.xml PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221026T230000Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221026T230000Z/logs MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-compiler From starlingx.build at gmail.com Wed Oct 26 23:00:36 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:00:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master - Build # 1101 - Failure! Message-ID: <1582440161.128.1666825237916.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master Build #: 1101 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221026T230000Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221026T230000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: false From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Oct 27 00:26:45 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 20:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Combined PL/TL/TSC Election Season starting next week!! Message-ID: <84442581-EFD0-4277-89B6-AC22D011ECA0@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, The second election season of the year is starting in less than a week from now. This email contains important information about the elections, please read carefully. For all the details on the elections please visit: https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ The nomination period officially begins on __November 01, 2022, 20:45 UTC__. Please read the stipulations and timelines for candidates and electorate contained in the above governance documentation. IMPORTANT NOTE: If you would like to run for any open position you need to register as an Open Infrastructure Foundation Individual Member[1] prior to when the nomination period starts. Also please note that you are required to confirm your preferred email address in Gerrit by October 30, 2022 00:00 UTC__ as described here: https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#electorate to make sure ballots are sent out to the correct addresses. As decided by the TSC group and the election officials the 2022, H2 PL/TL and TSC elections will run concurrently; deadlines for their nomination and voting activities are synchronized but will still use separate ballots. Please note, if only one candidate is nominated as PL or TL for a project team during the PL/TL nomination period, that candidate will win by acclaim, and there will be no poll. There will only be a poll if there are more than one candidates stepping forward for a project team's PL or TL position. There will be further announcements posted to the mailing list as action is required from the electorate or candidates. This email is for information purposes only. If you have any questions which you feel affect others please reply to this email thread. If you have any questions that you which to discuss in private please email any of the election officials[2] so that we may address your concerns. Thank you, [1] https://openinfra.dev/join/individual/ [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials From mingyuan.qi at intel.com Thu Oct 27 02:07:39 2022 From: mingyuan.qi at intel.com (Qi, Mingyuan) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 02:07:39 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Resigning from StarlingX TSC Message-ID: Hi folks, With mixed emotion, I decide to step down from StarlingX TSC. Our team was with STX since the founding of the project in 2018. We had tremendous achievements collaborating with the community members in the past years. It has been a great pleasure working with you! As a community member, we have precious memories here in each feature development, in each release, in each event(f2f or virtually). I really appreciate your help and support for me and for the team. Now, our team is beginning a new journey and could no longer contribute to the community. But it's a small world, I wish you all the best and wish we could cross path again in the future. Best Regards, Mingyuan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Oct 27 02:09:51 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Upcoming TSC and PL/TL elections - REVIEW NEEDED In-Reply-To: <1C48CFE8-BC55-4360-99DD-5EE8205FF0B6@gmail.com> References: <93D2C061-CAFE-48F0-B128-241D66F235C8@gmail.com> <1C48CFE8-BC55-4360-99DD-5EE8205FF0B6@gmail.com> Message-ID: <531E6C6C-AF92-41C9-8516-A0DDB880E77B@gmail.com> Hi StarlingX Community, It is a friendly reminder to please check list of electorates for the upcoming PL/TL/TSC elections. You can find the project contributors along with contributors per team here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-electorate-fall-2022 __Please check the above list and reply to this thread, or reach out to the election officials[1] directly, if you contributed to the StarlingX project in the past 12 months, but your email address is not in the list in the above etherpad.__ Please reply to this thread or reach out to the officials[1] if you have any further questions or comments. Thanks and Best Regards, [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > On Sep 27, 2022, at 20:57, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > As there were no objections to the proposed election timeline for the regular PL/TL and TSC elections, the patch to update the dates on the website is now merged. > > You can find the election timeline and further information about the process here: https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ > > As an early preparation step I pulled the contributor information to build an initial list of electorates for the community to review: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-electorate-fall-2022 > > __Please check the above list and reply to this thread, or reach out to the election officials[1] directly, if you contributed to the StarlingX project in the past 12 months, but your email address is not in the list in the above etherpad.__ > > Please reply to this thread or reach out to the officials[1] if you have any further questions or comments. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials > > >> On Aug 31, 2022, at 10:41, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> A quick update in preparation tot he upcoming TSC and PL/TL elections. >> >> As there were no objections to the proposed timeline so far I created a patch to update the timeline on the election website: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/election/+/855391 >> >> Please review the above change and leave any comments if you see any conflicts, typos or have any questions. >> >> You can also reach out to the election officials[1] if you have any questions regarding the elections. >> >> A still outstanding item: Similarly to last year we have an empty TSC seat[2] that we could try to fill for a half-term during an interim TSC election once the regular elections ended. The interim elections need separate dates to avoid confusions with the regular process. Would the TSC and community prefer to run the interim elections this time around as well? >> >> Thanks, >> >> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials >> [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html >> >> >> >>> On Aug 17, 2022, at 07:52, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >>> >>> Hi StarlingX Community, >>> >>> It is a friendly reminder that the time for the fall election[1] period is coming up fast and therefore we need to start planning the process. >>> >>> We need to decide on timeframe for the elections. For TSC we have a nomination, a campaign and a voting period, while for PL/TL elections we have a nomination and a voting period defined officially. >>> >>> We are looking for a 3-week timeframe in the fall that doesn?t collide with any major holidays or milestones in the release process. To avoid major events as well the proposed timeline would be the following: >>> >>> TSC nomination starts @ November 01, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> TSC nomination ends @ November 08, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> PL/TL nomination starts @ November 01, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> PL/TL nomination ends @ November 08, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> >>> TSC campaigning starts @ November 08, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> TSC campaigning ends @ November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> >>> TSC election starts @ November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> TSC election ends @ November 22, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> PL/TL election starts @ November 15, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> PL/TL election ends @ November 22, 2022 20:45 UTC >>> >>> >>> Similarly to last year we have an empty TSC seat[2] that we could try to fill for a half-term during an interim TSC election once the regular elections ended. The interim elections need separate dates to avoid confusions with the regular process. Would the TSC and community prefer to runt he interim elections this time around as well? >>> >>> Please think about your preference about the election process to make sure that people are available to submit nominations as well as to be able to vote in the election process. >>> >>> If you have any questions or comments please reply to this thread or reach out to the election officials[3]. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/ >>> [2] https://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/index.html >>> [3] https://docs.starlingx.io/election/#election-officials >>> >>> >>> >> > From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Oct 27 02:25:31 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor In-Reply-To: References: <93D2C061-CAFE-48F0-B128-241D66F235C8@gmail.com> <1C48CFE8-BC55-4360-99DD-5EE8205FF0B6@gmail.com> <42D3E443-E8DD-4585-A1EF-8D418F7C3A1E@gmail.com> Message-ID: <24630240-DA67-415E-8B13-286465AA3D9F@gmail.com> Hi, Thank you to the StarlingX TSC members for your responses. As a next step, as it is recognized by the TSC, I added Scott Kamp to the list of StarlingX project contributors on the etherpad we are using for the upcoming elections: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-electorate-fall-2022 Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? > On Oct 26, 2022, at 01:27, Qi, Mingyuan wrote: > > +1 > > Mingyuan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Subramanian, Ramaswamy > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 21:52 > To: Waines, Greg ; Ildiko Vancsa ; StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor > > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Waines, Greg > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 7:36 AM > To: Ildiko Vancsa ; StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor > > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 7:53 PM > To: StarlingX ML > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Adding Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as contributor > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > Hi StarlingX TSC, > > I would like to propose to add Scott Kamp to the StarlingX electorate as a contributor to the project. > > While Scott is currently not contributing code he has been participating in the community in the past couple of release cycles. He reported and was involved in identifying the following issues: > > * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1984125 > * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1982061 > * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1972748 > > Scott is also active on the starlingx-discuss mailing list and weekly meetings, such as the community call. > > If the TSC approves, I will add Scott to the electorate etherpad for the 2022 fall elections: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-electorate-fall-2022 > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com Thu Oct 27 02:30:49 2022 From: ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Resigning from StarlingX TSC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Mingyuan, I?m sorry to hear that you are moving away from the project and need to step down from the TSC as well. I would also like to use the opportunity to thank you for all your hard work since the launch of the project! It?s been an amazing journey and your work and efforts helped the project much to get to the stage where it is today! I wish you the best for your next project and journey and hope that maybe we?ll see you again in the project some time in the future. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Oct 26, 2022, at 22:07, Qi, Mingyuan wrote: > > Hi folks, > > With mixed emotion, I decide to step down from StarlingX TSC. > Our team was with STX since the founding of the project in 2018. We had tremendous achievements collaborating with the community members in the past years. It has been a great pleasure working with you! As a community member, we have precious memories here in each feature development, in each release, in each event(f2f or virtually). I really appreciate your help and support for me and for the team. > > Now, our team is beginning a new journey and could no longer contribute to the community. But it?s a small world, I wish you all the best and wish we could cross path again in the future. > > Best Regards, > Mingyuan > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > https://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Oct 27 11:35:48 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:35:48 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 From: Miller, Frank Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 2:32 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Request adding Bin Qian as Core to 3 repos Core reviewers: I'd like to propose that Bin Qian be added as a Core review to these 3 repos: StarlingX config, stx-puppet, ansible-playbooks repos Bin has been a contributor for StarlingX since the beginning of the project, has merged 100s of commits in that time, and is very familiar with each of these subproejcts. Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From austin.sun at intel.com Thu Oct 27 14:00:02 2022 From: austin.sun at intel.com (Sun, Austin) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:00:02 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Resignation from StarlingX Distro-openstack PL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi All: Due to job change, I have to resign OpenStack PL role with mixed emotion. It is my pleasure being working on StarlingX and cooperating with talent in community since 2018 and very appreciate community help. Wish more and more users to use StarlingX, and the community is prosperous. BR Austin Sun. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Oct 27 14:24:23 2022 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:24:23 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Resignation from StarlingX Distro-openstack PL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Another original ... . Austin ... thanks for all your help with StarlingX; especially in initial establishing of the starlingx project. Greg. From: Sun, Austin Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 10:00 AM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Resignation from StarlingX Distro-openstack PL [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi All: Due to job change, I have to resign OpenStack PL role with mixed emotion. It is my pleasure being working on StarlingX and cooperating with talent in community since 2018 and very appreciate community help. Wish more and more users to use StarlingX, and the community is prosperous. BR Austin Sun. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From starlingx.build at gmail.com Thu Oct 27 18:46:27 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:46:27 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_helm_charts - Build # 2894 - Failure! Message-ID: <1158940408.132.1666896388490.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_helm_charts Build #: 2894 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221027T184625Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221026T043529Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20221026T043529Z OS: centos DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-master-containers-20221026T043529Z-builder MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221026T043529Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20221026T043529Z/logs MAIN_HELM_CHART_RPM_NAME: stx-openstack-helm PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Oct 27 22:22:35 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 22:22:35 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Oct 26, 2022) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call October 26, 2022 Standing topics - Build - Main Branch CentOS Builds - Green all week - Main Branch Debian Builds - 6 out of 7 were green. One failure was transient due to error accessing - Debian Build Acceleration Feature - Reviews in progress - This will make builds faster - Weekly CentOS Builds for stx.6.0 & stx.7.0 - This will be setup shortly. - stx.6.0 - plan to build ISO only and no containers - stx.7.0 - plan to build both ISO and containers (since stx.8.0 is several months from being released) - Sanity - CentOS Main Branch Sanity w/ stx-openstack - Last sanity email sent on Oct 21: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013452.html - Status: Red - LP: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1993832 - Introduced by recent code changes. Ghada to assign to the developer who introduced the issue. - stx-openstack sanity transition to Debian - The time-frame is nominally in the Dec time-frame - The feature tracking the stx-openstack migration has a Code Merge date of 12/07 based on the stx.8.0 tracking spreadsheet - Action: Ghada to ask Frank to share the latest in the plan to disable stx CentOS builds on the mailing list. - Action: Rob/Thales to discuss if stx-openstack CentOS can be stopped for the next 4-6wks if the builds are stopping. To make this decision, a community poll via the mailing list is needed. - Debian Main Branch Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Oct 25: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013461.html - Status: Green - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - None brought forward in the meeting - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - Upcoming Elections - Nomination period starts next week on Nov 1 for both TSC & PL/TL positions - Action: Ildiko to add Scott Kamp to the electoral as a contributor to the project. - stx.8.0 Milestone-2 was declared on the mailing list - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013450.html ARs from Previous Meetings - None Open Requests for Help - stx aio bare metal 7.0 centos / openstack fails - Last Email in the thread: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013447.html - LP Opened and assigned to the stx-openstack team for investigation: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1993593 - Thales will follow up on status - Rook Installation - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-October/013404.html - Greg forwarded the email to the storage team. But still no response. Ghada to ping Flavio again - Note: The original Intel team who introduced rook is no longer active in the community. - Enabling cpu_dedicated_set - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013382.html - Last Question posted here: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2022-September/013382.html - Is there a way I can enable application-isolation across all the worker nodes including new nodes to be added in future? - Ghada to ping Chris Friesen again - Rebuilding ISOs - Raised by Scott Kamp - This will be covered in the context of upgrades support which will be managed in a subproject team. - Consider closed in the context of the communit call; it will be worked within the above context. From Frank.Miller at windriver.com Fri Oct 28 13:27:39 2022 From: Frank.Miller at windriver.com (Miller, Frank) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:27:39 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Proposed timeline for CENGN Debian only builds in stx8.0 Message-ID: StarlingX Community: As discussed at the previous 2 PTGs, the stx.8.0 release will be based solely on Debian and no longer based on CentOS. Currently we are building both CentOS and Debian based ISOs on a nightly basis and the plan for stx.8.0 is to transition to Debian only. At last week's PTG we identified the criteria [1] to be used to determine when CentOS builds can be stopped during the stx.8.0 release. The current view is this is expected to occur sometime in December 2022 once stx-openstack is shown to be applied and running on a Debian based StarlingX ISO. At that point stx.8.0 builds would be Debian only. (Note we will continue to support CentOS builds when required for stx.6.0 and stx.7.0.) If anyone has any questions or concerns please reply to this email or bring them up at our next community meeting. Frank [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-ptg-planning-october-2022 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Daian.CardosoSganderlla at windriver.com Fri Oct 28 16:05:55 2022 From: Daian.CardosoSganderlla at windriver.com (Cardoso Sganderlla, Daian) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 16:05:55 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Trouble getting Rook installed on Virtual AIO Duplex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Lennart. The rook-ceph application was not migrated to FluxCD in StarlingX 7. For this reason, it is not available for install in this version of stx. There is the armada version to install the rook-ceph, but you need to be using kubernetes version 1.18. It will not work on newer versions of k8s due to deprecated apis used by this armada rook-ceph. If still you want to use the armada rook-ceph, you can download it in the repository below: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/7.0.0/centos/containers/outputs/tarballs/ ________________________________ From: Lennart Hagemann Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 6:28 AM To: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Trouble getting Rook installed on Virtual AIO Duplex [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi, I?m new to starlingx and playing around with it in a lab environment. I was following https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r7_release/virtual/aio_duplex_install_kubernetes.html and chose to set up rook as the storage backend. In the optional steps for rook it tells you ?Wait for the rook-ceph-apps application to be uploaded? but I didn?t see the application. Uploading it (and where you can download the manifest) was not discussed in the docs so I eventually figured it should have been automatically been uploaded when I add the storage backend? I removed the storage backend and re-added it, no application was uploaded so I checked the latest puppet logs where it exits during prefetching apt when executing /usr/bin/dpkg-query -W. I ran that command by hand and I do receive a syntax error ?syntax error in triggers deferred file '/var/lib/dpkg/triggers/Unincorp' at line 1 character 65 ''. The content of the file is: 192.168.204.3:/var/rootdirs/opt/platform/sysinv/22.06:0x00000001 I think that might be a leftover from installation, but I am not entirely sure. I removed the file for testing purposes and dpkg-query -W did indeed execute successfully now. Re-Added the storage backend again, but no application appeared. The puppet run did run without errors though. So my most important questions are: Is the rook application actually supposed to upload itself automatically when adding the backend or do I need to upload it manually? If the latter, where can I find the manifest? Only found openstack manifests. If it does upload automatically, where can I dig deeper to gather more information on why it fails? Regards, Lennart -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From starlingx.build at gmail.com Fri Oct 28 23:00:26 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 19:00:26 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 4269 - Failure! Message-ID: <1559094195.140.1666998027064.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_repo_sync_layered Build #: 4269 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221028T230013Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221028T230000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MANIFEST: compiler.xml PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221028T230000Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221028T230000Z/logs MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-compiler From starlingx.build at gmail.com Fri Oct 28 23:00:28 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 19:00:28 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master - Build # 1103 - Failure! Message-ID: <1774192104.143.1666998029754.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master Build #: 1103 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221028T230000Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221028T230000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: false From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Sat Oct 29 01:37:59 2022 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 01:37:59 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Heads Up: Adopting CVSS v3 for the monthly Starlingx CVE scans Message-ID: Hello all, The StarlingX Security team is planning to adopt CVSS v3 (moving from CVSS v2) for the monthly StarlingX CVE scans in stx.8.0 as part of the Debian transition. CVSS v3 is a more recent version of the CVSS spec and is a move in the right direction. The StarlingX CVE policy has been updated accordingly: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Security/CVE_Support_Policy See the last slide for the proposed CVE fix criteria. Regards, Ghada stx security PL From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Oct 29 18:00:30 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 14:00:30 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 4271 - Failure! Message-ID: <1317081548.147.1667066431582.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_repo_sync_layered Build #: 4271 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221029T180007Z Branch: r/stx.6.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221029T180000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: r/stx.6.0 MANIFEST: compiler.xml PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221029T180000Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221029T180000Z/logs MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-6.0-compiler From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Oct 29 18:00:33 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 14:00:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.6.0 STX_6.0_build_layer_compiler - Build # 15 - Failure! Message-ID: <174481055.150.1667066434266.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_6.0_build_layer_compiler Build #: 15 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221029T180000Z Branch: r/stx.6.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/centos/compiler/20221029T180000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: true From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sat Oct 29 18:07:43 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 14:07:43 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_master_master - Build # 1453 - Failure! Message-ID: <1950778890.153.1667066864775.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_master_master Build #: 1453 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221029T130000Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/20221029T130000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false FORCE_BUILD: true From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sun Oct 30 09:32:58 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 05:32:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] STX_build_docker_flock_images - Build # 604 - Failure! Message-ID: <845966076.161.1667122383689.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_flock_images Build #: 604 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221030T052733Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters WEB_HOST: mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/rc-7.0-containers/20221030T044402Z OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-7.0-containers/cgcs-root BASE_VERSION: rc-7.0-stable-20221030T044402Z PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/logs REGISTRY_USERID: slittlewrs LATEST_PREFIX: rc-7.0 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/logs PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221030T044402Z FLOCK_VERSION: rc-7.0-centos-stable-20221030T044402Z WEB_HOST_PORT: 80 PREFIX: rc-7.0 TIMESTAMP: 20221030T044402Z BUILD_STREAM: stable REGISTRY_ORG: starlingx PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/outputs REGISTRY: docker.io From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sun Oct 30 09:33:09 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 05:33:09 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 9 - Failure! Message-ID: <1754411231.167.1667122390049.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_7.0_build_layer_containers Build #: 9 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221030T044402Z Branch: r/stx.7.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true FORCE_BUILD: true From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sun Oct 30 09:33:05 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 05:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 STX_build_docker_images_layered - Build # 360 - Failure! Message-ID: <1275948125.164.1667122386978.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_docker_images_layered Build #: 360 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221030T045702Z Branch: r/stx.7.0 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: r/stx.7.0 MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/rc-7.0-containers/20221030T044402Z OS: centos MUNGED_BRANCH: rc-7.0 MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-7.0-containers/cgcs-root PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/logs MASTER_BUILD_NUMBER: 9 PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/logs MASTER_JOB_NAME: STX_7.0_build_layer_containers MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/rc-7.0-containers PUBLISH_DISTRO_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20221030T044402Z DOCKER_BUILD_ID: jenkins-rc-7.0-containers-20221030T044402Z-builder TIMESTAMP: 20221030T044402Z OS_VERSION: 7.5.1804 BUILD_STREAM: stable PUBLISH_INPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/inputs LAYER: containers PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20221030T044402Z/outputs MAIN_HELM_CHART_RPM_NAME: stx-openstack-helm From outbackdingo at gmail.com Sun Oct 30 13:10:19 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 20:10:19 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] openstack charts for debian 8? Message-ID: Hi are there any charts yet for openstack for the debian builds pre-8 yet ??? Thanks From outbackdingo at gmail.com Sun Oct 30 13:13:45 2022 From: outbackdingo at gmail.com (Outback Dingo) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 20:13:45 +0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Debian pre-8 starlingx aio virtual Message-ID: So, doing some research, today we managed to get StarlingX debian pre-8 deployed on kvm/libvirt with some modifications, patch will be pushed to gerrit. And notified to the list. We do have to check why it says degraded, but it did deploy. sysadmin at controller-0:~$ source /etc/platform/openrc [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system host-list +----+--------------+-------------+----------------+-------------+--------------+ | id | hostname | personality | administrative | operational | availability | +----+--------------+-------------+----------------+-------------+--------------+ | 1 | controller-0 | controller | unlocked | enabled | degraded | +----+--------------+-------------+----------------+-------------+--------------+ [sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ kubectl get pods --all-namespaces NAMESPACE NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE armada armada-api-56f4d447d4-vwq7q 2/2 Running 4 (4h19m ago) 5h47m cert-manager cm-cert-manager-68f8bf57-xdhh7 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h42m cert-manager cm-cert-manager-cainjector-64844cc9f6-rktdc 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h42m cert-manager cm-cert-manager-webhook-566d99d5d-zwj6w 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h42m flux-helm helm-controller-7fb6fd7d7-5t6jn 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h45m flux-helm source-controller-666d785b85-wdvg4 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h45m kube-system calico-kube-controllers-c6ddd7d7d-vkg5q 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h48m kube-system calico-node-x9gsh 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h48m kube-system ceph-pools-audit-27785580-b48td 0/1 Completed 0 12m kube-system ceph-pools-audit-27785585-4rxgs 0/1 Completed 0 7m58s kube-system ceph-pools-audit-27785590-bfg8p 0/1 Completed 0 2m58s kube-system cephfs-provisioner-5b5f6479cd-gvp6r 1/1 Running 1 (4h19m ago) 5h19m kube-system cephfs-storage-init-2qk4c 0/1 Completed 0 5h19m kube-system coredns-54694687fd-c67gp 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h48m kube-system ic-nginx-ingress-ingress-nginx-controller-g8q8h 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h44m kube-system kube-apiserver-controller-0 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h48m kube-system kube-controller-manager-controller-0 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h48m kube-system kube-multus-ds-amd64-k8h4c 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h48m kube-system kube-proxy-zvlx6 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h48m kube-system kube-scheduler-controller-0 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h48m kube-system kube-sriov-cni-ds-amd64-5k7bd 1/1 Running 2 (4h19m ago) 5h48m kube-system rbd-provisioner-5d47d87b9b-pxhjz 1/1 Running 1 (4h19m ago) 5h19m kube-system storage-init-rbd-provisioner-wdwh7 0/1 Completed 0 5h19m From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sun Oct 30 23:00:24 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 19:00:24 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master - Build # 1104 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <201651006.141.1666998027679.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <201651006.141.1666998027679.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <186608190.177.1667170825563.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master Build #: 1104 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221030T230000Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221030T230000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: false From starlingx.build at gmail.com Sun Oct 30 23:00:21 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 19:00:21 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 4277 - Failure! Message-ID: <1777765790.174.1667170822855.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_repo_sync_layered Build #: 4277 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221030T230006Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221030T230000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MANIFEST: compiler.xml PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221030T230000Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221030T230000Z/logs MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-compiler From starlingx.build at gmail.com Mon Oct 31 23:00:24 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 19:00:24 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master - Build # 1105 - Still Failing! In-Reply-To: <897796142.175.1667170823545.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> References: <897796142.175.1667170823545.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: <914484417.191.1667257225919.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master Build #: 1105 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20221031T230000Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221031T230000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: false From starlingx.build at gmail.com Mon Oct 31 23:00:19 2022 From: starlingx.build at gmail.com (starlingx.build at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 19:00:19 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 4279 - Failure! Message-ID: <1349600581.188.1667257222227.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Project: STX_repo_sync_layered Build #: 4279 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20221031T230008Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221031T230000Z/logs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MANIFEST: compiler.xml PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221031T230000Z/logs PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20221031T230000Z/logs MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-compiler