[Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 37 - Still Failing!

[Scott Little]

I have disabled the container build step of the r/stx.7.0 build.


Scott



On 2023-05-29 16:46, Waines, Greg wrote:
>
> Any one else with any concerns over discontinuing container builds 
> from r/stx.7.0 ?
>
> As Thales mentioned, we have the official release container images 
> built and tagged in r/stx.7.0 .
> So this would only impact someone building stx 7 “AND” requiring 
> container images to be rebuilt … probably a small chance.
>
> Plus, as previously mentioned, STX 7 is EOL in September.
>
> Any last concerns ? … before we discontinue container builds in stx 7 ?
>
> Greg.
>
> *From:* Scott Kamp <scott.kamp at xunison.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 25, 2023 7:26 PM
> *To:* Waines, Greg <Greg.Waines at windriver.com>; Cervi, Thales Elero 
> <ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 
> STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 37 - Still Failing!
>
> *CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!*
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender 
> and know the content is safe.
>
> no we are not...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*Waines, Greg <Greg.Waines at windriver.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 25, 2023 11:53 PM
> *To:* Cervi, Thales Elero <ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com>; 
> starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io 
> <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 
> STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 37 - Still Failing!
>
> Scott Kamp ?   (or anyone else)
>
> Can you comment on whether you are building STX 7 that would require 
> container builds ?
>
> Greg.
>
> *From:* Cervi, Thales Elero <ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 24, 2023 2:55 PM
> *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 
> STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 37 - Still Failing!
>
> Hi Scott,
>
>
> From my point of view, since we already have the official release 
> images built and tagged, I don't see why not to discontinue container 
> builds from r/stx.7.0.
> This would only affect re-builds of our older branch and apparently to 
> maintain that code base is starting to become a problematic task 
> without any rewards if no one is needing those docker images to be 
> re-build.
>
> I would agree with discontinuing it.
>
> Thales
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com>
>
> *Sent:*Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:52 AM
> *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io 
> <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 
> STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 37 - Still Failing!
>
> Branch r/stx.7.0 can build ISO's, but container builds remain broken on
> stx-nova.
>
> stx-nova's issues started with spice-html5.  The first issue was
> spice-html5's github repo, forcing a move to gitlab's copy of the
> spice-html5.  The move to gitlab went smoothly for debian (master and
> r/stx.8.0), but is failing to clone from r/stx.7.0 centos.  It appears
> gitlab requires a newer version git.  Centos is using version 1.8.x.
> Debain is using a version 2.x.x.
>
> r/stx.7.0 needs to find a way to inject a newer version of git into the
> Loci CentOS container that stx-nova is based on.
>
> The alternative is to discontinue contained builds from r/stx.7.0
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 2023-05-21 06:41, starlingx.build at gmail.com wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the 
> sender and know the content is safe.
> >
> > Project: STX_7.0_build_layer_containers
> > Build #: 37
> > Status: Still Failing
> > Timestamp: 20230521T051649Z
> > Branch: r/stx.7.0
> >
> > Check logs at:
> > 
> http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20230521T051649Z/logs 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20230521T051649Z/logs__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!ftzUA8n1xWWbtn3QQJFR5OJKkoDXLFURJtptL6L_8rGfrwUjrYk3IT9-0edgdLCBIYmZvwyCqkoAPK4uHR5BQ30N9Bzydw_Bxg$>
> > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Parameters
> >
> > BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false
> > BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true
> > FORCE_BUILD: true
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20230601/a5b5fcc4/attachment-0001.htm>