Saul – Addition of host-fs content is captured in this story: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006888

 

Greg and I planned to address a subset of content for this new page (Certificate Management, Local docker reg) in the first pass.

 

I will be working on this page next week and will welcome any host-fs content!

 

Cheers,
Kris

 

 

 

From: Waines, Greg <Greg.Waines@windriver.com>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 5:27 AM
To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; von Hoesslin, Volker <Volker.Hoesslin@swsn.de>; Sun, Austin <austin.sun@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Dale, Kristal <kristal.dale@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem

 

Actually a section on managing filesystems on the controllers is planned for STX 3.0 ... based on the proposed TOC for the new Operations Guide.

Greg

 

From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM
To: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin@swsn.de>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun@intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>, "Dale, Kristal" <kristal.dale@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem

 

Kristal:

 

We probably need a Story/Task added to the documentation to get the

documentation of host-fs added in the right place.  This helps with

filesystem re-sizing.

 

Maybe it's already there.

 

Sau!

 

On 11/21/19 7:12 AM, von Hoesslin, Volker wrote:

incredible !!! thats the point i have search! big thx!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Von:* Sun, Austin [austin.sun@intel.com]

*Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 15:20

*An:* von Hoesslin, Volker; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io

*Betreff:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem

Hi Volker:

  From the email chain,

http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-August/005656.html

You can probably the command line to change the size of docker lv

Thanks.

BR

Austin Sun.

*From:* von Hoesslin, Volker <Volker.Hoesslin@swsn.de>

*Sent:* Thursday, November 21, 2019 9:20 PM

*To:* starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io

*Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem

hi,

i trying to import some existing qcow2 images into my new installed STX 2.0.

openstack image create --file /media/foobar.qcow2 --private

--unprotected --disk-format qcow2 "foobar"

all works fine, the image are available.

now, i'm trying to create an new volume based on this images. if the

images are <=6GB all works fine, but some images are very huge

(10-200GB) and then it ends in an error. after some research i can see

on controller the mount point

/dev/mapper/cgts--vg-docker--lv      30G   11G   20G  35% /var/lib/docker

increase the used storage. after fail "volume create" it goes back to

given value 35%. in my oppinion, this mount point should resize to some

value about 300-400GB, but how? in STX horizon backend

(http://10.10.10.2:8080/admin/system_config/?tab=system_config_tab__storage_table)

there is an "docker-distribution", but no docker-mount-point itself?

btw, if i try to change the "docker-distribution" value to some other

value (eg. 500GB via horizon backend), i got this error:

*Error: *backup size of 60 is insufficient for host controller-1.

Minimum backup size of 100 is required based upon glance size 20 and

database size 20. Rejecting modification request.

- see attachment -

how can i increase the backup size to handle this error?!

greez & thx, volker...

_______________________________________________

Starlingx-discuss mailing list

Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io

http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

 

_______________________________________________

Starlingx-discuss mailing list

Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io

http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss