December 2019 - Starlingx-discuss

[Starlingx-discuss] REMINDER about updating STX REST API DOCUMENTATION
by Waines, Greg 06 Mar '20

06 Mar '20

ALL StarlingX-Contributors, This email is probably about 5 months too late ... apologies. ATTENTION back in ~ September 2018, the StarlingX Documentation Team converted all of our StarlingX REST API Documents from those ugly wadl and yaml files into .rst / restructuredText files; basically aligning with the way all the other services in OpenStack are documenting REST APIs. The new API DOCS (.rst files) are now located under the applicable repos (or sub-repos). It is the responsibility of the contributor who changes / updates / creates STX REST APIs to also update the STX REST API DOCUMENTATION. ( ... again, apologies for telling you this 5 months late ... ) The HOWTO info on updating the new REST API DOCS can be found here: https://docs.starlingx.io/contributor/api_contribute_guide.html Greg. p.s. If you do know that you've changed an STX API in the last 5 months and know that you have NOT done the corresponding STX API DOC change, then minimally you need to raise a StarlingX Launchpad Bug on the issue with the details of the missing changes.

1 1

[Starlingx-discuss] Configuring Openstack SSL Certificates
by Austin Gillmann 02 Mar '20

02 Mar '20

Hello all, First off thank you Robert and Martin for the assistance re: my question about enabling swift. I found about the helm chart overrides on my own but forgot about the extra service. I since successfully deployed and all is working as intended, one minor question is how would I go about adding ssl certificates to the Openstack API's and Horizon. I found a stub page relating to it, but no other references except for stx-config docs that may just be for platform services. Do let me know and thanks again; have a great weekend everyone! -Austin Gillmann

3 3

[Starlingx-discuss] question about ceph or storage
by Chen, Haochuan Z 18 Feb '20

18 Feb '20

Hi Bob & Ovidiu Some question about ceph or storage. 1, What’s storage tier and storage profile? What’s the 2, why for duplex it request such puppet class dependency in ceph.pp? Is this request make all drbd config before class ceph? Drbd::Resource <| |> -> Class['::ceph'] And flag file “.node_ceph_configured”, to inform drbd make init setup before ceph config? 3, To launch ceph-mon, create a logical volume “ceph-mon-lv” and mount to /var/lib/ceph/mon, not directly mkdir “/var/lib/ceph/mon” for ceph-mon Thanks! Martin, Chen SSP, Software Engineer 021-61164330 From: Chen, Haochuan Z Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 4:46 PM To: Church, Robert <Robert.Church(a)windriver.com> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io>; Poncea, Ovidiu <Ovidiu.Poncea(a)windriver.com>; Qi, Mingyuan <mingyuan.qi(a)intel.com> Subject: RE: ceph ops enabling in sysinv-conductor Hi Bob Some question, what’s storage tier and storage profile? As you said, we no longer manage pool and pg num, is this also unnecessary and we should remove it? BR! Martin, Chen SSP, Software Engineer 021-61164330 From: Church, Robert <Robert.Church(a)windriver.com<mailto:Robert.Church@windriver.com>> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 12:09 AM To: Chen, Haochuan Z <haochuan.z.chen(a)intel.com<mailto:haochuan.z.chen@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Poncea, Ovidiu <Ovidiu.Poncea(a)windriver.com<mailto:Ovidiu.Poncea@windriver.com>> Subject: Re: ceph ops enabling in sysinv-conductor See inline… From: "Chen, Haochuan Z" <haochuan.z.chen(a)intel.com<mailto:haochuan.z.chen@intel.com>> Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 2:18 AM To: Robert Church <Robert.Church(a)windriver.com<mailto:Robert.Church@windriver.com>> Cc: "'starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>, Ovidiu Poncea <Ovidiu.Poncea(a)windriver.com<mailto:Ovidiu.Poncea@windriver.com>> Subject: RE: ceph ops enabling in sysinv-conductor Hi Bob 1, we could update default pg num in sysinv/helm/rbd_provisioner.py. But when platform-integ-apps applied, maybe user has not add osded, so the default pg num is still for user reference. And for user override, I think it should add in ceph-pool-audit, stx-platform-helm/helm-charts/ceph-pools-audit/templates/job-ceph-pools-audit.yaml. but pg num update will make rebalance which cause management network jam. [RTC] For a more robust solution, consider the following: * We can update _met_app_apply_prerequisites () in sysinv/conductor.py for platform-integ-apps to require OSDs to be provisioned prior to applying the application. This will ensure an accurate OSD view when the application is initially applied. * The provisioner system overrides (in sysinv/helm/rbd_provisioner.py) should have the ability to calculate and set an optimal PG number to avoid generating a warning. * The rbd provisioner chart should also support setting a new chunk size (if greater than the existing size) to update the PG num. This will support user PG updates from the helm-overrides API. * I think it’s potentially a good idea for ceph-pool-audit to support adjusting the PG numbers as well but this is tricky as I don’t think we can reduce PG_num in Mimic without creating a new pool and copying the contents (pg_autoscaling is added in Nautilis). This audit code would have to be very specific in adjusting the PG num as installing applications that add additional pools will change the PG_num distribution. 2, the above case is only for system application. Any more alarm for PG number, request user should manage. BR! Martin, Chen SSP, Software Engineer 021-61164330 From: Church, Robert <Robert.Church(a)windriver.com<mailto:Robert.Church@windriver.com>> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 10:34 AM To: Chen, Haochuan Z <haochuan.z.chen(a)intel.com<mailto:haochuan.z.chen@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Poncea, Ovidiu <Ovidiu.Poncea(a)windriver.com<mailto:Ovidiu.Poncea@windriver.com>> Subject: Re: ceph ops enabling in sysinv-conductor Hi Martin, In STX 1.0, we ran bare-metal openstack services for which we created and managed specific ceph storage pools for glance, cinder, nova, and swift. In this environment, we managed their creation and parameters (PGs and quotas) as the cluster scaled up. With the move to containerizing the openstack services in STX 2.0, pool creation is now driven mostly by helm charts packaged into an application (radosgw pools are the exception). Since we don’t know what additional application(s) will be deployed and what pools may be created, we are currently longer managing pools as in STX 1.0. These related functions in sysinv/conductor/ceph.py are remaining from STX 1.0 and need to be removed and/or repurposed to meet any new requirements. I took a look at the LP logs and it looks like we only have a single application applied: platform-integ-apps. This currently results in a single pool for 6 OSDs cluster: id: 6231df84-33be-4aa4-82ea-7408e0f2421c health: HEALTH_WARN too few PGs per OSD (21 < min 30) services: mon: 3 daemons, quorum controller-0,controller-1,storage-0 mgr: controller-0(active), standbys: controller-1 osd: 6 osds: 6 up, 6 in data: pools: 1 pools, 64 pgs objects: 0 objects, 0 B usage: 645 MiB used, 5.4 TiB / 5.4 TiB avail pgs: 64 active+clean Since every installation will install platform-integ-apps, I think we should do the following: 1. Update the chunk_size calculation in sysinv/helm/rbd_provisioner.py to be dynamically calculated based on the number OSDs provisioned in the cluster. As this may be the only pool created, it should meet the minimum size characteristics to avoid a ceph warning. 2. Update the rbd-provisioner helm chart to support explicitly setting the pg_num based on the chunk size. Do this to allow setting a user override for the chunk size so that we can re-apply platform-integ-apps and explicitly set new values. Regards, Bob From: "Chen, Haochuan Z" <haochuan.z.chen(a)intel.com<mailto:haochuan.z.chen@intel.com>> Date: Monday, December 2, 2019 at 1:15 AM To: Robert Church <Robert.Church(a)windriver.com<mailto:Robert.Church@windriver.com>> Cc: "'starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>, Ovidiu Poncea <Ovidiu.Poncea(a)windriver.com<mailto:Ovidiu.Poncea@windriver.com>> Subject: ceph ops enabling in sysinv-conductor Hi Bob I find some many function in sysinv-conductor/ceph.py, which could manage ceph cluster, such as create/delete/configure pool, audit pg etc. But why these function is not enabled? Or plan to request user to manage ceph cluster, such as create pool and configure pg num? Now I checked this issue, pg too few, as user maybe deploy few osd, which make alarm. So for such issue, request user to decide correct pg num or user could ignore? https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1844164 BR! Martin, Chen SSP, Software Engineer 021-61164330

3 12

[Starlingx-discuss] the way to enable swift in starlingx
by Chen, Haochuan Z 12 Feb '20

12 Feb '20

Hi system application-upload <openstack application tarball> system service-parameter-modify radosgw config service_enabled=true system service-parameter-apply radosgw system helm-chart-attribute-modify stx-openstack ceph-rgw openstack --enabled=true system application-apply stx-openstack openstack endpoint list | grep object BR! -----Original Message----- From: Chen, Haochuan Z Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 10:12 AM To: starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io Cc: Volker.Hoesslin(a)swsn.de; ji(a)sibyl.li Subject: swift enabling Hi I find there is voice to enable swift, why it was removed? Thanks! Message: 2 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:53:31 -0600 From: joji vlogs <ji(a)sibyl.li> To: "starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Enabling Object Storage Message-ID: <CAHQOA=hsC+wQf+MOVLx6iPziPBvmqtbJJ4saogGqgTnb4byB_g(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all, I recently did a test deployment based on a 2+2+2 setup with one minor difference being I only have one storage server on hand. My question is how would I go about enabling object storage? I saw a reference to it in the helm charts and attempted to set an override but the APIs would not be listening for requests and a "unable to get swift service info" error. Thank you and have a great day! Message: 3 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:14:15 +0000 From: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin(a)swsn.de> To: "starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] STX 2.0: swift? Message-ID: <DB39DAB5F762704A93D316F9CE7D021E42929584(a)emilio.sis.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" hi, how can i add the object storage (swift) feature to my current STX2.0 openstack? BR! Martin, Chen SSP, Software Engineer 021-61164330 -----Original Message----- From: starlingx-discuss-request(a)lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss-request(a)lists.starlingx.io> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:05 AM To: starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io Subject: Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 18, Issue 150 Send Starlingx-discuss mailing list submissions to starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to starlingx-discuss-request(a)lists.starlingx.io You can reach the person managing the list at starlingx-discuss-owner(a)lists.starlingx.io When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Starlingx-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: controller filesystem (Waines, Greg) 2. Enabling Object Storage (joji vlogs) 3. Re: <BLOCKING> StarlingX 2.0 Account Locked for User (Andy Ning) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:26:31 +0000 From: "Waines, Greg" <Greg.Waines(a)windriver.com> To: Saul Wold <sgw(a)linux.intel.com>, "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin(a)swsn.de>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun(a)intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io>, "Dale, Kristal" <kristal.dale(a)intel.com> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem Message-ID: <B514CD7A-7A7F-4051-9A62-F62193853B41(a)windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Actually a section on managing filesystems on the controllers is planned for STX 3.0 ... based on the proposed TOC for the new Operations Guide. Greg From: Saul Wold <sgw(a)linux.intel.com> Date: Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM To: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin(a)swsn.de>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun(a)intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io>, "Dale, Kristal" <kristal.dale(a)intel.com> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem Kristal: We probably need a Story/Task added to the documentation to get the documentation of host-fs added in the right place. This helps with filesystem re-sizing. Maybe it's already there. Sau! On 11/21/19 7:12 AM, von Hoesslin, Volker wrote: incredible !!! thats the point i have search! big thx! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Von:* Sun, Austin [austin.sun(a)intel.com<mailto:austin.sun@intel.com>] *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 15:20 *An:* von Hoesslin, Volker; starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> *Betreff:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem Hi Volker: From the email chain, http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-August/005656.ht… You can probably the command line to change the size of docker lv Thanks. BR Austin Sun. *From:* von Hoesslin, Volker <Volker.Hoesslin(a)swsn.de<mailto:Volker.Hoesslin@swsn.de>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 21, 2019 9:20 PM *To:* starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem hi, i trying to import some existing qcow2 images into my new installed STX 2.0. openstack image create --file /media/foobar.qcow2 --private --unprotected --disk-format qcow2 "foobar" all works fine, the image are available. now, i'm trying to create an new volume based on this images. if the images are <=6GB all works fine, but some images are very huge (10-200GB) and then it ends in an error. after some research i can see on controller the mount point /dev/mapper/cgts--vg-docker--lv 30G 11G 20G 35% /var/lib/docker increase the used storage. after fail "volume create" it goes back to given value 35%. in my oppinion, this mount point should resize to some value about 300-400GB, but how? in STX horizon backend (http://10.10.10.2:8080/admin/system_config/?tab=system_config_tab__storage_…) there is an "docker-distribution", but no docker-mount-point itself? btw, if i try to change the "docker-distribution" value to some other value (eg. 500GB via horizon backend), i got this error: *Error: *backup size of 60 is insufficient for host controller-1. Minimum backup size of 100 is required based upon glance size 20 and database size 20. Rejecting modification request. - see attachment - how can i increase the backup size to handle this error?! greez & thx, volker... _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20191125/…> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:53:31 -0600 From: joji vlogs <ji(a)sibyl.li> To: "starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Enabling Object Storage Message-ID: <CAHQOA=hsC+wQf+MOVLx6iPziPBvmqtbJJ4saogGqgTnb4byB_g(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all, I recently did a test deployment based on a 2+2+2 setup with one minor difference being I only have one storage server on hand. My question is how would I go about enabling object storage? I saw a reference to it in the helm charts and attempted to set an override but the APIs would not be listening for requests and a "unable to get swift service info" error. Thank you and have a great day! Austin Gillmann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20191125/…> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:05:19 -0500 From: Andy Ning <andy.ning(a)windriver.com> To: <starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] <BLOCKING> StarlingX 2.0 Account Locked for User Message-ID: <8f8e6cad-0ad7-4be4-6693-a25e6cec93ad(a)windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed On 2019-11-25 12:00 AM, Yong Hu wrote: > Hi Anirudh, > > This issue is similar to this LP#1853017 [0], which was triggered the > account locking if the password of Openstack user "admin" was changed. > In this LP, for unknown reason, "registry-token-server" daemon kept > accessing "keystone" on host (not the instance in containers) with > obsolete token and led to "admin" account locked after 5 attempts. > If registry token server keeps on accessing keystone with obsolete token, this could be a bug in the token server. Normally if a keystone client get a failed authentication, it should try to retrieve a new token by using username/password. Andy > Right now, I am debugging this issue. > Good thing is Cengn build 11/16 seemed not to have such a problem > (LP#1853017). > > You might have a try with this version? > BTW: which cengn build were you using? > > > [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1853017 > > regards, > Yong > > On 2019/11/19 6:06 PM, Anirudh Gupta wrote: >> Hi Team, >> >> I have installed StarlingX 2.0 Duplex Bare Metal. >> >> I am trying to create 2 VM’s and repeating this cycle a number of times. >> >> After using the setup for around half and hour, I am not longer able >> to access the GUI. >> >> Ever though I type correct Username/Password, it gives an error of >> Invalid Credentials. >> >> Then, I thought to use the CLI commands by following LOAD CLI section >> given in link >> >> https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r2_release/openstack/ >> access.html#local-cli >> >> >> But with this also, I am facing the same error >> >> controller-0:~$ export OS_CLOUD=openstack_helm >> >> controller-0:~$ openstack endpoint list >> >> The account is locked for user: 230578cde382430a8adac399afab1230. >> (HTTP 401) (Request-ID: req-6da6d59a-2edd-4f2b-a8bf-f13f2e423a77) >> >> Earlier this automatically started working after 5-7 mins. >> >> But this time, I am completely Blocked. >> >> I have also raised a bug regarding the same >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1853093 >> >> Please suggest some pointers, so that I can unblock and resume my >> activities. >> >> Regards >> >> Anirudh Gupta >> >> DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and all of its contents, contains >> information which is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected >> from disclosure. The information contained in this electronic mail >> transmission is intended for use only by the individual or entity to >> which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or may >> have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please >> notify the sender immediately and delete / destroy all copies of this >> electronic mail transmission without disclosing, copying, >> distributing, forwarding, printing or retaining any part of it. >> Hughes Systique accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising >> from the use of the information transmitted by this email including >> damage from virus. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io >> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -- Andy Ning Cube: 3071 Tel: 613-9631408 (int: 4408) Skype: andy.ning.wr ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss ------------------------------ End of Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 18, Issue 150 **************************************************

3 7

[Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: StarlingX Release Meeting - Dec 12/2019
by Khalil, Ghada 09 Jan '20

09 Jan '20

Agenda/Minutes are posted at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases stx.3.0 - No build yet as per Scott's email. Current ETA is 7:30pm Eastern - Test team is waiting for the new build (monitored by Jenkins job) to start sanity - Once sanity is green, will mark the build as released and declare the release milestone - Need to keep an eye on the sanity issue that was reported in master: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1856078 - Currently this was not seen on the rc 3.0 build - Will monitor to see if this appears in the next sanity on master or on the next 3.0 load Regards, Ghada

2 1

[Starlingx-discuss] Ceph Containerization feature discuss
by Sun, Austin 09 Jan '20

09 Jan '20

Hi All: There was a good discuss about Ceph Containerization task and schedule during the 10th china open source hackathon. open questions/risk： 1.Ceph Images will be pull directly from upstream or built from stx 2. Sysinv integration with Ceph. 3. Ceph feature branch ? needed branch ha / stx-puppet / config / platform-armada-app / ansible-playbooks / integ / utilities 4.rook -client code repo like ceph-client 5. librados / rgw provide 6. Test case/Test Strategy. Schedule/Plan: 1）Python Rook Plugin for Sysinv and Command Tingjie / 2020-1-1 2）Bootstrap and Helm-Override Mapping Martin / 2020-1-4 3）CSI Provider Replace Rbd Provider for Sysinv KubeApp Martin / 2020-1-20 4）SysInv Openstack Interface support provisioning (Cinder/Swift) Tingjie / 2020-1-20 5）Integration/System command/Patch upload ??? Wait for the 4th task finish and Plan 6）Old code cleanup The Detail info was put in etherpad [1], but it was changed simple Chinese characters in some section. Thanks Tingjie, Martin and Yong. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OpenSource-Hackathon-Ceph-Containerization Thanks. BR Austin Sun.

3 5

[Starlingx-discuss] Question about distributed openstack
by Wei Chen(联通集团联通云数据有限公司本部) 07 Jan '20

07 Jan '20

? Dear Sir/Madam, I'm an engineer that use the starlingx in our product. I setup a central cloud and an edge. Now I hit an issue about how to share the image from center to the edge. What I thought is, write one application on the edge, get the image list from center, then pull by demand. It's said that in the near future like starlingx 4.0, the distributed openstack will be leveraged and there's something about image process. So, could you share any idea/material about it? Thanks & Regards, Wei 如果您错误接收了该邮件，请通过电子邮件立即通知我们。请回复邮件到 hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn，即可以退订此邮件。我们将立即将您的信息从我们的发送目录中删除。 If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by e-mail. Please reply to hqs-spmc(a)chinaunicom.cn ,you can unsubscribe from this mail. We will immediately remove your information from send catalogue of our.

3 5

[Starlingx-discuss] CNCF K8s conformance - Error found
by Lemus Contreras, Cristopher J 07 Jan '20

07 Jan '20

Hello All, I created a launchpad to track an error found during the CNCF K8s conformance procedure: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1857716 Conformance was executed using sonobuoy tool, instructions here: https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/blob/master/instructions.md This is the summary: Ran 276 of 4897 Specs in 9316.930 seconds FAIL! -- 275 Passed | 1 Failed | 0 Pending | 4621 Skipped --- FAIL: TestE2E (9316.96s) FAIL It looks like there’s an issue with the self-signed certificate that might have caused the failures and skips. E1226 13:31:14.402186 1 authentication.go:63] Unable to authenticate the request due to an error: [x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "front-proxy-ca"), x509: certificate signed by unknown authority] Some additional details can be found on launchpad, including the full tar.gz file created by sonobuoy. Hopefully somebody can take a look at it. Regards, Cristopher

2 1

[Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: StarlingX Containerization Meeting
by Miller, Frank 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

Abbreviated minutes: Next meeting: Tuesday Dec 10 Minutes: 1. Stx.3.0 gating LPs: * Plan for the current 18 gating LPs: o 4 LPs are expected to land for stx.3.0 including the 2 Highs o 2 LPs to be marked invalid/not reproducible o 11 LPs to be re-gated to stx.4.0 o 1 LP TBD (Erich Cordoba to update 1824881) 2. Stx.4.0 features: In features: * 2006145: Kata container support [Shuicheng Lin] --> resourced and In for stx.4.0 * 2006537: Decouple Container Applications from Platform [Bob Church] --> resourced and In for stx.4.0 * 2006770: Backup & Restore - openstack [Ovidiu Poncea] --> resourced and In for stx.4.0 * 2005312: Containerize Openstack clients --> In for now but requires plan * TBD: Upversion Kubernetes and container platform components --> haven't create SB yet but will be required during stx.4.0 NOT In features: * 2006787: Smaller memory node support [Austin Sun] --> not committed for stx.4.0 but being worked on for stx.4.0 (ie: prep) * 2004008: Fault Containerization --> not In because it requires splitting GUI plugin into 2: one with shared panels, the other with the platform panels which is not resourced Etherpad with full minutes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-containerization Frank -----Original Appointment----- From: Miller, Frank [mailto:Frank.Miller@windriver.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 3:03 PM To: starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Containerization Meeting When: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 9:30 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: https://zoom.us/j/342730236 Please join me for the bi-weekly containers meeting. Agenda for November 26 meeting: 1. stx.3.0 gating work items: 18 gating LPs (down from 26 at our last meeting) * Status update for high priority LPs (2): * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1838659 kubernetes apiserver certificate needs rotation [Mingyuan Qi] * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1851287 Controller failed to lock following a failover due to elastic pod failure to shutdown [Dan Voiculeasa] * Medium priority LPs (16): * Status for the 4 LPs < 50 days old: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1851294 [Angie Wang] * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1850438 [Steve Webster] * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1850189 [Stefan Dinescu] * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1846829 [David Sullivan] * Status update for the 12 LPs that >100 days old. [Al, Angie, Bart, Erich, JimG, Ran, Shuicheng, Tao] * Can any be closed as not reproducible or won't fix? * Which ones are being actively worked on? Which ones do the owners have a plan to fix? 2. stx.4.0 planning: * 2006145: Kata container support [Shuicheng Lin] - Request update from Shuicheng if final 2 test scenarios are done (IPv6 testing + external registry with username/pwd authentication) * 2006787: Smaller memory node support, aka containerize flock services [Austin Sun] - Request feature approach & spec update * 2006537: Decouple Container Applications from Platform (stx.4.0 feature) [Bob Church] - Feature status update * Other potential stx.4.0 features --> which are resourced/have plans to address in stx.4.0? * 2006770: Backup & Restore - openstack [Ovidiu Poncea] * 2005312: Containerize Openstack clients * 2004008: Fault Containerization * TBD: Upversion Kubernetes and container platform components Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-containerization Timeslot: 9:30am EST / 6:30am PDT / 1430 UTC Call details * Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236 * Dialing in from phone: * Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 876 9923 * Meeting ID: 342 730 236 * International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/ed95sU7aQ Agenda and meeting minutes Project notes are at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-containerization Containerization subproject wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Containers << File: ATT00002.txt >>

3 11

[Starlingx-discuss] Canceled: Weekly StarlingX Release meeting
by Khalil, Ghada 31 Dec '19

31 Dec '19

** We will reconvene the release meetings on Jan 9 Weekly meeting on Thursday 11AM PT / 1900 UTC Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236 Meeting agenda/minutes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases

1 0