[Starlingx-discuss] CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Rasa, Nimalini
Nimalini.Rasa at windriver.com
Tue Sep 11 13:05:47 UTC 2018
It is not booting in my case. After the following , it just hangs there:
“Error: no symbol table.
Press any key to continue…”
-Nimalini
From: Waheed, Numan
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 8:50 AM
To: Lin, Shuicheng; McKenna, Jason; Liu, ZhipengS; Khalil, Ghada; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'; Xie, Cindy; Rasa, Nimalini
Subject: RE: CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Adding Nimalini
From: Lin, Shuicheng [mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com]
Sent: September-11-18 2:17 AM
To: McKenna, Jason; Liu, ZhipengS; Khalil, Ghada; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'; Xie, Cindy; Waheed, Numan
Subject: RE: CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Hi Jason,
Just finished deploy image with latest code, I could config controller successfully in bare metal environment.
Manifest is created for you reference. There are two patches I add manually:
https://review.openstack.org/596855 for python-horizon from master
https://review.openstack.org/599892 for build-iso
There is an issue found when reboot controller node.
After the OS selection menu, it will show below error. And it will auto continue boot after around 8 seconds. I will check the issue later.
“
Error: no symbol table.
Press any key to continue…
“
Best Regards
Shuicheng
From: Lin, Shuicheng [mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 9:35 AM
To: McKenna, Jason <Jason.McKenna at windriver.com<mailto:Jason.McKenna at windriver.com>>; Liu, ZhipengS <zhipengs.liu at intel.com<mailto:zhipengs.liu at intel.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed at windriver.com<mailto:Numan.Waheed at windriver.com>>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Hi Jason,
I just tried my last Friday’s image at bare metal machine. There is no issue to install controller node.
Will you help check what cause the install error in your environment?
I am syncing my code to latest to double confirm it.
Best Regards
Shuicheng
From: McKenna, Jason [mailto:Jason.McKenna at windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 12:13 AM
To: Liu, ZhipengS <zhipengs.liu at intel.com<mailto:zhipengs.liu at intel.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed at windriver.com<mailto:Numan.Waheed at windriver.com>>
Subject: RE: CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Status update. The build from the centos75 branch does not install on our hardware. The error message we are seeing is:
Installation failed.
ERROR: Specified installation (sda) or boot (sda) device is invalid.
-Jason
From: Liu, ZhipengS <zhipengs.liu at intel.com<mailto:zhipengs.liu at intel.com>>
Sent: September 8, 2018 9:56 AM
To: Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; McKenna, Jason <Jason.McKenna at windriver.com<mailto:Jason.McKenna at windriver.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed at windriver.com<mailto:Numan.Waheed at windriver.com>>
Subject: RE: CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Hi Jason,
I have fixed the issue you mentioned below.
- Furthermore, the tpm2-tools package was requesting version tpm2-tss-1.3.0-2.el7.centos (rather than tpm2-tss-1.3.0-2.el7). I hacked the spec file for tpm2-tools and rebuilt it to require the version mentioned, but there is some rework to be done there.
[slin14]: I have the same issue also. Let’s further check it to find the root cause. I use rebuild tpm2-tools/tss2 to workaround it without any code.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/600920/
Thanks!
Zhipeng
From: Lin, Shuicheng [mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com]
Sent: 2018年9月8日 21:14
To: McKenna, Jason <Jason.McKenna at windriver.com<mailto:Jason.McKenna at windriver.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed at windriver.com<mailto:Numan.Waheed at windriver.com>>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Hi Jason,
I have fixed the error in the openstack-aodh. Patch is updated:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/598388/
It is due to my local version is not the latest one.
Sorry for the trouble caused, and thanks for your test.
Best Regards
Shuicheng
From: Lin, Shuicheng [mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 9:23 AM
To: McKenna, Jason <Jason.McKenna at windriver.com<mailto:Jason.McKenna at windriver.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed at windriver.com<mailto:Numan.Waheed at windriver.com>>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Hi Jason,
Thanks very much for such detail feedback.
I added some comments inline, and will check the issue in my environment also.
Feel free to submit patch if you have to fix them. :)
Best Regards
Shuicheng
From: McKenna, Jason [mailto:Jason.McKenna at windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 3:47 AM
To: McKenna, Jason <Jason.McKenna at windriver.com<mailto:Jason.McKenna at windriver.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed at windriver.com<mailto:Numan.Waheed at windriver.com>>
Subject: RE: CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Hi Shuicheng,
I’ve completed a build of the code. We have not yet run run-time tests, but here are the build-time issues I encountered:
- The .lst file contains lighttpd-1.4.49, but this is no longer available for download, and the download_mirrors.sh step fails. It appears than CentOS has updated to lighttpd-1.4.50. I manually built a lighttpd-1.4.49-1.src.rpm to satisfy the .lst
- Even though the .lst file specifies lighttpd-1.4.49, the code still references 1.4.45
- At build-pkgs time (the build-srpms step), the meta-patches to openstack-aodh do not apply, as two of them are malformed. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/598388/6/openstack/openstack-aodh/centos/meta_patches/0001-Modify-service-files-and-create-expirer-cron-script.patch -- In the new version, on line 190, the patch states that the old code covered 6 lines, and the new code covers 9 lines (-283,6 +286,9). But there are only two lines inserted by the patch. There is also a new blank line in the patch at line 194. Removing this blank line and editing the hunk description to only insert 2 lines resolves the issue for this hunk (there are other similar issues in this patch, and in 0001-meta-modify-aodh-api.patch)
[slin14]: Let me double check it.
- At binary build time, I had build failures on python-django-horizon and some magnum packages. I had to pull in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/596855/2 (from the master branch, but not in the centos75 branch of stx-upstream) to get past this.
[slin14]: It is due to I have not synced latest master code, so I don’t have this issue. I used last week’s master code.
- After building all packages, I attempted to build the ISO. The tpm2-tss-1.3.0-2.el7.x86_64.rpm package were missing, and should be added to the .lst files.
[slin14]: This package is already in the lst.
- Furthermore, the tpm2-tools package was requesting version tpm2-tss-1.3.0-2.el7.centos (rather than tpm2-tss-1.3.0-2.el7). I hacked the spec file for tpm2-tools and rebuilt it to require the version mentioned, but there is some rework to be done there.
[slin14]: I have the same issue also. Let’s further check it to find the root cause. I use rebuild tpm2-tools/tss2 to workaround it without any code.
After these changes, I was able to produce a .iso
-Jason
From: McKenna, Jason <Jason.McKenna at windriver.com<mailto:Jason.McKenna at windriver.com>>
Sent: September 7, 2018 10:08 AM
To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed at windriver.com<mailto:Numan.Waheed at windriver.com>>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Hi Shuicheng,
As a download_mirrors.sh time issue, the version of lighttpd has been changed from 1.4.45 to 1.4.49. The lighttpd-1.4.49-1.el7.src.rpm file no longer exists on EPEL or CentOS servers, as they’ve moved to 1.4.50. I am attempting to locate an archived version of the 1.4.49 .src rpm.
-Jason
From: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>
Sent: September 7, 2018 9:36 AM
To: Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com>>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>>; Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed at windriver.com<mailto:Numan.Waheed at windriver.com>>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Thanks Shuicheng. We’ll run some tests in Wind River. Numan will be priming this activity. He’ll share the results with the team sometime next week.
Regards,
Ghada
From: Lin, Shuicheng [mailto:shuicheng.lin at intel.com]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 1:32 AM
To: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'; Khalil, Ghada; Xie, Cindy
Subject: CentOS 7.5 upgrade status update
Hi all,
Most task of CentOS7.5 upgrade in story 2003389<https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003389> is done. Please go ahead to have a try and verify it.
I expect there should be some issue due to we just did limited deploy test yet.
Here is the detail status update of this week.
For the total 44 srpm we plan to upgrade:
38 already merged in feature branch.
3 kept as original version. Anaconda upgrade is not needed. python-os-vif has higher version than 7.5. python-eventlet kept due to new src rpm itself have known issue.
2 under review with code ready. Puppet-haproxy and openstack-aodh.
1 under debug. Lighttpd.
Besides srpm, we also upgraded 260+ rpm packages to 7.5 version.
Here is the build instruction:
1. Switch to f/centos75 branch for stx-tools/stx-integ/stx-upstream/stx-root.
Cherry-pick below un-merged patch:
For puppet-haproxy:
https://review.openstack.org/600369
https://review.openstack.org/600359
For openstack-aodh:
https://review.openstack.org/598388
https://review.openstack.org/600591
For build-iso:
https://review.openstack.org/599892
For build-pkgs:
https://review.openstack.org/599901
https://review.openstack.org/600639
2. Run mirror script to get the upgraded src rpm and related rpm.
3. Try to build packages and ISO.
For the detail status of CentOS7.5 upgrade, please check below story:
https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003389
Feel free to contact me if you have trouble on it.
Best Regards
Shuicheng
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20180911/3444a1ec/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list