[Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub rate limit issues

Ildiko Vancsa ildiko at openinfra.dev
Mon Aug 21 15:36:11 UTC 2023


Hi Scott,

I also just recognized, that the snipped that you copied in refers to a golang image: “Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19 toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit.”. DO you have the same issue with StarlingX images as well? Or is it always the golang step that fails?

Thanks,
Ildikó

———

Ildikó Váncsa
Director of Community
Open Infrastructure Foundation





> On Aug 18, 2023, at 12:13, Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko at openinfra.dev> wrote:
> 
> Hi Scott,
> 
> Great, thank you for the pointers.
> 
> I reached out to Docker on the channel that is dedicated for their open source program, and also included the links that you added below so they have the full context. I will get back with updates on this thread, if I receive anything beyond what you got on the forums already.
> 
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Ildikó
> 
> ———
> 
> Ildikó Váncsa
> Director of Community
> Open Infrastructure Foundation
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 17, 2023, at 07:40, Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Here is a sample from a failed build ...
>> 
>> docker build . --no-cache ...
>> Sending build context to Docker daemon  37.68MB
>> 
>> Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19
>> toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading:https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
>> make: *** [builder-build] Error 1
>> 
>> One thing to note, It's pulls from within our build container that hits the problem.  We don't see it when pulling from bare metal hardware.
>> 
>> I've tried raising the issue with the docker community here ...
>> 
>> https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/46092#issuecomment-1654243988
>> 
>> https://forums.docker.com/t/inconsistent-behaviour-of-docker-pull-rate-limit/136896/2
>> 
>> We seem to be avoiding the rate limit by using docker login. Formal StarlingX builds are using a couple of service accounts. Designers were asked establish there own personal accounts with dockerhub.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2023-08-16 16:17, Ildiko Vancsa wrote:
>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>>> 
>>> Hi Scott,
>>> 
>>> I looked into the DockerHub download issue again, to the capacity that I could. To confirm what was mentioned already, I have not found anything that would explain what the community is experiencing in terms of rate limits:
>>> 
>>>  - The StarlingX project is still listed as ’Sponsored OSS’: https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx
>>>  - The DockerHub docs point to a blog post that says “we will suspend data pull rate restrictions, where no egress restrictions will apply to any Docker users pulling images from the approved OSS namespaces”: https://www.docker.com/blog/expanded-support-for-open-source-software-projects/
>>>  - I haven’t received any notifications from DockerHub recently about not meeting the criteria to participate in their open source program anymore
>>> 
>>> Can you please share a screenshot or the error message that you are getting about hitting a pull rate limit? Also, are you getting that on every repo, or just specific ones?
>>> 
>>> Once having more background information, I will reach out to the DockerHub team to see what the background issue might be.
>>> 
>>> Thanks and Best Regards,
>>> Ildikó
>>> 
>>> ———
>>> 
>>> Ildikó Váncsa
>>> Director of Community
>>> Open Infrastructure Foundation
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io




More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list