Yes, [wrsroot@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system host-list | grep "controller-1" | 4 | controller-1 | controller | locked | disabled | online | Tested against the last ISO too: stx-2018-10-01-156.iso Regards. Juan Carlos Alonso From: Rowsell, Brent [mailto:Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com] Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 9:40 AM To: Alonso, Juan Carlos <juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: There are not network interfaces in controller-1 Did controller-1 go online ? Brent From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 10:17 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] There are not network interfaces in controller-1 Hi, Was there a change on how to create or provision network interfaces for controllers? When Controller-1 was installed and try to provision it, there is not output for "system host-if-list -a controller-1", for controller-0 there is. So, if controller-1 is not full provisioned it cannot 'unlock' and cannot be used. I followed steps in Wiki for Virtual multinode controller storage. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Installation_Guide_Virtual_Environ... Execute against ISO: stx-2018-09-28-148.iso Regards. Juan Carlos Alonso