[Starlingx-discuss] Patch to support different address witdhs in DPDK
Brent.Rowsell at windriver.com
Thu Oct 11 00:49:02 UTC 2018
The networking team should weigh in here with the recommended path forward.
From: Dean Troyer [mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 7:40 PM
To: Cordoba Malibran, Erich <erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Patch to support different address witdhs in DPDK
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:18 PM Cordoba Malibran, Erich <erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com> wrote:
> - Should be look for a newer openvswitch version? We could look for a
> newer version but this one won't be a centos standard version.
We already keep more current versions of libvirt and qemu than are supplied with CentOS because there are certain advantages, including performance. openvswitch may fall in to that category too, particularly with the reliance we will have on DPDK. I'm not sure what the criteria should be for making that kind of decision, although I do expect we should have a high bar to meet to do that..
I would like to hear the thoughts from those who know these bits well.
The last time I build an openvswitch package was at the Bexar summit...
dtroyer at gmail.com
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
More information about the Starlingx-discuss