[Starlingx-discuss] Restructuring round 2

[Scott Little]

Important subjects that I want to participate in, but I think that's a 
subject for a different thread.  Long term solutions, versus a short 
term need to get WindRiver converged onto StarlingX. For now, we'd like 
to get a rational directory structure.  Subdivision of current gits into 
per-package gits can happen later if that's the path we choose.


Scott


On 18-07-17 11:54 AM, Cordoba Malibran, Erich wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Thanks for the info. There's something I would like to bring into the discussion of the consolidation.
> It has started a discussion on what infrastructure we need to have a CI of StarlingX and an evaluation on
> OBS (openbuildservice) and Koji has started.
>
> Taking that in mind I'm wondering how this consolidation can help/affect to adapt the StarlingX building
> Into one of these infrastructures,  as far as I recall, both solutions requires to have a repository per rpm.
>
> What are your thoughts on this?
>
> Thanks
>
> -Erich