Gentle Reminder !!!!! Hi Team, Can someone help me in regard to the below mail shared. *Queris: * 1. Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through that network 2. Is there a way to separate client traffic from Storage cluster traffic (running on Mgmt+Cluster Host NW) if we enable Ceph Metadata server on Controller nodes? Regards Anirudh Gupta On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 3:37 PM Anirudh Gupta <anyrude10@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Team,

Can someone help me in regard to the below mail shared.

*Query: *Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through that network

Regards Anirudh Gupta

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 7:41 PM Anirudh Gupta <anyrude10@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Hi Team,

I am trying to set up a Bare metal Standard with Dedicated Storage Installation R4.0 <https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedicated_storage.html> with 2 Controllers, 2 Storage Nodes and 2 Worker Nodes.

https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedica...

[image: image.png]

As per the Network Diagram, storage nodes are connected to MGMT + Cluster Networks and all the traffic flows through this network only.

https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedica...

Even the document suggests to assign the cluster-host network to the MGMT interface for the storage nodes

system interface-network-assign $NODE mgmt0 cluster-host

Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through that network

Looking forward for your response.

Regards Anirudh Gupta

Hi Team, Can we integrate a pre-deployed Ceph storage cluster (already created by us) with the existing StarlingX Dedicated Storage Model, rather than StarlingX deploying its own Storage nodes. Basically, we need to segregate client-to-storage traffic from Ceph cluster traffic which does not seem to be possible as per the mail thread below in the current implementation. Looking forward for your response. Regards Anirudh Gupta On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 7:52 PM Pratik M. <pvmpublic@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, Reading the following, a dedicated storage-only netowrk does not seem to be possible for the scenario you mention:

https://docs.starlingx.io/planning/kubernetes/networks-for-a-system-with-ded... https://docs.starlingx.io/planning/kubernetes/the-storage-network.html

Thanks and Regards

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 6:18 PM Anirudh Gupta <anyrude10@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Gentle Reminder !!!!!

Hi Team,

Can someone help me in regard to the below mail shared.

*Queris: * 1. Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through that network 2. Is there a way to separate client traffic from Storage cluster traffic (running on Mgmt+Cluster Host NW) if we enable Ceph Metadata server on Controller nodes?

Regards Anirudh Gupta

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 3:37 PM Anirudh Gupta <anyrude10@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Hi Team,

Can someone help me in regard to the below mail shared.

*Query: *Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through that network

Regards Anirudh Gupta

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 7:41 PM Anirudh Gupta <anyrude10@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Hi Team,

I am trying to set up a Bare metal Standard with Dedicated Storage Installation R4.0 <https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedicated_storage.html> with 2 Controllers, 2 Storage Nodes and 2 Worker Nodes.

https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedica...

[image: image.png]

As per the Network Diagram, storage nodes are connected to MGMT + Cluster Networks and all the traffic flows through this network only.

https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedica...

Even the document suggests to assign the cluster-host network to the MGMT interface for the storage nodes

system interface-network-assign $NODE mgmt0 cluster-host

Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through that network

Looking forward for your response.

Regards Anirudh Gupta

_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss