Thanks Maria. I expect you will have issues as per the bug below which will impact nova/VM functionality, so you may need to wait for tonight's build for a virtual env sanity. Regards, Ghada From: Perez Ibarra, Maria G [mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 7:18 PM To: Khalil, Ghada; Jones, Bruce E; Zvonar, Bill Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190619 Hello Ghada, The execution in virtual environment takes more time than baremetal. Yesterday's execution started late and the virtual environment wasn't attempted. For today's build we are working on gathering results and in a final debug, we are seeing possible issues launching VM that only applies in a virtual environment and creating the appropriate Launchpad. Regards Maria G. From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 6:02 PM To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com<mailto:bruce.e.jones@intel.com>>; Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar@windriver.com<mailto:Bill.Zvonar@windriver.com>>; Perez Ibarra, Maria G <maria.g.perez.ibarra@intel.com<mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra@intel.com>> Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190619 Hi Bruce, My understanding is that sanity would be red with this load if run on a virtual env (or if run with vswitch_type = none) due to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1833497 I don't see results from a virtual env sanity below. Maria, Can you comment on whether the virtual env sanity was attempted or not? Thanks, Ghada From: Jones, Bruce E [mailto:bruce.e.jones@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 1:00 PM To: Khalil, Ghada; Zvonar, Bill Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190619 Ghada, Bill - taking this to email since there is no release meeting today. This isn't the Green Sanity we were hoping for, but is it green enough to declare the milestone? I would support declaring MS-3 based on these results. brucej From: Perez Ibarra, Maria G [mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 8:33 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190619 Status of the Sanity Test for last CENGN ISO: bootimage.iso from 2019-Jun-19 (link<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190619T140326Z/outputs/iso/>) Status: YELLOW ====================== Bare Metal environment ====================== AIO - Simplex: Setup 03 TCs Provision-Containers 01 TCs Sanity-OpenStack 49 TCs Sanity-Platform 11 TCs ------------------------------ TOTAL: 64 TCs AIO - Duplex: Setup 03 TCs Provision-Containers 01 TCs Sanity-OpenStack 52 TCs | 13 TCs FAIL Sanity-Platform 09 TCs ------------------------------ TOTAL: 65 TCs Standard - Local Storage (2+2): Setup 03 TCs Provision-Containers 01 TCs Sanity-OpenStack 52 TCs Sanity-Platform 09 TCs ------------------------------ TOTAL: 65 TCs Standard - External Storage (2+2+2): Setup 03 TCs Provision-Containers 01 TCs Sanity-OpenStack 52 TCs Sanity-Platform 05 TCs ------------------------------ TOTAL: 61 TCs The issue was that in duplex configuration Volumes could not been created. We'll investigate more on these problems in the next execution. Regards Maria G.