Good idea, but let's deal with integ first. I meant "deployment" ________________________________ From: Panech, Davlet <Davlet.Panech@windriver.com> Sent: June 7, 2023 9:05 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>; Little, Scott <Scott.Little@windriver.com> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Input needed - split starlingx/tools git repo into multiple We should also consider separate repo(s) for config files like ... stx-tools/debian-mirror-tools/config Good idea, but let's deal with integ first. ________________________________ From: Scott.Little <scott.little@eng.windriver.com> Sent: June 1, 2023 11:29 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Input needed - split starlingx/tools git repo into multiple +1 on 'deployment' We should also consider separate repo(s) for config files like ... stx-tools/debian-mirror-tools/config stx-tools/debian-mirror-tools/config Scott On 2023-05-31 11:06, Panech, Davlet wrote: Good day, We are considering splitting the git repository starlingx/tools into multiple. Reason: it contains files & scripts from unrelated domains and it is difficult to find Git reviewers whose expertise covers all of them. At a minimum, I suggest we separate out the "deployment" directory in its own repository. Would it make sense to separate out any other directories? D. _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>