[Starlingx-discuss] Restructuring round 2

[Cordoba Malibran, Erich]

Agree, we can move that into a later discussion. 

Taking back into the topic I think that the proposal needs a section 
describing why this is needed or what is the problem that we are trying
to solve with these changes.

-Erich

On 7/17/18, 11:16 AM, "Scott Little" <scott.little at windriver.com> wrote:

    Important subjects that I want to participate in, but I think that's a 
    subject for a different thread.  Long term solutions, versus a short 
    term need to get WindRiver converged onto StarlingX. For now, we'd like 
    to get a rational directory structure.  Subdivision of current gits into 
    per-package gits can happen later if that's the path we choose.
    
    
    Scott
    
    
    On 18-07-17 11:54 AM, Cordoba Malibran, Erich wrote:
    > Hi Scott,
    >
    > Thanks for the info. There's something I would like to bring into the discussion of the consolidation.
    > It has started a discussion on what infrastructure we need to have a CI of StarlingX and an evaluation on
    > OBS (openbuildservice) and Koji has started.
    >
    > Taking that in mind I'm wondering how this consolidation can help/affect to adapt the StarlingX building
    > Into one of these infrastructures,  as far as I recall, both solutions requires to have a repository per rpm.
    >
    > What are your thoughts on this?
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > -Erich