[Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Input Needed - stx-nova build issue on r/stx.7.0
scott.little at eng.windriver.com
Wed May 31 19:10:56 UTC 2023
On 2023-05-29 10:46, Scott Little wrote:
> Replies inline below,
> On 2023-05-24 12:38, Waines, Greg wrote:
>> Technically STX7 is not EOL until Sep 2023.
>> Would be nice to keep it build-able for another 4x months.
>> Is there another option to rollback the move to gitlab's copy of the
>> spice-html5, in STX 7.0 ?
> [SL] The github URL was deleted. There is no going back.
>> For option 4), would it only be stx-nova that would be unbuildable
>> for 4x months ?
> [SL] Correct.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:30 AM
>> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Input Needed - stx-nova build
>> issue on r/stx.7.0
>> Branch r/stx.7.0 can build ISO's, but container builds remain broken
>> on stx-nova.
>> stx-nova's issues started with spice-html5. The first issue was
>> spice-html5's github repo, forcing a move to gitlab's copy of the
>> spice-html5. The move to gitlab went smoothly for debian (master and
>> r/stx.8.0), but is failing to clone from r/stx.7.0 centos. It
>> appears gitlab requires a newer version git. Centos is using version
>> Debain is using a version 2.x.x.
>> We have a few options:
>> 1) r/stx.7.0 needs to find a way to inject a newer version of git
>> into the Loci CentOS container that stx-nova is based on. A tricky
>> thing to fix.
>> 2) Move to a newer version of Centos across all Loci images,
>> Prohibitive cost.
>> 3) Discontinue container builds for r/stx.7.0
>> 4) Selectively discontinue builds of stx-nova and any other image
>> needing spice-html5 for r/stx.7.0
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
More information about the Starlingx-discuss