[Starlingx-discuss] swift enabling
Hi I find there is voice to enable swift, why it was removed? Thanks! Message: 2 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:53:31 -0600 From: joji vlogs <ji@sibyl.li> To: "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Enabling Object Storage Message-ID: <CAHQOA=hsC+wQf+MOVLx6iPziPBvmqtbJJ4saogGqgTnb4byB_g@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all, I recently did a test deployment based on a 2+2+2 setup with one minor difference being I only have one storage server on hand. My question is how would I go about enabling object storage? I saw a reference to it in the helm charts and attempted to set an override but the APIs would not be listening for requests and a "unable to get swift service info" error. Thank you and have a great day! Message: 3 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:14:15 +0000 From: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin@swsn.de> To: "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] STX 2.0: swift? Message-ID: <DB39DAB5F762704A93D316F9CE7D021E42929584@emilio.sis.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" hi, how can i add the object storage (swift) feature to my current STX2.0 openstack? BR! Martin, Chen SSP, Software Engineer 021-61164330 -----Original Message----- From: starlingx-discuss-request@lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss-request@lists.starlingx.io> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:05 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 18, Issue 150 Send Starlingx-discuss mailing list submissions to starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to starlingx-discuss-request@lists.starlingx.io You can reach the person managing the list at starlingx-discuss-owner@lists.starlingx.io When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Starlingx-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: controller filesystem (Waines, Greg) 2. Enabling Object Storage (joji vlogs) 3. Re: <BLOCKING> StarlingX 2.0 Account Locked for User (Andy Ning) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:26:31 +0000 From: "Waines, Greg" <Greg.Waines@windriver.com> To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>, "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin@swsn.de>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun@intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>, "Dale, Kristal" <kristal.dale@intel.com> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem Message-ID: <B514CD7A-7A7F-4051-9A62-F62193853B41@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Actually a section on managing filesystems on the controllers is planned for STX 3.0 ... based on the proposed TOC for the new Operations Guide. Greg From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> Date: Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM To: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin@swsn.de>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun@intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>, "Dale, Kristal" <kristal.dale@intel.com> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem Kristal: We probably need a Story/Task added to the documentation to get the documentation of host-fs added in the right place. This helps with filesystem re-sizing. Maybe it's already there. Sau! On 11/21/19 7:12 AM, von Hoesslin, Volker wrote: incredible !!! thats the point i have search! big thx! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Von:* Sun, Austin [austin.sun@intel.com<mailto:austin.sun@intel.com>] *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 15:20 *An:* von Hoesslin, Volker; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> *Betreff:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem Hi Volker: From the email chain, http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-August/005656.htm... You can probably the command line to change the size of docker lv Thanks. BR Austin Sun. *From:* von Hoesslin, Volker <Volker.Hoesslin@swsn.de<mailto:Volker.Hoesslin@swsn.de>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 21, 2019 9:20 PM *To:* starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem hi, i trying to import some existing qcow2 images into my new installed STX 2.0. openstack image create --file /media/foobar.qcow2 --private --unprotected --disk-format qcow2 "foobar" all works fine, the image are available. now, i'm trying to create an new volume based on this images. if the images are <=6GB all works fine, but some images are very huge (10-200GB) and then it ends in an error. after some research i can see on controller the mount point /dev/mapper/cgts--vg-docker--lv 30G 11G 20G 35% /var/lib/docker increase the used storage. after fail "volume create" it goes back to given value 35%. in my oppinion, this mount point should resize to some value about 300-400GB, but how? in STX horizon backend (http://10.10.10.2:8080/admin/system_config/?tab=system_config_tab__storage_t...) there is an "docker-distribution", but no docker-mount-point itself? btw, if i try to change the "docker-distribution" value to some other value (eg. 500GB via horizon backend), i got this error: *Error: *backup size of 60 is insufficient for host controller-1. Minimum backup size of 100 is required based upon glance size 20 and database size 20. Rejecting modification request. - see attachment - how can i increase the backup size to handle this error?! greez & thx, volker... _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20191125/053843ae/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:53:31 -0600 From: joji vlogs <ji@sibyl.li> To: "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Enabling Object Storage Message-ID: <CAHQOA=hsC+wQf+MOVLx6iPziPBvmqtbJJ4saogGqgTnb4byB_g@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all, I recently did a test deployment based on a 2+2+2 setup with one minor difference being I only have one storage server on hand. My question is how would I go about enabling object storage? I saw a reference to it in the helm charts and attempted to set an override but the APIs would not be listening for requests and a "unable to get swift service info" error. Thank you and have a great day! Austin Gillmann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20191125/7f40d408/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:05:19 -0500 From: Andy Ning <andy.ning@windriver.com> To: <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] <BLOCKING> StarlingX 2.0 Account Locked for User Message-ID: <8f8e6cad-0ad7-4be4-6693-a25e6cec93ad@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed On 2019-11-25 12:00 AM, Yong Hu wrote:
Hi Anirudh,
This issue is similar to this LP#1853017 [0], which was triggered the account locking if the password of Openstack user "admin" was changed. In this LP, for unknown reason, "registry-token-server" daemon kept accessing "keystone" on host (not the instance in containers) with obsolete token and led to "admin" account locked after 5 attempts.
If registry token server keeps on accessing keystone with obsolete token, this could be a bug in the token server. Normally if a keystone client get a failed authentication, it should try to retrieve a new token by using username/password. Andy
Right now, I am debugging this issue. Good thing is Cengn build 11/16 seemed not to have such a problem (LP#1853017).
You might have a try with this version? BTW: which cengn build were you using?
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1853017
regards, Yong
On 2019/11/19 6:06 PM, Anirudh Gupta wrote:
Hi Team,
I have installed StarlingX 2.0 Duplex Bare Metal.
I am trying to create 2 VM’s and repeating this cycle a number of times.
After using the setup for around half and hour, I am not longer able to access the GUI.
Ever though I type correct Username/Password, it gives an error of Invalid Credentials.
Then, I thought to use the CLI commands by following LOAD CLI section given in link
https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r2_release/openstack/ access.html#local-cli
But with this also, I am facing the same error
controller-0:~$ export OS_CLOUD=openstack_helm
controller-0:~$ openstack endpoint list
The account is locked for user: 230578cde382430a8adac399afab1230. (HTTP 401) (Request-ID: req-6da6d59a-2edd-4f2b-a8bf-f13f2e423a77)
Earlier this automatically started working after 5-7 mins.
But this time, I am completely Blocked.
I have also raised a bug regarding the same
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1853093
Please suggest some pointers, so that I can unblock and resume my activities.
Regards
Anirudh Gupta
DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and all of its contents, contains information which is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or may have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete / destroy all copies of this electronic mail transmission without disclosing, copying, distributing, forwarding, printing or retaining any part of it. Hughes Systique accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus.
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
-- Andy Ning Cube: 3071 Tel: 613-9631408 (int: 4408) Skype: andy.ning.wr ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss ------------------------------ End of Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 18, Issue 150 **************************************************
participants (1)
-
Chen, Haochuan Z