[Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ][ discussion ] Unified test framework

[Zvonar, Bill]

Hi Ada/Numan - apologies if this was discussed & I don't recall - is it an option for us to carry on with both (as long as they can both feed up into the same dashboard)?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com> 
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 5:59 PM
To: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ][ discussion ] Unified test framework

Hello,

   We currently have 2 testing frameworks proposed:

    - Robot [0]
	- Sanity check at Intel's premises is done using it
	- Deployment on virtual environment, and running the tests is automated.
	- ~200 tests automated so far.
	
    - PyTest [1]
	- used by Wind River for their testing
	- A big amount of test cases automated (Numan, can you provide a number?)

Both frameworks are similar, there must be some re-work required on one of the sides to align with the chosen one.
What I would like to have, is an informed decision, bringing the best impact to the project and thinking about the future, not only the current picture.  

Even knowing these days are going to be quiet, I want to continue the conversation: which one best serves StarlingX? 

Regards
Ada

[0] http://robotframework.org/
[1] https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/


_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss